Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do you think of the Flag Desecration Amendment?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:23 PM
Original message
Poll question: What do you think of the Flag Desecration Amendment?
Personally I think that whether or not burning a flag is distasteful it should be considered freedom of speech or expression.

If this passes then what about a law that would making speaking out against the president or your senator a crime?

We are slipping into fascism and many don't even realize it.

One thing that may result is that if the amendment includes improperly displaying the flag, burning and perhaps letting the flag touch the ground as against the law then maybe people will decide against displaying them at all.....then flag sales may plummet because it will become too much of a hassle to follow the letter of the law.

If they pass it then I think it will be a hoot when people start calling the cops on their neighbor because they didn't take the flag down at night...when we all know that it should be illuminated if displayed overnight...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Radical Activist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. The first amendment is for unpopular and offensive speech.
Forms of political expression that everyone agrees with don't need first amendment protection, because no one tries to stop it.

I think it's ironic to limit our freedom of expression in regard to a flag that is supposed to represent freedom and liberty. People who support that amendment are fighting the intent of Bill of Rights.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. the ones who support it probably can't read very well
our first amendment rights are being trampled..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. I burned a tiny American flag once..................
in protest against an attempt to pass an anti-flag-burning amendment about 15 years ago. Don't you DARE try to limit my freedom of expression!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. What a ridiculous waste of time!
I am sick of all these red herrings intended to rile up the moronically patriotic, meanwhile distracting from issues that are actually relevant.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:29 PM
Original message
yeah...why worry about healthcare when we can worry about flag burning
cuz you know there are just a few flags being burned but just a few tens of millions without healthcare...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
24. Veterans have more important things to worry about-
Like the way Bush's cuts to their benefits and services descrated their future way of life!

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm with you on this one.
We are so quickly becoming a fascist country. We are hemorrhaging our rights away.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. There are more important things than flag burning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeekingTruth Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
32. Like understanding the concept of true freedom - try this....
When I was in the army back in the early nineties, the issue of flag burning was heating up. When one joins the military he or she has to take an oath that he or she will uphold the laws of the land.

Knowing and appreciating this, I would ask fellow soldiers what they would do if someone burned a flag in front of them. The very largest of majority of those asked would say things like, "Kick their ASS!"

I then would ask them if they recalled the induction oath they took about upholding the laws of the land and remind them that the US Supreme Court ruled that burning the flag is a form of speech. Most would walk away muttering.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NinetySix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
6. You mean desecration like this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. good question...
wonder if we could prosecute * first if the law passes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NinetySix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. The flag under any such law must be defined
Edited on Sun Sep-12-04 11:45 PM by NinetySix
So I've always thought that if such an amendment were to pass, consequently causing an enourmous number of flags to be burned in protest, people protesting the new law could do one of several things:

a) burn a characature of the flag, i.e., one that does not conform to the flag as defined under the law, for instance, one with 52 stars or 9 stripes.

b) burn the flag of another nation that merely resembles the US flag, like those of Liberia and Malaysia:




c) my personal favorite, sew your own flag with green and black stripes and black stars on an orange field, photograph yourself burning it, then post the negatives (showing the colors as red, white and blue) everywhere you can think to display them.

edit:space between the two flags
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. A close-up of this image reads:
"0wn3d"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
17. OMG Even I wouldn't do that!
I agree it is a red herring so we don't talk about issues that are important,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ReaderSushi Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Throw it back in their faces.
If they make flag burning illegal, then make the confederate flag illegal as well. After all, if one is unpatriotic then other must be outright treason right? Personally, I think both are legitimate forms of rebelling but you get the idea; don't let conservatives have it both ways. And yes I know not all conservatives wave the stars and bars, it's mostly southern ones and only the loons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
16. Burning Confederate flags sounds like a wonderful idea.
Too bad I'm not going to waste my money buying one to try it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #16
25. Believe it or not, in 1970, political activist Brett Bursey was jailed...
in SC for burning the dixie loser rag. Incredible. By the way, this is the same Brett Bursey who was recently found guilty of violating the boy king's mandated "free speech" zone. Again, incredible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CalebHayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
9. Free speech!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bu*h has already desicrated the flag with his ACTIONS
to such a degree that it will not be looked at with respect by other countries for generations.

This legislation is whacked.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave123williams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Nobody ever died for the flag...
The flag is a SYMBOL of freedom, the very freedom I might add, to burn the flag in protest.

IMHO, because it's a symbol of freedom it's only necessary to burn it when freedom is debauched. Like now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. I never, EVER think about burning flags.
And then something like this comes along and, BOOM! Now I'm thinking about it.

Thanks, Pugs, for putting a thought in my head that wasn't there before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
14. I will NEVER obey any such law/amendment!
I consider it a desecration of our Constitution to amend it thus.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kazak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
19. Aren't you supposed to burn flags?
Or is my recollection fuzzy (wouldn't be hard to believe). But I thought burning a flag was the proper we to dispose of a flag that has been worn out.

I went to the OU vs. UofHouston football game on Saturday (Sept. 11) and they were handing out these little flags that you were supposed to wave in conjunction with all of the patriotic events that they had planned. I ended up with one and originally didn't mind so much thinking it might be time to show a little patriotism. Hell, just because I'm liberal, it certainly doesn't mean I don't love my country!!! Anyway once the ceremonies were over I thought to myself, what am I supposed to do with this thing? Now that I've got it, If I want to observe proper flag etiquette, I can't let it touch the ground, right? I certainly can't throw it in the trash. Now that I have it, am I going to have to burn it, to dispose of it properly? This is what I hate so much about all of the phony patriotism with regards to the flag (flag stickers, flags with people (John Wayne, Bush) superimposed over the stripes, etc...) that we see now-days, that it fails to show any real reverence or even flag etiquette toward the flag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #19
39. you are correct the only way to dispose of them is to burn them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #19
47. That's correct
But if I remember correctly, there are only certain organizations that are authorized to dispose of flags in that way. The Boy Scouts are one, I'm pretty sure and maybe the VFW? You're not supposed to do it privately, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-12-04 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
20. Burn it ...

The amendment that is.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
21. If you don't have the right to destroy the flag
you don't have to right to display it.


rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partygirl Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
22. I don't have any opinion
at all. Isn't that sad? My parents were flower children, they have a photo of a protest where they burned the flag when they were young. When I was growing up, they used to be very in favor of being able to do stuff like that in protest so as a young kid I thought that was cool. My mother even made me a pair of pants that had a flag sewn into them and when I was in grade school I got sent home for wearing them! No kidding!

But, a couple of years ago, we started seeing all kinds of people wearing flag stuff and now my parents are dead set against it. They talk about how disrespectful it is for the people to wear flag hats and shirts and junk. It makes them SOOO angry to see people wearing the flag and disrespecting it that way.

So it is hard for me to know what to believe. Obviously even people like my parents change their views over time. It is much more complicated than it seems. I really haven't decided where I stand yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:48 AM
Response to Reply #22
29. Yup. That's sad.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #22
30. "Flower children" were generally not politically active...
Odd that yours were.

Finding mistreatment of the flag distasteful is not the same as wanting to change the Constitution to prevent it. Is that really your parents' current belief?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partygirl Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:17 AM
Response to Reply #30
33. really? Interesting, my parents
met at UC Berkely in 1969, they were both graduate students at the time. They were flower children (nowadays my father looks pretty normal but my mother looks like an aging hippie!) they were extremely politically active at that time as were all of their friends. They have plenty of stories and some pictures to prove it. You find it odd that they were politically active? I will share this with them I find your comment odd, because they raised me to believe that political activism is so important. I know that they are still friends with many of the same people from grad school, and they were all very politically active as well. I do not think any of these people considered themselves at all "out of step" with their peers. But if you say so, then perhaps you are correct. Perhaps my parents and all of their politically active friends were quite odd I just had never even considered that possibility before.

I do know that my parents are super cool and they have even partied with their children and our friends a little (well with my mother at least). I would share more details but I don't want anyone to get busted, because we have done some illegal (but helluva fun!) things together.

My parents hate people showing their patriotism by wearing flag stuff. But they used to wear flag stuff themselves but not to show patriotism. So things have changed. They are not into the flag or other symbols. I have no idea how they feel about this ammendment to the Constitution, we have not discussed it. I don't know how I feel because really this is the most I have ever thought about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bridget Burke Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:42 AM
Response to Reply #33
37. Then talk to them about the Amendment.
Apparently they thought about political things when they were young--so why don't you follow in their footsteps? A Constitutional amendment is a rather serious thing. Are you politically minded at all? This would be a good time to get involved.

And about the "flower children" comment--that was not really a phrase anybody used to describe themselves. It was more a journalistic label. Generally, it would be applied to the more hedonistic members of the counterculture rather than the more serious politicos. However, there was quite a bit of overlapping. Are your parents still politically active--or at least, interested?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
partygirl Donating Member (187 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #37
42. my parents are extremely active
in politics and many other social causes. I just have never thought about this particular issue. I don't really see how it is that important. This will probably never be an issue that I get involved in. I save my energy for things that speak to me such as abortion. I was raised not to care about "symbols" and so it doesn't matter to me whether people worship the flag or not. People who feel strongly about this are the people who should become activists regarding this issue.

And my mother calls herself a "flower child" jokingly I suppose. That is why I called them that. Interesting that you claim to know so much about ALL the people in the counterculture of that time ie they would not use that phrase to describe themselves and they would only rarely be politically active. But yet my family and their friends do not fit your ideas at all and they are the only members of that counterculture that I know. I am sure that you must know a lot about that time since you claim to, however maybe you don't know all about EVERYONE in the counterculture and you cannot speak for all of them. Definitely you do not speak for my family or their many many friends. I am sure that you mean well and are only trying to educate me, however what my parents tell me is what I will believe about that time. I know that I can trust them much more than someone I have just met on the internet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
23. Of course I believe in the sanctity of cloth...
it's right up there with fetus worship.
A stupid amendment for stupid people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smirkymonkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:32 AM
Response to Reply #23
26. Touche!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #23
38. "the sanctity of cloth" LMAO! What next, a ban on acid-washed jeans?
:crazy:

OK, really though, who wears acid-washed jeans anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiCoup2K4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
27. As long as they want to pass ammendments, how about one that's useful?
No member of the Bush family, nor anyone with any genetic link to the Bush family shall be permitted to hold any elected or appointed office

That alone would benefit this country far more than any ridiculous hype about burning a fucking piece of fabric, or paranoia about gay weddings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. insert this and you've got an amendment:
or financial after the word "genetic."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:45 AM
Response to Original message
28. Rethuglican PR.
They trot this sorry crap of an amendment every few election years to make the DLC types squirm and win a few points with the idiots who think burning a symbol is threatening them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeekingTruth Donating Member (370 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
31. One that has always baffled me - American Bald Eagle vs Flag
Isn't so sad that in our past the American Bald Eagle was fair game for hunters and even today people give less care towards a living, breathing symbol of America versus that of a inantimate object such as a flag...(I'm not saying the concept of the American flag isn't important, just that something such as the American Bald Eagle should carry just as much weight, if not more).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlemingsGhost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
34. First thing I do, if it passes:
Edited on Mon Sep-13-04 03:38 AM by DemsUnite
Take a shit on an American flag, and promptly deliver it to the doorstep of the nearest federal building. With any luck, it will be a bitterly frigid day, so that visible columns of steam will be seen dancing toward the heavens.

I will call this masterpiece, "Flag Defecation Ammendment."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
35. I picked up three American flags lying on the floor at work...
Edited on Mon Sep-13-04 06:33 AM by Dangerman
And I threw them in the trash.

My, I might get arrested if I get caught.

(This is not meant as anti-patriotic or un-American. I was just doing my job cleaning the floor.)

It is a shame that BushCo and the GOP use the American flag to cover up their criminal activities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sputnik Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
40. Not completely sure of the source
since it's been attributed to different people (even Alan Keyes!) but Molly Ivins said that a former Texas legislator, Craig Washington, said this:

"I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag."

Amen.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #40
41. found it..
Craig Washington

"I prefer a man who will burn the flag and then wrap himself in the Constitution to a man who will burn the Constitution and then wrap himself in the flag."
--quoted in Molly Ivins' syndicated newspaper column, June 30, 1997

http://home.pacifier.com/~ascott/they/quotesw.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patricia92243 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:42 AM
Response to Original message
43. This sort of silly thing crops up every election cycle - along with ...
Welfare Cadillac mothers, blah, blah, blah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
44. I think if we're going to worship the flag, then
we're going to have to prohibit government institutions
from displaying the flag, because of the constitutional
separation of church and state. We can't have the government
advocating a particular religion or trying to force it down
the citizens' unwilling throats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ParanoidPat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
45. A flag is NOT a 'sacred' object!
Meaning of DESECRATE
Pronunciation: 'desu`kreyt

Definition:

1. remove the consecration from a person or an object
2. violate the sacred character of a place or language; "desecrate a cemetary"; "violate the sanctity of the church"; "profane the name of God"

Meaning of CONSECRATION
Pronunciation: `kânsu'kreyshun

WordNet Dictionary

Definition:

1. sanctification of something by setting it apart (usually with religious rites) as dedicated to God; "the Cardinal attended the consecration of the church"
2. a solemn commitment of your life or your time to some cherished purpose (to a service or a goal); "his consecration to study"


Reading is fundamental, illiteracy is fundamentalist! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skygazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
46. It's a distraction
It comes up with amazing regularity and Congress wastes a ton of time that could have been better spent working on vital issues arguing about it. It's completely political and used by politicians to prove how patriotic they are or how much they back freedom of speech. It's a non issue and a waste of time and taxpayer dollars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
48. We can make flag boxers, t-shirts, ties, bandanas--but don't burn 'em!
This is a load of horseflop. A phony "issue" -- just a meaningless bone to throw to the reactionary right wing, all surface and no real content.

If such a ludicrous amendment wee ever enacted, I'd like to see how "flag" would actually be defined. This will be tough to do.

If you have a pair of American-flag boxer shorts, and you set them aflame (preferable while you're NOT wearing them), would that then constitute flag-burning? And if not, WHY not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 10th 2024, 06:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC