Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NEVER FORGET - Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq? (60 Min. Jan'04)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 01:45 PM
Original message
NEVER FORGET - Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq? (60 Min. Jan'04)
Bush Sought ‘Way’ To Invade Iraq?

Jan. 11, 2004



Paul O'Neill Speaks Out


(CBS) A year ago, Paul O'Neill was fired from his job as George Bush's Treasury Secretary for disagreeing too many times with the president's policy on tax cuts.

Now, O'Neill - who is known for speaking his mind - talks for the first time about his two years inside the Bush administration. His story is the centerpiece of a new book being published this week about the way the Bush White House is run.

Entitled "The Price of Loyalty," the book by a former Wall Street Journal reporter draws on interviews with high-level officials who gave the author their personal accounts of meetings with the president, their notes and documents.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/09/60minutes/pri...

snip

Based on his interviews with O'Neill and several other officials at the meetings, Suskind writes that the planning envisioned peacekeeping troops, war crimes tribunals, and even divvying up Iraq's oil wealth.

He obtained one Pentagon document, dated March 5, 2001, and entitled "Foreign Suitors for Iraqi Oilfield contracts," which includes a map of potential areas for exploration.

“It talks about contractors around the world from, you know, 30-40 countries. And which ones have what intentions,” says Suskind. “On oil in Iraq.”

snip


O'Neill was very clear. 8.5 months before 911 shrubco's cabinet was looking at a way to "take down Iraq".

ALL this "lack of WMD" (after the fact) is no surprise. The WMD story was needed to attack Iraq and Paul O'Neill told 60 minutes in January '04.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. A kick to the pants of PNAC...
... and the BFEE!

Excellent post, cthrumatrix. These turds have been working night and day to get their mits on Iraq's oil and whatever else they can steal -- and whomever else they can enslave or kill. Even Ted Koppel's alien wig noticed:

Were Neo-Conservatives’ 1998 Memos a Blueprint for Iraq War?

March 10 — Years before George W. Bush entered the White House, and years before the Sept. 11 attacks set the direction of his presidency, a group of influential neo-conservatives hatched a plan to get Saddam Hussein out of power.

The group, the Project for the New American Century, or PNAC, was founded in 1997. Among its supporters were three Republican former officials who were sitting out the Democratic presidency of Bill Clinton: Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney and Paul Wolfowitz.
In open letters to Clinton and GOP congressional leaders the next year, the group called for "the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime from power" and a shift toward a more assertive U.S. policy in the Middle East, including the use of force if necessary to unseat Saddam.

And in a report just before the 2000 election that would bring Bush to power, the group predicted that the shift would come about slowly, unless there were "some catastrophic and catalyzing event, like a new Pearl Harbor."

CONTINUED...

http://abcnews.go.com/sections/nightline/DailyNews/pnac_030310.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. After 9-11, Blair had to 'RESTRAIN' Bush from attacking Saddam
Ted Koppel's alien hair-do must've missed this story...

Blair 'restrained Bush from attacking Iraq after Sept 11'

By Anton La Guardia, Diplomatic Editor
(Filed: 21/03/2003)

Tony Blair played a key role in stopping President George W Bush from ordering military action against Iraq immediately after the September 11 attacks, and convincing him to take a longer diplomatic road to war, British sources disclosed yesterday.

The Prime Minister also urged caution and delay on at least two later occasions.


SNIP...

After the September 11 attacks, hardline members of the administration, such as Donald Rumsfeld, the defence secretary, called for Iraq to be included immediately as a target of the "war on terrorism".

But Mr Blair backed more cautious figures, such as Colin Powell, the secretary of state, who said that uprooting al-Qa'eda from Afghanistan should be the first priority.

SNIP...

Officials said one of his main objectives was to ensure that the US administration did not take action against Iraq immediately.

CONTINUED...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/03/21/wus21.xml&sSheet=/portal/2003/03/21/ixportaltop.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cthrumatrix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. they lied to get into Iraq... O'Neill (a repug insider) was very clear
that this was ALL planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-07-04 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Shifting money...
that was allocated by Congress for Afghanistan to invasion plans for Iraq without Congressional knowlege and of course not approved by Congress because this was in secret is a crime isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC