|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:32 AM Original message |
Why do we refuse to admit that the memos COULD be forgeries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ET Awful (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:40 AM Response to Original message |
1. I've always said they COULD be, not that they were, but I've also said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumpstart33 (328 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 12:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
37. Forgeries of copies? or copies of forgeries? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 12:37 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uzybone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
46. Exactly my position. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
republicansarewhores (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
66. Flammable Materials... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasSissy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-04 10:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
72. That's pretty much my position. The issue isn't settled yet, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:41 AM Response to Original message |
2. I really don't care |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rockholm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:51 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Exactly. The INFORMATION IS REAL. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cthrumatrix (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:02 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. BINGO -- It's all about smear .... cloud the real issues and smear CBS/dem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zorra (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:40 PM Response to Reply #2 |
54. Yep. And besides that, these memos are just a needle in a haystack. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:42 AM Response to Original message |
3. who is this "we" you speak of? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
thebigidea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:52 AM Response to Reply #3 |
12. geez, I've posted here thousands of times... and yet - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:06 AM Response to Reply #12 |
16. It's a tip-off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 10:16 AM Response to Reply #16 |
27. Please don't include spelling in that list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demoiselle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:44 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. "Plaice knot yore trussed inn spilling chequers"....!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kayell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 02:28 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. Probably, its an old joke. At least by internet standards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stephanie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:47 AM Response to Reply #27 |
34. It's a generally reliable clue, when alongside others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
61. Wow, Stephanie must have the hots for me or something. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:16 PM Response to Reply #27 |
48. Creative spelling |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:36 PM Response to Reply #16 |
60. Bad spelling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:34 PM Response to Reply #12 |
59. If you had bothered to read my original message ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
58. Holy crap, forgive me for having a divergent opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
republicansarewhores (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
68. Wow Stephanie. US vs. YOU |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClintonTyree (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
4. Perhaps they are.......................... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wurzel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
5. It is the difference between "forgery" and 'fabrication". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GoldenOldie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:52 AM Response to Reply #5 |
11. Dan Rather keeps asking the Questions??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
6. Bush is a pampered punk- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spinzonner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:43 AM Response to Original message |
7. Anything without a documentable chain of custody could be a forgery |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wishlist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
8. Where have you been all week- there has been lots of debate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildClarySage (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:49 AM Response to Original message |
9. I don't know and I don't care if they're real or not |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dumpster_baby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:54 AM Response to Original message |
13. my thoughts, from another thread |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spider Jerusalem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 07:59 AM Response to Original message |
14. They "look like they were done on MS Word".... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:09 PM Response to Reply #14 |
45. I didn't know "MS Word" was a kind of printer or typewriter. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:40 PM Response to Reply #14 |
63. I've seen people try (and fail) to duplicate these documents ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObaMania (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:09 AM Response to Original message |
17. I think they are fake and somehow planted by KKKarl.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zeemike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:22 AM Response to Original message |
18. You ask to prove a negative |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cravat (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:07 AM Response to Reply #18 |
30. Come on, what kind of statement is this? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:32 PM Response to Reply #30 |
52. The depth of your penetration to the heart of this issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtTheEndOfTheDay (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:51 PM Response to Reply #30 |
57. Another "we" post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cravat (34 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-04 09:36 AM Response to Reply #57 |
70. So true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
robcon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:23 AM Response to Original message |
19. I think they are fake and planted by Burkett |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
64. I agree... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cocoa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:28 AM Response to Original message |
20. look at the source of the forgery allegations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 08:57 AM Response to Original message |
21. Deleted message |
Kathy in Cambridge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 02:34 PM Response to Reply #21 |
44. . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
22. Why do repubs refuse to admit the docs could be the real thing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tinanator (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 09:12 AM Response to Original message |
23. how stupid are we supposed to be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mark414 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 09:26 AM Response to Original message |
24. olbermann said last night they were probably forgeries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MUSTANG_2004 (688 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:47 PM Response to Reply #24 |
56. On forgetting the main issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Carson (560 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
25. It's the nature of the political beast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cogito ergo doleo (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 09:44 AM Response to Original message |
26. There's rational plausible doubt on both sides of the issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skittles (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 10:22 AM Response to Original message |
28. because we know the bastard was AWOL |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ducks In A Row (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 10:25 AM Response to Original message |
29. The info is real, and the forgery talk distracts from that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EndElectoral (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:08 AM Response to Original message |
31. Why can't the media admit they might be real and address the content? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:40 AM Response to Original message |
32. The whole thing is a farce. There are real issues to be addressed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TahitiNut (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 11:56 AM Response to Original message |
35. Why not call them "reproductions"?? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
36. Deleted message |
shanti (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 12:36 PM Response to Original message |
38. my position isn't popular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
2Design (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 12:38 PM Response to Original message |
40. The story is about the content - it is the message not the messenger |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wuwei (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 02:06 PM Response to Original message |
41. i feel this is a smokescreen issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 02:31 PM Response to Original message |
43. Hmmmmm. Who is "WE"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:13 PM Response to Original message |
47. Yeah, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
49. What WAS the name that you used to post under? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kathy in Cambridge (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:26 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. It's pretty bad when they're so obvious that you know their last 3 handles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EST (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:45 PM Response to Reply #50 |
55. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:51 PM Response to Reply #49 |
67. I posted it in the first message. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:31 PM Response to Original message |
51. They don't look like they were done on MS Word to me (m) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flammable Materials (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:48 PM Response to Reply #51 |
65. I thought ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlFrankenFan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
53. They COULD be |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Waverley_Hills_Hiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 06:38 PM Response to Original message |
62. Given Mrs Knoxes interview its pretty clear they are fake, now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-04 10:18 AM Response to Reply #62 |
71. Ms. Knox' statements do not prove the documents are forgeries |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dem_Loyalist (234 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Sep-16-04 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
69. I don't think it really matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
skygazer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-04 10:28 AM Response to Original message |
73. Because the argument buries the real issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Wally (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Sep-17-04 10:29 AM Response to Original message |
74. I don't see............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC