Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why are the usual suspects acting as if they KNOW it's forgery?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 09:13 PM
Original message
Why are the usual suspects acting as if they KNOW it's forgery?
Sorry if I missed a thread on this, but I am Watching that assmunch Scabborough and a panel is all acting as if it is certain that the documents are forgeries? Did I miss something? Has CBS admitted the documents are forgeries? Does anyone know this as a fact yet?

WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Round up the usual suspects
I want to take them on a 7-day excursion with me into the Gila Wilderness -- and set them out far from each other, alone with a blanket.

Four days and four nights they will fast from food and water. When their minds are clean, I will light the council fire. We will pass the Talking Stick around our circle for three days and three nights, enjoying food and stretching in the Sun and under the Star Nations.


In this manner, we will clear up this excrebale forgery business.

All people carry the truth within them. Most times fasting and counciling are in this regard profoundly illuminating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 09:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's the Deal - They ARE Forgeries, but TRUE
1) KKKarl's m.o. is to leak TRUE things to somebody vulnerable like James HATFIELD and now BURKETT. Then he DISCREDITS them SO bad that the TRUE crap gets shoved aside.

He did it again.

2) KKKarl's shop cooked up the documents a year or two ago. In March of this year they hooked BURKETT.

3) Roger STONE and his (Cuban? "Lucy RAMIREZ") wife hooked BURKETT.

4) Once BURKETT got the docs, he started getting calls from MANY media outlets about the docs. HOW DID THEY KNOW? (KKKarl's shop tipped them off.)

5) CBS fell into it by serendipity with the other outlets. Because of CBS's prestige, BURKETT picked 'em.


FOLLOW THE BENEFITS: WHO benefitted from all this crap? a) RATHER was smeared, b) CBS was smeared, c) attempts to smear the KERRY campaign. d) Shrub is INNOCULATED from the (TRUE) draft issue.

It will be, what, ten, twenty years till KKKarl is outed. Our current media won't do it TODAY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozvotros Donating Member (394 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I thought they were suspected forgeries
But experts were saying that a definitive answer was not possible without the originals which Burkett said he destroyed.

Has CBS admitted they are actual forgeries or just that the chain of custody is suspect and that Burkett lied to them about where he got them. All of that is a far cry from saying they ARE forgeries.

It certainly has the Rove stench but I still thought it was all still speculation until I listened to the shills on Scaborough.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-22-04 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I think the Washington Post
report this weekend was pretty much the end.

They proved they were forgeries at least to my satisfaction. I think that just about every news office gets the Washington Post, and that was the end of the discussion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC