Saddam, safer with, or without? Reagan/Bush view....

[supercrash]

I don't know where I am going with this thought...but...

Kerry is taking heat for implying (I guess?) that we would be safer with Saddam, rather than a Islamic fundamentalist regime that more than likey will take power no matter what we do, it's bound to happen...just give it time.

Anyway, My point...Reagan/Bush decided that we would be safer with Saddam in power rather than the radical Shia majority in Iraq and Iran...Saddam was using wmd's at this time, yet Reagan/Bush thought we would be safer with him.

Jr. thinks we are safer with chaos instead of Saddam, His father would disagree, his actions tell us this.

His father picked Saddam, when he was armed and using wmd's, ...Jr. picked chaos when Saddam was disarmed

Both actions hurt America

Just a odd point...