Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Poll: What is the most appropriate term for the defenders of Fallujah?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
oblivious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:01 AM
Original message
Poll question: Poll: What is the most appropriate term for the defenders of Fallujah?
Rumsfeld calls them assassins, killers and criminals.
Stooge Allawi calls them terrorists.
Gen. Myers, Gen. Casey and the press call them insurgents (i.e. rebel soldiers).
Asia Times calls them the resistance.
Xinhua calls them rebels and fighters.
Other Iraqis call them either fighters or simply Fallujans.
Colonel Brandl calls them collectively 'Satan'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Iraqi's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Safi Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. Patriots (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LosinIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:07 AM
Original message
How would we act if we had been invaded pre-emptively???
Wouldn't we considrer ourselves patriots for fighting against the invaders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
12. Well yar but we were classed as rabble.
And if we had not won? I am sure George Washington would have been shot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
17. I'm with you...
.. Patriot should have been added to the poll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:04 AM
Response to Original message
3. They are Sunnis resisting the occupation...
The "foreign fighters" and "terrorists" crap is pure propaganda.

Remember that Allawi is a Shiite with scores to settle...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Shi'ites are also resisting...al Sadr IS a Shi'ite.
It ain't just Sunnis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBHam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Fallujah is a Sunni-dominated city...
That's what I was saying...

And Allawi is a Shiite
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MSgt213 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 06:37 AM
Response to Reply #3
14. Even if there are foreign fighters didn't we have foreign fighters helping
us with the British? I seem to remember the French supporting us. But on a large note if there are foreign fighters there Saddam didn't let them in. We did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. we illegally invaded and bombed them based on a pack of lies
they don't care much for it and are resisting. Sounds like a f***ing RESISTANCE to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:09 AM
Response to Original message
5.  troop whackers- gooooo-oh troop whackers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
6. What were the men who defended the Alamo called?
I should know this, since I live in Texas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JSJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:17 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. short-lived?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:22 AM
Response to Original message
9. Well every one who does not go with Bush is now a terrorist.
The name seems to have been stuck on to anyone who is not a Bush lover. Even when he travels around this country or over seas Bush has moved into the middle of only people who swear they love him. I guess it is one reason he thinks he has the go ahead on anything he wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
11. Un-Christian & Un-American
/Sarcasm off
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wildwww2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
13. Victims of the Usurped nation. Bu$h Land Under God. And more to come!
Yes I`m sure Jesus wants Bu$h Inc. to kill these people for not allowing him to steal their oil. Without a fight. Like he stole our last two Presidential elections. Without a fight. Praise the lord and pass the contribution plate.
Peace
Wildman
Al Gore is My President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
15. resistance would be the strictly accurate term, AFAIK
Edited on Tue Nov-09-04 07:36 AM by NorthernSpy
They aren't "insurgents" or "rebels", because their existence actually long predates that of the Iraqi "governing authority" that they are supposedly "rebelling" against. That governing authority is itself wholly the creature of the invading foreign power that these forces have fought since the war broke out. The apparent origin of the resistance was in a decision made by the Iraqi military to switch to guerilla tactics in defense of their country during the invasion.

To the extent that they target noncombatants, they may be legitimately called terrorists. However, this term does not apply to persons doing battle against the soldiers of an invasive foreign army.

So I suppose that "resistance" is probably the most accurate term.


(edit: added clarification)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorthernSpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-09-04 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. mind you, there may well be other elements in the mix
I'm talking about the people who are most commonly -- if inaccurately -- referred to in US media as "the insurgents".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC