Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

9-11 'Drills': Interview of Stanley Hilton, Sept 10, 2004

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 11:41 AM
Original message
9-11 'Drills': Interview of Stanley Hilton, Sept 10, 2004
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 08:25 AM by Skinner
http://www.incunabula.org/hive/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=170

SH: "Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location……"

Interview of Stanley Hilton, attorney for 9/11 taxpayers’ lawsuit
Alex Jones Radio Show
September 10, 2004
Transcription by 'RatCat'

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole’s chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out – half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it’s great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We’ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you’ve deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject – how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

AJ: That’s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you’ve got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim’s families involved….

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT

Additional information: http://www.incunabula.org/hive/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=172&mode=flat&order=0&thold=0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. Looks like lots of good stuff here
thanks and welcome to DU :hi: !!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Thank you! I'm enjoying DU very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #15
58. HEY GUYS, THE ABOVE ARTICLE IS A MUST READ -Bad day for Bush
I think dumbya must be having a very bad day.

1)We print this lawsuit all over DU

2)Kofi Annan says the Iraq war was illegal (which makes the cabal war criminals (but no one has an army to take them on and take them to the
Hague

3) And Dan Rather proves that the resident was dishonorable in his duites to the Air Force.

BUT - we are having a good day.

We just have to get this article out into the media!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
186. FULL ARTICLE & UNCOPYWRITED MATERIAL HERE:http://www.prisonplanet.com/art
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 09:07 AM by Skinner
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/130904hiltontranscript.htm



Transcript: Alex Jones Interviews Stanley Hilton

| September 13 2004

The MP3 of this interview is available at

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole’s chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out – half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it’s great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We’ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you’ve deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject – how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

EDITED BY ADMIN: COPYRIGHT (YES, IT IS COPYRIGHTED)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Very interesting
Thanks for posting this. I will never believe the "official" story on 911. Something big went down, and I feel that there is more to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. Just finished reading the whole thing - MAN
PEOPLE - you will WANT to read this!! Thank God for Stanley Hilton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
never cry wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow, long read, but worth it!
Thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. passenger-type jets were under remote control – this is decades old techno
reorg


"Before the final flight on December 1, 1984, more then four years of effort passed trying to set-up final impact conditions considered survivable by the FAA. During those years while 14 flights with crews were flown the following major efforts were underway: NASA Dryden developed the remote piloting techniques necessary for the B-720 to fly as a drone aircraft; General Electric installed and tested four degraders (one on each engine); and the FAA refined AMK (blending, testing, and fueling a full size aircraft). The 14 flights had 9 takeoffs, 13 landings and around 69 approaches, to about 150 feet above the prepared crash site, under remote control. "
http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/CID/HTML/index.html

Minstrel Boy

"Raytheon announced Monday the company is working on a secure military and civilian system that relies on ground units to improve the precision of satellite navigation.

"The company successfully landed a FedEx Corp. 727 cargo aircraft without the help of a pilot at Holloman Air Force Base in August (2001)."
http://www.abqtrib.com/archives/news01/100201_news_remote.shtml


The Flying Wedge Issue of "What Hit the Pentagon"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=125&topic_id=19723&mesg_id=19723
Dov Zackheim is NOT an Israeli citizen.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=125&topic_id=19748

:hi:
Minstrel Boy
reorg
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #5
197. i KNEW they were remotely controlled!!
no plane or pilot could make the 280 degree turn that were necessary to crash it. my ex airforce father, a jet mechanic, totally refused to believe it either, but if it was controlled by something as small as a computer chip in the nose of the plane, and was authorized for secret military intervention, i can understand why most were in the dark.

i was always MIHOP, this interview simply reinforces it. mr. sheldon is a brave man and a true patriot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is much too much for me anymore
Alex Jones had a Heck of a piece on S&B today (produced by some guy on the other side of the Alantic, no surprise). The information on that effing temple at Yale was the last straw for me.

I may pull a lever for........... Actually at this point I don't think that day will really matter that much in light of the way things are. A lot more is going to go on would be my guess. Mostly not surprised except for my own gullibility.

JOHN MELLENCAMP – ( Check It Out Lyrics ):

Million young poets
Screamin? out their words
To a world full of people
Just livin? to be heard
Future generations
Ridin´on the highways that we built
I hope, that they have better understanding

Check it out
Goin to work on monday
Check it out
Got yourself a family
Check it out
All utility bills have been paid
You can´t tell your best buddy
That you love him
So check it out
Where does our time go
Check it out
Got a brand new house in escrow
Check it out
Sleepin? with your back
To your loved one
This is all, we have learned
About happiness

Check it out,
Forgot to say hello to my neighbours
Check it out
Sometimes I question my own behavior
Check it out
Talkin? about the girls, we´ve
Seen on the sly
Just to tell our souls
We´re still the young lions
So check it out
Gettin? too drunk on saturdays
Check it out
Playin? football with the kids
On sundays
Check it out
Soaring with the eagles all week long
And this is all, we have learned
About living
This is all, we have learned
About living

A million young poets
Screamin? out their words
Maybe someday
Those words will be heard
By future generations
Ridin? on the highways that we built
Maybe they´ll have a better understanding
Check it out
Maybe they´ll have a better understanding
Check it out
Maybe they´ll have a better understanding
Check it out
Maybe they´ll have a better understanding
Check it out
Hope they´ll have a better understanding
Check it out ...

http://www.lyricsfreak.com/j/john-mellencamp/74561.ht
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
198. come again?
what's this about a temple at yale?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #198
209. More paranoid rants from archnutbag Alex Jones (who is more rightwing
than Zell Miller). At least I've never heard Zell talk about the NWO coming after "white people" as Jones is prone to say.

Jones is also good buddies with Mel Gibson's Holocaust-denying daddy and considers him an expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. See transcript from PBS --"not an exercise, not a test"
See transcript from PBS --"not an exercise, not a test"

http://www.pbs.org/now/transcript/transcript337_full.ht...

>>AZZARELLO: At 8:37 and 52 seconds, Boston Center reached NEADS. This was the first notification received by the military at any level that American 11 had been hijacked.

FAA BOSTON CENTER: We have a problem here. We have a hijacked aircraft headed towards New York, and we need you guys to… we need someone to scramble some F-16s or something up there to help us out.

NEADS: Is this real-world or exercise?

FAA BOSTON CENTER: No, this is not an exercise, not a test.
>>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Search Party Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. kick


damn


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CornField Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. BFEE/PNAC Mobsters MIHOPed the shit out of us!!
Justice can never be served until these treasonous monsters are prosecuted!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. If this doesn't scare the shit out of you, nothing will
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. This thread has provided me w/one large part of the puzzle
I've needed to understand why no jets were scrambled on September 11, 2001.

While I knew FEMA was in NYC on September 10, 2001, I had not known the extent of the drills.

For all that is good in this world, please let the truth come to light in my lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I did know about the drills that morning
but this puts them in the "cold-blooded" killers light that I always suspected they were................

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, it was the
35 drills that did it for me too.

The moment I heard about the attacks, my 1st thought was, WTF has the government done now? I thought I had gone over the edge until I began reading Nico's (ewing) research.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Crossing the Rubicon"
TO DATE, THE CASE THAT 9/11 WAS PERPETRATED SOLELY BY OSAMA
BIN LADEN AND AL QAEDA HAS NEVER BEEN PROVED, EVEN TO THE
MOST RUDIMENTARY STANDARDS. IN FACT, SOME 35 MONTHS AFTER
THE ATTACKS THERE HAS NOT BEEN A SINGLE SUCCESSFUL 9/11
PROSECUTION ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. THE ONLY CONVICTION
THAT HAD BEEN SECURED, A GERMAN PROSECUTION AGAINST MOUNIR
EL MOTASSADEQ, CHARGED WITH AIDING THE SO CALLED HAMBURG
CELL OF MOHAMMED ATTA, WAS OVERTURNED IN 2004 BECAUSE THE
US GOVERNMENT REFUSED TO PRODUCE KEY WITNESSES SUCH AS
KHALID SHAIKH MUHAMMAD OR RAMZI BIN AL-SHIBH AND OTHER
EVIDENCE RELEVANT TO THE CHARGES. EVERY DEFENDANT IN A
WESTERN CRIMINAL CASE HAS THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE THE EVIDENCE
USED AGAINST HIM AND TO CROSS-EXAMINE WITNESSES.
TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC AS WELL AS TO THE 9/11 RESEARCH
COMMUNITY, THE MYSTERIOUS AND INEXPLICABLE FAILURE OF THE
NATION’S AIR DEFENSES THAT DAY REMAINS THE MOST GLARING AND
GAPING HOLE IN THE KEAN COMMISSION’S ACCOUNT AND IN THE
GOVERNMENT’S VERSION OF EVENTS. SCRAMBLING FIGHTER
AIRCRAFT WAS A ROUTINE OCCURRENCE FOR YEARS BEFORE 9/11.
30
THE ASSOCIATED PRESS HAS TOLD US THAT FIGHTER AIRCRAFT WERE
SCRAMBLED AND FLYING BESIDE ERRANT COMMERCIAL AND PRIVATE
AIR TRAFFIC WITHIN MINUTES OF THE SLIGHTEST DEVIATION SOME 67
TIMES IN THE CALENDAR YEAR PRECEDING JUNE 1 2001. THIS IS ONE
OF MANY AREAS WHERE THE KEAN COMMISSION NOT ONLY FAILED TO
LOOK BUT ACTUALLY ALTERED EVIDENCE IN THE PREPARATION OF ITS
FINAL REPORT.
FOR ME, THE PIVOTAL EVIDENCE ABSOLUTELY DEMONSTRATING
DIRECT GOVERNMENT COMPLICITY IN, AND MANAGEMENT OF, THE
ATTACKS WAS FOUND IN A NUMBER OF UNDISPUTED, YET VIRTUALLY
UNADDRESSED WARGAMES THAT I WILL SHOW WERE BEING
CONDUCTED, COORDINATED AND/OR CONTROLLED BY VICE PRESIDENT
DICK CHENEY OR HIS IMMEDIATE STAFF ON THE MORNING OF
SEPTEMBER 11TH. THE NAMES OF THOSE WARGAMES ARE KNOWN TO
INCLUDE: VIGILANT GUARDIAN, VIGILANT WARRIOR, NORTHERN
GUARDIAN, NORTHERN VIGILANCE, AND TRIPOD II. ALL HAVE BEEN
REPORTED ON BY MAJOR PRESS ORGANIZATIONS RELYING ON
UNDISPUTED QUOTES FROM PARTICIPATING MILITARY PERSONNEL.
THEY HAVE ALSO BEEN CONFIRMED BY NORAD PRESS RELEASES. ALL,
EXCEPT FOR NORTHERN VIGILANCE AND TRIPOD II HAD TO DO WITH
HIJACKED AIRLINERS INSIDE THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATES,
SPECIFICALLY WITHIN THE NORTHEAST AIR DEFENSE SECTOR WHERE
ALL FOUR 9/11 HIJACKINGS OCCURRED.
ACCORDING TO A CLEAR RECORD SOME OF THESE EXERCISES
INVOLVED COMMERCIAL AIRLINE HIJACKINGS. IN SOME CASES FALSE
BLIPS WERE DELIBERATELY INSERTED ONTO FAA AND MILITARY RADAR
SCREENS AND THEY WERE PRESENT DURING (AT LEAST) THE FIRST
ATTACKS. THIS EFFECTIVELY PARALYZED FIGHTER RESPONSE
BECAUSE, WITH ONLY EIGHT FIGHTERS AVAILABLE IN THE REGION,
31
THERE WERE AS MANY AS 22 POSSIBLE HIJACKINGS TAKING PLACE.
OTHER EXERCISES, SPECIFICALLY NORTHERN VIGILANCE HAD PULLED
SIGNIFICANT FIGHTER RESOURCES AWAY FROM THE NORTHEAST U.S.
– JUST BEFORE 9/11 – INTO NORTHERN CANADA AND ALASKA. IN
ADDITION, A CLOSE READING OF KEY NEWS STORIES PUBLISHED IN THE
SPRING OF 2004 REVEALED FOR THE FIRST TIME THAT SOME OF THESE
DRILLS WERE “LIVE-FLY” EXERCISES WHERE ACTUAL AIRCRAFT, LIKELY
FLOWN BY REMOTE CONTROL – WERE SIMULATING THE BEHAVIOR OF
HIJACKED AIRLINERS IN REAL LIFE. ALL OF THIS AS THE REAL ATTACKS
BEGAN. THE FACT THAT THESE EXERCISES HAD NEVER BEEN
SYSTEMATICALLY AND THOROUGHLY EXPLORED IN THE MAINSTREAM
PRESS, OR PUBLICLY BY CONGRESS, OR AT LEAST PUBLICLY IN ANY
DETAIL BY THE SO-CALLED INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION MADE ME
THINK THAT THEY MIGHT BE THE HOLY GRAIL OF 9/11.
THAT’S EXACTLY WHAT THEY TURNED OUT TO BE.
ONLY ONE WARGAME EXERCISE, VIGILANT GUARDIAN, WAS MENTIONED
IN A FOOTNOTE TO THE KEAN COMMISSION REPORT AND THEN IT WAS
DELIBERATELY MISLABELED AS AN EXERCISE INTENDED TO INTERCEPT
RUSSIAN BOMBERS INSTEAD OF A HIJACK EXERCISE IN THE
NORTHEAST SECTOR. EVEN THEN, A DELIBERATE LIE WAS TOLD TO
THE AMERICAN PEOPLE AS NORAD COMMANDER RALPH EBERHART
TESTIFIED TO THE COMMISSION THAT THE EXERCISE ACTUALLY
EXPEDITED US AIR FORCE RESPONSE DURING THE ATTACKS.
WHEN MICHAEL KANE, A BRILLIANT YOUNG NEW YORK ACTIVIST AND
BUDDING INVESTIGATIVE REPORTER APPROACHED GENERAL
EBERHART ON AN FTW ASSIGNMENT AT THE CONCLUSION OF THE
COMMISSION’S LAST PUBLIC HEARING AND ASKED FOR INFORMATION
32
ON THE OTHER EXERCISES, EBERHART’S ONLY RESPONSE WAS, “NO
COMMENT.”
AND AN ADDITIONAL NON-MILITARY BIOWARFARE EXERCISE CALLED
TRIPOD II, BEING “SET UP” IN MANHATTAN ON SEPTEMBER 11TH WAS
UNDER THE DIRECT COORDINATION OF FEMA AND – BY WHITE HOUSE
DIRECTIVE – THE IMMEDIATE CONTROL OF THE VICE PRESIDENT. THE
SET UP FOR THAT EXERCISE CONVENIENTLY PLACED A FULLY STAFFED
FEMA, NEW YORK CITY AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE COMMAND POST
ON MANHATTAN’S PIER 29 IN TIME FOR IT TO BE CONVENIENTLY USED
AS THE COMMAND POST AFTER THE TWIN TOWERS HAD COLLAPSED.
THERE ARE MANY, MANY AREAS WHERE THE OFFICIAL ACCOUNT AND
THE FINDINGS OF THE KEAN COMMISSION ARE CONTRADICTED BY
HARD EVIDENCE, OFFICIAL RECORDS, MAINSTREAM NEWS
INVESTIGATIONS AND EVEN SWORN TESTIMONY. BOTH THE LOS
ANGELES TIMES AND THE NEW YORK TIMES HAVE NOTED SOME OF THE
LESSER, BUT NO LESS GLARING, INCONSISTENCIES. IN MY BOOK I WILL
PROVIDE YOU WITH MANY MORE.

............

IN MY BOOK I WILL MAKE SEVERAL KEY POINTS:
1. I WILL NAME RICHARD CHENEY AS THE PRIME SUSPECT IN THE MASS
MURDERS OF 9/11 AND WILL ESTABLISH THAT, NOT ONLY WAS HE A
PLANNER IN THE ATTACKS, BUT ALSO THAT ON THE DAY OF THE
ATTACKS HE WAS RUNNING A COMPLETELY SEPARATE COMMAND,
CONTROL AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM WHICH WAS SUPERCEDING
ANY ORDERS BEING ISSUED BY THE NMCC, OR THE WHITE HOUSE
SITUATION ROOM. TO ACCOMPLISH THAT END HE RELIED ON A
REDUNDANT AND SUPERIOR COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM MAINTAINED
BY THE US SECRET SERVICE IN OR NEAR THE PRESIDENTIAL
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS CENTER – THE BUNKER TO WHICH HE AND
33
NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISOR CONDOLEEZZA RICE WERE REPORTEDLY
“RUSHED” AFTER FLIGHT 175 STRUCK THE WTC’S SOUTH TOWER. I WILL
DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SECRET SERVICE POSSESSED RADAR
SCREENS WHICH GAVE THEM, AND THE VICE PRESIDENT, WHOSE SIDE
THE NEVER LEFT, WITH REAL-TIME INFORMATION AS GOOD AS OR
BETTER THAN THAT AVAILABLE TO THE PENTAGON;
2. I WILL DEMONSTRATE THAT IN WHAT ARE CALLED NATIONAL SPECIAL
SECURITY EVENTS THE US SECRET SERVICE IS THE SUPREME US
AGENCY FOR OPERATIONAL CONTROL WITH COMPLETE AUTHORITY
OVER THE MILITARY AND ALL CIVILIAN AGENCIES.
3. I WILL ESTABLISH CONCLUSIVELY THAT IN MAY OF 2001, BY
PRESIDENTIAL ORDER, RICHARD CHENEY WAS PUT IN DIRECT
COMMAND AND CONTROL OF ALL WARGAME AND FIELD EXERCISE
TRAINING AND SCHEDULING THROUGH SEVERAL AGENCIES,
ESPECIALLY FEMA. THIS ALSO EXTENDED TO ALL OF THE CONFLICTING
AND OVERLAPPING NORAD DRILLS ON THAT DAY.
4. I WILL ALSO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE TRIPOD II EXERCISE BEING
SET UP ON SEPT. 10TH IN MANHATTAN WAS DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO
CHENEY'S ROLE IN NUMBER 3 ABOVE.
5. I WILL ALSO PROVE CONCLUSIVELY THAT A NUMBER OF PUBLIC
OFFICIALS, AT THE NATIONAL AND NEW YORK CITY LEVELS, INCLUDING
THEN MAYOR RUDOLPH GIULIANI, WERE AWARE THAT FLIGHT 175 WAS
EN ROUTE TO LOWER MANHATTAN FOR 20 MINUTES AND DID NOTHING –
ABSOLUTELY NOTHING – TO ORDER THE EVACUATION OF OR WARN THE
OCCUPANTS OF THE WORLD TRADE CENTER. ONE MILITARY OFFICER
WAS FORCED TO LEAVE HIS POST IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ATTACKS AND
PLACE A PRIVATE CALL TO HIS BROTHER - WHO WORKED AT THE WTC -
34
WARNING HIM TO GET OUT. THAT WAS APPARENTLY AN ACT OF
DESPERATION BECAUSE NO OTHER PART OF THE SYSTEM WAS TAKING
ACTION.
6. I WILL ALSO SHOW THAT THE ISRAELI AND BRITISH GOVERNMENTS
ACTED AS PARTNERS WITH THE HIGHEST LEVELS OF THE AMERICAN
GOVERNMENT TO HELP IN THE PREPARATION AND, VERY POSSIBLY,
THE ACTUAL EXECUTION OF THE ATTACKS."

more
http://www.fromthewilderness.com/PDF/Commonwealth.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecessaryOnslaught Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #11
22. A few pages from the book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Thanks so much NecessaryOnslaught
Really great, again thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecessaryOnslaught Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #24
41. You're welcome..
Any friend of truth is a friend of mine. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #11
75. I pre-ordered my book yesterday!
They have it nailed. The Crime Family did 9-11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivebydesign Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wow. Powerful read. I"m speechless.. WHERE is Hilton's thesis?
I'm not sure what to make of all of it, yet.


I REALLY want to read Hilton's thesis from his school days... that would help me immensley. We ALL know about the NorthWoods project, that was not carried out, but it was exactly what he is alleging here.

I have to admit, I always wondered.. in the back of my mind.. abut 9/11. Only because the term: 9/11 is quite American, and quite marketable. Does that sound wierd? Beyond all the conspiracy scenarios (which very well may be true), there has been an nagging feeling of how well 9/11 was marketed and used for political gain. The significance of it.. we would not be saying it and using it so freely if it were not related to American culture and media, 9/11 is a brand name. Does that make sense? And.. other countries would NOT find the significance in it, because the date would be 11-9, they do it month first... I know that sounds trite, but it's something that has bugged me, the 9/11 brand is too easy to exploit.

I
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-14-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. "9-11 is a brand name"
911 - (emergency number) Unites America (airlines - United American)

If you had your choice of dates - and airlines - those are the exact choices you would make to make the most lasting impression on the country. Just another lucky trifecta for the War Chimp?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
34. Holy shit!! (Jaw hitting the table)
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I tried to talk about him over a month ago in LBN ElementaryPenguin
DoD Statement on Jack Shaw and the Iraq Telecommunications Contract
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=102&topic_id=743997

not many wanted to talk about Dov then
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
45. DREAM, it doesn't click until the pieces come together in order, piece by
piece,...that's why when we do research and post it, we are figuring it out as those reading us are,,,,and then we all get it.

We are all getting it, now.

I never would have believed it two months ago.

Now it's unavoidable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #36
111. Here's a photo of their Command Transmitter System (Remote)
Shit! It's right here! They can do this - and they did!

http://www.sysplan.com/Radar/CTS

:puke:
:argh:
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leesa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #19
74. Dov Zakheim was also in charge as comptroller of the DOD
when the trillion dollars went missing prior to 9-11. I guess it's expensive to pull off a 9-11 event! Gotta pay alot of people off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #74
89. LEESA - interesting. prolly to pay for the automation of the airplanes
plus a little profiteering.

I'd like to know what company he has gone to now cause he resigned this past March.

Back to the "Systems" company or ran out of the country?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #74
107. Wow! Did the 9-11 Whitewash Commission interview Zakheim?
He's not exactly been a household word up to this point, has he?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #107
133. Here's how that would go:
Q: Mr. Zakheim, some people on the Internet claim that you helped develop remote control plane technology that was used to crash the planes on September 11. What is your response?

A: Are you fucking nuts? Of course not.

Q: Thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #74
157. Analysis: Defense budget practices probed
Analysis: Defense budget practices probed
Thursday, 02-Oct-2003 10:00AM PDT Story from United Press International
Copyright 2003 by United Press International (via ClariNet)

MIAMI, Oct. 2 (UPI) --

Zakheim said, however, he was limited in his response because of the ongoing audit of the issue, which originally was sparked by a telephone call to the Pentagon's Defense Hotline.


"Our objective will be to review the allegations to the Defense Hotline concerning funds 'parked' at the U.S. Special Operations Command by the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)," said a letter from the inspector general's office to Gen. Charles Holland, who has since retired as Special Operations commander.

Among several documents The St. Petersburg Times obtained during its investigation was e-mail sent by Special Operations Command Comptroller Elaine Kingston to colleagues in February 2002.
She said an unidentified official in the Pentagon comptroller's office had asked her if the command could "park" $40 million of research-and-development money in its proposed budget for the 2003 fiscal year.


The programs where the money was placed included missile warning systems on aircraft, infrared equipment on helicopters and radar system. The amounts ranged from $2 million to $5 million.
Kingston said in the e-mail message she coached her colleagues on how to account for the money and avoid attracting congressional attention to it.

"We are doing a favor for the OSD (Office of the Secretary of Defense) which we hope will benefit the command if we should need additional (research and development funds)," the message said.
Young said at the hearing on President Bush's request for $87 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan Tuesday that he wants to know if it is a common practice.

Young is clearly not finished and called it "an obvious attempt to keep from Congress what was happening. I think that would make you suspicious. It makes me a little suspicious."

more
http://quickstart.clari.net/qs_se/webnews/wed/dp/Uus-defense-young-analysis.RUt1_DO2.html

Somebody watching him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElementaryPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #74
161. Dov Zakheim has just gone to Booz, Allen & Hamilton - big 9-11 connection
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 07:22 PM by ElementaryPenguin
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #161
193. PENGUIN-wish you'd print paras- WOOLSEY-profiteering - cheezus
Consultants Profit From Their Pentagon Ties

by Walter F. Roche, Jr., LA Times
August 18th, 2004


Los Angeles Times
August 15, 2004
Consultants Profit From Their Pentagon Ties
Ex- CIA couple reflect a pattern

by Walter F. Roche Jr.

WASHINGTON -- Suzanne H. Woolsey is a trustee of a little-known arms consulting group that had access to senior Pentagon leaders directing the Iraq war. In January, she joined the board of Fluor Corp.

Soon afterward, Fluor and a joint-venture partner won about $1.6 billion in reconstruction contracts in Iraq.
<>

Woolsey's husband, the former CIA director, R. James Woolsey, a leading advocate for the war, also serves as a government policy adviser. He, too, works for a company with war-related interests.
The Woolseys' overlapping affiliations are part of a pattern in Washington, in which individuals play key roles in organizations advising officials on major policy issues, while involving themselves with businesses in related fields.


Such activities generally are not covered by conflict-of-interest laws or ethics rules. But they underscore an insiders' network, in which contacts and relationships developed in government meld with individual financial interests.

Suzanne Woolsey, 62, is a former executive with the National Academies, the institution that advises the government on science, engineering, and medicine. She does not appear to have had a substantive background in military or national security affairs before she was named a trustee of the Institute for Defense Analyses, a nonprofit corporation paid by the government to do research for the Pentagon. She has been on the board since October 2000.

James Woolsey, 62, who headed the CIA from 1993 to 1995, is a member of the Defense Policy Board, an unpaid advisory panel serving Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and other senior Pentagon officials.

Woolsey is on CIA and Navy advisory boards; he was a founding member of the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, a private advocacy group that was set up in 2002 at the instigation of the White House to build public backing for the war.

He is also a vice president at Booz Allen Hamilton, a consulting company that cosponsored a conference in May 2003 on business opportunities in the reconstruction of Iraq. Woolsey was one of the keynote speakers.

Booz Allen is a subcontractor for a $75-million telecommunications project in Iraq. The company does extensive work for the Defense Department as well. Recently, the Navy awarded it $14 million in contracts. The former CIA director said in an interview that he had not been involved in Booz Allen's Iraq contracts.

Last month, Woolsey appeared at a Capitol Hill news conference to announce the creation of a group called the Committee of the Present Danger, which he said would attempt to focus public attention on the threat ''to the US and the civilized world from Islamic terrorism."

Others with overlapping interests include Richard N. Perle and Christopher A. Williams.

Perle, a national security specialist who served as an assistant defense secretary under President Reagan, was chairman of the Defense Advisory Board, but stepped down from the chairmanship and eventually the board itself after questions were raised about possible conflicts between his advisory role and his business interests.

Christopher A. Williams, also a Defense Policy Board member and a former ranking staff member in the Defense Department, has registered as a lobbyist for Boeing and other arms contractors. A former aide to Senator Trent Lott, Republican of Mississippi, Williams is a partner with Johnston & Associates, the lobbying enterprise that was founded by former Sen. J. Bennett Johnston, Democrat of Louisiana, and that is now headed by his son, Hunter Johnston.

**********************************************************

new name to me = Christopher Williams
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #193
194. So Dov Zakheim joins Woolsey at war consulting Booz Hamilton
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 08:32 PM by Pallas180
to obtain more Iraq war contracts (no bid) or wherever they're going
to go to war next.

Did you catch that Woolsey has a contract for a communications system
in Iraq?

he must be the third with Perle's Trireme Corporation

Perle
Woolsey
Kissinger
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
119. thetruthseeker.co.uk is a Nazi website and banned by DU rules
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 04:14 PM by geek tragedy
Don't know why people insist on linking to it. Especially when they know it's a Nazi website.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=120x21832
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #119
180. don't know why people insist on it being a nazi website. n/t
-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #180
192. Read these article titles. If you don't respond, I'll assume you agree
that it's a Nazi website.

Representative articles:

One Jew to Another. (First line: "I do think that no Jew will ever dare to tell you the truth.")

Auschwitz: From the Inside (also titled "Let's Stop With The Auschwitz Lies.")

New "Official" Changes in the Auschwitz Story (written by the David Irving's Insitute of Historical Review")

Simon Wiesenthal: Fraudulent "Nazi Hunter" (link takes you to page with header stating "Our Race is Our Nation.")

Hitler Didn't Want World War

"Elders of Zion" Shapes Our Culture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
191. Guess which neo-cons' prior job was with Remote Piloting Company ?
Under Sec Dov Zakheim former area of expertise (DARPA)


http://www.sysplan.com/SEWT

System Planning Corporation:

Signatures and Electronic Warfare Technology

The Signatures and EW Technology Group provides support to both government and industry in the development of more survivable military vehicles and associated enabling technologies. The Group's expertise spans the areas of surface ship and aircraft/missile survivability, electronic warfare (EW) systems, mission analysis and planning, signature management tactics, and advanced systems applications. The Group is organized around three "Centers of Excellence": the Center for Signature Technology (Mr. Larry Myers, Director), the Center for Tactical Air Warfare (Mr. Laddie Coburn, Director), and the Center for Advanced Systems Applications (Ms. Gail Heim, Director). Each Center's focus is summarized as follows.



Center for Tactical Air Warfare


This Center's staff are primarily resident in Lexington Park, MD, with a small field activity located at China Lake, CA. The focus of the Center's activities is to provide technical RDT&E, systems engineering, and program support to the NAVAIR/NAWCAD organizations located at NAS Patuxent River, Md and NAS China Lake, CA. The operationally experienced team of SPC engineers specializes in jet aircraft RDT&E, aircraft survivability, aircraft avionics, weapons systems integration, combat identification systems, and smart/precision-guided weapons. The Center has supported activities on AX, JAST, and JSF new concept aircraft as well as JSOW/JDAM, and JASSM new precision-strike weapons.


Center for Advanced Systems Applications


Engineers in this Center provide technical and program expertise in the areas of sensors, lasers, solid-state devices, electro-optical/infrared, microwave devices, communications systems, etc., as they are applied to both advanced development and prototype/fielded systems. This Center's customers include leading-edge technology organizations (such as the U.S. government's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and associated research laboratories and commercial contractors.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #16
44. Andrew Card is a marketing man - remember he said you dont market
a new product in August - ?

9 11

like 7 11

wonder if he was ever the adman for 7 11....

the most cold blooded vicious killers since Stalin and Bundy.

You have to wonder why one of the 3000 families or the cops or firemen haven't tried to tear them limb from limb.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
20. Someone posted the first interview on DU with Stanley Hilton before he
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 01:40 PM by KoKo01
was asked to not give anymore, and he sounded believable. But, this interview makes him sound a little breathless and wacked out...so I'm not sure about it.

Some questions: Why not just take down one tower instead of two, if they wanted to make a statement? Why go after the Pentagon and either the WH or Capitol (F93 which went down in PA). It seems a bit of overkill to fly four planes when bringing down one tower would have been enough.

Also, how did they get the hijackers to cooperate with them, if they knew they would die in the planes? I don't believe the remote control stuff, but that the hijackers had enough ability from training on simulators to fly the planes. I have a friend who is a commercial jet pilot and he says a "monkey could fly a jetliner because the automation is so good." Why would they need to bother with "remote signals" when anyone could fly the plane with very little training and some of them did have in flight training at Dekker's Flying School in Florida.

What if is was an "exercise" gone wrong, though. What if the hijackers were Cia Ops working with Cheney who were testing to see if a terrorist attack could work and the mission went badly when the Ops turned on them, and decided to go forward with carrying out real suicide missions. That would explain the huge cover up and stonewalling about this. Cheney/Rumsfeld's big dreams of thwarting terrorist attack and it turns out that they hired the wrong Operatives.

I really find it hard to believe that they needed that much destruction just to take over the country for their own PNAC/Facist purposes. :shrug: Hilton may be onto something, but I don't think it's quite what he says. As evil as the Bushista's are it would involve too many folks who couldn't go along with that much death and destruction who would have "pulled the plug."

It could have been massive (Mock Exercise for Possible Terrorist Attacks) plan that went wrong and they don't know how to dig themselves out of it maybe. But it doesn't let them off the hook if it was a CIA/OP plan because they would still be guilty of Crimes that are too huge to imagine. :shrug:

The other alternative is that their "drills" went wrong that morning because they were infiltrated by the real terrorists who knew all along that they were conducting these "mock attacks" and they managed to get the codes and the "pretend mock exercise" turned into the real thing. Look to Chalabi and PNAC for who brought the spies in to get the codes to pull a REAL hi-jack off on 9/11. :shrug:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BMJ Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Sure...
... Stage ONE plane hijacking as part of an agenda, and it's understandable. But stage FOUR plane hijackings... well, that's just CRAZY! :silly: :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eloriel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
33. Remember, KoKo
He was being interviewed on the radio. That doesn't always translate all that well to print.

Some questions: Why not just take down one tower instead of two, if they wanted to make a statement? Why go after the Pentagon and either the WH or Capitol (F93 which went down in PA). It seems a bit of overkill to fly four planes when bringing down one tower would have been enough.

Why not? Doesn't the whole thing prove how criminally, treasonously CRAZY and DEMENTED they are? How can you hold crazy and demented people to rational thought processes?

Also, how did they get the hijackers to cooperate with them, if they knew they would die in the planes?

They didn't. One of the hijackers made the announcement over the intercom during flight that there was a bomb on board, that they would be landing and asking for their demands, etc. They didn't know. They were collateral damange.

What if is was an "exercise" gone wrong, though.

Oh, please. Exercises with live commercial planes with live hijackers and live everyday passengers and stewardesses? That's not the way exercises are planned or conducted -- you don't make innocent civiliians part of your "exercise," not even crazy and demented people plan military exercises that way.

As evil as the Bushista's are it would involve too many folks who couldn't go along with that much death and destruction who would have "pulled the plug."

It actually doesn't. Not EVERYONE has to know all the details, and even those who do know the details only need to know a small part. Most of the military probably has no idea, other than that the "exercises" being carried out the same day was a terribly unfortunate coincidence.

Further, think of all the PNACers in the government, and supporting it in conservative think tank. We have an ARMY of demented fascists. There's apparently no dearth of people who would willingly participate in such a stunt.

Look, I've never quite made the emotional jump all the way from LIHOP to MIHOP, but intellectually I have. I understand if you can't. But I have to say it's disconcerting to see you try to make excuses for and defend them. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #33
37. I tend to think a lot of people DO know.
And are playing along. Including laypeople who I have seen reject the idea then come to accept it and feel it might be justified.

You look at the twisted way the Struass neo cons lie and twist reality ove the smallest things it is no surpirse to me that Babs Olsen and ilk would be willing to be part of such an undertaking because it was needed for the "greater good".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. The Stealth Bomber was kept a secret, hundreds AF knew and no one leaked
other Air Force , Army, the Manhattan project for instance...have been
kept secret..no one leaked and certainly thousands were involved.

But the people on the planes did not know, and certainly Barbara Olson
did not know....our society does not committ suicide for the good of
the neo-cons...

which gives credence to the automatic plane mechanism...once that takes over, no instruments in the plane will operate manually -

check out that Dov's company and all the operations it did...things we
wouldn't think were possible - science fiction stuff...the electro magnetic thing...

Sure. And do you think anyone would admit they were a part of it now?

Not the big boys, but some little guy who isn't a sociopath and who cannot live with it, will come forward. Sooner or later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
serryjw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:30 AM
Response to Reply #33
57. Isn't that what a coup d'etat. ... is?
Everyone has pieces of the puzzle and ONLY few have the whole puzzle. Everyone is guilty but then no one is guilty...Doesn't that remind you of the 9-11 commission? How can we have the worst disaster on our soil and NO ONE is help accountable?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #33
101. I'm certainly not making excuses for them or defending them. I am a
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 02:34 PM by KoKo01
LIHOP believer. My point was speculation asking questions about what "else" it could have been. I was using Hilton's comments as a basis of my questions.

I do think that whatever they knew was coming was bigger than they thought. I just don't believe they "wired the planes" to remotely control them, when it wasn't necessary.

Hey...I'm a DU "Tinfoiler" but I still always look for "rational reasons" I can deal with and perhaps there really aren't any, with this crowd, but I still think Hilton sounds a little off the deep end in this latest transcript. His first one over a year ago was much more believable. This sounds more like a rant. :shrug:

Will Pitt's article on Hilton from 2002 that's posted here with link to "TruthOut" shows a Hilton that's more reasoned. I guess one could speculate that his being threatened has made him more desperate, but if you mention 4 remote controlled planes it starts to sound a little OTT.

And, I have trouble with even the depraved Bushistas and PNAC'ers needing the "overkill" of taking out the White House or the Capitol and Pentagon all in one swoop. It was a highly organized plan and I just don't see Bush/Cheney being able to mastermind it given how they've f**ked up Iraq and Afghanistan. But, they did know something was up and that's why I believe in LIHOP...they just didn't know how big and they have covered their butts since because of their incompetence and because it suited their purposes.

On Edit: I also believe they were conducting "Norad Exercises" that day while the attack was going on, and the terrorists got the codes and managed to bypass them to orchestrate the attacks. Cheney got caught with his pants down and probably the Chimp wasn't even told what was going on because he's such a clueless idiot. It was PNAC and Cheney...I think Rummy was out of the loop on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
52. Why both? so there could be two separate insurance claims
and two separate bonanzas
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
122. first interview
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 01:21 AM
Response to Reply #20
200. Crimes that are too huge to imagine
yes, and that's why they have gotten away with it so far. americans don't WANT to believe this. cognitive dissance, something most avoid cause it doesn't feel good, and we're a feel good people! :grr:

*USH LIED and that's how he got away with it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
21. bookmarking for later, kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. I'm speechless.
If they have the documentation to prove
the accusations, then we are in deep shit.
The criminals will kill us all before they allow their
house of shit bricks fall in on them.
Oh man- it is SO time to leave this country.
I think the window is closing quickly.
BHN
:nuke: :scared: :scared: :scared: :scared: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeHereNow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
26. BOOKMARK THIS THREAD FOLKS!
Kickin'
BHN
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. Yes, by all means. Bookmark it. Kick. eom
1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Stanley Hilton is a 21st century Jim Garrison!
Just look at the similarities. Threats, intimidation, putting a spy on his research team, all to cover up treason. If this hits the mainstream, they'll make him look like a kook, just like they did to Garrison.

I saw on that site that Hilton is thinking of writing a New York Times op-ed piece. He better, and better do it soon, it may save his life the same way Garrison going public saved his life. The more attention this gets, the better. Especially if he has documented proof that they controlled this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
28. I keep shying away from "MIHOP"....
...but then I read something like this. Do you think the Murkan sheeple will ever wake up? I guess it depends on the mainstream media doing their jobs for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ocean girl Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
30. Thank you so much for posting this article.
I'm sending it to everyone I know who thinks I'm just a crazy conspiracy girl.

We've got to take this country back!

Peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
31. Kick it to the top!
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vadem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
32. This scared the sh*t out of me, even though I know it to be true...
in my heart, from everything I have read, researched and investigated. To see it in black and white before a court of law, meaning that someone else believes it to be true also, is pretty damn scary!!! What in the hell are we going to do? Go out and buy the 100 meg clips to fit into the assault weapons so as to be prepared for what is possibly eventually coming in the future?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:29 PM
Response to Reply #32
47. Vadem. Yes. Exactly. That's my thought. Anarchy. Martial Law, Civil War,
streets of Baghdad if they don't go quietly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
timefordrinking.com Donating Member (81 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. The big question is...
Will the mainstream press pick up on this? Let's hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #35
38. No question there at all.
NO NO NO and NO!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
milkyway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #35
39. You can't suggest that bush was AWOL in 1972 without being called traitor.
Any mainstream hint that the bush cabal did 9/11 would have to be accompanied by massive, irrefutable proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. they still haven't reported that 50% of NYers think it was LIHOP
so I kinda doubt they'll touch this

Interesting, though, 7 Billion dollar lawsuit against Bushco, representing 400 9/11 survivors, and this is the first I've heard of this guy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. Not without a lot of pressure. and someone whose known for guts
Edited on Wed Sep-15-04 10:33 PM by Pallas180
this would bring down not only the WH but most of the government I think , as it should.

Maybe a Sy Hersh.

Maybe someone in the part of the CIA who wants to get rid of him, would help or leak to a reporter they trust.

It won't happen without people like us pressuring and sending it out
to reporters and papers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 01:27 AM
Response to Reply #48
201. i've always felt
that cheney built that bunker in his neighborhood for a damn good reason!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nordic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. Will Pitt wrote about him two years ago for truthout.org
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usurper4 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
43. More evidence
Sept 2000: The Project for the New American Century submits a report to several defense contractors, most notably Halliburton and The Carlyle Group. In it, the group states that military spending will be curtailed without “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” Remember this.

2000–2001: The military conducts exercises simulating hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets causing mass casualties. One target is the WTC. Another is the Pentagon.

May 2001: “Though the Department of Defense had no capability in place to protect the Pentagon from an ersatz guided missile in the form of a hijacked 757 airliner, DoD medical personnel trained for exactly that scenario in May.”

July 2001: The G8 summit in Italy takes the unusual step of setting up surface-to-air missiles for security purposes. Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister explains that Italian intelligence had uncovered a plan to assassinate Bush during the event by crashing a hijacked commercial airliner into Air Force One or one of the buildings in use for the summit.

July 26, 2001: Attorney General Ashcroft stops flying commercial airlines due to a threat assessment.

Aug 2001: The World Trade Center begins a series of evacuation drills. According to Ben Fountain, who worked in the South Tower: “They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we’d been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual.”

Sept 3, 2001: “Author Salman Rushdie, the target of death threats from radical Muslims for years, is banned by US authorities from taking internal US flights. He says the FAA told his publisher the reason was because it had “intelligence of something about to happen.”

Sept 7, 2001: The State Department issues the following: “American citizens may be the target of a terrorist threat from extremist groups with links to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization.”

Sept 7, 2001: George W. Bush schedules an appearance at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida.

Sept 7, 2001: Florida Governor Jeb Bush calls up the Florida National Guard to aid law enforcement and emergency-management personnel in the event of “civil disturbance.” He also cites their need due to “the potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism….” (notice the timing of all the events on Sept 7…looks like somebody received confirmation of the attacks!)

Sept 10, 2001: “Newsweek has learned a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns."

Sept 10, 2001: “Eight hours prior to the attacks, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown receives a warning from “my security people at the airport” advising him to be cautious in traveling. He was scheduled to fly to New York the next morning.”

Sept 10, 2001: George W. Bush flies into Florida, stays the night at the Colony Beach and Tennis Resort on Longboat Key, Florida. Surface-to-air missiles have been placed on the roof of the resort.

Events on Sept 11, 2001 (all times Eastern Standard Time): Described as a bizarre coincidence, a US intelligence agency was all set for an exercise on Sept 11th at 9 AM in which an aircraft would crash into one of its buildings near Washington, DC.

8:46am: Flight 11 strikes the North Tower of the WTC

Between 8:46am and 8:55am: Bush watches, on television, the first plane hitting the North Tower. Bear in mind, there was NO footage of this crash until the next day, when a documentary film crew submitted their footage. Unless you consider the Israeli film crew found at 4:30pm…. Here are Bush’s own words: “I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower - the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it.” Could he have just misspoken? Here’s another interview a month later: “Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida ... and my Chief of Staff – well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane..." Many have chalked this up to Bush being not too bright...I disagree. Curious as to what footage he saw? Keep reading.

8:55am: Bush enters Booker Elementary School

9:03am: Flight 175 strikes the South Tower of the WTC

9:16am: Bush finally leaves the school

9:41am: Flight 77 strikes the Pentagon

9:43am: Bush boards Air Force One

10:06am: Flight 94 goes down in Pennsylvania

11:45am: Air Force One lands…in Shreveport, LA and leaves again at 1:30pm

2:50pm: Air Force One lands again…in Omaha, NE.

4:30pm : “Five Israelis are arrested for “puzzling behavior” related to the WTC attacks. They are arrested around 4:30 P.M. after having filmed the burning WTC from the roof of their company's building near Liberty State Park, then shouting in what was interpreted as cries of joy and mockery. They were spotted by a neighbor who called the police and the FBI. The police tracked them down in a van with the words “Urban Moving Systems” written on the side. One man was found with $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock, another had two passports on him, and a box cutter was found in the van. Investigators say that “There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted… It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” One of these Israelis later says, “Our purpose was to document the event.” The FBI later concludes at least two are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission. The FBI interrogates them for weeks. They are held on immigration violation charges and released 71 days later.”

4:33pm: Air Force One takes off for Washington, DC

6:54pm: Bush finally arrives at the White House. Before going to sleep, Bush writes in his diary, “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. ... We think it's Osama bin Laden.”

I don't need any more verification of it...he knew. He allowed it to happen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #43
49. Usurper - where did you get this info or did you write it
yourself?

if you found it someplace, do you have a link?

thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usurper4 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:25 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. Sources
This was actually from an email I started up to see if I can start getting it circulated, as I feel that the evidence makes a REALLY strong case for Bush having a hand in the attacks. Here's the email (feel free to copy it and send it around):

Let’s End The Sacrifices

“Who watches the Watchmen?”

Just as a preface: many people have told me that the President of the United States would never sacrifice American lives in order to further his cause/agenda. History has proven this wrong. Bikini Atoll, where the government sacrificed the lives of the natives in nuclear experiments. Tuskeegee, where the government allowed African-Americans to contract syphilis, then withheld the cure. Reagan and his election team bartering a deal with Iran to keep their hostages until after Reagan got elected in exchange for weapons and money. And, mirroring modern times, the invention of a conflict to begin the Spanish-American war. Don’t think it can’t happen…it has.

Also, this is not an indictment of the CIA, FBI, or any other government agency. This is Bush/Cheney/et al. We’ve already determined, with the 9/11 commission, that we should have known about the attacks. This document is proof that we did know, and that the uppermost levels of our government either allowed it to happen, or made it happen. You decide.

Also, I’ve tried everything in my power to ensure that none of the items cited are inaccurate. I have cited everything where necessary; anything that is not documented should be considered general knowledge and can most easily be verified through the 9/11 Commission Report. However, you will notice that some of the most damaging pieces of information come from the mouth of Bush himself.


Sept 2000: A consulting group, The Project for the New American Century, submits a report to several defense contractors, most notably Halliburton and The Carlyle Group. In it, the group states that military spending will be curtailed without “some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” <“Rebuilding America’s Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources[br />For a New Century”, The Project for the New American Century. September 2000] Remember this.

2000–2001: The military conducts exercises simulating hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets causing mass casualties. One target is the WTC. Another is the Pentagon. <9/11 Commission report>

May 2001: “Though the Department of Defense had no capability in place to protect the Pentagon from an ersatz guided missile in the form of a hijacked 757 airliner, DoD medical personnel trained for exactly that scenario in May.” The tri-Service DiLorenzo Health Care Clinic and the Air Force Flight Medicine Clinic train inside the Pentagon this month “to fine-tune their emergency preparedness.”

July 2001: The G8 summit in Italy takes the unusual step of setting up surface-to-air missiles for security purposes. Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister explains that Italian intelligence had uncovered a plan to assassinate Bush during the event by crashing a hijacked commercial airliner into Air Force One or one of the buildings in use for the summit. <9/11 Commission report>

July 26, 2001: Attorney General Ashcroft stops flying commercial airlines due to a threat assessment. In May 2002, Ashcroft walks out of his office rather than answer questions about it.

Aug 2001: The World Trade Center begins a series of evacuation drills. According to Ben Fountain, who worked in the South Tower: “They knew this building was a target. Over the past few weeks we’d been evacuated a number of times, which is unusual.” <9/11 Commission report>

Aug 11, 2001: “US Navy Lt. Delmart “Mike” Vreeland, jailed in Toronto on fraud charges and claiming to be an officer in US Naval Intelligence, writes a note which may have contained details of the pending 9/11 attacks, and seals it an envelope which he gives to Canadian authorities. He claims to have been a courier delivering a sealed pouch, which he opened when its recipient failed to show up. The document he claims to have read, written in Russian, not only describes the attack but has the added comment: “Let one happen, stop the rest”. This incident is fraught with controversy, as are the accounts of who Vreeland is and what he has done in the past.

Sept 3, 2001: “Author Salman Rushdie, the target of death threats from radical Muslims for years, is banned by US authorities from taking internal US flights. He says the FAA told his publisher the reason was because it had “intelligence of something about to happen.”

Sept 7, 2001: The State Department issues the following: “American citizens may be the target of a terrorist threat from extremist groups with links to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda organization.”

Sept 7, 2001: George W. Bush schedules an appearance at the Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Florida.

Sept 7, 2001: Florida Governor Jeb Bush calls up the Florida National Guard to aid law enforcement and emergency-management personnel in the event of “civil disturbance.” He also cites their need due to “the potential massive damage to life and property that may result from an act of terrorism….”
(notice the timing of all the events on Sept 7…looks like somebody received confirmation of the attacks!))

Sept 10, 2001: “Newsweek has learned a group of top Pentagon officials suddenly canceled travel plans for the next morning, apparently because of security concerns."

Sept 10, 2001: “Eight hours prior to the attacks, San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown receives a warning from “my security people at the airport” advising him to be cautious in traveling. He was scheduled to fly to New York the next morning.”

Sept 10, 2001: George W. Bush flies into Florida, stays the night at the Colony Beach and Tennis Resort on Longboat Key, Florida. Surface-to-air missiles have been placed on the roof of the resort.

Events on Sept 11, 2001 (all times Eastern Standard Time):
Described as a bizarre coincidence, a US intelligence agency was all set for an exercise on Sept 11th at 9 AM in which an aircraft would crash into one of its buildings near Washington, DC.

8:46am: Flight 11 strikes the North Tower of the WTC

Between 8:46am and 8:55am: Bush watches, on television, the first plane hitting the North Tower. Bear in mind, there was NO footage of this crash until the next day, when a documentary film crew submitted their footage. Unless you consider the Israeli film crew found at 4:30pm…. Here are Bush’s own words: “I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower - the TV was obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it." ” Could he have just misspoken? Here’s another interview a month later: “Well, I was sitting in a schoolhouse in Florida ... and my Chief of Staff – well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane..." Curious as to what footage he saw? Keep reading.

8:55am: Bush enters Booker Elementary School

9:03am: Flight 175 strikes the South Tower of the WTC

9:16am: Bush finally leaves the school

9:41am: Flight 77 strikes the Pentagon

9:43am: Bush boards Air Force One

10:06am: Flight 94 goes down in Pennsylvania

11:45am: Air Force One lands…in Shreveport, LA and leaves again at 1:30pm

2:50pm: Air Force One lands again…in Omaha, NE.

4:30pm : “Five Israelis are arrested for “puzzling behavior” related to the WTC attacks. They are arrested around 4:30 P.M. after having filmed the burning WTC from the roof of their company's building near Liberty State Park, then shouting in what was interpreted as cries of joy and mockery. They were spotted by a neighbor who called the police and the FBI. The police tracked them down in a van with the words “Urban Moving Systems” written on the side. One man was found with $4,700 in cash hidden in his sock, another had two passports on him, and a box cutter was found in the van. Investigators say that “There are maps of the city in the car with certain places highlighted… It looked like they're hooked in with this. It looked like they knew what was going to happen.” One of these Israelis later says, “Our purpose was to document the event.” The FBI later concludes at least two are Mossad agents and that all were on a Mossad surveillance mission. The FBI interrogates them for weeks. They are held on immigration violation charges and released 71 days later.”

4:33pm: Air Force One takes off for Washington, DC

6:54pm: Bush finally arrives at the White House. Before going to sleep, Bush writes in his diary, “The Pearl Harbor of the 21st century took place today. ... We think it's Osama bin Laden.”

So you ask, “Why?” Why would Bush/Cheney allow this to happen? One reason: money. Some have said it’s to gain a leg up for reelection, but that argument doesn’t hold water; in the 20th century, war never assisted a president in staying in office. Franklin Roosevelt did manage to get reelected, but it was by the smallest margin of his career. So, we’re left with money. How much, you say? Estimates put Bush’s take (and Bush Sr.’s take) at several million dollars due to their ties to the Carlyle Group. Cheney, already receiving a huge annual payout of retirement benefits from Halliburton, also owns huge amounts of stock in the company.

So both stood to benefit significantly from 9/11 for simply…doing…nothing…when…attacked.

Except, of course, for hiding and watching one’s own back.

The current administration has sacrificed nearly 3000 lives on 9/11, and over 1000 in Iraq and Afghanistan. Isn’t it time we end the sacrifices?

Send this to everybody you know. Let’s find a way to end the sacrifice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #60
61. Well, your timeline is damn good. It fits right here. Thanks
maybe we can send it onto Stanley Hilton.

Have you tried?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usurper4 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #61
63. Not yet
Haven't tried yet...if you have an email for him, feel free to forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #63
115. Stanley's website
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 03:54 PM by slaveplanet
http://www.deprogram.info/page2.html

on edit-
whoops- sorry this is abel aches website...but it is the one Mr. hilton give reference to in the interview....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #60
110. Hey usurper4, this Sept. 10 story should go on your timeline.
Thanks to RebelYell:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x17417

Our theory on what was going on at the Colony Beach and Tennis Resort that night? Cheney was trying to move up one notch on the Executive Branch ladder.

I'm trying to make that sound less inflammatory than it actually is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usurper4 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:38 PM
Response to Reply #110
170. Saw it but didn't much like it
Reason being, I can't really vouch much for the authenticity of the Longboard Examiner (sorry, it just doesn't sound like a bastion of credible reporting). Also, for this little timeline, I only allowed for documents that I've actually seen, and I've only seen reports of these articles, not that actual copies.

Thank you, though!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #43
120. There is no evidence here.
But the paranoid are ready to follow this guy over the cliff.

Alex Jones is nuts too.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
usurper4 Donating Member (63 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:42 PM
Response to Reply #120
172. Are you talking about my timeline?
Yes, admittedly, it's all circumstantial...but I've seen people convicted on a lot less.

It would be interesting at least to have somebody ask Bush at either a press conference or a debate, "Why did you and your brother make such odd arrangements on 9/7, that would all seem to be designed to defend yourself from an airborne attack? Were you afraid of the Canadian Air Force launching from their carriers in the Gulf of Mexico?" I would looooove to see Bush try to answer that one.

I would also like Bush to be called to task for saying that he saw footage of the first crash before the second plane struck. Wouldn't it be great for somebody to ask him what footage he was watching?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
50. thanks for posting this. kick!
don't really know what to say, it is hard for me to imagine a future where the president of the united states is incriminated as a participant of 9/11. If this is true, people will not be able to accept it. it will be crazy times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NecessaryOnslaught Donating Member (691 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-15-04 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. Phony radar blips
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nolabels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #51
185. After all if your some paranoid that has a bunch of other paranoids around
Working with you it really is not that hard to imagine taking things like this off the shelf.

(from his link above)
Targets

Drone Formation Control System and Software Development

The Drone Formation Control System provides control systems for tracking and controlling ground and aerial targets used for weapons testing. The DFCS, a fully automated multiple tracking and control system, consists of an IBM 4381 computer subsystem, multiple ground interrogator stations, display and target control consoles, and target transponders.

Tracking and control are accomplished using distance-measuring techniques with a single 915 MHz time-shared RF data link, a transponder in each target, and a combination of interrogator systems. The DFCS can automatically and simultaneously control a single target or several aerial targets in single or multiple formations on individual preprogrammed flight paths. The system can automatically take off and land full-scale aerial targets and is also capable of tracking and controlling several ground targets. The system's software consists of a combination of approximately 500,000 lines of FORTRAN and Assembler code.

Using a set of RISC 6000/58H workstations, DFCS has been upgraded to increase its capabilities to control up to 12 aerial or 48 ground targets. An Ethernet network and a fiber-optics network has been installed, integrated, and configured to augment system capability.
(snip)
http://wstc.wsmr.army.mil/technology/range_instrument/targets/drone_form.html

From and earlier thread


Devils Advocate NZ (1000+ posts) Mon Aug-18-03 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #12

14. Consider this:
Edited on Mon Aug-18-03 11:18 AM by Devils Advocate NZ


The only reason there are pilots in modern airliners is to make passengers feel safer. The modern FMCS' are more than capable of taking off, flying to a distant location and landing the aircraft. Hell, they could even taxi in to the correct gate!

Consider the Global Hawk (I know, I know, but just read on a moment) pilotless reconnaisance drone. It is capable of taking off, flying half way round the world to a specific location and landing there with aboslutely no human intervention. In fact a year or so ago one flew from the US to Australia unaided. The Global Hawk is smaller than a 757 or 767 and it can do it, so why not an airliner? There is more than enough computing power in the 757/767 FMCS to do it.

In fact such pilotless airliners have been talked about for years, and the result has always been that passengers are not yet comfortable with the idea of letting a computer fly the plane unaided.

But here is the real kicker: they already do! It's just that there are also pilots who "monitor" the computer during flight. If you are in an airliner, it is more likely than not that the FMCS is actually flying the plane. In fact airliners are far safer because of it. Computers don't get distracted or tired, they don't turn up drunk, and they don't get suicidal because of personal problems.

Imagine if those 757/767's on Sept 11 were computer piloted and had NO cockpit. Exactly what could hijackers have done to take over the aircraft and crash it into buildings? Nothing. Sure they could have killed the passengers, and maybe they could have bombed it to fall over a city, but they couldn't have taken it over and flown it into a target, unless of course they managed to hack the data links. But they wouldn't have had to get on the aircraft to do that.

And yet the pilot that wrote to BartCop claims that to suggest an airliner could be remotely piloted shows that the claimant knows nothing about commercial airliners! It seems that this pilot may be just a little out of date - like 10 years out of date.

on edit: By the way, have you ever wonder why, out of all the different aircraft that could have been hijacked, the four hijacked aircraft were either 757's or 767's? Could it be because both of those types of aircraft have the FANS FMCS, while few others do? The 777 has it as standard, but the 747 has to be retrofitted with it, and most haven't, likewise the many other variants of commercial airliner... Still I'm not saying this means anything, its just... interesting...
(snip)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=193546
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:06 AM
Response to Original message
53. But But But
I thought Osama bin Forgotten did it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #53
54. Nope. Partners in the deal for the Caspian Oil. Why do you think
no one can find OBL - why the WH puts obstacles in the way of anyone
in FBI investigating OBL connections...why Agent O'Neill quit and said the WH was putting obstacles in the way of his investigation.

And here's the reason why America was attacked. To make us agree to go to war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Notice that the two countries are on either side of Iran. And we have
Bahrain. And now we , or rather our army, our kids, have made it safe
for Unocal, Chevron, BP and several others to complete the pipelines for oil and gas across the Stans, Afghanistan , Turkmenistan, across
to Azberjan and the Caspian Sea with the largest untapped oil pool in
the world.

That's what 1000 kids have died for.and 3000 office workers died for. The private business of American and British Oil Companies:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:23 AM
Response to Reply #54
56. Ohhhhhhh
So when we were told not long ago that, "Osama bin Laden did 9/11. Believe it.", he was on the kool-aid. Now I get it. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:15 AM
Response to Original message
55. calling dan rather, calling dan rather- here's your next story nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #55
59. I dont think even DAn RAther could touch this one -Have to go Brit papers
more likely - and then it would come to America.....

We';ll have to bombard the brits with e mails....

unless we can get hold of some brits online to help us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:41 AM
Response to Reply #59
62. I luv BE HERE's posts: (from another thread)
BeHereNow (1000+ posts) Thu Sep-16-04 02:19 AM
Response to Original message

5. Hang on to your arses-


It's going to go downhill from here.
The train from hell has reached the edge of the cliff.
They're alluding to military action in Iran.
They're hurling insults at China And Russia
who are not going to stand idly by and
watch the neocons make a grab for what's
left of the world's oil.
We be fucked so bad, cause these crazy
mother fuckers are actually going to try it,
and WE are gonna pay for their outrageous actions.
God help us all.
BHN


* * * * * * *
From Pallas now:

China and the Sauds are in on the deal in the Caspians. The pipeline will go east and west, so the Chinese who have signed a contract with
the Azberjans got their piece. But you'r right about Iran. Look at
Iran's position on the Caspian. Now you know why they want to attack
Iran. I suppose they want to attack Syrria to bring their pipeline across, but I'm not sure of that yet....

We'll get rid of them. I dont think the military, CIA, FBI will let this continue... we have to get Hilton's lawsuit out to the public, and the news that 9 11 was an inside job.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:19 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. Oh, God.
And I'm not even sure there IS one.

This explains why people were told to go back upstairs in the towers. Why not two towers? The more deaths the better.

And now they are out there blowing up babies for oil in the cloak of Christianity, with the elect so damned decieved they want to elect him for four more years of war and death and terror.

God help us. And can't a bunch of guys and gals volunteer to protect this guy?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:36 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. Ghost - I dont think people were told to go back on purpose -
those buildings were built to last 500 years - no one ever thought they could go down like that - although whoever did tell them to go back was a damned idiot. probably a dead damned idiot now.

You need to start telling people about this map and the Caspian oil as the real reason for the war. The point of the war is Afghan is on one side of Iran and Iraq is on the other side...so they're probably pretty serious about attacking Iran which has much more frontage on the Caspian, as well as getting Iran's oil.

People, even repugnants stop and listen after awhile then...and we dont have much time.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #66
73. You guys are really scaring me.
I still don't want to believe that "our" government is cabable of something this evil. But you can hide your eyes & put your fingers in your ears for only so long...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #66
76. People were told to go back in the towers because of burning debris
Flaming hunks of building and airplane were raining on the plaza. Also, people were jumping onto the plaza. So it was thought to be safer to keep the people in Tower Two inside until the situation was under control.

Had NYPD/NYFD had ANY IDEA of a terrorist threat it's likely they would have made a different decision regarding evacuation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #76
85. Stef, it wasn't the FDNY or PDNY who told them to stay, it was
a building manager type who had access to the internal intercom to the
whole building.

the whole realization, even the next day of all we have posted above and read...is horrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #85
88. Regardless, it was thought to be safest to keep them inside
Had emergency services been on alert, I have no doubt Tower Two would have been evacuated.

Where are these docs Hilton is discussing? Has he released anything? Does anyone have the AP story he mentions about the multiple drills that morning? Is Hilton reliable? He seems to have great credentials.

I am already sure of LIHOP - I would like to see more of what Hilton has.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #85
109. There is a video of a security guard or police officer telling people...
...to go back in the buildings. He was standing in one of the streets below the WTC main towers. I saw this piece of film on a recent 911 aniversary special.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #109
112. unbelievable. but that's exactly it -no one could believe it could happen
just as this Stanley Hilton thing has been difficult to digest...but
it sinks in....

It has taken us three years.

I guess waiting for the 9 11 commission and then realizing something was wrong with all they left out.

Well, all comes in its own time.

And it seems to be timed well now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
84. I sent it to the Guardian n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #84
86. That's my bud, REB - hope you also sent
my post 19 about Dov Zakheim with his experience with automatic pilot
and writing Pearl Harbor paper.

That's a punctuation mark to belief - an exclamation mark !

Thanks REB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #86
98. I sent most of the thread, yes n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beam Me Up Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:15 AM
Response to Original message
64. I've been MIHOP from day-1:
There is no way in hell that our National Air Defense failed on 9/11. The story that has been promulgated through government and media is simply NOT CREDIBLE. Never has been, never will be. Elements within the United States Government are GUILTY OF MASS MURDER AND TREASON.

We as a nation and we as humanity CAN NOT GO FORWARD under the leadership of lying criminals, murderers and sociopaths. We MUST BRING THIS NIGHTMARE TO AN END and we must to so with the utmost care, and yet the utmost urgency and decisiveness.

CRITICAL MASS: We need a CRITICAL MASS of people who UNDERSTAND precisely what happened on 9/11 and what is going on now. It need not be a "majority," but it needs to be a solid minority who are articulate, clear headed and focused and not easily deceived by the slight of hand tricks of the "intelligence" trade.

The future is in our hands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:40 AM
Response to Reply #64
67. Hey Beam, did you read
my post # 19 ?

The pieces fall into place as well as what Sibel talked about, where arms, smuggling, dope, and oil meet. Azberjan. The Caspian Oil.

You're right. But we need to get this into the media and I think through the Brits. Concerted effort. What do you think?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 01:45 AM
Response to Reply #64
202. that was my first thought upon viewing the towers
our military would NEVER let this happen....but they did. i've never waivered from that belief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:56 AM
Response to Original message
68. funny
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 03:03 AM by slaveplanet
you 'd think all the Jones detractors would be coming out the woodwork with the usual crys of chupacabra, black helicopters, ufo's , mothmen and tinfoil.

but when he interviews a guy who actually went to school with these madmen the silence gets deafening in here....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:03 AM
Response to Reply #68
69. I have no idea what you're talking about. There's nothing
funny about a lawyer putting his career on the line to put these charges in writing in pleadings in a lawsuit representing 400 widows and widowers whose spouses or children died in the WTC

It has nothing to do with the fact that he attended the same law school or university.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:11 AM
Response to Reply #69
70. agreed ,neither do I
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 03:14 AM by slaveplanet
find it funny that he'd put himself out like that...that's the whole point....

I just find it funny that people give more credence to guys like Ruppert , when Jones has been on this from the get go..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:14 AM
Response to Reply #70
71. there's no room for ego here- this is
a matter of living in freedom or slavery ----and coming up soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #69
79. Hilton went to school with the neocons
Hilton's thesis was "The New Pearl Harbor". He says 9/11 was in the planning stages for 35 years. That's why he took the case. He knew what 9/11 was the minute it happened.

I strongly suggest listening to the interview after you read the transcript. Much more compelling.

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #79
80. REB- durn- something wrong with speakers connection- can never
hear nothin over computer...durn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #80
83. If you tell me what OS you're using, I can get your sound working n/t
Or do you have headphones? I can help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #68
146. slaveplanet, you spoke too soon.
There's a geek trolling around this thread, and he's a real tragedy.
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #146
147. Have you seen this lawyer's "evidence?"
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 05:16 PM by geek tragedy
To believe some guy without seeing any of his evidence, now that would be truly tragic. . .

Why is it that 9/11 skeptics are so intolerant of tough questions about their own account?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #146
148. yup
I noticed ...his normal meme has lost it's punch ...so now he revert's to the neo nazi angle...such a puppet
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #148
150. It's lost its punch
because the CT crowd don't have the capacity for rational, logical thought. Logical requirements such as evidence, proof, and reasoning have no effect on such people.

But then, the hardcore CT'ers aren't really Democrats anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #150
158. Hmm- your definition
Is both enlightening and confusing in the same swipe...while agree that the most hardcore CTers are certainly not Democrats (because they are currently squatting in the white house), am I then to believe Hillary is not a Democrat
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:29 PM
Response to Reply #148
151. But no refutations are necessary!
I mean, these crazy conspiracy kooks saying the government was involved in 9/11, next thing you know they'll be saying they had a hand in assassinating JFK!

Just click your ruby slippers together three times and say, "There are no conspiracies! There are no conspiracies! There are no conspiracies!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corker Donating Member (175 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 07:11 AM
Response to Original message
72. Damn the media!!
Few people will ever hear of this.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:16 AM
Response to Reply #72
77. Oh c'mon. Katie Couric is the bee's knees.
Our media are wonderful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #72
81. CORKER - not if we start bombarding them with printed copies of it, &
demanding to know why they aren't doing stories, hypothesis on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #81
91. Great idea!
Go for it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
78. Proof of MIHOP
I would like to say that I am shocked, but I can't since I pretty much have believed in MIHOP from the start. Hey lurking FReepers, IS THIS OKAY WITH YOU ALL? Have anything to say about your fearless leader now? How do you bushbots square this against your belief that bush* is a man of honor and integrity? And this isn't Clinton's fault afterall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #78
82. TEX - use your anger to call media, print out & fax copy and
ask why they aren't doing any stories on it????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
87. kicking to the top for others
this is incredibly put together - I hope it starts getting more publicity

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
90. Greg Palast.
Has he been sent a copy? He's connected to the British Press.

I didn't sleep well last night after reading this. :( It's all so surreal. :scared:

I'll send Palast a copy. I'm sure he has one, but one more won't hurt. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #90
92. Good INCOGNITO - dont forget to add post 19 bout Dov Zakheim's abilities
which make it even more believable.

worked with DARPA, Poindexter too...

In charge of Comptroller, audits....a trillion dollars missing

cheezus...what do the Oversite committees do?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
93. OK, a STUPID question.
Do you think our Senators like Durbin and Kennedy know about this? and would it help if we sent them copies of the interview? Since it's the U.S. government being sued, they must have the facts of the lawsuit???? Should we let them know WE know about it? Would that put a fire under their asses to DO something?

I TOLD you it was a stupid question! You were warned. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #93
94. I think it's a GOOD question.
I just don't know the answer. This is seemingly one of those "won't touch it with a ten foot pole" issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #94
95. I sent them both a copy of the interview.
They need to know there are people out here who DO know what's really going on. We'll see what happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #95
96. If you see...
...an unmarked black sedan pull up to the curb and some men get out, walk up to your door and knock...don't open it, OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #96
97. K.
I won't. :scared:

Last night, after reading this on the thread Pallas started, I was home alone and was actually feeling PARANOID about CIA people coming after me. I felt so STUPID! This shit truly is scary! :scared: I often wonder if my phone has been tapped. Have they bugged my house? Have they dug threw my hard drive? :scared: Damn! I HATE this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #97
99. I use to worry too - no more
there's too damn many of us for one thing, way too many people have been made aware and for the other - our lives aren't going to be worth living if things don't change - and change soon. So I figure whatever...... no fear.

I hope you'll check out this thread please. Thanks.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x2360237
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #99
106. TNOE - YES!!!! HOW SMART - Battle him in the same places he goes
WOW. You go for it! Definitely. Contact HQ of Baptists in DC


There's also a very large one in Philadelphia, Pa.

Yes. What a great idea.

Battle dumbya in his own place.

He actually had the effrontery to ask the Pope to tell the
Bishops to tell their parishioners to vote for him.

The pope released a message that he thought Bush was the
anti-christ.

I kid you not. Did you hear of that?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #106
113. here's the truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #106
116. Of course Chimpy is an Anti-Christ...
Few people on this planet act LESS like Jesus than Chimpy (or Cheney, or Asscrack, or Rove, or...anyone else in that evil thuggish administration).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 02:02 AM
Response to Reply #106
203. whaaaat?
do you have a link to the poop's statement? i hadn't heard that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #97
100. You 'n' me both.
We've been getting some of those creepy "dead phone" calls recently--you know, the phone will ring and when you pick it up, all you get is dead air. No talking, no humming, just dead phone.

But I'm not going to be intimidated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #100
108. Just say into the phone, you better have a good reason for doing this
cause I'm going to the cops who are going to trace you. You can explain it to my locals.

don't worry about it though..

Just make sure you have a firewall on your computer

Try Sygate.com, they have a great freebie

there's a test to run at grc.com , then install Sygate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #97
103. Okay, to feel better, send
but dont use your real name.

Send to Durbin, he's hot.

And I hear Feingold is also a guy going places

Levin, Warner, Waxman, Conyers, Harry Reid, Hillary, Rockefeller= let's shock the hell out of him, he may be part of it , but the Senate Intel committee knows, they should know we know...Grassley, Pat Roberts, Leahy, DEAN,Rangel,Schumer, Lautenberg.....how about Rev AL , he 's got a big mouth... just off the top of my head those are some...there's more. but that's a start

HEY John Dean who writes on Findlaw.com

That woman from Maine.

Who has the Jersey Wives website or address?

I'm thinking a group of us should do what the Jersey wives did.
Go to Wash DC as a group...corner the good Senators, present them with this info and talk to them about impeachment, sedition, jailing
the cabal....but very seriously... no histeria...good behavior..
What Do You Think About That ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #97
105. LOL, dont worry INCOGNITO, if they take us we'll all be in the
same camp <grinning>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #95
104. You're a firecracker INCOGNITO -- read my next posts and
DU e mail me with info and what you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #93
102. Answer:SEND, I think Kennedy knows & why he's so angry-really attacking
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 02:32 PM by Pallas180
dumbya...have you seen any of his speeches on C Span. Frankly saying
assache is destroying the Const...

Yes, send it and let them know we know....but add this:

more proof:


Raytheon's automatic pilot from Der Spiegel Newspaper


The times for an airplane kidnapper are becoming harder: in America engineers are working to land kidnapped machines in the future by an improved autopilot without assistance of the cockpit on the nearest airport - an emergency switch, that a ground control operates crew; the levers in the airplane are then blocked and the kidnappers can no longer control the plane from the hand controls.

According to a recent news release, technicians of US aviation and arms company Raytheon already in August landed a passenger aircraft six times successfully on the military airport at Holloman, New Mexico. The plane was equipped with a special forced landing system without any pilots.

The Boeing 727 oriented itself not, as usual, with the radar signals at the end of the runway, but by a combination of GPS satellite and ground signals, which help, to exactly compute the alititude ­ and thus the necessary angle of approach ­ with deviation no greater than one meter.



US-Sicherheitssystem: Entführte Maschinen Landen Selbständig

Der Spiegel
October 28, 2001

********************

And this:



Under Sec Dov Zakheim former area of expertise (DARPA)


http://www.sysplan.com/SEWT

System Planning Corporation:

Signatures and Electronic Warfare Technology

The Signatures and EW Technology Group provides support to both government and industry in the development of more survivable military vehicles and associated enabling technologies. The Group's expertise spans the areas of surface ship and aircraft/missile survivability, electronic warfare (EW) systems, mission analysis and planning, signature management tactics, and advanced systems applications. The Group is organized around three "Centers of Excellence": the Center for Signature Technology (Mr. Larry Myers, Director), the Center for Tactical Air Warfare (Mr. Laddie Coburn, Director), and the Center for Advanced Systems Applications (Ms. Gail Heim, Director). Each Center's focus is summarized as follows.



Center for Tactical Air Warfare


This Center's staff are primarily resident in Lexington Park, MD, with a small field activity located at China Lake, CA. The focus of the Center's activities is to provide technical RDT&E, systems engineering, and program support to the NAVAIR/NAWCAD organizations located at NAS Patuxent River, Md and NAS China Lake, CA. The operationally experienced team of SPC engineers specializes in jet aircraft RDT&E, aircraft survivability, aircraft avionics, weapons systems integration, combat identification systems, and smart/precision-guided weapons. The Center has supported activities on AX, JAST, and JSF new concept aircraft as well as JSOW/JDAM, and JASSM new precision-strike weapons.


Center for Advanced Systems Applications


Engineers in this Center provide technical and program expertise in the areas of sensors, lasers, solid-state devices, electro-optical/infrared, microwave devices, communications systems, etc., as they are applied to both advanced development and prototype/fielded systems. This Center's customers include leading-edge technology organizations (such as the U.S. government's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) and associated research laboratories and commercial contractors.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
114. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #114
117. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #117
123. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
NeonLX Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #114
118. Great refutation there, Woodrowfan!
Way to wow 'em with all that information you provided in your rebuttal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #118
121. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #121
124. But we should believe everything that lawyer claims.
Who cares if he hasn't produced any evidence? Evidence isn't important for a good Conspiracy Theory.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #124
126. Ok
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 04:10 PM by slaveplanet
let see your evidence that he has no evidence....or are you sitting on that evidence until his trial?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #126
128. I said he has PRODUCED no evidence.
Do I really need to prove that to you?

Okay I will.

Read the post. There's no evidence there--just unsupported claims and conclusions.

This is MEANINGLESS without documentation and actual witnesses. Otherwise it's just some guy saying stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #128
136. so you think
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 04:54 PM by slaveplanet
he should show the other players all his cards before the game really starts...That wouldn't be to smart now , but it sure would put the kabosh on those pesky office burglaries....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #136
137. I'm saying that people should use their brains when reading this.
People who believe this stuff without being shown any actual proof or evidence are not thinking. It's like the people who think Saddam was involved with AQ because Bush tells them so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #124
127. evidence??
evidence is to a CTer what a garlic-holy water cocktail is to a vampire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #127
129. Wrong!
A garlic-holy water cocktail can't be explained away by alleging a vast conspiracy to hide the truth.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #129
131. BOL! (NT)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #131
134. Oh and you are on a DEMOCRATIC Board
you might want to take off the "unfit for Command" thingy which goes directly the the White House site that supports the theif in chief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #134
144. He's saying that Bush is Unfit For Command. Sheesh. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #144
153. I seriously doubt that is what he is saying
otherwise it would go directly to a site that says WHY Bush is unfit for command, not Bush's own personal website. I have never been fooled by Woodrow. Like I said, I have known him to ONLY come out on the 9/11 threads. Otherwise, he is quiet as a mouse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #153
154. It's a joke. People see the "Unfit for Command" wonder "what the hell"
and then click on the link to see W's ugly mug.

I was expecting to see the Swifties.

I get accused of being a Neocon and a Freeper too, because I hold the 9/11 CT stuff in very low regard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:30 PM
Response to Reply #154
155. it's Google-bombing
It's an attempt to influence Google so that if someone searches for "Unfit for Command" they will get a GW Bush page. It was suggested by another DUer and a lot of DU posters have it. There is a similar google-bomb at the bottom of every DU page for "miserable failure."

Besides, anybody who thinks I'm a freeper because of my "unfit" link (or any other reason) only proves they jump to unwarrented conclusions and that they can't weigh evidence for s**t. Gee, sounds like a CTer to me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #155
163. Can we stop the bickering please? It ruins a thread & distracts from the s
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 09:55 PM by Pallas180
subject.

although I couldn't figure it out for a long time, DU does have
"miserable failure" at the bottom of their front page which leads
to a picture or site of the resident.

I myself don't think it's too swift (pun) but I dont run the site. :)
and it's a good thing too, cause a lot of people would be missing from
the site if I did :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #127
130. the question is
where is Gov's evidence to support their CT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #130
135. You could start with the 9/11 Report.
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 04:20 PM by geek tragedy
Which actually relies on things like documents and witnesses.

Not as entertaining as wild speculation like this, but much more reliable.

If this guy has presented absolutely no evidence, why are people so convinced?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WoodrowFan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #135
138. for the same reason people see the virgin mary in a water stain
it's an article of faith so they see something that's not there, it's religion, not reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. It's funny how they disbelieve the 9/11 Report but link to Neo-Nazi
websites.
Baaah baaah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #135
139. Baaahhhhaa Baaahhaaaa ahhha
You are a Hoot GreekTragedy!!!! Thanks for the great belly laugh!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #139
142. No problem.
Enjoy life on the discredited fringe of political discourse!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #135
143. does it now
The 9/11 Commission's report of Mohamed Atta's final days does not match what’s already on the record.

http://www.madcowprod.com/mc6112004.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #135
149. Please point me to the testimony of
Sibel Edmonds.

Of Randy Glass.

Of Michael Springman.

Of Lt Gen. Mahmood Ahmed.

Of a hundred more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #149
152. Which one of them claims that the WH ordered 9/11? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #152
159. I think they all provide their own part of the story.
There are many whistle blowers out there telling the part they know. Are any of them making any attempts at explaining the larger context of what the information they provided means?

Some have offered limited speculation but I don't look to these people to explain the meaning of life to me or give me the whole truth about 9-11 for that matter.

It is not that complicated of a thought process to examine different pieces of information and conclude that they are related and might in fact be bits of a larger story. It's pretty much the same way law enforcement investigates unsolved crimes. Why is it that it's unreasonable to apply the same techniques to this issue?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #159
162. Bravo, Sterling. Glad to see understanding of what we have been
doing for the last three months...garnering pieces from all over the internet from reputable sources...and putting it together.

Sibel Edmonds Speaks Farsi thread opened it all up for the researchers
here. Her clues were shouting out the truth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sterling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #152
160. dupe
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 06:53 PM by Sterling
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TNOE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #114
132. Oh THERE you are Woodrow
You always ONLY come out of the woodwork when someone questions the administration's 9/11 conspiracy theory (with ZERO Proof) and dismiss legitimate solid evidence as hooey. You better hold on to that bridge, you're going to need it soon enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #132
141. THE IGNORE BUTTON IS INSTALLED FOR INFESTATIONS OF TROLLS
so we've had a lovely polite civil thread here.

I have two people on ignore...therefore I only know that they are
irritating the rest of you, by your answers to them

Please put them on ignore, or alert the MOD, so that we dont have
to deal with CARP.

Thanks guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #141
145. He's right.
I personally have no desire to engage in discourse with people who find Nazi/Holocaust denial websites to be believable, credible sources of information.

If you think Holocaust denial is no big thing, please put me on Ignore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RebelYell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #145
164. Pfffft


We aren't jew bashing. Comprende?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #164
176. REB - if that assache is back again, please hit the alert button and dont
answer anymore jerkoff stuff.

Thanks.

Temper, temper.....breathe deeply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #141
187. visualize this


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AmerDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
125. interesting
That is all I will say about it. I hope he gets some of the proof out there he speaks of, I would be much more on board with this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #125
175. Amer Dem - you dont have to be on board...and if you were in
the courtroom if and when the case comes up, you would probably find out everything he knows.

Apparently "burglars" (does that sound familiar) want to know what he knows also before it comes to court.

That's not the way the Justice game is supposed to be played.

He doesn't need to get proof out anywhere before he goes to court.

I'll say it again.

He doesn't need to get proof out anywhere before he goes to court.

At a certain point in the process, he has to present the Court with a
list of his witnesses. That would be a key to what he is going to prove.

And he won't totally know what he's going to prove, until he gets
depositions of the defendants.

That's the way it works.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shanti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #175
204. isn't it called
credible evidence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
156. Can someone call into Air America and see if they've heard about this?
I was about to write it off as wierd conspiracy theory possibly started by someone in the Administration to make us look kooky, but then, if you read the article, this guy represents 100s of families of 911 victims, he may have documented evidence, and the thing that should be getting talked about on the media: he's getting harrassed by the FBI and judges!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:06 PM
Response to Reply #156
165. A Judge has to rule on whether he is allowed to bring a class action suit,
if that has been done already, the Judge does not have the right to
be harrassing him.

Although Judges dont like class action suits, of course it's one of the major things that doll, John Edwards , made his name on.

If I knew the name of the case and the venue, I would look up its status
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slaveplanet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #165
166. here it is
all laid out....case # , everything

http://deprogram.info/page2.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #166
167. Thanks S. Planet - extensive site - Japanese TV Show Here:



© valis productions
« austin, texas
° contact
♠ What's New?

T Y W

News 5 3 49

Comments 4 2 20

Links 1 2 8

Members 3 4 16

Forums posts 15 21 43


Today · Yesterday · Week

Main Menu


· Home
· Log-In/Sign Up

· Sub-FORUM
· Submit News
· Text Only
· Topics Index
· Members List
· Recommend Us
· Reviews
· Search
· Downloads
· Web Links
· Add Links
· Contact
· Top 50



♠ Search Awoken






♠ Categories


· 9-11
· 9-11 'Drills'
· Al-Qaeda
· Anthrax Attacks
· Chechnya
· Fake Terror
· Pakistani ISI
· PNAC
· Royal Terror
· SE Asian Terror
· Venice, FL
· Website News


Last 5 Comments

Last Comment by:
Zandi


Damn. Somebody ...
Isn't the gover...
CIA Queda
What a CO Inky ...
I am struck by ...


:::Comments posted :::
Guests:16
Member:13

♠ Libertythink News Feed

Kerry military cover-up continues

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Forcing Kids Into a Mental Health Ghetto

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oswald was CIA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SiaNews/FriendsOfLiberty Goes International

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9-11 Muslim Brotherhood Connections Run Through Hamburg, Madrid, Afghanistan, Bosnia, Kosovo to USA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GW Bush Worried that Government Might be Subverting Democracy in the Name of Fighting Evil Boogeymen

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Don't Mess With Librarians

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Americans Suspicious of Terror Plans

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source of Plame Identity Leak Comes Forward

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Iraq War was Illegal

Read more


♠ Syndication


You can syndicate Awoken's news using the file backend.php
♠ Hosted by sTaRe

♠ Legal Info


♠ Quotes


"Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we."

-- GW Bush



9-11: TV Asahi (Japan) Primetime Special on 9-11 Conspiracy Theories - A Viewer Report
500 Reads



This evening I watched the TV Asahi special on 9/11 entitled "Terror! Pursuing the 9-11/Bush Conspiracy Theories," a two-hour special (and No. 2 on BobbySophistry's list) that addressed seven topics and featured short discussions of each among the celebrity guests on the show (none of whom, except perhaps Beat Takeshi, are likely known outside Japan).
The show was done entirely in Japanese -- comments in English were dubbed over in Japanese -- so, as you are not likely to see a rebroadcast over there anytime soon, I thought I'd give a brief overview of the content. Please note that any misspellings of names below are due to the fact that the names were given in katakana transliteration.

1. Was Flight 93 shot down?

This segment featured interviews with David Ray Griffin and William Thomas, people living near the crash site and Japanese aviation experts. Discussed were the scattering of plane wreckage over a 13-kilometer area along the flight path, reports of a second plane having been spotted, and seismograph readings showing a sonic boom (from an F-16?) shortly before Flight 93 crashed.

2. Were the phone calls from Flight 93 faked?

This segment started with a look at Barbara Olson's call, asking why she would make a time-consuming collect call in an emergency situation. The show then pursued the calls made from the plane that day but discovered that no records were available anywhere. An experiment was conducted to show that cell phone calls from even a much lower height than Flight 93 are not possible, and the suggestion was made (and another demonstration done to show) that the calls could have been made from the ground, not the air, by editing together tape recordings of the passengers' voices for transmission to family members for the purpose of establishing that the hijackers were of Middle Eastern origin.

3. Bush's (in)actions on 9-11

This segment began with a look, a la Michael Moore, at Bush's seven-minute "deer in the headlights" imitation after receiving notification of the second plane hitting the WTC. The show's reporters interviewed the principal of Booker Elementary School and Linda Carson of ABC and learned that Bush had received the report of the first plane crash while in the car on the way to the school; he phoned Rice from the school (overheard by the principal) to say that he would continue on with the visit. The show then played Bush's announcement three months later at a town meeting that he had learned of the first plane crash when he saw it on TV, and brought out evidence to prove that this was clearly a lie. The segment closed with a quick examination of the Phoenix Memo and other information that should have led Bush to take action before 9-11.

4. What hit the Pentagon and where did AA77 go?

This segment opened by questioning the idea that a plane hit the Pentagon because of the size of the hole made in the building, the incredible flying skill needed to hit the Pentagon without hitting any of the smaller structures and fences in the way, and the clear shortage of plane wreckage and lawn damage. A Japanese expert pointed out that, at the very least, the titanium parts of the plane's engines would have survived the crash, and other crashes were shown to illustrate how much wreckage could be expected. Alan Wallace of the FMMC Fire Department was interviewed, and he and the other fire department personnel mentioned their surprise at finding so little aircraft wreckage at the scene. The AP photos of the instant before and after but not during the impact were broadcast, and witness reports of a missile-like object/sound were mentioned. The show's reporters tried to question the staff at the gas station across from the Pentagon about the film footage captured on their security camera, but they were turned away by a military policeman. The program then looked at the possibility of a cruise missile strike against the Pentagon, comparing the size of the hole in the Pentagon to such a missile and the size of a cruise missile's engine with that of the engine appearing in photos taken at the Pentagon. Also raised was the question of why AA77 disappeared from the air traffic control radars at Indianapolis but was then picked up at Dulles Air Traffic Control shortly before the crash. Newspaper reports of a second airplane crash near Washington were offered as a possible explanation for the disappearance of AA77.

5. Were the hijacked planes remotely controlled?

The show then touched on the possibility of the hijacked planes having been remotely controlled. Doubts were raised about the ability of Atta et al. to have flown 767s since they had only received simulator training on 737s. Stanley Hilton, an attorney suing the US government on behalf of some 9-11 families, discussed the possibility of the US military having controlled the planes, and their successful US-to-Australia flight of the Global Hawk was offered as evidence of the technical feasibility. Similarities between the WTC planes and Egypt Air 990 (which crashed in 1999) -- that the aircraft models were the same and that Egypt Air 990 and UA175 were directed by the same air traffic controller -- were also examined. Readily willing to accept the suspicions raised in the earlier segments, the guests on the show were noticeably skeptical about this particular theory.

6. How did the US government determine that Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda were to blame?

This segment started out with a glance at the preliminary "evidence" against Al Qaeda (the Atta passport, the Koran and flight manuals in the car, etc.) and the idea that these were planted. This was followed by a continuation of the interview with Stanley Hilton, who stated that the wife of one of the hijacking suspects had provided testimony that the FBI had been funding Al Qaeda. A Japanese political analyst was brought on for a very short introduction to the US' sponsorship of Al Qaeda in Soviet-occupied Afghanistan, and then the show took up the investigations and "untimely" death of FBI agent John O'Neill.

7. Ties between Bush and bin Laden

The final bit began with a few clips from Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 911" on Bush-bin Laden business ties, and then questioned the motives of the US government in flying out 24 members of the bin Laden family on September 19. An interview with Carmen bin Laden was aired to support the premise that Osama bin Laden may not be as disassociated with his family as the US government has suggested. The program then brought up the close ties between the government and the defense industry and between members of the Bush administration and Big Oil, going on to point out that administration-connected companies hadve benefitted to the tune of 66 trillion yen as a result of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. A Japanese political analyst very strongly hinted that the US government has no interest in capturing bin Laden, preferring instead to use him as an excuse to continue its worldwide "War on Terror" to secure global domination. David Griffin's The New Pearl Harbor book was then mentioned, and a few points in common between 12/7 and 9/11 were noted.


As you can tell, the show did cover quite a bit of ground but was unexpectedly thorough for a program lasting less than two hours, including commercials. No doubt some of you will be disappointed that there was no investigation of the Air Force's response (or lack thereof) to the hijackings, no consideration of the possibility that the WTC towers were demolished by explosives and, of course, no mention of possible Israeli complicity but then how many prime-time shows in the US have done this?

The narrators concluded each segment of the show with a comment to the effect that the matter remains shrouded in mystery, but I was pleasantly surprised at how open the guests were to the possibility that the US government had foreknowledge of the attacks and played an active role in post-9/11 cover-ups.

I hope that any of you watching/listening to other "conspiracy theory" specials being broadcast today will give us a report.

by The_Expatriate



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:23 PM
Response to Reply #167
168. And change in the lawsuit is interesting:
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 11:27 PM by Pallas180
"Stanley Hilton apparently dropped the previous lawsuit which was on the behalf of "400 families" of the 9/11 deceased. The government offered them more than a million dollars each, so they took the money and give up any hope that Hilton or any other lawyer would obtain justice in the courts. "

"Hilton then filed a new taxpayers' lawsuit on Aug 13, 2004. TAXPAYERS OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CASE NO. CV-03-03927-SI"

"BTW, the violation of the Federal Claims Act, discussed by Hilton, is an impeachable offense, as is obstruction of justice."


_____

And this is odd - kind of like the move of the lawyer who represented
Paula Whatsherface against Big Dawg. What is his name? Lawyer in DC
with a non-profit - at the time supported by Mellon-Scaiffe, arch right wing wacko billionaire.

"This being a taxpayers lawsuit, anyone who pays taxes in the US and believes themselves to have been harmed by the actions of the Bush administration, as summarized in the brief, can join the suit.

An official website for the case will be up shortly."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #168
169. This appears to be the Amended Complaint (case) Hilton filed in San Fran
Edited on Thu Sep-16-04 11:42 PM by Pallas180

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA



TAXPAYERS OF UNITED STATES OF CASE NO. CV-03-03927-SI

AMERICA; STANLEY G HILTON;

SCOTT MUNSUN,

ABEL ASHES,

PLAINTIFFS, PLAINTIFFS’ STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT II

Date AUGUST 13, 2004

Time 2 pm

V.

GEORGE W. BUSH, ET AL. ,

Defendants.



FACTS: All defendants have been served.

PLEADINGS: Plaintiffs desire to file a 2nd amended complaint to narrow down the case considerably. We wish to dismiss many of the original defendants, in fact we wish to dismiss from the case all original defendants except UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (the federal government), BUSH, CHENEY, RICE, MUELLER, TENET, RUMSFELD, ASHCROFT. These defendants have been served in DC and local US Attorney. They were served in June 2004. The proposed 2nd Amended Complaint will more narrowly focus the case and clarify the issues at hand.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

This is a taxpayer class action suit against high officials in the current Bush administration, for complicity in aiding and abetting and facilitating the Sep. 11, 2001 attacks as a contrived and stylized "New Pearl Harbor" and for doing so in order to launch unconstitutional aggressive war against the sovereign states of Afghanistan and Iraq, declare political opponents "enemy combatants," suspend the Constitution indefinitely, etc., all for sordid political ends which subvert the very system of laws and Constitution the defendants have sworn to uphold in their offices.

The suit alleges two theories, which are not mutually exclusive: (1) LIHOP: that defendants Bush et al LET IT (911) HAPPEN ON PURPOSE, i.e., that they had received adequate warning from FBI agents, NSA intercepts, spy satellites and other sources, of imminent air attacks against the WTC by "Al Quaeda" but deliberately chose to look the other way and to allow these attacks to take place; and (2) that Bush et al actively participated in planning executing and orchestrating the 911 events in order to manufacture a contrived and stylized sensational event aimed at frightening the taxpayers and Congress into passing unconstitutional laws, the PATRIOT ACTS, and in authorizing Bush via resolution to wage an unjustified war of aggression against Iraq. The suit seeks to obtain damages against defendants, an injunction ordering them to reimburse the US treasury for moneys unconstitutionally finagled to prosecute an illegal aggressive war in Iraq, and other damages. Each of the plaintiffs is a victim in some significant way, of the Bush-911 phenomenon and aggressive war and costly perpetual occupation in Iraq. The suit alleges that Bush, as President, violated the US Constitution by deliberately lying to—and defrauding—the US Congress into passing an "Enabling Act" resolution in October 2002, authorizing Bush to wage aggressive war on Iraq. The war is unconstitutional and an illegal drain on the US taxpayers’ funds in the treasury. The suit alleges the Iraq war is unconstitutional and that declaratory and injunctive relief should be ordered. It is unconstitutional and illegal because the president violated the Separation of Powers provisions of the Constitution by deliberately lying to the Congress by falsely assuring them that Bush had evidence of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, and that Iraq was involved in plotting and carrying out the 9/11/01 terrorists attacks on the World Trade center and Pentagon–attacks actually orchestrated by defendants. The suit also alleges that the USA Patriot Acts I and II are unconstitutional and must be struck down as such, because they violate the fourth, fifth, ninth and first amendments to the US Constitution o by permitting the government to spy on Americans and violate their rights to privacy, and because the Patriot Acts, like the war in Iraq, were passed under false and fraudulent circumstances presented by defendants to the Congress.

To the extent that the US Constitution is legally analogous to a "contract" between the government and the plaintiffs (taxpayers), it seems that deliberate fraud by defendants should nullify any unconstitutional acts by them, such as the aggressive war and occupation of Iraq and the Patriot Acts.

While this case presents many issues of first impression (such as whether individual citizens have recognized voices in court to challenge unconstitutional and illegal acts by a sitting president and his administration), there is precedent for such a suit: in 1996, the courts permitted a suit to go forward, whereby President Clinton’s line item veto power was declared an unconstitutional delegating of power by Congress to the President.

While defendants will assert "political case," to urge the court to decline jurisdiction, this is not so. This is a legal case with political overtones. The courts cannot escape their responsibilities by branding this a "political controversy." Defendants’ campaigns to spy on plaintiffs’ records and activities, threats to deprive plaintiffs of freedom and citizenship—these are not "political" questions but rather real legal ones. Defendants Bush et al pose an imminent and immediate threat to the health, safety and well beiong of plaintiffs, and the case is real and not theoretical.

This case presents many issues of first impression which are important public issues, to wit: whether a president can deliberately lie and defraud and deceive the Congress into delegating war making powers and unconstitutional search and seizure powers to the government, under the false pretext that "terrorists" have to be rooted out everywhere even though it means tearing up the constitution; whether a self-proclaimed and totally fraudulent state of "perpetual national emergency and perpetual war on terror," as defined- by Bush etc, can justify "suspending" and vitiating the Constitution; and whether taxpayers have standing to challenge the government in this fraudulent exercise of power.

Another reason why the suit must be allowed to proceed is that defendants continue to pose a clear and present danger to plaintiffs as taxpayers, because defendants have announced their intent to invade other countries, such as Iran, North Korea etc, in pursuit of their political goals, and these anticipated military misadventures all stem from the 911 events.

DISCOVERY: Plaintiffs intend to take the depositions of defendants

Bush, Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Tenet, Mueller and Ashcroft, and also seek requests for production of documents, i.e., all air communications between the planes hijacked on 9/11/01 and ground control, all USAF and NORAD communications records of 911, all stand down orders to USAF that day, the entire Phoenix memorandum of July 2001 (warning of 911) and the August 6 2001 briefing records of Rice to Bush, All records of all persons and entities who bought put options on United Airlines (UAL) and American Airlines (AMR) stock just before 9/11/01, at the Pacific Stock Exchange etc. the suit also seeks documents relating to defendants; ties to the Saudi Arabia government and that governments involvement in 911.

ANTICIPATED LEGAL ISSUES

Of course, defendants will maintain that they are immune from suit, that plaintiffs lack standing, and that "national security" should impose a cloak of secrecy and lock the doors of justice. We disagree and maintain that there is sound legal precedent for (1) taxpayer suits against the US government and defendants (where unconstitutional acts are being perpetrated in the taxpayers’ name), and (2) suing a sitting precedent and taking his deposition (Paula Jones vs Bill Clinton), even on a civil case not even remotely connected to the president’s function as head of the federal government. We maintain that we have a right to v indicate our rights as US citizens and that we have standing to sue.

Standing derives not only from plaintiffs’ being taxpayers whose tax dollars have been wasted and misappropriated on an illegal war to benefit the defendants and their allies, but also because the USA Patriots Acts I and II (these Acts are herein referred to as "PA") have seriously infringed on all of the plaintiffs’ rights to privacy and freedom of association and speech and 4th amendment rights to be free from unwarranted government snooping. The PATRIOT ACTS ("PA") have been used against plaintiffs by defendants, to spy on what books they check out of libraries, what e mail they receive and send, what books they buy from bookstores, what phone calls they make, what banks they have accounts at, etc. Also, becasue these deplorable, un-American and unconstitutional statutes give defednants the right to pick up any US citizen off the streets, declare him or her an "enemy combaant," and deprive him or her of citizenship and liberty and even of the rights to a lawyer. This poses an imminent threat to every taxpayer in the country, to allow defendants to suppress political dissent by arbitrarily declaring any citizen an "enemy combatant," becasue they oppose George Bush II’s political policies. These serious infringements on constitutional rights of plaintiffs warrant judicial action and inquiry. We maintain that the PA are unconstitutional and were directly related to the 911 incidents which defendants aided and abetted.

Under the precedent of Marbury vs Madison, and a plethora of progeny, judicial precedent has long maintained that the federal courts have a right, a duty and indeed an obligation to examine and review the federal acts and actions of Congress and of the president—such as the PATRIOT ACTS and the unconstitutional war in Iraq—because of the separation of powers doctrine. This court has jurisdiction to review and declare unconstitutional the actions and acts of defendants.

There is precedent for permitting depositions of sitting president and their top aides: In Paula Jones vs Clinton the high court ruled that a sitting president can be sued and deposed whilst in office

VENUE: Why is this case brought in US District Court for the Northern District of California? Plaintiffs live here and their rights have been violated here in the San Francisco area. Also, venue is right here because plaintiffs have been victimized here, one of the 4 skyjacked airliners on 9-11-01 was heading to San Francisco from Newark, NJ, and most of the put options on UAL and AMR stock were bought and sold and traded on the Pacific Stock Exchange in San Francisco. Plaintiffs allege that the massive sales of put options on 9/10/01 reveals complicity by certain purchasers of the options, i.e., foreknowledge of 911, a theme prevalent as a motif throughout this case. The vast and pervasive evidence of foreknowledge by defendants of 911, and defendants’ deliberately allowing of the 911 attacks to take place, is a motif of the case.

CONCLUSION

Plaintiffs believe they have the right to bring this suit as American citizens and that they face an imminent threat to their freedom from defendants, arising out of the entire orchestrated scenario of 911, the PA laws that were passed as a proximate result of 911, and the actions of defendants in infringing on their constitutionally guaranteed freedoms.

DATE: 8/1/04
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:40 PM
Response to Reply #169
171. This wouldnt be his first case? Why file in San Fran?
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #171
173. Its his amended complaint, and because he's a California lawyer.
I suppose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-16-04 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #173
174. Gotcha.
Didnt know he was from California.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:22 AM
Response to Reply #169
178. "Tax payer class action"=dismissal for lack of standing
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 01:23 AM by geek tragedy
He couldn't get any families to sign off on this junk suit.

This will be laughed out of court, probably on the standing issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 04:15 AM
Response to Reply #167
179. One question....
there were records of 911 phone calls, how are these explained?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #179
182. You should write Attorney Hilton and ask him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
177. BIG BIG KICK
'cuz I sent the link out to many friends yesterday
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
181. Kerry's October suprise
Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 07:33 AM by gordianot
I have followed these type of comments for some time and do not want to sound like a conspiracy theorist. I know this there are some people really mad at the Pentagon. There are a lot of glaring anomolies that were not covered by the 911 commission. There is probably a high placed espionage cell working in the Pentagon. When you hear hints in the mass media they are getting close.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #181
183. One thing we know for sure;from Brzinski's time the 70's US CIA supported
and fomented Muslim dissatisfaction and tried to start a religious movement in the Middle East with a leader who would fight against communism.

He got his wish...but the movement continued after the CIA and the USA
dumped the Mujaheedin and the Kurds.

Since in an interview on TV bin Laden's brother refused to say whether he is in contact with OBL and refused to condemn his actions or disown him " he's my brother, what would you do? ". Since we know that bin ladens were and still are in business both with Saudis and the US in oil deals, including the new Caspian Oil fields and the ppipelines; my theory is that there was an agreement to effect a "new
Pearl Harbor" in order to put pipelines through Afghanistan and Iraq, both of whom were negotitating contracts since the early 90's under Bush 1 with the major oil companies, and then reneging on signing off on the deals.

The US supported The Taliban in Afghanistan thinking they would be cooperative. To hell with the freedom of the people and the police state and beatings they lived under. The religious movement that finally took hold was Zbrinski's desire come true, to keep Afghanistan, its oil and pipe avenues out of the hands of the Russians.

Look that up. That's true.Zbrinski even wrote a book about it. He should be charged with sedition and as a war criminal.

These multi-nationals and republicans think long term. Very Very long term, in 50 and 100 years time slots.

What could be better than to blame the attacks of US interests, (which slowly built oddly only during Clinton's administration when the PNAC - Wolfowitz, Cheney, Perle and company - couldn't convince Clinton to attack Iraq and secure those oil fields and pipeline avenues for them) it on these Mujahadeen troublemakers.

My theory is OBL was leading them and engineering attacks to make it look like exactly what the US wanted its citizens to think.Terrorists attacking US interests...preparation for the WTC attacks similar to the US Military's NOrthwoods plans of the 60's.

The problem was it got away from OBL. The Muslim population, world wide, believed it was finally an uprising - revolution of the Islamic brotherhood against the dictators and the evil United States, to return Islam to the domination of the world. NOW it is an Islamic revolution for real.

The entire war for "liberation of Iraq" and hunting OBL in Afghanistan
has been phony. Oil companies using American children and the American Army for free, under the guise of installing "freedom" when in fact it has been for geopolitical land and resource grabs by private oil companies.

Of course they want to attack Iran. Iran borders the Caspian of the newest and largest oil fields known, in addition to Iran having perhaps the second or third largest known oil fields .

My view: all of the neo-cons should be arrested and charged with sedition, treason, murder in the DoD, State Dept, and White House.
They have more than sufficient funds and already have their own private armies - which they can use instead of "volunteer" underpaid
American children in the US Army and National Guard. Perhpas it's a shade of things to come: slave labor.

Study this map, and google "Azberjan Chamber of Commerce. See the truth of these wars.

Pallas





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gordianot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #183
184. Long term Makes sense
I remember speaking with an young (new to the US) Iranian student in the 70's when the Shaw was still in power. He told me he and others in Iran were convinced that America was ripe for a Muslim conversion and revolution. He told me at the time he heard this from an American in Iran.

I hated to burst his bubble he seemed to be shocked when I told him it would never happen. I also asked him "no answer" why he would trust an American in Iran?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #184
188. " Paralyzing The System In Order To Pull Off The Attacks"
Click on the url for the excerpt from the book which is many pages...
but your hair will stand up. Including why Dubya is kissing Putin's
putin.

http://www.newsociety.com/News/rub_war.pdf


WARGAMES AND HIGH TECH: PARALYZING THE SYSTEM TO PULL OFF THE ATTACKS

heney to Oversee Domestic Counterterrorism Efforts

President announces new homeland defense initiative

President Bush May 8 directed Vice President Dick Cheney to coordinate development of US government initiatives to combat terrorist attacks on the United States...
— White House Press Release, May 8, 2001

Therefore, I have asked Vice President Cheney to oversee the development of a coordinated national effort so that we may do the very best possible job of protecting our people from catastrophic harm. I have also asked Joe Allbaugh, the Director of the
Federal Emergency Management Agency, to create an Office of National Preparedness. This office will be responsible for implementing the results of those parts of the national effort overseen by Vice President Cheney that deal with consequence management.
Specifically it will coordinate all federal programs dealing with weapons of mass destruction consequence management within the Departments of Defense, Health and Human Services, Justice, and Energy, the Environmental Protection Agency, and other
federal agencies….

— Official Statement of President George W. Bush, May 8, 2001
Office of the Press Secretary, The White House What wasn’t addressed by any of the constructs previously posed by 9/11 investigators
was an assumption that pilots and commanders would just sit passively by and watch their country be attacked — no matter what the orders were — if Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, or acting Joint Chiefs Chairman Richard Myers failed to issue a scramble order or actually issued a (very risky) direct stand-down order.


-major snip-


Running a spy ring is expensive, and it takes a lot of things, especially people, which al Qaeda didn’t have. Osama bin Laden and his family did own some satellites, and they hobnobbed with George H.W. Bush and former British Prime Minister John Major. They invested in companies benefiting both Bushes. Dick Cheney’s company Halliburton had been involved in joint-venture construction
projects with the Bin Ladin Group in the Middle East. But this was truly a case where state sponsorship was the only thing that could explain one or more highranking American traitors.

It was becoming clearer that the state sponsor was the United States.
What if Vreeland had been wittingly or unwittingly delivering vague documents in which Russian President Vladimir Putin demanded certain slices of the 9/11 pie in exchange for Russian silence and cooperation? -

Immediately after 9/11 Putin was one of America’s head cheerleaders. He welcomed George W. Bush to Moscow shortly after the attacks. Did Bush get a look at Putin’s intelligence files on how the Bush cabal, its financial backers, and US intelligence agencies had set up the attacks, roughly between 1998 and 2001, by assembling pieces of known terrorist plans already on the shelf; by quietly co-opting some terrorist cells which still believed they were following
bin Laden; by arranging for other al Qaeda members who had been “flipped” to recruit the unwitting muscle who would die a martyr’s death on September 11th?

It was not until Iraq became the Bush administration’s raison d’être that the Russian relationship went sour. Iraq had 11 percent of the world’s oil, and Russia Wargames and High Tech 355
had around $8 billion of contracts to refurbish the oil infrastructure and $4 billion worth of Saddam’s unpaid IOUs.
So where could a few key al Qaeda operatives, some of whom had trained at a CIA sponsored training camp in Chechnya, have possibly gotten detailed information about multiple wargame exercises on 9/11 so that they could complete movements that would fill out the legend of their crime? From their handlers perhaps?
Unlike a police detective, I had no badge, no authority, no legal mandate, no ability to compel people to show me records or even talk to me. But one thing was absolutely certain.

It was time to go out and start asking questions.
356 crossing the rubicon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
189. 911 link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #189
190. Dave, your link not working
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #190
195. FULL STANLEY HILTON INTERVIEW HERE- UNcopywrited
FULL ARTICLE & UNCOPYWRITED MATERIAL HERE:http://www.prisonplanet.com/art

Edited on Fri Sep-17-04 12:27 PM by Pallas180
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/september2004/1309...



Transcript: Alex Jones Interviews Stanley Hilton

| September 13 2004

The MP3 of this interview is available at

http://www.prisonplanet.tv/audio/091204hilton.htm

AJ: He is back with us. He is former Bob Dole’s chief of staff, very successful counselor, lawyer. He represents hundreds of the victims families of 9/11. He is suing Bush for involvement in 9/11. Now a major Zogby poll out – half of New Yorkers think the government was involved in 9/11. And joining us for the next 35 minutes, into the next hour, is Stanley Hilton. Stanley, it’s great to have you on with us.

SH: Glad to be on.

AJ: We’ll have to recap this when we start the next hour, but just in a nutshell, you have a lawsuit going, you’ve deposed a lot of military officers. You know the truth of 9/11. Just in a nutshell, what is your case alleging?

SH: Our case is alleging that Bush and his puppets Rice and Cheney and Mueller and Rumsfeld and so forth, Tenet, were all involved not only in aiding and abetting and allowing 9/11 to happen but in actually ordering it to happen. Bush personally ordered it to happen. We have some very incriminating documents as well as eye-witnesses, that Bush personally ordered this event to happen in order to gain political advantage, to pursue a bogus political agenda on behalf of the neocons and their deluded thinking in the Middle East. I also wanted to point out that, just quickly, I went to school with some of these neocons. At the University of Chicago, in the late 60s with Wolfowitz and Feith and several of the others and so I know these people personally. And we used to talk about this stuff all of the time. And I did my senior thesis on this very subject – how to turn the U.S. into a presidential dictatorship by manufacturing a bogus Pearl Harbor event. So, technically this has been in the planning at least 35 years.

AJ: That’s right. They were all Straussian followers of a Nazi-like professor. And now they are setting it up here in America. Stanley, I know you deposed a lot of people and you’ve got your $7 million dollar lawsuit with hundreds of the victim’s families involved….

SH: 7 billion, 7 billion

AJ: Yeah, 7 billion. Can you go over some of the new and incriminating evidence you’ve got of them ordering the attack?

SH: Yes, let me just say that this is a taxpayers’ class action lawsuit as well as a suit on behalf of the families and the basic three arguments are they violated the Constitution by ordering this event. And secondly that they fraudulent Federal Claims Act, Title 31 of the U.S. Code in which Bush presented false and fraudulent evidence to Congress to get the Iraq war authorization. And, of course, he related it to 9/11 and claimed that Saddam was involved with that, and all these lies.

AJ: Tell you what, stay there. Stanley, we’ve got to break. Let’s come back and get into the evidence.

BREAK

AJ: Alright my friends, second hour, September 10th, 2004, the anniversary of the globalist attack coming up tomorrow. It’s an amazing individual we have on the line. Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, political scientist, a lawyer, he went to school with Rumsfeld and others, he wrote his thesis about how to turn America into a dictatorship using a fake Pearl Harbor attack. He’s suing the U.S. government for carrying out 9/11. He has hundreds of the victims’ families signing onto it – it’s a $7 billion lawsuit. And he is Stanley Hilton. I know that a lot of stations just joined us in Los Angeles and Rhode Island and Missouri and Florida and all over. Please sir, recap what you were just stating and then let’s get into the new evidence. And then we’ll get into why you are being harassed by the FBI, as other FBI people are being harassed who have been blowing the whistle on this. So, this is really getting serious. Stanley, tell us all about it.

SH: Yeah, we are suing Bush, Condoleeza Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Mueller, etc. for complicity in personally not only allowing 9/11 to happen but in ordering it. The hijackers we retained and we had a witness who is married to one of them. The hijackers were U.S. undercover agents. They were double agents, paid by the FBI and the CIA to spy on Arab groups in this country. They were controlled. Their landlord was an FBI informant in San Diego and other places. And this was a direct, covert operation ordered, personally ordered by George W. Bush. Personally ordered. We have incriminating evidence, documents as well as witnesses, to this effect. It’s not just incompetence – in spite of the fact that he is incompetent. The fact is he personally ordered this, knew about it. He, at one point, there were rehearsals of this. The reason why he appeared to be uninterested and nonchalant on September 11th – when those videos showed that Andrew Card whispered in his ear the words about this he listened to kids reading the pet goat story, is that he thought this was another rehearsal. These people had dress rehearsed this many times. He had seen simulated videos of this. In fact, he even made a Freudian slip a few months later at a California press conference when he said he had, quote, “seen on television the first plane attack the first tower.” And that could not be possible because there was no video. What it was was the simulated video that he had gone over. So this was a personally government ordered thing.

We are suing them under the Constitution for violating American’s rights, as well as under the federal Fraudulent Claims Act, for presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress to justify the bogus Iraq boondoggle war, for political gains. And also, under the RICO statute, under the Racketeering Corrupt Organization Act, for being a corrupt entity.

And I’ve been harassed personally by the chief judge of the federal court who is instructing me personally to drop this suit, threatened to kick me off the court, after 30-years on the court. I've been harassed by the FBI. My staff has been harassed and threatened. My office has been broken into and this is the kind of government we are dealing with.

AJ: Absolutely and now it has come out – five separate drills of flying hijacked jets into buildings that morning – which you told us about before it even broke in the Associated Press. They were trying to get out ahead of you. You talked about how you interviewed military people who were told it was a drill that morning. Then to get out ahead of that, the news finally reported on it. Now, we’ve learned that all these operations – I want to get into that, I want to talk about the new incriminating evidence of ordering it and how they had drilled on this, how Cheney was in the bunker controlling this. That has even come out in the mainstream news but they won’t release the details of that, Stanley. But what type of FBI harassment are you going through?

SH: First of all, my office was burglarized in San Francisco several months ago. Files were gone through and some files were seized – particularly the ones dealing with the lady that was married to one of the hijackers. Fortunately, I had spare copies in a hidden place so nothing disappeared permanently. But more significantly, FBI agents have been harassing one of my staff members and threatening them with vague but frightening threats of indicting them. And it’s just total harassment. They have planted a spy, an undercover agent, in my organization, as we just recently discovered. In other words, these are Nazi Germany tactics. This is the kind of government you have in this country. This is what Bush is all about.

AJ: Stay there Stanley, Bob Dole’s former chief of staff. We’ll come back after this quick break. Please stay with us.

BREAK

AJ: Alright, eight minutes, 25 seconds into the second hour. Stanley Hilton, political scientist, lawyer, Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, is suing the government for 7 billion dollars for carrying out 9/11 and for racketeering. And he joins us now. During the break, I first really did the big interview with Stanley Hilton after I saw him attacked on Fox News. And that interview got massive attention. And then he kind of went underground for a while because a judge, we’re going to talk about that, ordered him to not do any more interviews. And now he’s back doing interviews. He’s had his office broken into, FBI threats and harassment. Bottom line, he has deposed military individuals, wives of hijackers, you name it, it was a government operation. It has even come out in mainstream news, a piece here, a piece there. They had drills on 9/11, that’s why NORAD stood down. Cheney was in control of the whole thing. Stanley Hilton has now gotten documents about how Bush ordered the whole operation. And I’ll tell you right now, his life is in danger, folks. And he’s got so much courage. He went to school with these neocons at the University of Chicago. He wrote his thesis on how the government could use terrorist attacks to set up martial law. He is the man for the time and folks wondered why he disappeared for a while and just did his lawsuit and wasn’t doing interviews, it was because he was ordered to.

Stanley, can you get into that for us?

SH: I did an interview with you, Alex, back in March of 2003, about a year and a half ago, and literally two weeks after that, I was contacted by the emissary of the chief judge of the federal court where I have the lawsuit. And I was warned not to publicize it but to keep it quiet and threatened with discipline. And it remained quiet until a couple of months ago and then I got on the air on some programs and some publicity and… July 1st, I was threatened directly by the chief judge here, threatened with court discipline. This particular judge has been circulating communiqués to the other federal judges seeking anything negative she can get against me to try and discipline me after I’ve been on the court here for 30-years with no disciplinary problems at all. This is suddenly happening. And her assistants who are on the committee of the court met with me on July 1st in Palo Alto, California, and threatened me directly. They handed me a copy of the lawsuit and said that the judge wants me to dismiss this. What’s this? She doesn’t like the content of it. This is politically incorrect. This is outside the norm. I said I represented more than 400 plaintiffs, how am I going to dismiss this case? And they threatened me directly and they said, “the next time you’ll be disciplined.” And also they’ve threatened me not to go public, etc. And this is just outrageous….

AJ: It’s all color of law. No direct orders, just all in your face.

SH: They sent a letter out, and of course they deny it’s because of the political content of the suit but they told me directly on the phone that it is because of this suit and this judge is very, very angry, apparently has been in contact with Ashcroft’s Justice Department. I got a call from Ashcroft’s Justice Department a few months ago about this, demanding that I drop the suit, threatening sanctions and all kinds of things. I refused to drop it.

AJ: Now let’s go back over, you had them break into your office, harassment. Let’s go over that in detail.

SH: My office was broken into about 6 months ago. The file cabinets – it was obvious they had been rifled through. Files were stolen. Files dealing with this particular case and particularly with the documents I had regarding the fact that the – some of these hijackers, at least some of them were on the payroll of the U.S. government as undercover FBI, CIA, double agents. They are spying on Arab groups in the U.S. And, in effect, all this lead up to the effect that al Qaeda is a creation of the George Bush administration, basically. That’s the entity that he called al Qaeda.is directly linked to George Bush. And all this stuff was stolen. Fortunately, I had copies. But this was just part of the harassment. The FBI has also been harassing some of my assistants and has planted a spy in our midst. And it is just outrageous that these Nazi tactics are being used - and the obstruction of justice, these people are criminals. And that’s what’s happening under the tremendous pressure here to just drop it. Or to shut up now and just go away.

AJ: Now, let’s talk about what they want you to drop. Let’s talk about, without giving names, the people you deposed, what really happened, the picture you’ve got. You said earlier that Bush ordered this, they were simulating this which they now admit there were simulations on that morning. Let’s go over what they don’t want you to talk about, Stanley.

SH: We have evidence both documentary as well as witness sworn statements from undercover former FBI agents, FBI informants, etc., that other officials in the Pentagon and the military and the Air Force that deal with the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that’s not possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one.

We do have some incriminating documents that Bush personally ordered 9/11 events. It was well planned. A FEMA official has admitted on tape that he was there the night before – September 10th, that is …

AJ: And now Mayor Giuliani, a few months ago in the 911 Commission, admitted that – Tripod II. They had their whole command post already moved out of Building 7. Now, this is very, very important. This is a key area of this whole event. You said months before it came out on the CIA’s own website and the Associated Press, you said I deposed people. They said there were drills that morning and exactly what happened, happening – that was the smoke-screen for the stand-down. And then to get out ahead of it, the CIA comes out and said yeah we were running a drill that morning. Now, we’ve learned that five, possibly six, were confirmed. Five of these – one drill with the exact same thing happening that actually happened, at the exact same time in the morning. That’s why NORAD stood down with 24 different blips on the screen. You’ve said this. You brought this up first. Now, I know you can’t get too much into detail but can you tell us how you learned of this?

SH: I have interviewed individuals in NORAD and the Air Force. I personally toured NORAD many years ago around the time that I worked for Dole. I’m very familiar with the operations at Cheyenne Mountain at Colorado Springs, where NORAD is. Individuals that work in NORAD as well as the Air Force have stated this, off the record, but the point is, yes, this was not just five drills but at least 35 drills over at least two months before September 11th. Everything was planned, the exact location……

AJ: But five drills that day.

SH: That day, that day, and Bush thought it was a drill. That’s the only explanation for why he appeared nonchalant………

AJ: We also had NORAD officers and civilian air traffic controllers going, “Is this part of the exercise? Is this a drill?”

SH: Yes.

AJ: On the tapes and in TV interviews, they thought it was, quote, a drill.

SH: That’s right. That’s exactly what I said long before it became public. I’ve known about this since earlier in March of ’03, as I stated before. This was all planned. This was a government ordered operation. Bush personally signed the order. He personally authorized the attacks. He is guilty of treason and mass murder. And now, obstruction of justice by attempting to use a federal judge and FBI agents to inhibit a legitimate civil lawsuit in this country, in federal court. Even a chief judge in this court tried to harass and threaten me personally for representing legitimate plaintiffs. And they got Clinton for allegedly lying under oath about Paula Jones and now – look what’s happening now. And Ken Starr used to be across from me in Duke Law School in the early ‘70s and it’s interesting that he got away with trying to get Clinton impeached, so we have a far worse criminal sitting in the oval office today – somebody guilty of mass murder as well as obstruction of justice.

AJ: Well, I mean look, they say they never heard of a plan to fly planes into buildings – said it all over television – Rice, Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft. And then we find out they were running all these drills that morning. Even if they weren’t involved, that proves they were liars about ever hearing of such a plan.

SH: Well, I’m trying to take their depositions – I’ve been trying to take their depositions for months. They’ve been trying to object to it. They will have to admit they were either lying then or now. It’s clearly perjury either way. They are liars and perjurers; that’s what they are. These are the people that we have running this government and, of course, they knew about it. How are they going to claim now that they didn’t know about these drills? Their idea is that nobody knew anything. It’s the old know nothing mentality. And how anybody considers this believable is beyond me.

AJ: Alright, now people ask how could a huge organization, how could the AWACs, how could the military let this happen; whereas before, if your Cessna got off course for five minutes, they would launch F-16s on you. It’s real simple. It’s what Stanley Hilton said here a year and a half ago. It’s what came out in the news after that. The military, good people, were told this was all a drill. And it was not a drill. And ABC News admits that Cheney was in control of out of the White House and that he ordered the military to quote “do something.” Our inside sources from Hilton and others say it was a stand down and they admit they will not release that under national security. Stanley?

SH: Well they are going to admit it, they’re going to release it in the court case because if you demand it under subpoena powers and they must release it. And part of our lawsuit is brought in the name of the U.S. because under the federal fraudulent , we accuse the Bush Administration of presenting a fraudulent claim to Congress. And under the statutes of Title 31 of the U.S. code, they must release this information. That’s why they are trying to threaten me, harass me, invade my office, steal my files, commit blatant obstruction of justice and other crimes to try and prevent a legitimate civil suit from exposing these criminals and their acts of treason and mass murder.

AJ: I think you need to publicly tell folks that you are not planning suicide. Would you like to tell folks that?

SH: (laughs) I’m not planning suicide. I’ve got family and I’m not planning that but I don’t like the threats I’m under – but I can tell you this, it’s taking a toll emotionally on me and my staff. And particularly, when you get a threat from the chief judge of your own court.

AJ: Why have you decided to go public again after a year of being under the radar?

SH: Because the more and more evidence that I’ve been adducing over a year and a half has made it so obvious to me that this was now without any doubt a government operation and that it amounts to the biggest act of treason and mass murder in American history. I mean George Bush makes Benedict Arnold look like a patriot. He makes Benedict Arnold look like George Washington. I mean that’s what we have – a criminal and a traitor sitting in the White House pretending he’s a patriot, wrapping himself in the flag. And it’s pretty disgusting because the other side of the so-called opposition, the Kerry camp is just saying nothing because they’re afraid to speak.

AJ: Stay right there. We’ll be right back.

BREAK

AJ: Stanley Hilton will be with us for another 15 or 16 minutes. Then he’s got to go into court. Bob Dole’s former chief of staff, political scientist, lawyer, represents 400 plus plaintiffs – most of them victims of 9/11. When I was in New York last week, everybody I was talking to, I mean 90 plus percent of them at ground zero – “I had family, I worked in the buildings, my son’s a Navy Seal – he called the night before and said don’t go to work.” You know, all of this, and then now they never had any idea – and it turns out they had all these drills – and one drill of hijacked jets flying into the World Trade Center and Pentagon at 8:30 in the morning. That morning – come on people! And Stanley Hilton brought all this out on this show before it was in the mainstream news. And I was talking to him during the break. I mean, the harassment, the moles, the threatening of his staff, the judge threatening him. Stanley, let’s get specifically into the documents that you have now got that they have now been robbing you for, that you luckily, thank God had copies. Specifically, Bush ordering this. Can you get into that for us – ordering 9/11?

SH: National Security Council classified documents which and it’s was part of a series of documents that were involved with the drill documents. This was all planned – they had it on videotape. These planes were controlled by remote control, as I stated previously a year and a half ago, there’s a system called Cyclops. There is a computer chip in the nose of the plane and it enables the ground control, the military ground control, to disable the pilot’s control of the plane and to control it and to fly it directly into those towers. That’s what happened. It’s also a technology used on what’s called the Global Hawk, which is an aircraft drone – a remote-controlled aircraft. And they were doing it. We are talking about National Security Council classified documents that clearly indicated that had a green light to order this to go and this is no drill. These drills that were running were clearly a dress rehearsal and this was a government operation. You wonder why these people are trying to threaten people and trying to intimidate people who have written this suit, I guess if you murdered 3000 of your own citizens, in conjunction with the corrupt Royal family of Saudi Arabia as Bush did. And if you then waste billions more on a worthless garbage war in Iraq, I guess you’ve got something to worry about and you want to threaten people to prevent it from coming out.

AJ: I mean let’s look at this. Not only are there dress rehearsals, they are smoke screens so the good military stands down and doesn’t know what’s happening. But it’s now coming out, even in mainstream news, that yes these drills were going on. Yes, and some of these drills, quote, passenger-type jets were under remote control – this is decades old technology. In 1958, NORAD was < > old jets and using them for target practice. Decades ago they flew jumbo jets from LA to Sidney Australia. So since that’s going on, everybody knows that. And it’s the same MO. Just like the first World Trade Center where they get two retarded men who followed this blind sheik who had a tiny mosque above a pizza pallor. And they set them up as the patsies. Then the FBI cooks the bomb, trains the drivers. This informant goes, “You’re not going to bomb the building? They go “Yeah, we’re letting it go forward.” He tapes them to protect themselves. The two retarded gentlemen, thank God, didn’t park it up against the column, as the FBI instructed them to do, so it didn’t bring down the tower – because you have to be right up against the column. That doesn’t happen. Yet, it’s the same thing with 9/11. You’ve got these CIA agents, these Arabs, who were trained at U.S. military bases, Pensacola Naval Air Station – mainstream media, out creating their legends for this background. They’re on board the aircraft. My military sources say nerve gas kills everybody on board the plane – nerve gas packets. Then they fly the planes into buildings. From your inside sources, is that accurate?

SH: It’s one of the things that we are looking into – that nerve gas or something else disabled people. It’s possible. I can’t say for sure to be honest with you…

AJ: All you know is they were government agents and they were on board and the planes were remote controlled.

SH: Yeah, it was basically a smokescreen. I mean, the events of the hijackings, how someone snuck in those cutters, it was a plant. It was like a classic decoy. I’ve got some military background. And it’s called decoy. It’s a decoy operation. You make the people focus on the decoy to avoid looking at the real criminals. So they are focusing on these so-called nineteen hijackers and saying, “Oh, it must have been these Arabs. When, in fact, the guilty person is at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue – sitting in the oval office. That’s the guilty person. That’s the one who authorized it. There is only one man who could have authorized this operation and that’s Bush. And anyone at NORAD will tell you as I have been told personally at NORAD in the war control room, there is only one man who has the power to do this kind of thing and that’s Bush. Even though many believe he’s a puppet. And I think in many ways he is. The fact of the matter is where was < > Cheney, Rumsfeld and these other traitors. The fact is Bush personally ordered and he’s guilty and liable and he’s going to be re-elected apparently because the media’s asleep and for Bush.

AJ: Well, the media is owned by the same military industrial complex that carried out the attacks.

SH: Yeah, the media is only interested in maintaining the official government fantasy that this was a little lone Arab. These Arabs couldn’t even steer that plane down a runway.

AJ: Stay there Stanley, final segment coming up.

BREAK

AJ: Mr. Hilton, when you talk to these FBI agents, when you talk to these military men and women, what’s their attitude? They’ve got to be pretty freaked out to have the big picture and know what actually happened on 9/11.

SH: Yes, you know it’s like clouds just before a thunderstorm in the sense that they are sort of pregnant with rage. They are just enraged at the criminal politicians who have perverted and misused the government to murder its own citizens and pursue these dubious political ends. And many of them, in increasing numbers, are willing to talk and will talk under subpoena – but only under subpoena because the official party line of the government is shut up and don’t talk to the trial lawyer. But more and more, they are very outraged that part of the government has done this to its own people, to its own people. I mean you have to go back to Stalin to see something – not even Hitler did this to his own people. You have to look at Stalin who murdered the Kulaks, the Russians for his own dubious gains. Also we’ve got – we have a Stalinist mentality in this country. And, if these people pose as patriots and wrap themselves in the flag, it’s disgusting.

I wanted also to point out that the Japanese television network, Asahi, is going to be airing a special on primetime tomorrow, on September 11th. They interviewed me for eight hours a couple of weeks ago. I’ll be on that. I wish – of course, the America media don’t care so they are not going to care. But in Japan, people are very serious in interviewing me and others. And we have a website now, called deprogram.info, if more people are interested: www.deprogram.info .

But the other thing, I just wanted to say that if anything happens to me - and I don’t know why – because I’m being threatened here now. And it seems you can’t bring a case in this country anymore against criminals in power without being threatened. And this is how they operate. The stakes are pretty high when you’ve got a world historical level of treason and fraud by this government against it’s own people. I guess this is what you have to expect.

AJ: Stanley, the globalists, the new world order crowd, definitely intend to carry out more terror attacks. I know they would have carried out more attacks if we wouldn’t have done what we’ve been up to, if you wouldn’t have been out there boldly speaking out and many others. And then their electronic Berlin wall has a bunch of cracks in it now. Thanks to good people like yourself and many others who are speaking out and telling the truth. But do you think that they may carry out what they’ve been hyping – a suitcase nuke attack, a biological release to try to smokescreen all of this? I know it’s a catch 22, you’ve got to expose the murderers. We’ve got to get the word out on this but some government people that I’ve talk to say, “Yeah, but if you do that, they are going to go even more hard core and must totally try to take over.” But I say regardless, they are already doing that. So what do you say to that?

SH: Well, yeah, I think they have an agenda. They have contingency plans. I think they are laying low now because there are an increasing number of people, like myself, who are openly challenging them and accusing them of criminal conduct. I think they would have done it again if we had not spoken up. I think they’re planning, what they would like to do is silence any dissenters. That’s why we are trying to get the Patriot Act declared unconstitutional in this lawsuit also.

AJ: Let’s talk about polls. In the beginning a patriot is a scarce man, hated and feared, but in time when his cause succeeds, the timid join him, because then it costs nothing to be a patriot. You are one of those guys who hit the barbwire for us, or figuratively jumped on the hand grenade for America. But when you’ve got a Zogby poll, who is highly respected, half of New Yorkers believe that the government was involved. When you have a Canadian poll, 63% on average believe that the U.S. government was involved. And some groups, as high as 76% in polls believe the government was involved. European polls, two-thirds show the same thing. We have German defense ministers and technology ministers and another member of their government now, three of them going public, known conservatives, and progressives. You have an environment minister, Michael Meacher, saying that if they didn’t do it, they sure as hell knew what was going on. Look, if anybody who is a thinking person looks at the evidence, their official story is impossible. Then you investigate and they are involved in it. Comments to this massive awakening and what’s happening.

SH: Well, I think that’s why they want the Patriot Act to suppress political dissent. They have to, they’re anticipating, they are not dumb individuals. I know these people personally, Wolfowitz. These are criminal individuals but they are smart and so they anticipated political dissent. And that’s why, like the Nazis, their forebears, and their blood brothers, the Nazis and the Stalinists, they’re all for political repression. Every corrupt and criminal government has done this – they suppress their own people: Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Mao Tse-Tung, that’s why we have the Patriot Act. So it’s hand in hand. They had it planned to go right up to September 11th, this was all part of the plan. You have to do it. It was part of my senior thesis. You must follow through the terrorists attacks with a political suppression mechanism in the law. And that’s why they want Patriot I and Patriot II and their plans are to continue launching more terrorist attacks to justify even more repression. The goal is to make this a one party dictatorship in this country, to pursue their dubious ends with their blood brothers like the Saudi Royal family. And also, historical blood brothers, such as the Nazi Germany and the Communist Russian. That’s the goal

AJ: You’ve got to go in just a minute or two. But I wanted to also tell you about New York. Sound cannons that are used in Iraq, they’re against us. Men in black ski masks. 41,000 police, accredited media being arrested randomly. Children being arrested, people in wheelchairs, 2000 plus people put in a camp with barbwire fences inside with no bathrooms. You had to have permission to go to the porta-potties. Police screaming at you. It had nothing to do with terrorism. They are openly setting the precedent for martial law.

SH: Well, that’s right, the word terrorist is now being overly broad and overly defined and also, you know, it’s like the word communist was used for anything during the McCarthy witch hunt. And anybody can be called a terrorist by Bush’s definition. But the irony is that the number one terrorist in the world is living at the White House at the oval office today. That’s the real irony. For sheer hypocrisy, I think he deserves the world prize and ought to be in the Ripley book, Believe It or Not, and the Guinness book of world records for sheer brazen chicanery and fraud.

AJ: Let me ask you a question on this because this is the experience that I had. Watching television, watching the killers, watching those that are guilty, stand up there as our saviors is incredibly painful. It’s like watching Ted Bundy being the judge at his own trial. I mean it is just painful to know who these people are. To see them putting America is a shredder. Now we are going to have forced psychological testing of every American, forced drugging, you know Pan-American unions, I mean it’s just all happening, it’s in our face, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, it’s very disturbing and as one who has studied the theory and concept of dictatorships, I personally interviewed Albert Speer, who was Hitler’s armaments minister. I interviewed him in 1981 in Munich. And I’ve studied the psychology and history of totalitarianism and there is no question that it’s very frightening. And it has, today, with high technology, albeit for the first time in history, the chance of having a world empire dominated by corrupt, technologically oriented government - an elite government. And they’ve got now what people like Napoleon and Hitler didn’t have, which is the technological means to dominate not only their own country but others – the world.

AJ: The answer is to expose them as the terrorists, to show how PNAC said we need helpful Pearl Harbor events, to show how Northwoods called for the exact 9/11-style attacks, to show their own plans. And to force people to face this horror. What are they going to do in a year or two when 80% of us, not half of us, know the truth?

SH: Well, that’s why they want repression and, then again, the ancient old diversion, launch another terrorist attack to get people to pitch it away. I mean who knows what they’ll do next. I mean their capacity for ingenious creation of these events is sort of untraveled. I mean there is no limit. My guess is they are going to try another stunt – maybe a stunt just before the election to justify getting Bush reelected. Although it seems like he is running against a straw man or a ghost right now, anyway. But, my guess is they’ll try some other tactic to get people’s attention away from 9/11 if it gets to be too much attention. What you really want is for the public to just lose interest because the public - and it’s like remember the Alamo, you know, people don’t forget things like that. To me it’s like the Alamo, remember 9/11, that ought to be the slogan for this outrageous act of treason. That’s what it is. It’s not……

AJ: We are at a crossroads, I don’t think they anticipated this much resistance, Stanley.

SH: Yeah, I hope they are truly wrong and as incompetent as they are corrupt and guilty. That means their incompetence is exceeded only by their corruption and their guilt. And eventually, if enough people are going to get outraged enough, these people in the bureaucracy and in the civil service and our military, and eventually we can get people under subpoena these individuals will be exposed.

AJ: Stanley, their whole operation hinges on us being naïve and not recognizing evil. This is what they got with Hitler and others. People couldn’t recognize evil so they continued to repeat succumbing to it. We are recognizing it this time. We are putting our lives, our treasure, our future on the line for freedom because we cannot let these blood-thirsty control freak terrorists capture us and use us and turn us into the empire and have a draft and use us as their slaves to invade the planet. And that’s their PNAC plan. Stanley Hilton, I know you’ve got to get to court. God bless you. I want to thank you for being here with us today. Can we get you back on next week?

SH: Sure, just give me a call.

AJ: God bless you my friend. Any closing comments?

SH: My closing comments would be, I think people ought to just think about the consequence of having someone like Bush in the White House and the danger for the future that these sort of individuals pose. This is not just a historical event of the past. This is part of the plan and the camera is still rolling. They have an agenda. These individuals are extremely dangerous. They are armed and dangerous. They pose a clear and dangerous threat to every freedom-loving person not only American but in the whole world.

AJ: You are absolutely right Stanley Hilton. They have captured the government. They have not captured the peoples’ minds and they are counting on us not facing up to it.

SH: And they are counting on the repressive Patriot Act and threats and chief judges and FBI agents threatening people who are exposing them. That’s what they are counting on.

AJ: But you’re not backing down are you, my friend.

SH: No, I’m not

AJ: Well, we all stand with you, my brother, and God bless you.

SH: All right. Thank you.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lefergus70 Donating Member (94 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 02:35 AM
Response to Reply #195
206. I'll wait for a judge to rule on all that.
Although I agree with Hilton that "dangerous people" have taken over the government, I'm leery about his general charges. I'm 70 years old and can recall how my father and I had a serious falling out over Sen. McCarthy's lists of communists in government; Dad believed the senator, and I said he was full of crap. Then there were - still are - the mountain of conspiracy theories about Kennedy's assassination that still seem like mad ravings to me - and to Jimmy Breslin, who was there.

For example, Hilton says, "the fact that there were many drills, many rehearsals for 9/11 before it happened. Bush had seen this simulated on TV many times. He blurted this out at a press conference in California a few months after 9/11 where he said he had, quote, seen the first plane hit the first building on the video. And that’s not possible because there was no official video of that. There was one of the second plane not the first one. He had seen the first one."


Well, we've seen enough of Bush's mangling of facts and language to know he probably couldn't tell a video from live TV, a first plane from a second one. This type of "evidence" doesn't tell me much. I'm waiting for some hard facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-17-04 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
196. Very Interesting!
Does anyone know if this is related to that woman's RICO lawsuit? I can't remember her name at the minute.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #196
199. Ellen Mariani..I just posted her Rico lawsuit in full on another thread
That lawyer Phil Berg knows what he's doing. He wrote some complaint.

I wonder if the judge allowed it or dismissed it.

Did you see the last paragraph :

http://www.911forthetruth.com/pages/AmendCom.htm


"<32> On Friday, November 21, 2003, just days prior to the filing of this Amended Complaint, Retired Army General Tommy Franks the former commander of the military's Central Command warned, that if terrorists succeeded in using a weapon of mass destruction (WMD) against the United States or one of our allies, it would likely have catastrophic consequences for our cherished republican form of government. Frank further stated; if the United States is hit with a weapon of mass destruction that inflicts large casualties, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government. (NewsMax). On “911” Plaintiff and her nation were hit by weapons of mass destruction and to date no one based upon “hard evidence” has been held responsible and Plaintiff holds standing to find and bring to account those responsible parties and through discovery and trial testimony Defendant GWB, et al., will provide Plaintiff and the People of the United States of America the who, what, why and how “911” occurred. Plaintiff asserts her willingness to find the truth will in the end, preserve our constitutional system of government if only afforded the right to be heard in this matter and to call credible and other concerned American Citizens to prove this Amended Complaint, its basis and claims are bona fide and will prevent destruction of our way of life through accountability by this Honorable Court."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemonFighterLives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #199
207. Thanks Pallas
I just realized there was a link to it at deprogram.com.
The link you just left for me turns to jibberish on my computer. Don't know why?
Mariani - vs- B*sh
I wonder if either of the lawsuits are getting any traction?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alittlelark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
205. Just remain focused or "The fear Factor!!!!
CZ we know the scoop, and we were the 'cool kids' The series is Soho latant....at least for the uninformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ladyhawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
208. I'm going to need more specific info than this to believe MIHOP.
As of now, I think incompetence or "LIHOP" are way more likely. The article was a big generalization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #208
210. For specificity, a good read is this chapter of
Edited on Sat Sep-18-04 04:47 PM by Minstrel Boy
Michael Ruppert's soon-to-be-released book, Crossing the Rubicon, entitled "Wargames and High Tech: Paralyzing the System to Pull off the Attacks":

http://www.newsociety.com/News/rub_war.pdf

Here are a few fer instances:

May 2001, Cheney assumes the oversight of counterterrorism efforts.
June 2001, Rumsfeld assumes responsibility for shoot downs, changing a more than decade's old policy that rested with the judgement of field commanders. (The rule is changed back soon after 9/11.)
Sept 11, 2001, at least five wargames are in progress at the time of the attacks, some drawing much of the Eastern Seaboard's fighter response into north western Canada. One simulation includes the live-fly simulation of hijacked aircraft and the insertion of false radar blips. Another, the crashing of a plane into a building.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #210
211. Hi Minstrel Boy - I though I did thread " Paralyzing The System" but
you never know what the mods are going to do with these things....
I'll try to find if it still is on GenDiscuss and kick it.

-But Condoleeza Rice never heard of using a plane to attack a building - as the National Security Advisor - she was not let in on
the war games, right?

As long as they have the corporate owned media, owned by 6 corporations playing a long with them - it will only leak out, as it has here bit by bit...and maybe too late...

Only 48 days left..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pallas180 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-18-04 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
212. Here's the "Paralyzing" thread, MB - switch over cause this one's too long
okay?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=2365290#2369375

there's only 8 posts on this one..but it's the whole book excerpt....

(sshhhhhh - don't tell anybody)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC