Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I think it's important that we quit calling right-wingers 'conservative'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:54 AM
Original message
I think it's important that we quit calling right-wingers 'conservative'
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 12:58 AM by rumguy
They don't conserve anything. They don't conserve money. They don't conserve the environment. Their foreign policy is not cautious or careful.

Hell - there's not much that is conservative about them.

We need to call them right-wingers. We are more conservative than they are - this is important because many people like the idea of being conservative.... And there's a lot to be said for conserving things.

Labels matter - they frame things in important ways.

Here in Washington I hear prominent Dems saying that Dino Rossi (the pubbie candidate for governor) is too conservative for Washington. They should use the term right-wing instead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. That would make a nice question to ask your right wing friends
"Name one thing that the repukes conserve"

There is no answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ranosgol Donating Member (307 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree..these guys are about as Conservative as Hitler.
I hate to use Hitler but it fits sometimes.

I am not saying the GOP wants to put people in gas chambers by any means but they are using the same propaganda tactics to the tee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. None of the old labels mean anything anymore
Leftwingers and rightwingers are all leftovers from the Cold War.

Means nada now...except they're both seen as extremists.

Conservative and liberal are from the same era.

They all have too much baggage from the last century.

We all need new names.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. that may very well be true
but for purposes of elections this year I think right-winger is the best way to describe them - or wingnut - whatever...

they are not conservative...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. If you are talking solely next month, fine
I meant in general, and for every other election.

It's obviously way too late to change names before the upcoming US election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TaleWgnDg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
4. exactly!! and I've been saying it for years . . .
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 01:02 AM by TaleWgnDg
that so-called "conservatives" are any BUT conservative. Instead, that are radical off-the-wall whackos.

Rightwinger is an excellent tag. Extremist is another great tag.

. . . . . . . . .

edited to add: btw, when you've got George Will and Pat Buchanan bashing GWBush's policies, then you KNOW the tag "conservative" no longer sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eye and Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Radical.
Someone on DU suggested "radical" a week-or-two ago. I like it. I've used it, and it drives pseudocons crazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. I know I even put one of our radicals
in the same boat as the ones they claim to hate... two sides of the same coin and both are TRUE BELIEVERS... drove him batty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eye and Monkey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. similar experience!
cheers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Division Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Radical Right Wing - It does have a nice ring to it
I've always been a fan of alliteration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCSBLiberalCat53 Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:00 AM
Response to Original message
7. Why not call them
Reactionaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:05 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. I don't think reactionary is right either
They're something different. A reactionary, as I understand it - wants to return to some time way in the past. Well - Thomas Jefferson coined the term 'separation of church and state'. Their fusion of fundamentalist christianity with corporate power and militarism is something new and different.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. problem is they share elements of
Millenarian thought with any religious extremist on this planet....

Hence why they want to go back to a wonderful era well in teh past when all was good

For AQ it is the caliphate, for our radicals it is .... somehwere before Presdient McKinley, and for some even before the Civil War... maybe Massachussets Bay Colony.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UCSBLiberalCat53 Donating Member (199 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #13
26. Hmmm
Contrary to popular belief, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was NOT ruled by church leaders. The Puritans thought if government and the Church mixed, government would corrupt the church. Ministers were forbidden to hold public office, even though they were the most respected figures in the colony. However, you're right that their laws were based on God's law like forbidding work on the Sabbath. So basically based on your model, you probably won't see Falwell or Robertson in positions of leadership but probably advisory positions.

They probably also desire to go back to Biblical Israel. They seem to love the types of capital punishment that the Bible talks about, like death by stoning for adulterers, but that poses a slight problem. These flying monkeys wouldn't mind stoning Bill Clinton to death, but what about Henry Hyde and other Republicans caught in adulterous affairs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:08 AM
Original message
America is Owned by Asia!
Bush has sold us out with his borrowing to foreign nations who can call in the chips anytime and may be doing so with corporate deals. The average Joe has no idea of that fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
16. yeah what's conservative about that?
NOTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Merlin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
12. I totally agree.
There are some really positive attributes to conservative thought. I respect genuine conservatives.

I know conservatives. Some of them are friends of mine. Right wing idealogues are no conservatives!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:09 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Radical right wing idiots works for me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zero Division Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. Heh, didn't see your post until just now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:09 AM
Response to Original message
15. Used to mean they were "conservative" when it came to
creating or supporting social programs for the poor. Now it means that they are the craziest people on the planet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carnie_sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
17. I think reactionary
fits perfectly. After all, their heroes in Wash DC are trying their damnedest to recreate the gilded age.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oscar111 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. "RW thieves" "Thief-rule".-- best terms
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 02:06 AM by oscar111
"RW thieves" gets to the core of the repubs policies. Their basic source of strength is cheap labor {thats us}. That is the main kind of theft they use.

store ripoffs, bank ripoffs, repair ripoffs, landlord ripoffs happen, but are small in comparison.

"thief-rule" gets to the reality of how we are ruled by thieves, and points out their method of bought elections.
===Say "campaign bribes", do not say "campaign donations".

"radical" may work in annoying them, but in our minds, realize that that term does not invalidate any idea system.

democracy was radical in 1776, now it is mainstream.

extremist is also not a term to dismiss things, for the same reason.\

wingnut is too obscure.

"reactionary" is an odd term. If one reacts to a bad policy, then it is good to be reactionary. Forget this term.
"Mammonist" is too obscure for Joe sixpack.
==============================
"RW thieves",

is the best term for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arikara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. There is one thing that they try to conserve
and that's their own bank accounts. How about calling them mammonists.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:47 AM
Response to Original message
22. I call them anti-American
But radical works, too. Or the more casual "wingnut."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:49 AM
Response to Original message
23. "Extreme right wing"
Too extreme for America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MsConduct Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
24. Yeah, right-wing (nuts) are as 'conservative'
as the all the followers of dictators are, in that crazy radical way.




Peace
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UdoKier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 01:51 AM
Response to Original message
25. I never use that term.
I'm conservative - in dress and lifestyle. There is nothing conservative about the modern-day GOP. Sick, corrupt, twisted, sometimes backward-looking, but not conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drhilarius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:41 AM
Response to Original message
27. I prefer "regressives"...
sets them in contrast to us,and it pretty much sums up their ideology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 03:54 AM
Response to Original message
28. Yup. Neo-cons aren't conservative. I never use conservative to label them.
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 03:57 AM by w4rma
In fact, I think it's lying about them to call them conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarbleus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
29. the New American Fascist Party..........n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KayLaw Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:05 AM
Response to Original message
30. I hate to say it
But most are simply suckers who are giving away everything so the big corporations/media/robber barrons can govern. They lose their good-paying jobs, civil rights, clean environment, etcetera, pay for infrastructure and the war machine so the elite don't have to, and get little to nothing in return.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
31. "Extreme right-wing" or "extreme right-wing radical" ...
I have been using these terms for quite awhile to differentiate them from true conservatives and old-style Republicans, hoping to make my audience think. Doesn't matter if my audience tilts to the left or to the right -- I want to move them away from overly-simplistic thinking and toward understanding just who is the problem.

Hekate
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
32. I like Robert Reich's term
Radical Conservatives. That associates the word radical with their own term in people's minds and gives it a negative connotation without being overtly nasty or rude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
33. Good Call
I've taken to referring to them as the Fringe Right.

One thing i find galling is the reference to Dems as being out of the mainstream. When someone says that to me, i ask 2 simple questions. "What percent of the vote did your guy get in 2000?" "What was the overall ratio of Repub to Dem votes in 2002 Congressional races?"

Answers:
In 2000, Bush was elected with less than 45% of the popular vote. It would appear that HE is not the mainstream's choice. More people didn't want him than did!

In 2002, the overall ratio was 201:200. Given that there are moderate repubs, that would indicate that the extremists on the right are not representing at least 50% of the people.

They are NOT part of the mainstream. The mainstream has rejected their message. It's only their reliance on the 28% who would vote Republican even in Jesus were running on the Dem ticket that keeps them in power and allows them to organize their campaign of obfuscation. They are not representing the mainstream, and they never have.

Given that, it is obvious that they are extremists who cannot win on their message but need other means to win.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flammable Materials Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
34. The phrases I use:
"worrisome extremists"
"fundamentalist radicals"
"hijackers of the Republican Party"
"non-conservatives"
"reactionaries"
"religious authoritarians"
"American jihadists"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laylah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
35. Personally, I call them
right-wing nut jobs...does that count?

Jenn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:33 AM
Response to Original message
36. I prefer "radicals," "extremists," and "fundies"
And I'm not shy about using those terms. I don't miss any oppotunity to point out that "conservative" means fiscal responsibility, LESS governmental intrusion and a strong belief in personal freedom.

Those words produce strange looks in this repug region, but it's fun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy331 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:54 AM
Response to Original message
37. Yes, Yes, I've been saying this for a long while now they wear this label
as a badge of honor, they are anything but honorable. Time to call a spade a spade and conservative they are not and anyway most people are conservative in some sense one way/another.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BulletproofLandshark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
38. I call them Anti-American fascists...
always an attention-getter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sputnik Donating Member (347 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
39. That's why I call them "Cons"
They hate that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rumguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
40. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hiphopnation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-30-04 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
41. Well stated
Edited on Thu Sep-30-04 06:28 PM by hiphopnation23
My dad is a "conservative" and he ain't buyin' the steamin pile o' sh*t this dork and his daddies buddies are sellin. Really, I come from a whole family of thoughtful conservatives none of whom go to church regularly, think America should be seeking domination of the world oil supply, think the state should tell women or gays how to live thier lives etc. But they ARE conservative folk in the family, "down-home", and especially monetary sense of the word. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC