Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Who sold Saddam his weapons?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:10 PM
Original message
Who sold Saddam his weapons?
I showed some guys the pic of Rumsfeld with Saddam, however one of them said Europe sold Saddam his weapons. How can I prove him wrong? I'm not having good luck on google. I think I'm typing my search wrong. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Which weapons.... the ones he didn't have?
LMFAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nothingshocksmeanymore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. We sold them during the Iraq/Iran war
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. That doesn't mention Rumsfeld by name.
Thanks anyways. It is a good reference, i'll be sure to bookmark it. I'm sure it'll come in handy sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stavka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Your site doesn't say that....
It says both the US and Soviets supported Saddam.

I would guess we gave some aid, but weapon systems were entirely non-American - Chinese/Soviet/Eastern Bloc (Remember the Eastern Bloc?) Some French and some other European.

We also flagged their tankers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Which weapons?
Conventional arms were primary supplied by the then USSR and Franc as well as China and NK.

The US assisted in bio/chem development and so called dual purpose equipment. Germany also likely had a hand in bio/chem development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. WMD. I'm looking for a artcile that shows the link between Rummie-Saddam
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. This pic may answer your question.
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 04:38 PM by maveric
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Thats the one I gave him when he said Europe sold him the weapons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
5. that's the joke, isn't it?
how did we know saddam had weapons of mass destruction?
we kept the receipts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. This IS a joke but it's funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
19. Ooops
You beat me to it. Sowwy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Receipt? Did someone say receipt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
enki23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. we gave him plenty of aid, but not military aid
Edited on Wed Sep-08-04 04:52 PM by enki23
not directly. we simply ensured that channels were opened to him, so others could sell him weapony. that includes weaponry that was made in the USA. in other words, we sold it to him, only we did it a little bit indirectly. and we did, of course, give him the resources to purchase it.

at least, that's how i understand it. i could be wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aidoneus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Russians, Germans, French, British, Americans..
The guy isn't really wrong, but I suspect he'll lie about the context. "Old Europe" were US satellites then and did what they were told. Ah, the good old days..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frylock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:42 PM
Response to Original message
12. an excellent read on the subject is unholy babylon..
If you are interested in learning more, you should read Unholy Babylon: The Secret History of Saddam's War, written in 1991.

enki23 is correct in stating that we didn't provide direct military aid, but our government turned a blind eye to US firms who provided Saddam with equipment to produce weaponry. US firms such as Bell Helicopters, Global Research International, Hewlitt Packard, Hughes, McDonnell Douglas, and a host of others.

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0312065310/qid=1094683192/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/002-7605274-6797603?v=glance&s=books
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. From the Sunday Herald ...
http://www.sundayherald.com/27572

How did Iraq get its weapons? We sold them


By Neil Mackay and Felicity Arbuthnot


THE US and Britain sold Saddam Hussein the technology and materials Iraq needed to develop nuclear, chemical and biological wea pons of mass destruction.
Reports by the US Senate's committee on banking, housing and urban affairs Ð which oversees American exports policy Ð reveal that the US, under the successiveÊadministrationsÊof Ronald Reagan and George Bush Snr,ÊsoldÊmaterialsÊincluding anthrax, VX nerve gas, West Nile fever germs and botulism to Iraq right up until March 1992, as well as germs similar to tuberculosis and pneumonia. Other bacteria sold included brucella melitensis,ÊwhichÊ damagesÊmajorÊorgans,Êand clostridium perfringens, which causes gas gangrene.

ClassifiedÊUS Defence Dep-artment documents also seen by the Sunday Herald show that BritainÊsoldÊIraqÊtheÊdrug pralidoxine,ÊanÊantidoteÊto nerve gas, in March 1992, after theÊendÊofÊtheÊGulfÊwar. PralidoxineÊcanÊbeÊreverse engineered to create nerve gas.

TheÊSenateÊcommittee'sÊrep orts on ÒUS Chemical and BiologicalÊWarfare-Related Dual-UseÊExportsÊtoÊIraqÓ, undertaken in 1992 in the wake of the Gulf war, give the date andÊdestinationÊofÊallÊUS exports. The reports show, for example, that on May 2, 1986, two batches ofÊbacillusÊanthracisÊÐÊtheÊmicro-organismÊthatÊcauses anthrax Ð were shipped to the IraqiÊMinistryÊofÊHigher Education,ÊalongÊwithÊtwo batchesÊofÊtheÊbacterium clostridiumÊbotulinum,Êthe agentÊthatÊcausesÊdeadly botulism poisoning.

One batch each of salmonella and E coli were shipped to the Iraqi State Company for Drug Industries on August 31, 1987. Other shipments went from the US to the Iraq Atomic Energy Commission on July 11, 1988; the Department of Biology at theÊUniversityÊofÊBasrahÊin November 1989; the Department ofÊMicrobiologyÊatÊBaghdad UniversityÊinÊJuneÊ1985;Êthe Ministry of Health in April 1985 andÊOfficers'ÊCity,ÊaÊmilitary complex in Baghdad, in March and April 1986.

-snip-

Sorry bout the weird symbols .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EDT Donating Member (369 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. The French were helping with Nukes till Israel bombed the facility
As much as I poo poo Israel, they did the world a favor bombing the Nuclear plant the French helped Iraq with, as well as assassinating Iraqi Scientists in France who were key in building the plant prior to the bombing. And lets not forget their sabotage of the French facility milling several key components with explosives.

The Iranians tried bombing it as well, but their air attacks were unsuccessful.

I always suspect the US was involved in the 1981 Israeli attack, though they publicly condemned it.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nyc_lib Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. Read "Treachery" by BILL GERTZ
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1400053153/qid=1094688800/sr=8-9/ref=sr_8_xs_ap_i9_xgl14/002-3422219-3232009?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

Just released, already has a high ranking -- but I'm not sure how trustworthy Bill Gertz is on this matter.

See the Washington Times for excerpts. Today's Part I had some interesting info related to your question.

"A Defense Department-sponsored report produced in February identified France as one of the top three suppliers of Iraq's conventional arms, after Russia and China. The report revealed that France supplied 12 types of armaments and a total of 115,005 pieces."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
istruthfull Donating Member (111 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
17. Regan
I thought Regan sold him his chemical weapons. *Liked the guy(Regan) but we are feeling the results of his initiating the corporate takeover of America*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. Google the "Reigle Report"
In the early 1990's, the U.S. Senate investigated claims of returning veterans regarding Gulf War Syndrome. The 500+ page report resulting from these investigations came to be known as the "Reigle Report". Much of this information is still classified, concerning the names of individual U.S. companies, but read the introduciton to this long report:

"...U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

Staff Report on U.S. Chemical and Biological Warfare-Related Dual-Use Exports to Iraq and The Possible Impact on the Health Consequences of the War

INTRODUCTION

In October 1992, the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, which has Senate oversight responsibility for the Export Administration Act (EAA), held an inquiry into the U.S. export policy to Iraq prior to the Persian Gulf War. During that hearing it was learned that U.N. inspectors identified many U.S.- manufactured items exported pursuant to licenses issued by the U.S. Department of Commerce that were used to further Iraq's chemical and nuclear weapons development and missile delivery system development programs. ..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clu Donating Member (228 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. a bit to comb through
But this is the best site I've seen. You have to read between the lines a bit, but in the end you can see that US firms were supplying chemical weapons precursors to Saddam after Iran had complained that these weapons were being used against them.

European countries gave him armaments, but we didn't want to see Iraq lose the war.

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/index.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-08-04 11:40 PM
Response to Original message
22. Here's an excellent, well-documented timeline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC