Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should Pro-athletes be given preferential treatment to leave the military?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:20 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should Pro-athletes be given preferential treatment to leave the military?
Edited on Sat Apr-30-05 12:20 PM by NNN0LHI
http://www.recordonline.com/archive/2005/04/29/armystory.html

Army will loosen rules


Pro-caliber athletes can get out early

Former Army offensive lineman Joel Davis had three NFL teams seriously interested in him before the 1996 draft.


But each team kept asking Davis the same question: when will he be available to play? Maybe in half a decade.


Davis had a five-year military commitment to serve after graduating from West Point.


"I know I was fighting an uphill battle," Davis said. "But that hurt me. I couldn't really give them any answers. I think it hurt my chances."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why does the phrase...
"tough shit" keep swirling around my brain?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drdtroit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. NO!
Be a MAN Mr. Davis. That means honoring your commitments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
3. they should be moved to the FRONT of the draft line
all those "Athletes for Smirk" from last year should have themselves ro their service-aged kids moved to the front, pronto. As for Lt. Davis, some time between when he went to West Point and when he graduated, he obviously forgot WHY he went there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elvisbear Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
4. Maybe Roger Staubach should have a talk with him...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
makhno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. Me, me, me. Selfish prick.
Wasn't a strong desire to serve his country the reason Mr. Davis decided to attend West Point instead of a civilian university? If he wanted to be a pro football player rather than a combat leader, he should've perhaps been a little more honest during the admissions process and his years at West Point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tammywammy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. No
I think this is disgraceful to all everyone who joins the military. You signed up for this, and you have to follow through. I would be more inclined to want to give leeway to those joining the reserves and have families. But, overall, you joined, you signed on the dotted line knowing what was expected of you (or what could happen, i.e. reserves being called up), and you should have to fulfill those obligations, whether or not you could make more money as a pro athlete.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
7. Let them out early so they can make outrageous $um$ doing ritual war
in sports arenas? NO.

I also think the clowns who start the wars should be on white horses, wearing plumed helmets leading the charge too.

Sorry sports heroes but you are not as important as the meighbor down the block who is supporting a family and keeps getting his/her regular enlistment, reserve, or guard duty extended because of Stop Loss. Prowess on the playing field is not as important as being home to take care of real life.

Early outs for jocks is more corporate welfare. Pro teams need stars to make $$ for the Board Room Set. Fuck that shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chalky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Exactly. HELL NO. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. Not unless they also let leave the following:
Parents
Brothers
Sisters
Fathers
Mothers
Exceptional academics
people with dreams
people who don't want to shoot people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Alright...who said "Yes" and WHY????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
11. only if the violinist
for the community orchestra, the guy with a lawn mowing business, and the woman with the nail salon can...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stirk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
12. Just out of curiosity, what the hell is the argument *for* it?
Because he stands to make alot of money...? Am I to assume that we're openly admitting that military service is beneath the rich, and dying for your country is only a poor man's duty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
13. Everybody should be given preferential treatment to leave the military.
It's an "all volunteer army", right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bill McBlueState Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yes
Then it will be that much clearer to the average Jack and Jill just how easy it is for the rich to avoid service, while the poor often have no other option. Anything to cast a critical eye on the military's practices is a good thing, I say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
15. Would this be the haves & the have mores?
First reaction... they (if they're chickenhawks, along with all other chickenhawks) should be the first to serve in their Leader's war.

Rationally thinking... get all the troops out now & stop this immoral war... and put their Leader & Co. on trial for war crimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryWhiteLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
16. Military doesn't want to risk negative propaganda (e.g., Pat Tillman).
A high profile military/athlete death would only highlight the CONTINUED DEATHS of our American soldiers...even after the pitiful "democratic" Iraqi elections.

JB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. yes, absolutely
so should NASCAR drivers and evangelical preachers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. And, everyone other millionaire in the entertainment industry.
Gotta keep the people amused while the slaughter continues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. what's bread?
without circuses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracyindanger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
19. COWARDS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kitkatrose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
21. No fucking way!!!!!
Why the fuck would you do that??? I couldn't get out early if I was a scientist working on a cure for AIDS or what have you, why the fuck should a pro-athlete? What the hell kinda use does the world have for an athelete??? Over a scientist, or a teacher, or a police officer, or a hundred other damn jobs. This is why our education sucks in America. Apparently we value sports so much that the army is considering letting them out of their obligation--that they fucking knew when the signed up--to play a damn game. What a goddamn stupid idea!!!


:mad: :nuke: :mad: :nuke: :mad: :nuke: :mad: :nuke: :mad: :nuke: :mad: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
22. This guy didn't know he could play football before
he joined the military? If he wanted to be an NFL prospect he shouldn't have joined the military.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. You make entirely too much sense.
Is that allowed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
24. They didn't used to get preferential treatment.
Ted Williams served as a bomber pilot in two wars.

Willie Mays did his military service. It probably hurt his overall career figures.

During the Vietnam era, many people were infuriated at Muhammad Ali and Joe Namath for avoiding the draft, but both had good reasons. Ali was a minister and a conscientious objector and had to fight in the courts to make sure that ministers of his faith would have the same rights to be exempted from the draft as ministers of any other faith. Namath simply had bad knees. The US Army wouldn't take him and classified him 4-F. That the New York Jets were willing to take a chance on those knees and pay him a boatload of money to play quarterback was their business. Neither Ali nor Namath could have been said to have received preferential treatment.

Roger Staubach, who won a Heisman Trophy at Annapolis, fulfilled his obligations to the US Navy and promptly resigned from the service and went to play for the Dallas Cowboys. No one could complain about that and no one did.

The first military athlete I noticed getting what appeared to be some kind of preferential treatment was Napoleon McCallum, who graduated from Annapolis and played for the Raiders in 1986. In order to play in the NFL, the Navy had to make sure that McCallum was given a duty assignment compatible with his football career. However, McCallum had to give up football after the 1986 season and fulfill his obligation to Navy until 1990, when he resigned his commission and went to play for the Raiders.

The case of yet another Annapolis graduate, David Robinson, raised more eyebrows. Drafted into the NBA by the San Antonio Spurs in 1987, Robinson was released from his obligation to the Navy after only two years instead of the usual five. Robinson began his impressive pro basketball career in 1989.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Republican Jack Kemp sought and received a medical deferment
He was declared unfit because of a knee injury during the Vietnam War, though he heroically continued as a National Football League quarterback for another eight years.

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
26. I voted yes
I'm a vet, I finished my tour in the Navy back in 93, and back when I was in they would let people out if they came into money, i.e. they hit the lottery or a rich relative died and left them a fortune.

A pro football career averages about five years. Why not let the person sign a contract that once their career in the NBA, NFL, etc. is over they will fulfill their contract with the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. Was there a stop loss policy signed by a Chickenhawk in effect...
...during the time period you are talking about?

Don

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Actually in 92-93
they couldn't get people out of the military fast enough. I know lots of fellows who took early outs, they retired before 20 years, they didn't get retirement but a lump sum for time served.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ridgerunner Donating Member (368 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. and btw
the stop loss is total bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-30-05 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Apparently serving their country gets in the way of their making millions.
Nice that they have their priorities straight. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC