Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fox&Friends guest author suggests 911 could have been stopped by Bush41

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:04 AM
Original message
Fox&Friends guest author suggests 911 could have been stopped by Bush41
in 1992 - and the group goes silent for 5 seconds! LOL

Fellow (Peter Lance, author of "Cover Up.") asks in the book "did the 9/11 Commission fail to include key pieces of evidence in their report that would have shed light on events leading up to the Sept. 11 attacks?" - so he wrote a book about the about the "Conspiracy" & about the 911 commission covering up the importance of what was known in 92 - and those 92 folks show up again in 96 with FBI not folowing up (perhaps because the FBI focused on helping the GOP get Clinton? - DU wants to know!). The implication being that if Bush41 had stopped them in 92, all the WTC terror would have been stopped.

But that blames the GOP! - Somebody forgot to give this fellow his talking points! - so they ended the interview quickly.

LOL

One of Fox Cable News' better moments!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leetrisck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I have tried to find out why the 9/11
Commission did not "interview bush, sr - to no avail. Material in the book definitely covers his time frame. I also feel the book puts way too little emphasis on Louis Freeh and the Republican Congress and what they were doing at the time (chasing Clinton)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. This guy was interviewed on AAR (Garofalo/Seder)...
a day or so ago (at least I'm pretty certain it was him). He seemed to have evidence that TWA 800 was blown up as well. Apparently provides lots of evidence that backs up his arguments.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
3. I agree both on appearing to have a lot of evidence - and on going
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 07:41 AM by papau
easy on Louie Freeh.

I wonder why Fox put him on?

He did a great job of naming names of those at the FBI who had major clues, and did nothing back in 92.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. February 26, 1993 -5 WEEKS into the Clinton Presidency
and this is one of the first times I have ever heard any of the big media even mention that Poppa Bush could in anyway be responsible. We just don't hear "on hi swatch" anymore do we?

Very interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. "Fuzzy math"
Clinton is responsible for everything just 5 weeks into his presidency, but * was still cleaning up after Clinton 9 MONTHS into his.

Got it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh right 233 days
of course the day they unveiled that little focus grouped gem was the 233rd day W had been at the Crawford ranch.

It's true you can look it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 04:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC