Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Howard Dean: An Expiration Date On Safety

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:27 PM
Original message
Howard Dean: An Expiration Date On Safety
http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_13319.shtml

On Monday, Sept.13, the law banning the manufacture of semiautomatic assault weapons for private sale in the United States expired.

SNIP..."Before you read further I should tell you that my father was an avid hunter. I grew up with guns in the house, and although I do not hunt, I own an over-and-under shotgun. While running for office in Vermont, I won eight straight elections with the endorsement of the National Rifle Association. As Governor, I conserved hundreds of thousands of acres of habitat by partnering with the NRA to fight off the right-wing property rights advocates who opposed government land acquisition. I believed Vermont's outdoors should be the way it has been for generations, and now it will be.

However, I have never met a hunter who thought owning an assault weapon was necessary to shoot a deer or a bear. I have met a lot of law enforcement officers who think that the federal assault weapons ban saved a lot of their colleagues' lives. I have met parents whose kids were killed by assault weapons years ago and are bracing for more of the same.

Where I come from, chief executives are supposed to lead. Where I come from, when the chief says he supports something and his party controls the House and the Senate, what the chief really wants, he gets.

I would have more respect for President Bush if he had come out and said "I changed my mind, and I'm not supporting the reauthorization of the assault weapons ban." But, he did not do that. America needs a president with the real courage to say what he believes - no matter what the latest poll numbers show.
END SNIP


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ninga Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Howard rocks!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrBenchley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great statement....
the GOP pandering to the corrupt gun industry shows exactly what a farce their claim to "Keep America safer" is....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Malva Zebrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. No doubt about where he stands at all--clear and concise no nonsense
Howard Dean is confident and fearless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Howard we love ya!
g
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. As a true leader should be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. "what the chief really wants, he gets."
SNIP..."Where I come from, chief executives are supposed to lead. Where I come from, when the chief says he supports something and his party controls the House and the Senate, what the chief really wants, he gets...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shane7726 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. We need to DROP the AWB issue NOW
Who was the last Presidential candidate to win who proposed stiffer gun legislation?

Does anyone remember what happened in the House and Senate after the passing of the first ban?

THe amount of crimes committed with an "assault weapon" prior to 1993 was less than 2%. During the last 10 years, the amount of crimes committed with an "assault weapon" was less than 2%. There has been aboslutely NO effect on crime with this legislation so why are we pushing it so hard? Any person who researches the subject will find that both the DOJ and the CDC have done extensivle studies that show there was no benefit to having this law in place.

When John Kerry gets on the stump and says that terrorists are going to be arming themselves in America he will be accused of using the same scare tactics that the other side are using. Guess what...terrorists are using planes and truck bombs and strapping dynamite to their chests. They want to kill as many people as possible. They aren't going into gun stores to buy guns they could have bought for the last ten years anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. That is just ridiculous.
I have nothing to say to that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shane7726 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Perhaps you can say...
in what way I am mistaken?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. This has been in place. Does not need to expire.
It is a wedge issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shane7726 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It does need to expire
The whole purpose that a "sunset clause" was written into the law is because the legislature wanted to gauge the ban's effectiveness in reducing crime. After 10 years, it has shown that it had NO effect. Why keep the ban in place if it doesn't do anything to make anyone safer?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-13-04 11:58 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Then why is law enforcement so worried?
They are really concerned. I question you on that. I see no need for removing the ban.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC