|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:20 PM Original message |
Poll question: Should Pro-athletes be given preferential treatment to leave the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pacifist Patriot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
1. Why does the phrase... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
drdtroit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
2. NO! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Doctor_J (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
3. they should be moved to the FRONT of the draft line |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elvisbear (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
4. Maybe Roger Staubach should have a talk with him... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
makhno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
5. Me, me, me. Selfish prick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tammywammy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
6. No |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
havocmom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
7. Let them out early so they can make outrageous $um$ doing ritual war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
chalky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:00 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Exactly. HELL NO. n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w13rd0 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 12:58 PM Response to Original message |
8. Not unless they also let leave the following: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
10. Alright...who said "Yes" and WHY???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
G_j (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
11. only if the violinist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stirk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
12. Just out of curiosity, what the hell is the argument *for* it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bemildred (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
13. Everybody should be given preferential treatment to leave the military. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bill McBlueState (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:16 PM Response to Original message |
14. Yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sapphire Blue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:26 PM Response to Original message |
15. Would this be the haves & the have mores? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryWhiteLiberal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:29 PM Response to Original message |
16. Military doesn't want to risk negative propaganda (e.g., Pat Tillman). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:34 PM Response to Original message |
17. yes, absolutely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 01:52 PM Response to Reply #17 |
18. And, everyone other millionaire in the entertainment industry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofthedial (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 02:10 PM Response to Reply #18 |
20. what's bread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
democracyindanger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 02:02 PM Response to Original message |
19. COWARDS. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kitkatrose (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 04:28 PM Response to Original message |
21. No fucking way!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 04:34 PM Response to Original message |
22. This guy didn't know he could play football before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
soup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 04:46 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. You make entirely too much sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jack Rabbit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 05:09 PM Response to Original message |
24. They didn't used to get preferential treatment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 05:35 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. Republican Jack Kemp sought and received a medical deferment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ridgerunner (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 05:58 PM Response to Original message |
26. I voted yes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 06:05 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Was there a stop loss policy signed by a Chickenhawk in effect... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ridgerunner (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 06:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. Actually in 92-93 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ridgerunner (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 06:13 PM Response to Reply #28 |
30. and btw |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VOX (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Apr-30-05 06:13 PM Response to Original message |
29. Apparently serving their country gets in the way of their making millions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC