Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Priceless! Scarborough talking w/ John Stossel about media bias!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:28 PM
Original message
Priceless! Scarborough talking w/ John Stossel about media bias!
On msgop 10:24 pm est talking about CBS. I'm trying not to listen. Is this a great country or what?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salinen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Stossel & Scar
Hitler & Mussolini, or, Abbot & Costello?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Velveteen Ocelot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. That should be entertaining.
I'm sure they'll explain how the liberals totally dominate and control the news these days. By the way, Stossel totally blows. I think I dislike him even more than Scabrous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Maybe they can explain why
the librul media gave so much coverage to Chandra Levy's disappearance, and no coverage at all to Lori Klausutis' death. I mean, that's a huge indication right there of librul bias.

Inadvertantly running into a John Stossel program was one of the things that scared me off the tube permanently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
3. Scarborough called Rather a liar
Then he smiled and tried to softpeddle by asking Stossel if HE was calling Rather a liar.

Most of the discussion centered around the technicalities of whether these documents could have been prepared on a typewriter or a word processor. None of this discussion proves anything. Forms such as the ones that were displayed were often created on technology designed for "forms design" -- even in the 70s. Word processing existed in the 70s. So even if those disputing that they were typed but were in fact word processed do not without further evidence establish anything.

Oh and this is a "scandal" now? What scandal? It's a controversy its critics are trying to balloon into a scandal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotTooSimpleSimon Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Word processors, typesetters, fancy typewriters etc...
Why on earth would a CYA private memo be created on such expensive and unnecessary equipment rather than a handwritten memo? If I were to write a CYA it would be handwritten, signed and dated in ink. Why all the fancy documenting typesetting?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Every MFR I produced in the military had to be typed
I didn't have a secretary, so I typed my own.

How did they do MFRs when you were in?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotTooSimpleSimon Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. How many CYAs did you type up?
All mine are handwritten.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vickers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Never did a CYA
All MFRs all the time, baby.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karlrschneider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Well, I was in the USAF in 1967, and amongst my various duties, did a LOT
of inter-squadron correspondence. Hand-written notes were (if not contrary to AFM) highly discouraged. I recall one time I actually did write one and caught hell for it. I even got some shit for writing out a typewritten memo in response to a verbal query from some fatass Colonel who wanted to know "what time our lunch hour was"...I shit you not. I couldn't get back to him on the phone so I typed out a short memo saying "11:30 - 13:30" (or whatever it was)...the General I worked for ragged on me for answering that stupid question by correspondence.
I told him "Yeah, I should have just told him I had no fucking idea."

I don't know much about the military right now, but back then it was run by morons.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Samantha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. It's a lot cheaper and a lot quicker
to produce these forms on technology with the ability to design forms and quickly replicate them for duplicative use.

There's absolutely nothing wrong with your method either! I love writing things in longhand, and there is a certain authenticity about it that cannot be denied! However, I have done extensive word processing on a lot of different equipment for many years, and I am giving you the official explanation as to why one would use this method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can joe dead girl explain what particular bias was
involved in hiring a disgraced former congressman they may or may not have killed his intern? Or did they skip that part?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PROGRESSIVE1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
11. What about the intern you killed Joe???
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC