|
from the very science of definition and semantics that empowers it, and be not this knowledge? And if it is you, then your knowledge is much richer than ever can be squeezed in discrete phoenetic characters. So my theory has it, that knowledge must exist already to even discuss "theory" and knowledge suggests its prescience.
That the ethos in teaching knowlege is itself classic liberalism, then is not liberalism tied in with god? I can't help but see the two slightly entertwined, by the very unmentionable base of human perception, the window of experience, and its direct knowledge direct from the heart, knowing that all of life is sacred.
Rather than anthromorphize a face, god as merely omnipresent light, perfect knowledge, primal knowing deep and ecstatically still. Then knowledge could be being ignorant and acting wise. But being ignorant and acting ignorant is not knowledge, so we know that bush and his ilk, must be cut loose, or science, and the root foundations of learning and epistemology demand it, in the name of truth, the church must cut loose the monkey.
|