Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rush-"Let's get it all out on the table 'neo-con' means 'Republican Jew'"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:31 PM
Original message
Rush-"Let's get it all out on the table 'neo-con' means 'Republican Jew'"
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 02:33 PM by underpants
While I was out running errands I heard this little piece of bullshit.

~"I have refrained from making this point until now but those who use that term ...those who use it in a prejorative sense mean 'Jew' not a 'liberal Jew' or a 'Democratic Jew' but they mean 'Republican Jew'.....PEople like Wolofowitz, Kristol,......Pearle.....well let's leave it at there"

ON EDIT-yes he did say "prejorative"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Union Thug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, George Bush is a republican jew... Got it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Mandate Here. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
32. No, He is HANDLED by them... EOM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whhhaaa??
No, Rush, that's not what I mean at all when I use the phrase, but thanks for playing. Here's your parting gift.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah man! It's Jews like Cheney...er...
nevermind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
52. Or Poppy Bush

Rush needs to be taken off of the air right now!
How dare he say something like that ,what a bigot!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow... someone's gone WAAAAAY off the deep end...
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. Nope, now he can call people who dont support war anti semites.
If you oppose neo-cons you oppose jewish republicans under this definition.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StClone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #4
64. No this is the way Rush operates
Have you ever noticed he rarely attacks certain news items until long after they are out in the public?

Here is part of the reason:

1) Ignore item wait for it to go away while...

2) Think tanks put together a plan of attack

3) Put on air "The Rush Propaganda Show"

His ideas are so old he passes coprolite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Or "Fundamentalist Christian Republican"
who loves the Jews insofar as they are required to rebuild the temple before Jesus will come back. In other words, they need Israel and the Jews to bring about their much-anticipated apocalypse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sui generis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. they don't have to change the world
I'd be happy to get together with a few other like minded people and provide a personal apocalypse for them, er, tomorrow? Is that soon enough?

sheesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
51. Bingo. We're opposed to the "Judeo-Christian" western tradition
In other words, being opposed to the war in Iraq makes us traitors to our country, traitors to our culture, and traitors to God, in the newspeak of the right.

If we protest that we aren't against those things at all, then we are "filled with hate" and "messengers of Satan."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BBradley Donating Member (645 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. He stole that from some other idiot...
Anybody have a link to the original comment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. See I KNEW that wasn't an original
I thought for a minute there someone let him read that talking point first. No they aren't that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Ask and ye shall receive
Take your pick. Maybe he stole it from AAR???

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=neocon+%22republican+jew%22
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
45. I found this posted on the AA blog (© Dow Jones)
So let’s go over the rules: Just because we call ourselves “neocons,” it doesn’t mean you can. Of course, if you’re right-leaning and don’t intend the word disparagingly, you get a pass. Just know that unless you’re aware that “neoconservative” also includes last names like Bennett, Kirkpatrick, Sowell, Kemp and Ashcroft, when you refer to someone as a neocon, you’re saying “Jew.” We might suggest reverting to previous, less codey expressions such as “Jewish conservative” or “Republican Jew"--especially since not every right-leaning Jew is neo. But not to worry: We neocons, Republican Jews, Jewish conservatives and Jews for Bush won’t take offense, since we don’t want American Christians to feel even more paranoid than they already do (particularly during “holiday” season).

As for our imperviously left-leaning fellow tribesmen, let them figure out for themselves how to handle their non-Jewish co-ideologists who say “neocon” angrily and freely in mixed company.

Ms. Gorin, a contributing editor of JewishWorldReview.com, performs with RightStuffComedy.com.

Copyright © 2004 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #45
47. P.S. according to her - liberals are not allowed to use the term "neocon"
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
comsymp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. I must be really losing it
because that was actually pretty funny, in a snarky kinda way. Too bad about her going to all that trouble to explain the religious connotation and distinctions, and then making the broad-brush swipe at American Christians, tho. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
imax2268 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
18. no...
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 02:44 PM by imax2268
he stole that from Wikipedia...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_(United_States)

for some reason I can't get the link to post properly...just make sure to add the underscore and the (United_States) in the address line...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. David Brooks was one source for this
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 02:42 PM by jpgray
But I think dimwitted Dave got his marching orders from Muravchik's Commentary piece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
23. David Frum
http://www.nationalreview.com/frum/diary122002.asp

Max Boot

http://www.opinionjournal.com/editorial/feature.html?id=110002840

John Podheretz, Bill Kristol...

All around the same time. It's an orchestrated meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Thanks-NOTE Chertoff is Jewish so expect it to snowball
as his confirmation nears. Yes they are playing the race card and they have been getting ready for it for some time-that is why Gonzales was brought along with W and Condi is such their sweetheart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #30
56. Hitler would be so proud of junior!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
24. David Brooks wrote a column on it for the NYT
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. Wow! Rush is so smart. Now we can't talk about them anymore.
NOT! :D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. wow, he can't even get that shit right....
....Buchanan loves pointing out that Wolfowitz and Pearle are supposedly registered Democrats. Rush is a piece of shit. Right-wingnuts always are the FIRST to play the "race card", as if...oh hell. Just ask yourself why it's always an Armstrong or Powell or Rice or Gonzales out there being the apologists for the exposed lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. Right supposedly neo-cons are socially liberal
Funny you don't hear them speaking about social issues very much.

The Powell Rice thing is dead on too.

Oh I almost forgot Monsour Ijaz is a Dem too he gave money to Clinton's campaign....see?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gatorboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Wolofowitz is a Jewish name?
Coulda fooled me! Sounds German....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, it means a fat, lying, pillpopping bigtime AH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #11
53. Could you leave the 'fat' out of it, please?
"Lying, pillpopping bigtime AH" can stand alone.

Those of us who are fat don't mind the word, but we do mind it being used as a insult.

Thanks. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0007 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #53
57. Fat could = super wealthy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KlatooBNikto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #53
61. I am sorry, I did not mean to offend.My apologies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcscajun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #61
67. Thanks....all smiles here.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 04:04 PM by mcscajun
:)

It's my new year crusade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenArrow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
13. no, it means fascist
of which Rush is one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpgray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
16. Yes, James Woolsey's Jewish heritage is so well-known
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 02:38 PM by jpgray
He's a neocon. As is Jeane Kirkpatrick. Must be a Jew, right?

:crazy:

(Note Rummy and Cheney aren't properly speaking neoconservatives.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stanwyck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. Poor Rush
he just lost his anti-Semitic audience. And I bet that's a large slice. Must be the drugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. banana republicans just LOVE to play the victim
"waaaah, look, i'm being discriminated against!
i'm subject to anti-whiteism!
i'm subject to anti-christianism!
i'm subject to anti-americanism!
i'm subject to anti-wealthism!
my jew friends are subject to anti-jewism!
my token n-friends are subject to anti-n-ism!"

these people are bigots through and through and they cloak themselves in the language of anti-bigotry to further their selfish and bigotted ends.

as much as they pretend like liberals play the victim, no one can hold a candle to the banana republicans and their wailing. virtually ANYTHING the democrats say is an attack against them personally or against some class. they can't even accept that we might be talking about an issue.

they are a disgusting lot, and rush leads the pack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
22. "I have refrained from making this point until now..."
As usual for Rush, that's bullshit. He's been peddling that codswallop for years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. I know I've heard him say that before
He even lies about telling lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. Thanks!
I just added "codswallop" to my vocabulary...!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
26. "Neo-con" means "Fuck-up Trying to Avoid Blame."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
youngred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
27. they're ratcheting up the Democrats=racists card aren't they
with Gonzales and this. Such an ugly canard and very hard to fight. Each successful lie has an element of truth...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Yes they are-Franken's ditto head friend did this yesterday
Franken didn't have a very good response either.

BTW- Chertoff is Jewish I believe so watch for this to snowball as his conformation nears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
29. actually i think that is mostly accurate
al franken uses it in that way too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
34. No it isnt, and no he doesnt.
It is a blatent lie.

There are plenty of conservative jews who arent neocons, thus completely disproving Limbaugh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
La Lioness Priyanka Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. i mean i heard him once say, conservative christians and jewish neocons
granted rush takes things out of context...but thats what i meant by that

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
31. He gets nuttier by the day
:eyes:

----------------------------------------------------------
Save our country one town, county, and state at a time!
http://timeforachange.bluelemur.com/electionreform.htm#why
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. Rush Limbaugh? Is he still around? Why isn't he in jail yet?
What ever happened to the investigation into Rush's drug abuse and crimes?

Have his assets been seized yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
36. Ok, let's get a contest going between Rush Limbaugh and Pat Buchanan
and see which one cares more about America and democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
37. How much did Bush pay you for that one, Rush?
Just the usual rate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #37
55. Plus a "Get Out of Jail Free" card n/t
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 03:44 PM by Ms. Clio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AntiFascist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
39. Come on Rush, let's put it ALL out on the table....
What does "Republican Jew" imply? Radical Zionism? And what does that imply, world dominion? Sounds like some sort of Dominionism to me, but he would never talk about that! At that point you might as well drag in a lot of Catholics, Templars, Freemasons.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. world dominion?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Algorem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
40. And Hitler was a socialist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jdonaldball Donating Member (684 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:20 PM
Response to Original message
42. Ironic, considering that in Hitler's time, most of the
the Americans who sympathised with Hitler or wanted to stay out of the war, were Republicans. And FDR and the majority of the portion of Americans who supported joining the alliance against Hitler, were Democrats.
There was a pro-Nazi, German-American Bund in America, even after we went to war against Germany, and the majority of them were Republicans, and virtually none were Democrats. In those times, the majority of American Jews supported FDR, for good reasons. Herbert Hoover was a Nazi sympathiser, and he advocated coming to an understanding with the Nazis in 1938, when he was a former President but still one with a lot of persuasive clout in antisemetic and isolationist circles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #42
48. "America First"-isolationists of that era
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 03:29 PM by underpants
Joe Conason wrote about them in "Big Lies" it was the first that I had heard of them. I have tried to google it and research it but there is very little written about them.

Yes, they protested US involvement in WWII before and , to a lesser extent, after Pearl Harbor-they stuck to their beliefs regardless of the facts. Conason wrote that it turned out to be a front for Japanese and German agents in the US (though that was not necessarily known by all the America Firsters-useful idiots) and one of the agents was allowed to use a Republican Congressman's office to do some of his work.

Pat Buchanan used that term in his runs for president-that is what swallows up most of the links on google.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
43. Condi Rice?
Maybe she is Falasha.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
44. When I hear "neo-con" I generally think of right-wing Christians
Not trying to Christian bash at all - I know there are many many Christians who aren't neo-cons. But at least the vast majority of neo-cons are conservative fundamentalist Christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
K-W Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #44
54. It depends on how you define neocon.
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 03:42 PM by K-W
It can refer to the original philosophical movement, in which case it is a small mostly Jewish group of idiot-intellectuals.

It can also refer to the wider movement in washington now, in which case its that group, plus others, many non-jews, not particularly religious though.

Or it can refer to all people who have signed onto the neocon inspired Bush foriegn policy, in which case a significant portion are fundie christians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. Thanks for the insight
I guess I think of the third on your list.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #54
62. That is a good recap of this
Neocon 101
http://www.csmonitor.com/specials/neocon/neocon101.html

So they started mostly from Jewish "liberals" but they aren't anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bloom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
68. I think of the neo-cons
as being about half Jewish - based on the signers-on for some of their statements.

I'm sure the Republicans would like to paint to Democrats as anti-Jewish to get some more votes and sway people to their side....



Most self-described Jews voted for Democrats - from the exit polls - 78% Kerry. (And I believe the exit polls).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flobee1kenobi Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
46. ladies and gents...
We have their next talking point
Democrat=racist
anyone who attacks Blackwell, Gonzo, Wolfie, Kristol ect
are racists

Nevermind the fact that these people are scumbags, if their judgement is questioned, it MUST be because of their race:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #46
49. Chertoff
third time I have posted this---Do you think it is a coincidence he makes this point the day that Chertoff (who is jewish) gets nominated for Homeland Security?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #46
69. Actually, it would be racist to NOT attack them
Nobody is attacking their race. Dems believe that people of all backgrounds are capable of great achievement. The flip side of this is that all peoples are capable of great mischief.

As a feminist, I always hate it when someone dismisses a conservative woman by saying, "she's really a man." No, she's just a really bad woman. (thinking Thatcher during the 1980s)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. I'm sure that Limbaugh makes them proud. Strange bedfellows, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
59. Rush Limpballs....fuck you and your kind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prodigal_green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
60. Condoleeza Ricestein?
Scott McClellanberg? John Ashcroftowitz?

What the hell is wrong with these people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ms. Clio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
63. "Neocon" is political and economic, not religious
According to Merriam-Webster, the word neoconservative simply means: A former liberal espousing political conservatism.

This is confirmed by Irving Kristol himself:

Even I, frequently referred to as the "godfather" of all those neocons, have had my moments of wonderment. A few years ago I said (and, alas, wrote) that neoconservatism had had its own distinctive qualities in its early years, but by now had been absorbed into the mainstream of American conservatism. I was wrong, and the reason I was wrong is that, ever since its origin among disillusioned liberal intellectuals in the 1970s, what we call neoconservatism has been one of those intellectual undercurrents that surface only intermittently.

(snip)

"...one can say that the historical task and political purpose of neoconservatism would seem to be this: to convert the Republican party, and American conservatism in general, against
their respective wills, into a new kind of conservative politics suitable to governing a modern democracy."

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/003/000tzmlw.asp

This attempt to link "neocon" with "Jew" with "anti-Semitism" is a perfect example of how they violate and manipulate language and exclude debate. Make "neocon" the next "N-word" even as the neocons go on about their bloody business.

Very disturbing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WMliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 04:02 PM
Response to Original message
65. Republican Jew?
Edited on Tue Jan-11-05 04:08 PM by WMliberal
I love his little "let's leave it at there" because if you go any further, his point crumbles under it's own stupidity and. Any closer examination just obliterates it. You gotta love his "debates" with himself.

BTW, I can't get the kool-aid recipe straight. Are the Jews controlling everything or are us DU-types controlling the Jews? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 06:18 PM
Response to Original message
70. What a dope
Neo-Con = The new conservatives. The old ones were bad enough, but now they're Fascists.

When are they going to send HIM up and throw away the key?

And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up. --Rush Limbaugh TV show (10/5/95)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RetroLounge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-11-05 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
71. Let's get it all out on the table 'Rush' means Asswipe
or more specifically, Pill-Popping, closeted, Pig-boy asswipe.

RL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC