http://www.dailyhowler.com/Is it true? Are modern journalists “arrogant, out of touch and untrustworthy?” For the moment, just consider a few examples we have reported at THE HOWLER. How do Kristof’s colleagues behave? They go to a birthday bash for John McCain, where they disgracefully sing “Happy Birthday”—to a future White House hopeful, one they will all be covering. They brag about their dinners with Condi, then fail to ask her obvious questions about her apparent misconduct. They perform at a testimonial dinner for Colin Powell—then rush off to the TV studio, unprepared for a crucial interview. They even create tearful religious ties with the Big Pols they allegedly cover. And of course, they say that it is just too “frightening” to ask tough questions of President Bush. They tell Larry King that it “hurts their head” to get straight on the facts on our basic debates. And when Powell presents fake facts at the UN, they stampede to swear that his statements are true—just as they stampeded fives years earlier, when they swore that Kathleen Willey’s attacks on Clinton were true. And oh yeah! When the Independent Counsel ended up calling Willey a liar, they all knew that they just mustn’t tell.
“Arrogant, out of touch, untrustworthy?” Why shouldn’t our scribes be seen this way? Why shouldn’t they suffer from “dwindling credibility?” Specific critiques may be misguided, driven by the gang of “demagogues” Kristof and his trembling colleagues are too uncaring to confront. But there’s nothing “unfair” about such criticism. Keep reading—such critiques are too soft.