Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

you're one o' them over-educated book readin' liberals ain't ya?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:54 AM
Original message
you're one o' them over-educated book readin' liberals ain't ya?
i had an uncle way back when who always messed with me about reading books. i read thousands as a kid, and he used to say things like the above to insult me in front of everyone. he looked down on intellectualism, for lack of a better term.

he sneered at those who read newspapers or books of any kind. of course, he'd never ever read a single book in his life, other than school. but this attitude is nothing new, and now even the president carries this anti-intellectual swagger.

this is still going on, stronger than ever. teens make fun of the smart kids. i was never that bright, but the one's who were were always picked on and ridiculed. the less educated kids scoff at scholarly kids who use proper english, as opposed to the current slang. called teacher's pets, or nerds, and even beaten up.

that same childish attitude is carried into adulthood unfortunately, and i've never seen it in more full swing than right now. especially under bush II. he BRAGS about not reading books or newspapers. BOASTS about his in-curiousness. deliberately uses a hick accent to appeal to the dumbest among us. (i've got a hick accent too, so don't attack me)

the nazis also attacked intellectuals and free thinkers. saw them as dangerous, because thinking for yourself is counter to the group think, nazi personae. become like the dominant mob, don't be an intellectual troublemaker. write only nationalist books. speak only nazi words, make only official artworks and music.

when i was readin' all them fancy schmancy books, i read about the nazis pretty heavily. they've always fascinated and horrified me, and i was caught off guard when i realized that bushkkko is using the nazi playbook, for the same nazi purposes. my momma didn't raise no idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bicentennial_baby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 05:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reminds me of a Bill Hicks bit...Whatchoo reading fer?
"She did'nt ask me what I was reading, but what I was reading for. I never really thought about it before, but I guess it's so I don't become a fucking waitress in a waffle house like you lady!"

"He must be one of them....readers"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedSock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
17. i love that hicks routine
"Looks like we got ourselves a reader!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. You don't get criticized just for knowing too much.
It's also the things you decide to focus your time on, and the level of intensity that you decide to give to a project.

In a modern world that loves a multi-tasker, those who enjoy doing one thing and doing it well are considered abnormal -- unless it has something to do with making fast money. It's the reason why we're losing our master craftsmen and the reason why the young generation is losing the ability to critical think. Better to run with the pack, than to go against it and get torn apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
3. I see this everyday as my teenagers come back from school and
tell me how some kids in their classes ridicule them for getting good grades and for going to the library afterhours.Even when my kids are very good at sports ( one in Tennis and the other in soccer) they never stop being ridiculed as "nerds". When this is the attitude of children one can only guess what their parents' thinking is like.

I will never forget the day when one of my daughters came home saying that her teacher told her that ambition is not very good for young girls.The ambition she was especially concerned about was intellectual in nature.

Bush, of course, has made being dumb fashionable in his own way, but he was on fertile ground to start with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phylny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
8. Since our girls were little, we've asked them the same question:
"Who gets the good jobs?"

"The ones who study."
"The ones who work hard."
"The ones who are educated."

We also have instilled in them the notion that people who make fun of you are insecure and feel like they have to mow you down to make themselves look better, but WE know the truth. We can smile at their folly and move on, because they're going nowhere, and we have places to go, things to do, education to acquire, money to earn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Absolutely.To ask our girls to be less ambitious is a sin in my
opinion.It is like consigning 50% of our population to be as mediocre as Jesse Helms, or even Bush for that matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
4. Fucking A
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freeplessinseattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
24. no, a fucking C is more like it, lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
5. My sister poked fun at me for "always having my nose in a book"
When I gave my nieces children's storybooks for Christmas, Caldicott Medal winners, she complained to my mother that I'd bought them BOOKS. She does have a collection of well-worn books on her shelves--they are part of the decor that her Bloomingdale's decorator picked out and installed.

My sister is a Republican. She loves her Rush Limbaugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpaceCatMeetsMars Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. So typical!
My husband and I seek out educational gifts for our nieces and nephews that look fun simply because that's the kind of gift we remember getting the most enjoyment from. My mother-in-law keeps marveling that two nephews, in particular, seem to gravitate to these gifts repeatedly.

It doesn't seem to occur to them that these kids have brains and enjoy using them, because they keep getting them the popular, expensive gifts that don't require reading or learning anything. They think the gifts we give are just weird! Every Christmas is an orgy of expensive gifts and then they can't figure out why the kids turn to that "weird" book or science activity. They all love Rush too, must be a connection there!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. None readers are easier to fool
Personally, I take it as an insult that the RNC chose to target WV and AR with the mass mailings asserting that the 'liberals' will ban the Bible. Shows the GOP believes in stereotypes-that people in these states are ignorant hillbillies. As I said in my local LTTE, I hope people getting this mailing are as insulted by the insinuation as I am, and that they look carefully at everything the GOP says-if they lie about this, what else are they lying about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muchacho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
7. Don't worry, be stupid!
it is an interesting,and troubling,phenomenon.

Having highly educated people (often Ivy league) championing ignorance and undermining the desire for intelligence.

Like the man that condescendingly says "Don't worry your pretty little head..."

The Dems aren't much better here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Yes, anti-intellectualism is a big problem here in the US
Politicians want to keep us stupid.
Religious leaders FOR SURE want to keep us stupid.
Stupid people are easier to deceive.

"The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for himself... Almost inevitably, he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable."
--H.L. Mencken
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 06:32 AM
Response to Original message
11. book learning and knowledge
Knowledge is transmitted through a methodological approach, and
one form of knowledge, can be transmitted through books. THis is
in contrast to the "actors" approach, where knowledge is being able
to "do" something, not talk about it.

Once i designed a software system. Months later as users were
using the system in their work every day, someone pointed out to me
that the training manual that my team wrote, was partly wrong, and
that i did now know the steps and the theory behind why they did
things a certain way. The person did not realize i designed the
system, and berated me, for being ignorant of the book.

I realized that that person attained their position by book learning
and greasing away through exams and whatnot in a university system
that produces good attaboy ass kissers.... but people who are poorly
equipped to discriminate what knowledge is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crankie Avalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Yeppers...
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 07:11 AM by George W Bush
...them thar books is no good fer kids. Much better ta give 'em some shoot-'em-up video games as gifts--makes 'em better citizins fer when they gotta do their duty in places like Iraq and Syriaq.

Later, as kids become more older, they can read the Bible and maybe some pro-Confederacy Civil War hist'ry, but that's about it.

WAHOO!!! Remember the Alamode and whatnot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. LOL, Bunnypants*
Howz the coke habit doing? Or are you only allowed prescription drugs now (and LOTS of em!)?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
14. If any of my children whine about having to read some assigned
books, my wife always has a scare that snaps them right back: Do you want to wind up as another George Bush? LOL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
15. We're currently increasing our anti-intellectual population by
leaps and bounds.

We've standardized schools into hateful places to be, relegated thinking and enjoyment of intellectual pursuits to the dumpster in favor of indoctrinating our entire population of young children into the "learning is a nasty chore; get it over with and get on with the real world" agenda. If you think it's bad now, just wait another 20 years.

Or...:think:....

Stand up and kick the test-obsessed learn-by-rote standardistos out of public ed today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
18. leave no intelligentsia behind
Jebus Rice came to me in a dream last night and said that Dubya wuz annointed and that I must burn all my books and watch only FU(X) News for three moneth to be absolved of the sins of analysis, hearty vocabulary and lack of ignorance. I am complying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 08:10 AM
Response to Original message
19. Nazis & gopers don't READ. They rely on spoken word for their information
since that method prevents them from processing and digesting any information, especially in today's teevee nation, where 'information' is rammed and crammed into 12 second sound bytes.

When "information" is force fed into tiny tublets, the lack of critical thought is clearly evident... the nazis er I mean the Gopers are only able to belch ouch one line of lies at a time without applying any principals of critical thought and analysis. They belch the same 3 lines over and over and over... I see this DAILY on the yahoo chats.

Makes me puke. I can't imagine NOT reading 12 articles on the same topic and making up my OWN mind about something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sputnik Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
20. See #11
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
21. Guilty
Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa. I admit it freely that i have read hundreds of books. Some of them were actually for enjoyment. What a sick, sick person i must be.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
22. And proud of it!
What I don't understand are the people who are proud of their self-imposed ignorance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minstrel Boy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Death to intelligence and long live death!"
Edited on Tue Sep-28-04 09:25 AM by Minstrel Boy
Some interesting quotes here, from Harold Walsby's old The Domain of Ideologies:

During the Spanish Civil War, the "great Catholic writer and philosopher", Miguel Unamuno - who, at its beginning, favoured the fascist cause as against the "Reds" - was horrified at the brutalities ordered by the fascist General Staff. He wrote:

"All these crimes are committed in cold blood, in response to the slogan implied by the double-edged cry of this insane general who calls himself Millan Astray: 'Death to intelligence and long live death!'" (quoted by Melvin Rader in "No Compromise" p. 136)

Walsby quotes further from Raders' book:

"...one of the main aspects of Fascist anti-intellectualism: the refusal to employ science in the determination of basic human ideals." He goes on to describe the strong influence of "that forerunner of Fascism, Vilfredo Pareto" upon Mussolini and his sympathisers: "His (Mussolini's) remarks indicate that he was especially impressed by Pareto's denial of the intellectual, political, religious and moral unity of society. . . The Fascists either leave no room for pure theory, or subordinate it to morale and action. Typical of the Fascist attitude are the words of an early Nazi theorist, Moeller van den Bruck: 'The future belongs not to the problem-monger, but to the man of character'... in the Popolo d'Italia, November 22, 1921, Mussolini himself champions the relativistic position. Endeavouring to go the relativists one better, he defines Fascism as 'super-relativity'. The Fascists, he asserts, display their extremely relativistic outlook by refusing to give a definite form to their programme and by recognising 'in life and action an absolute supremacy over intelligence.'"

Has the strong anti-intellectual, anti-rational bias of the Right-wing - and particularly that of fascism - nothing to do with their vehement opposition to the Left? Is it mere coincidence or is there, as we suggest, a very intimate connection between the two? Is there not really an implicit recognition of the identity of the Left-wing ideology with a higher level of intellectual development than their own? Is not implied here our present thesis that there is a direct relationship between political outlooks or ideologies, on the one hand, and the vertical or qualitative development of intellect, on the other? What, we suggest, is here merely implicit, we shall, in due course, confirm with much stronger evidence in its favour.
http://www.gwiep.net/books/doi13.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-28-04 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
25. Power fears thought.

Brute force always wins, except when eluded or outsmarted. To know you are a moran is to fear being shown up for the moran you are.

Some things I noticed when I was young was that teachers didn't like pupils who knew the subject matter better than they did, and employers didn't want to hire anyone smarter than they were.

I think that the dominance/pecking order stuff sort of falls apart when brains develop. There was an example among chimps or gorillas in the wild studies, when the alpha male was always the biggest and strongest, until one youngster figured out how to frighten others into submission even if they were bigger, by using nearby objects to make loud noises.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC