Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Argument against preventative war

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
GreyPilgrim Donating Member (140 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:37 PM
Original message
Argument against preventative war
A friend of mine was listening to NPR today, and he heard a good case against preventative war. I've been looking for the audio feed or transcript, but I haven't located it. If anyone has it, please post it. :-)

But, there's an excellent quote that would be nice to see in a circulated e-mail.

"Allow the President to invade a neighboring nation whenever he shall deem it necessary to repel an invasion and you allow him to do so whenever he may choose to say he deems it necessary for such purpose, and you allow him to make war at pleasure....
If today he should choose to say he thinks it necessary to invade Canada to prevent the British from invading us, how could you stop him? You may say to him, "I see no probability of the British invading us," but he will say to you, "Be silent; I see it, if you don't."


Who said that? Abraham Lincoln (criticizing Polk's decision to invade Mexico to prevent war).

Y'all may have noted this quote before, but it's the first time I've read it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rainy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Robert Byrd had this in one of his most beautiful speeches
I love Robert Byrd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-29-04 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. you are missing one important word, unilateral
If you think your neighbor is a threat, go to the security council. Let them decide if it really is a threat.

There is nothing wrong with truely preventing an imminent threat, there is a problem with letting a government decide when it is threatened or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC