|
Sam Reed has given "provisional" certification to new software in six counties that will be used in the primary and November election.
This software is not federally certified or tested and does not meet the state requirements set out in law, to be used in Washington.
Plus, it seems since it will be removed in 2005, there are no plans to ever have it tested or certified.
Supposedly, a couple counties wanted to use the new, consolidted ballot format where you have to mark a preference. Never mind they could have just done what the bulk of the others are doing- using separate ballots for party preference. (In this primary, GOP, Dem, Lib, and one ballot for nonpartisan issues)
Reed declared an "emergency" to accomodate the last minute software changes.
Other reasons given are to save paper, which is bogus because it takes as much paper to print the equivalent of three or four separate ballots on one page as it does to do three or four smaller ballots; lack of ability to accomodate marking a preference (which, logically, would only apply to consolidated ballots, but other states using the same voting systems have been doing this since at least 1999); or the increase in the PCO races on the ballot.
Of all of them, only the PCO issue may carry some merrit and only in King County- whose previous Diebold program was supposed to be able to handle the increase.
Keep in mind, that in 2000, the whole state handled a presidential preference primary, where preference had to be marked if the ballot was consolidated, King County used a consolidated ballot in that primary, and pulled it off. I understand it took a lot of work but most of that was really due to checking the ballots to make sure that if intent was clear but preference was marked, judges would rule on the ballot, get it marked, and make sure it was counted.
This time, if the preference isn't marked, the ballot will be chucked.
Safer, smarter, and easier to use the separate ballots.
King, Pierce, Snohomish, Kitsap, Chelan, and Klickitat all have the changes. That will easily encompass over half of the votes in Washington State. Only Klickitat will be doing any auditing, so there's at least one auditor who understands the issue. King, Chelan, and Klickitat use Diebold; Pierce and Kitsap ES&S, and Snohomish is Sequoia. I understand that software changes have been done to both the touch screens and optical scan in Snohomish. (Tell me why those fancy touch screens couldn't accomodate a consolidated ballot, since in essence, that's sort of what they are?)
Sam Reed just trashed all of the rules and laws in this state, all so a couple counties could use a consolidated ballot. And get this, he claims he can't stop them, but he's the head of elections in this state and he sure didn't have to accomodate the provisional certification.
In the primary election, those six counties should have to hand audit everything- then remove that software and put the old back in for the general election in November- that won't involve a consolidated ballot, which is the excuse for the inexcusable.
|