Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Elementary, My Dear DU! Lucy Ramirez is Nydia Stone (Cuban) and Roger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:43 AM
Original message
It's Elementary, My Dear DU! Lucy Ramirez is Nydia Stone (Cuban) and Roger
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 10:46 AM by Dems Will Win
Stone is the unknown man with the envelope!!

I have just finished playing my violin and have figured out the whole Memo Scandal.

Bush is toast.

Lucy Ramirez is Nydia Stone (Cuban) and Roger Stone is the guy with the envelope (probably wearing sunglasses and a hat). Burkett could indentify him and her voice--because this is wire fraud and a felony, as William Safire so helpfully pointed out in the New York Times today.

Since Stone grew up with Rove in the Dirty Tricks Department, the whole thing becomes clear.

It's the old Rove trick as they did with Hatfield and planting the cocaine stories. Burkett has a history of mental illness and so became Patsy #1. And only Rove could have gotten Stone the original memos to copy!

Now fetch me my pipe!

Burkett's story--in which he is virtuous to the lady and dutifully burns the originals as she requested:

-snip-

The story begins in March, when Mr. Burkett, who had just been on MSNBC's "Hardball" discussing Mr. Bush's Guard service, received a call from a mysterious woman he calls Lucy Ramirez. Previously, Mr. Burkett had identified the source of the memos as one George Conn, another former Texas National Guard officer, conveniently abroad in Europe. In an e-mail to USA Today, Mr. Conn denied any involvement with the Killian memos. Mr. Burkett himself admits that he had lied about his source as a way of protecting her.

In their conversation, Lucy Ramirez explained how she had in her custody damaging documents to Mr. Bush and scheduled a meeting with Mr. Burkett to hand them over. That meeting occurred on or around March 3 at a livestock show in Houston. But, according to Mr. Burkett, Lucy Ramirez didn't show up. Instead, as he told USA Today, an unknown "man handed him an envelope and quickly left." After receiving the memos, Mr. Burkett said he stopped off at a Kinko's store in Waco and made copies. In the parking lot outside, Mr. Burkett said he then burned the originals, pursuant to Lucy Ramirez's wishes. Over the next few days, Mr. Burkett said he hid the copies "in cold storage" at an undisclosed location 100 miles from his home in Baird.

-snip-

http://washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20040921-085106-6584r.htm

A Dirty Trick has finally been exposed--and well before an election!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Cute-
Have you called Mcauliffe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No I decided to let you know first!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itcfish1 Donating Member (204 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
30. How About
Informing Dan Rather and CBS News???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Would you do that, old friend
I'm rather busy between the violin and the case, you know!



Dems Will Win and Dr. H20 Man Join the investigation at CBS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wolfgang Donating Member (38 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:47 AM
Response to Original message
3. You get inspiration from playing music too?
Amazing how therapeutic it can be. I think you have an interesting theory. Aren't these the swingers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. And they'll soon be swinging from the highest tree,
if Scotland Yard has anything to say about it, my dear fellow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. But how is Stone connected to Buckhead?
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 10:49 AM by DoYouEverWonder
that's what I want to know?

I think there's something there, and it might be easier to prove. There will be more fingerprints and he wouldn't have burnt up the forensic evidence.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Great Escape Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Do They Really Need To Be Connected?
I would think only the Buckhead link to Rove and/or the Stone link to Rove.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EST Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. We already know how their connections are umm, connected
At least, the external, visible connections. T'would be so very simple for the evil master mind to set up. After all, the bit with Rove being in another part of the country and still whispering about Bush's cocaine habits only required a sorta look alike. Rove has one of those twelve standard faces that nearly everyone has an uncle who looks like him, so that was a piece of coke, uh I mean cake.
I still have plenty of tin foil left, although terrible arthritis cut short my musical career some years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. Don't need the connection but Buckhead is a GOP Atlanta lawyer
and likely knows the whole crowd.

THe crime is forging TANG docs that were then broadcast as real.

Whoever, having devised any scheme or artifice to defraud transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both. " U.S. Criminal Code, Chapter 63, Section 1343.


WASHINGTON — At the root of what is today treated as an embarrassing blunder by duped CBS journalists may turn out to be a felony by its faithless sources.

Some person or persons conceived a scheme to create a series of false Texas Air National Guard documents and append a photocopied signature to one of them. The perpetrator then helped cause the fraudulent file to be transmitted by means of television communication to millions of voters for the purpose of influencing a federal election.

That was no mere "dirty trick"; it could be a violation of the U.S. criminal code. If the artifice had not been revealed by sharp-eyed bloggers, a national election could have been swung by a blatant falsehood.

Who was the forger? Did others conspire with him or her to present a seeming government document - with knowledge of its falsity and with intent to defraud, which is a felony in Texas? Who was to benefit and how?


-snip-

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/09/22/opinion/22safi.html?hp

The evil Professor Moriarty (Rove) even had a backup plan if Stone was found out. And so they unleashed Safire today with a call for an FBI investigation to cover it up until after the election.

They always make a mistake, my dear DU! All you need do is look!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. You make some good points
I didn't consider the wire fraud issues. That does make it imperative that we find out more about Ms. Lucy, ah excuse me Ms. Nydia. But Ms. Lucy wasn't necessaritly even in TX. Just some man who showed up instead and gave Burkett the envelope?

But, hey what does Dr. Watson know anyway?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
26. Elementary, my dear Watson.Roger and Nydia share some
common activities (wink, wink) with Buckhead and his SO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
5. Ah!
Very nice! :)

Um, how does anyone prove it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Just have Burkett look at a picture of Roger Stone and listen to a tape
of Nydia's voice.

Plus Stone must have traveled to Texas somehow for the March 3rd date. It's interstate wire fraud, my dear DU.

Time to bring in the chief coverup artist, FBI Director Mueller. THAT'S WHY SAFIRE REVEALED IT'S A FELONY TODAY!

They need to get this off the front page with a hearty TALLY-HO and "We will investigate with the FBI!--So let's wait for the investigation to finish."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogtag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
7. I don't want to visit the Washington Times site, but
would like to know if the article mentions the Kinko's in Abilene. Did Burkett re copy the Waco copies again before sending them to CBS?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Yes--and burned the originals
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
13. I wonder if the venue for the Livestock show
has CAMERAS? Wouldn't that be sweet? EXCEPT, if KKKRove is behind this, any film of that meeting at the Livestock show has already been confiscated IF it was caught on camera. :(

I like your theory, but are you SURE Lucy Ramirez is REALLY Nydia Stone? Do we have proof? Just the fact that Stone wouldn't deny he was involved, pegs him as GUILTY, in my book, but I think we need more PROOF to take down these people. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. My dear fellow, as Mr. Holmes himself said:
"How often have I said to you that when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth?"

Nydia Stone is Cuban and no doubt has an accent so she called herself Ramirez. THen Roger Stone didn't want to involve his wife directly so he traveled to Texas and gave the forgeries to Burkett.

Plus Stone has a history of dirty tricks. The real question will be who gave the docs to Stone.

PLUS! STONE CLEARLY TALKED TO A LAWYER ALREADY WHO INSTRUCTED HIM TO SAY NO COMMENT. THAT'S OBVIOUS. THIS IS WIRE FRAUD.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
14. Here's The Thing: How Would Stone Create Accurate Documents
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 11:07 AM by GR
As Killian's former secretary says they are, in content. This would have to come initially from someone who had the original documents or at least copies of them....Can you spell KKKarl Rove....?

See Hesiod for his ideas on this subject. He came up with the idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I'm afraid you mean Professor Moriarty, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egalitariat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
17. Forgery, I understand. What is the wire fraud?***
nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. It was broadcast on TV, see post #12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
18. I have no doubt this is a Stone production.. but..
do you think they'd be dumb enough to do the work in person? Stone and his ilk have "faithful", especially in Texas, that will do that work for them... keeping them clean. How did they find Burkett?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I bet Stone did it, cause he wouldn't trust anyone but Lucy, I mean Nydia!
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 11:22 AM by Dems Will Win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shrek Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
21. Is there any new evidence pointing to Stone?
All I've heard about is the "no comment" which doesn't seem like much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Ah, yes, my dear DU! THe dog that didn't bark!
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 11:29 AM by Dems Will Win
"Is there any point to which you would wish to draw my attention?" "To the curious incident of the dog in the night-time." "The dog did nothing in the night-time." "That was the curious incident," remarked Sherlock Holmes. (It's from the short story "Silver Blaze".)

NO COMMENT -- curious incident no? The Dog that didn't bark!

Now go refill my pipe!

Anyone with a serious flaw in my argument? Something that might force me to play my violin again?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
23. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. interesting theory......
One of the things that the neocons do is the old nazi practice of mixing one part truth with three parts of lies, which allows them to bounce back and forth between fact and fiction in any discussion or debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. My dear H20 Man, there's no time to waste theorizing now!
The chaps over on the other thread have noticed something even old Sherlock missed!

I have to get used to this global brain Internet thing!

ANyway, the question is: who called CBS to tell them to call Burkett??

So it's off to CBS! Hail a coach, old boy would you! I must get my coat, my pipe, my hat and my magnifying glass!

We must go question the lovely Miss Mary Mapes straight away! She holds the answer to "The Strange Case of the TANG Forgeries"!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. One thing - If the docs they passed were forgeries BASED on real docs
AND they did them on a modern computer, are you saying they just got lucky that CBS didn't discover their (apparently) so easily uncovered ruse?

I still have seen no evidence that they were NOT typed on a machine of the releveant time period. If they were, then how was the forgery story so easily sold?

Something doesn't square. The documents are either real, "real", fake or "fake". And each designation goes down a different path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Ah my dear FOE, the secretary for Killian himself said she did not type
them but typed something similar on an old manual Olympia.

Put on your thinking cap now!

The criminal, the notorious Roger Stone, DID type them on a Selectric of the time and thought this will prove an easy forgery as the original was an old manual typewriter.

THis is where everyone but I, the greatest detective in all of England, got lost in this case.

You must think like the criminal to catch the criminal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. So it is your position, good Dr, that the CBS documents are copies of
fake "real" documents? Professor Stoneiarity got the real ones, and upon determining their method of coming into being, selected a close enough machine to get them past scrutiny, but with enough "markers" as to their true progeny.

Their intention was to pull the rug out from under CBS based on the irregularites of typewriters of the era, but in a stroke of luck, modern day computers were brought into the whole thing thereby overriding their intended misdirection with an even greater turn of events?

What happens when the original fake "real" docs turn up with the Professor's or "Lucy's" fingerprints? How about the REAL documents that Ms. Kox typed?

Truly a mystery!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. I believe Dear Foe, you may have forgotten a key fact
Edited on Wed Sep-22-04 02:32 PM by Dems Will Win
Being a virtuous man of the South, Mr. Burkett says he burned the originals upon the impassioned ("hard and deep") pleas of the seductive "Lucy Ramirez", who we know now was Nydia. So there are no fake originals.

And Dr. Roviarty no doubt had his accomplice Stone destroy the inciminating evidence long ago!

So there are no originals--which would have been, in my esteemed estimation, on the old manual Olympia, typed by the lovely Mrs. Knox.

Wait Stone missed one!



Dems Will Win and Dr. H20 Man find the partially-burned original in the Stone Apartment!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. The "burn the originals" part of the plot gives me pause, Dr.
Wouldn't you NEED to make SURE the originals were SAFE and hidden well away just in case you needed to verify your story? Why cut off your only way to establish your credibility? Methinks you may be onto something.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. Normally true, my dear FOE!
But when a woman pledges her honor to a gentleman of the South, you must agree he feels duty-bound to honor his pledge to her and burn the originals as she requested.

I'm afraid Mr. Burkett was taken and Lucy (who everyone knew as Nydia) purred and cried into the phone, after which she must have been given a big kiss from hubba hubby and the Academy Award for best Election-Stealing Scene.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. ha-ha-ha!!
Oh, that was great!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fridays Child Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
33. Burkett didn't burn anything. He's not a stupid man.
Either there was no call from a Lucy Ramirez nor meeting with a man at the fairgrounds or Burkett still has the originals and they will be revealed in the course of his litgation against CBS.

I hope for the latter but, given Burkett's previous lie to CBS, I'm afraid that it's the former.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. harumph!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-23-04 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #38
39. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC