Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PA: Bar Assoc.: Planned Federal `ID' Law Threatens Rights

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
liveoaktx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-20-05 01:11 AM
Original message
PA: Bar Assoc.: Planned Federal `ID' Law Threatens Rights
http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/04-19-2005/0003435734&EDATE=

Sending a clear message that the Philadelphia legal community is opposed to legislative action that would hinder the rights and safety of immigrants in the United States, Philadelphia Bar Association Chancellor Andrew A. Chirls has asked Pennsylvania's U.S. Senators Rick Santorum and Arlen Specter to vote against the Real ID Act of 2005 (H.R. 418).
The Real ID Act of 2005, passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on Feb. 10, proposes legislation that would make it exponentially harder, and often impossible, for immigrants and asylum seekers to receive drivers' licenses -- forcing them out of the country due to lack of proper identification.
At its most recent meeting, the Bar's Board of Governors unanimously passed a resolution opposing the Real ID Act of 2005, citing that it "threatens and undermines both the right to privacy of Americans, the right and ability of persons from other countries to apply for refuge in the United States when they are persecuted in their home countries, and the authority of our federal courts to review matters brought before them."

.....Pointing out a less-publicized issue of the legislation, Chirls said Section 102 of the Real ID Act would allow the Secretary of Homeland Security to seize property within 100 miles of any U.S. border. "This includes a large swath of land in Pennsylvania," Chirls wrote."Seizure of land without regard to law and due process violates principles of judicial supremacy and due process."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC