Fire The War Pimps: Zero Tolerance for Iraq War Pundits
May 17, 2004
By: Ted Rall
Universal Press Syndicate
NEW YORK--A year and a half late and 30,000 lives short, supporters of the war in Iraq finally admit that they were wrong.
When I appeared on Bill O'Reilly's show recently, his bellicose bravado was MIA. We argued about Bush and war, but he studiously avoided talking about Iraq. The Fox News demagogue limited his attacks to my opposition to the war against Afghanistan (news - web sites). To his credit O'Reilly, formerly a ferocious advocate of the Iraqi invasion, was one of the first media war promoters to concede that Iraq had never been a threat to the United States. "I was wrong," he told ABC in February. "I think every American should be very concerned" that weapons of mass destruction have not been found.
Over at The New York Times, two pro-war columnists who repeatedly parroted the Bush party line--arguing that Gulf War (news - web sites) II was a noble experiment in Middle Eastern democracy, accusing opponents of appeasing Saddam and repeatedly ridiculing skeptics as knee-jerk pacifists who didn't care about the long-suffering Iraqis--have ordered up a heaping plate of crow. "We went into Iraq with what, in retrospect, seems like a childish fantasy," allows Republican war pimp David Brooks. "We were going to topple Saddam, establish democracy and hand the country back to grateful Iraqis. We expected to be universally admired when it was all over. For us to succeed in Iraq," he concludes now, "we have to lose
."
"I supported the war and now I feel foolish," says CNN's Tucker Carlson.
snip
http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=7306&fcategory_desc=Media%20Lies%20and%20Right%20Wing%20Bias
all these "assholes" that were blood thirsty should be brought to task.