Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

AIPAC is implicated in the Pentagon spy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:03 AM
Original message
AIPAC is implicated in the Pentagon spy
Edited on Tue Sep-14-04 12:15 AM by shraby
case.

<snip>

Blitzer flung this canard at Buchanan, who protested that there are plenty of neoconservatives who are not Jewish, naming Bill Bennett, Jeanne Kirkpatrick, and others. The disdainfully knowing look on Blitzer's face was just begging to be wiped off, and if it had been me, I would have included in the list one Larry Franklin, the neocon ideologue, devout Catholic, and upper echelon Pentagon official recently identified as a spy for Israel. Blitzer, a former employee of AIPAC, which has been directly implicated in the spy imbroglio, would probably have imploded onscreen – and what a pretty sight that would have been.



<http://antiwar.com/justin/>

MY HUMBLEST APOLOGIES...I MISREAD THE SENTENCE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
1. Um, I think you've overstated your case -- by a bunch
unless there's more about Blitzer and AIPAC and the Pentagon in the article that you haven't yet cited.

AIPAC has been implicated, but there's currently no information (that I know of -- and none in what you cite) also implicating Blitzer who must've worked for them quite some time ago since I've been seeing him on CNN for 3 centuries now.

Don't like defending Blitzer, but I do like being a little careful about the charges we make about people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. How has Blitzer been implicated?
I don't like the way he's been handling his job lately, but I never heard he was implicated in any spy investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Go read the article.
Justin has been onto the neocons for quite a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Syrinx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. I knew that Wolf used to work for the Jerusalem Post
And judging from his behavior, I've wondered if he might work for Israeli intelligence.

(But, maybe your subject line is a wee-bit misleading.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. My humblest apologies. I misread the sentence.
Edited on Tue Sep-14-04 12:17 AM by shraby
ARRRRGGGGGHHHH!

:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:08 AM
Response to Original message
4. "opportunistic infection" I like his term for * I really hope he's right:
"What I hope and pray is that the patriotic Americans in our intelligence services, law enforcement, and the military, who have been on to the Great Neo Con since the very beginning, do not lose heart, and continue the fight. What heartens me above all else about the Franklin affair is the news that this was just part of an investigation into Israel's underground espionage operation that has been going on since before 9/11 – and that Bush's top officials were briefed on it when they first came to Washington during the transition. The sheer scope of such a probe, its longevity and breadth, means that America's natural defenses are healthy in spite of the opportunistic infection that has set in at the very top.

We can win this one yet – and, God willing, we will."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Al-CIAda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. expose
IN REMEMBERANCE OF THE 3RD ANNIVERSARY OF THE 911 ATTACKS - WE PRESENT THIS INITIAL DISCLOSURE

From: LetsRoll911 Investigative Group & LetsRoll911.Org

Subject: Direct evidence that 911 WAS an Inside Job involving, at least in part, official complicity within certain levels of the United States Government.

Introduction:

Our investigative group has been gathering and investigating all of the evidence related to the 911 attacks for quite some time. The impetus for this investigation started when certain anomalies and contradictions were observed between the “official” 911 government story and the direct evidence. It became rapidly apparent that the clear conflict existed between the “official” government story, and what the direct scientific and video evidence clearly showed.

Our group consists of citizens from the United States, and from many other nations as well, and it includes attorneys, law enforcement / police officers, criminal investigators, pilots, aircraft specialists, photo analysts, and many, many others.

We have now issued our first disclosure of this inculpatory evidence. Additional evidence continues to be obtained, analyzed, and investigated, however we felt it necessary to compile and release this first disclosure in the extreme interest of national and global security.

The ramifications and conclusions of this evidence are not at all pleasant; they are in fact astoundingly dangerous and gravely disturbing. So much so, that we have observed at times, persons may review this direct evidence and cannot mentally or emotionally accept these findings of fact due to Cognitive Dissonance. This is a psychological phenomenon which refers to the discomfort felt at a discrepancy between what you already think you know or what you believe to be true, and new information or interpretation which conflicts with those preconceived beliefs.

Our first disclosure herein clearly shows that there is probable cause to provide formal notice of the following as applicable:
_____________________________________________________________

NOTICE OF PROBABLE CAUSE AS TO CRIMINAL AND CIVIL VIOLATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (U.S.C.) AS AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, ITS CITIZENS, AND OTHER PERSONS UNDER AS MAY BE RELEVENT OR APPLICABLE, BUT NOT LIMITED TO: U.S.C, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 1: Sec. 2. · Sec. 3. · Sec. 4.; CHAPTER 19: · Sec. 371. · Sec. 372. · Sec. 373.; CHAPTER 37: · Sec. 792. · Sec. 793. · Sec. 794. · Sec. 798.; CHAPTER 51: Sec. 1111. · Sec. 1113. · Sec. 1114. · Sec. 1117; and applicable sections of: CHAPTER 73; CHAPTER 79; CHAPTER 96; CHAPTER 105; CHAPTER 113B; CHAPTER 115; CHAPTER 18; CHAPTER 13; CHAPTER 11; CHAPTER 7; CHAPTER 5; CHAPTER 39; CHAPTER 41; CHAPTER 47; CHAPTER 55 CHAPTER113. et seq.

And more specifically, as applicable:
U.S.C, TITLE 18, PART I, CHAPTER 1: sec. 4. - Misprision of felony:
Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Dear Respondent:

You have received the following submitted and enclosed evidence exhibits as you are a person of vital importance as to the truth of these matters, as well as to any potential and viable course of remedial action. The evidence contained herein has been compiled and verified by numerous investigators and researchers, and includes evidence of a circumstantial, direct, and scientific nature. It is very important that you review this evidence thoroughly. Upon reviewing this evidence, only you can determine your most appropriate and lawful next course of action, as may be within your capacity, discretion, authority, or abilities. Indeed, the evidence contained herein if presented to any independent grand jury would result in certain indictments as to the suspects involved, and at bare minimum the evidence justifies initiating the most massive independent criminal investigation in the history of the United States, if not in the history of the world.

A Clear and Present Danger:

These evidentiary exhibits indicate that this is a matter of extreme urgency and gravity, affecting both current and future national security and global security. You may well determine after reviewing the enclosed exhibits that our nation, as well as other global nations, face a clear and present danger from very powerful domestic enemies within the United States, acting in concert with their counterparts in certain other foreign nations; nations which claim to be our allies. It also may very likely require high levels of courage, insight, strength, determination, true patriotism, and moral clarity in order to face and combat this threat. Let there be no doubt. The threat to the United States, and indeed to the world as a whole, is greater than any other faced in history. This is due to several enemy agents / perpetrators being stationed domestically, and occupying high-level defense, intelligence, and other official positions. The highly coordinated psychological operation (psy-ops) carried out by the 911 attacks could not have succeeded so well if not for the aid and comfort provided by the American mass media. Any person who has a substantial military, intelligence, law enforcement, or other relevant background, combined with the insight to clearly see the evidence and its implications, will also understand the extreme gravity and danger this situation represents.

What We Cannot Allow:

We cannot allow fear, partisan politics, intimidation, or any other such factor, to prevent action by any lawful means necessary. This domestic enemy and the danger it represents, cannot be overcome via military means, although credible military and other sources indicate that certain sectors of the armed forces and their commanders, who being aware of much of the unsuppressed evidence, do have contingency plans drafted to place under military arrest the domestic perpetrators, especially in the event another domestic terror attack is carried out within our nation. Any future major terror attack upon the United States, or even in any other nation, must be considered as involving the suspects implicated by the evidence contained herein.

What We Must Do:

Unity, organization, disclosure, and public awareness are the primary weapons to combating this clear and present danger. In this extreme situation, we are being called to defend our country from all enemies, whether foreign and/or most especially domestic. We must coordinate closely with those elected officials who are open to considering this evidence. We must also use the strength of numbers to provide protection for others, in that the perpetrators will not hesitate to kill again if they face exposure or if it would serve their agenda. This is not a partisan issue, a democrat vs. republican, or a liberal vs. conservative issue. Such petty conflicts pale into absolute insignificance under the weight of these implications. Using the clear evidence and facts, via the public forum and media, is where we must…. draw our clear and bright line in the sand.


Primary Inculpatory Evidence:

911 IPS:
www.911inplanesite.com

Remote Targeting Laser:
http://copywriting.com/video/

LetsRoll911.org - generally

To view 911 IPS, immediately, available here:
http://www.hypertorrent.com/

Type in "in plane site"
Should be 3 versions available now, SVCD, VHS and DVD copy.

If you currently don't have any Bittorrent program installed, use ABC < Yet Another Bittorrent Client >

http://pingpong-abc.sourceforge.net/

Multiple Perspective Comparative Analysis/Framework, (a brief overview + additional info. See pages 7 and 8)
http://letsroll911.org/ipw-web/bulletin/bb/viewtopic.php?t=1744&sid=86685844d1b7d31f47d50aee6c4c5e67

The New Pearl Harbor by David Ray Griffin:
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/print.php?id=141355
(NOTE: Click on link, the click REFRESH on your browser application to open the page.)

6 Questions, and DOD response:

http://www.policestate21.com/dod.htm

The Pentagon was NOT hit by a 757 airliner:
http://pages.infinit.net/noc/pentagon.swf


We have not forgotten…911 was an Inside Job:
http://911digitalarchive.org/special/tribute.swf


Respectfully Yours: LetsRoll911.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
8. Perhaps it represents
a slight conflict of interest for Wolf B to "report" on the neocon spy scandal.... though not in the same manner it would be if Robert Novak "reported" on the Plame case. Yet this could be easily remedied: if Wolf told the listening audience about the potential conflict, and then let an informed public know his position in that context, it would allow us the opportunity decide for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC