If we need to fear any country, it must be Pakistan, a country

[Veggie Meathead]

dominated by a fanatic Muslim dictator armed with nuclear weapons and who plans to spread the technology of nuclear weapons to other rogue nations under the guise of an Islamic Bomb.This is to counter the nuclear weapons that India and Israel have.These two countries are infidels that must be destroyed at any cost for Muslim nations to prevail.At the moment, Musharraf has formed a marriage of convenience with Bush but his real intent is to form a Muslim Military Pact in the mold of NATO.

Watch as Pakistan arms terrorists with nuclear weapons in the decade ahead financed by oil money from Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the Emirates and assorted Muslim fanatics. When this happens, every day will be a
9/11 or even more.

Why no one bothers to ask Mr.Bush what he has done to stop the spread of nuclear weapons to Muslim terrorists through Pakistan remains a mystery to me.

[no_hypocrisy]

1. And the best part: the U.S. is giving significant funds to Pakistan for

its assistance in routing out "terrorists", which in reality helps Pakistan achieve its goals as outlined above.

[leesa]

2. Well,if we keep tweaking China and Russia, we will have bigger fish to fry

[Alpharetta]

3. I agree completely

Pakistan played nuclear brinkmanship games with India a few years ago. Games that could have had a tragic outcome.

Pakistan's scientists have exported nuclear weapons technology.

Al Qaeda and Taliban move freely between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

I seriously doubt Pakistan's nuclear weapons are safe from being seized by the Taliban or Al Qaeda. All you have to do is pay off a few guards and their commanders.

Musharraf doesn't scare me as much as the Pakistani warlords who keep him in power. He's a moderate by comparison.

Why Bush pretends Iraq was a bigger threat is just pure stupidity. He needed a threat to consolidate his rule by terror. He should have picked a true threat like Pakistan.

[loverNotAfighter]

4. Off the mark...

First off, Musharraf is not a fanatic - he is considered moderate in relative terms. In fact his life is danger everyday from hardliners - so pakistan does not pander to the US. If it was not for Musharraf - the Pakistan would not have fully co-operated with the imediate demands of the US - 1 or 2 weeks after the twin towers terrorist attack. The genral sentiment in the country was not to comply

If you ask any political analyst specialising in pakistan - they will mention that pakistan is the US's baby. Keeping general zia in power (a fanatical radical 'muslim'). Most of the Taliban and Mis-guided Mullahs have spent a generation indoctrinating young children a hijacked version of islam.

[skypilot]

5. That's right, Musharraf is not a fanatic. but...

...fanatics in Pakistan try to assassinate him every chance they get. They feel that he is too cooperative with the West. If Musharraf took a bullet tomorrow we'd be in a lot of shit.

[Strelnikov_]

9. Good Analysis, The Real Danger Is Musharraf Getting Knocked Off

And I am afraid the question is when, not if.

[Veggie Meathead]

10. There is no such thing as a moderate Muslim. They differ in the

degree to which they will cooperate but their aims are the same.The defeat of the infidels by any means necessary.A charlatan like Musharraf was trading in weapons technology with North Korea while he was making so called "moderate" noises with Bush and acquiring missile technology from North Korea.He was faced with the complete collapse of the Pakistani economy and put on a moderate face until he was able to squeeze out a few billions from Bush.

He pardoned the Pakistani Bomb Guru, A.Q.Khan, who has declared his intent to disseminate weapons technology and materials to the Muslim world.If Al Qaeda gets hold of weapons technology and misslies to deliver them, you can be certain that A.Q.Khan will be responsible while we are singing the praises of a "moderate" Musharraf.

[dansolo]

6. Pakistan should be a member of the "Axis of Evil"

Along with Saudi Arabia and Kuwait.

[Dangerman]

7. We invaded the wrong place...

And ousted the wrong dictator.

I don't trust Musharraf. He may (just my opinion) be more dangerous than Saddam Hussein!

AND HE IS OUR FREAKING ALLY, FOR GOD SAKE!

[oneighty]

8. So too was Saddam

an ally at one time-more or less. Allies are tools in the hands of the "New World Order" Drum roll.

180