are the FReepers defending Gannon's porn/prostitution sites?

[goodboy]

I haven't been over there because I have a new computer and I don't want to get it all dirty yet.

What do they have to say about the new AmericaBlog.org story on him?


Are their heads exploding?

[swag]

1. They're too busy beating off to type.

[goodboy]

2. HA! I guess so...I don't even know how to read their site...I wish

someone could post some choice snippets here.

[goodboy]

3. how would one search that site for responses to the

americablog story on guckert.

[centristo]

4. denial...

they accept his line of defense that he was registering those gay porn sites for a third party. He supposedly had an ISP business or something. I haven't seen any comments regarding that picture of him in his underwear. It is pretty funny to see them defend the indefensible though.

[tjwmason]

7. It's very amusing

Especially as these are the same guys who rant about how wicked gays are, and how terrible the 'homosexual agenda' is.

[goodboy]

9. how do they explain the x-rated pics of himself?

[No Exit]

5. I understand their new Freerepublic coffee mug

has his cheesecake-underwear picture on it, along with the Freerepublic logo and a caption, "Freepers do it deeper!"

[Freedom_from_Chains]

6. are the FReepers defending Gannon's porn/prostitution sites?

More than likely. Remember that being a scumbag only applies to those on the other side. Like Rush for example, being a drug addict and illegally buying drugs is O.K. seeing as to how he is "talent on loan from God."

More than likely he, and his drug use, is part of God's "grand plan."

[tnlefty]

8. But, but, a few months ago weren't they practically cheering

about someone who works in porn contracting HIV and how all of the women he had worked with having to be tested and screened? IIRC there were some awful comments about how someone who worked in the porn business had it coming to them and how evil they all were, etc. So if Gannon worked as a prostitute isn't he the epitome of evil in their book?

Just asking as I already know they will find a way to make an exception for Jeff or John or whoever/whatever he is today.

[Freedom_from_Chains]

10. Well logic might indicate that such questions be asked

But did you forget we are talking about freepers here. :)

[Adenoid_Hynkel]

11. freepers defending hmosexual prostitution of "our brave soldiers"

[elehhhhna]

12. The skinny:

"Geraldo & Wolf use fake names too."

Dems really hate gays & we're hypocites.

Deny seeing multiple likes to Americablogs.

Blame liberal media--"all he did was ask a nice question..."

"He lied on TV--not under oath."

maybe 15% think he's disgusting...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1343385/posts#comment?q=1

[Coventina]

13. William Pitt is a flaming queen? Does Will know this?

:eyes:

man those freepers are just bizarre.

[blueheeler]

14. Total bash job there!!

They paint us as anti-gay, woman, and hispanic. Must be the appointments that we so blocked because they were black, or woman, or hispanic. Not because they LIED!

[Liberal In Texas]

15. Yep, they're apparently clueless

about the difference between opposing someone because of lying or having a warped sense of morality (Gonzales); and opposing someone for being a certain race/gender/sexual orientation/etc.