Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fire The War Pimps: Zero Tolerance for Iraq War Pundits (Tucker confesses)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 07:49 AM
Original message
Fire The War Pimps: Zero Tolerance for Iraq War Pundits (Tucker confesses)
Fire The War Pimps: Zero Tolerance for Iraq War Pundits

May 17, 2004

By: Ted Rall
Universal Press Syndicate


NEW YORK--A year and a half late and 30,000 lives short, supporters of the war in Iraq finally admit that they were wrong.
When I appeared on Bill O'Reilly's show recently, his bellicose bravado was MIA. We argued about Bush and war, but he studiously avoided talking about Iraq. The Fox News demagogue limited his attacks to my opposition to the war against Afghanistan (news - web sites). To his credit O'Reilly, formerly a ferocious advocate of the Iraqi invasion, was one of the first media war promoters to concede that Iraq had never been a threat to the United States. "I was wrong," he told ABC in February. "I think every American should be very concerned" that weapons of mass destruction have not been found.

Over at The New York Times, two pro-war columnists who repeatedly parroted the Bush party line--arguing that Gulf War (news - web sites) II was a noble experiment in Middle Eastern democracy, accusing opponents of appeasing Saddam and repeatedly ridiculing skeptics as knee-jerk pacifists who didn't care about the long-suffering Iraqis--have ordered up a heaping plate of crow. "We went into Iraq with what, in retrospect, seems like a childish fantasy," allows Republican war pimp David Brooks. "We were going to topple Saddam, establish democracy and hand the country back to grateful Iraqis. We expected to be universally admired when it was all over. For us to succeed in Iraq," he concludes now, "we have to lose ."

"I supported the war and now I feel foolish," says CNN's Tucker Carlson.

snip

http://www.independent-media.tv/item.cfm?fmedia_id=7306&fcategory_desc=Media%20Lies%20and%20Right%20Wing%20Bias

all these "assholes" that were blood thirsty should be brought to task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wait: They used to be for the war, now they are against it? A flip flop?
Edited on Tue Sep-21-04 07:59 AM by htuttle
No, it 's not!

It's called watching someone make a fucked up mess of something, and realizing it was a bad idea to begin with. A lot of Americans have woken to the same realization over the last 12 months.

That's why this 'Iraq flip flop' that Bush alleges Kerry did causes little harm. Too many Americans who used to think the war was a good idea have changed their minds after seeing Bush's performance. The Flip Flop charge only works on people who still support Bush and the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. THEY are the reason for the Iraq war...supporting bush when the
"whole world" was against it...bush NEVER went back for a "war vote" at the UN.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well, the blame for the Iraq fiasco falls squarely on President Bush
Can't look at it any other way.

Sure, he had an assortment of enablers in Congress and in the press -- some of whom knew the truth, others of whom believed Bush's lies -- but the ultimate blame still lies with Little Boots.

What I'm saying is that pundits like those described in the article can hardly blame someone for changing their mind on the invasion of Iraq, since they've changed their minds themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-21-04 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. Bush loving pundits should find a job where their asinine opinions ...
won't help get someone killed. O'liely should go back to tabloid reporting and stay out of politics. Bow tie boy should find a job writing a lifestyles column at a newspaper someplace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC