Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Post Stupid, Immoral, Inane, or Otherwise Repulsive Legislation Here

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:13 PM
Original message
Post Stupid, Immoral, Inane, or Otherwise Repulsive Legislation Here
Such as this one:



Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act of 2005 (Introduced in Senate)S.51.IS

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

Congress makes the following findings:

(1) At least 20 weeks after fertilization, an unborn child has the physical structures necessary to experience pain....

SEC. 3. AMENDMENT TO THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE ACT.

The Public Health Service Act (42 U.S.C. 201 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

`TITLE XXIX--UNBORN CHILD PAIN AWARENESS

...


`SEC. 2902. REQUIREMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT.

`(a) Requirement of Compliance by Providers- An abortion provider performing any abortion of a pain-capable unborn child, that is in or affecting interstate commerce, shall comply with the requirements of this title.

`(b) Provision of Consent-

`(1) IN GENERAL- Before any part of an abortion involving a pain-capable unborn child begins, the abortion provider or his or her agent shall provide the pregnant woman involved, by telephone or in person, with the information described in paragraph (2).

`(2) REQUIRED INFORMATION-

`(A) ORAL STATEMENT-

`(i) IN GENERAL- An abortion provider or the provider's agent to whom paragraph (1) applies shall make the following oral statement to the pregnant woman (or in the case of a deaf or non-English speaking woman, provide the statement in a manner that she can easily understand):

`You are considering having an abortion of an unborn child who will have developed, at the time of the abortion, approximately XX weeks after fertilization. The Congress of the United States has determined that at this stage of development, an unborn child has the physical structures necessary to experience pain. There is substantial evidence that by this point, unborn children draw away from surgical instruments in a manner which in an infant or an adult would be interpreted as a response to pain. Congress finds that there is substantial evidence that the process of being killed in an abortion will cause the unborn child pain, even though you receive a pain-reducing drug or drugs. Under the Federal Unborn Child Pain Awareness Act of 2005, you have the option of choosing to have anesthesia or other pain-reducing drug or drugs administered directly to the pain-capable unborn child if you so desire. The purpose of administering such drug or drugs would be to reduce or eliminate the capacity of the unborn child to experience pain during the abortion procedure. In some cases, there may be some additional risk to you associated with administering such a drug.'.....



`SEC. 2904. PENALTIES FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY.

`(a) In General- An abortion provider who willfully fails to comply with the provisions of this title shall be subject to civil penalties in accordance with this section in an appropriate Federal court.

`(b) Commencement of Action- The Attorney General, the Deputy Attorney General, the Associate Attorney General, or any Assistant Attorney General or United States Attorney who has been specifically designated by the Attorney General may commence a civil action under this section....

Author: Sam Brownback. Co-sponsors (33):

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:s.00051:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ncrainbowgrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can this be on a state level too? (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. To find idiotic legistlation, go to Thomas.gov
Enter the name of an idiot Senator or Representative in the find box, and, voila!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eyesroll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. HR 1528
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
darkism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. "the process of being killed in an abortion"
Oh come on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #5
14. Congress has determined that you are going to hell for killing babies
and further determined that if it weren't stopped by other heartless murderers sitting on the Supreme Court, Congress would take you outside for a horsewhipping followed by whatever means were necessary to keep you from committing murder, including but not limited to emprisoning you for the entire term, and strapping you to a gurney with your legs spread until God's will is done."

"Congress has further determined that it would be deemed a looneybin and not a legislature if these words weren't being quickly recited by a respected physician who is not allowed to tell you what a crock of shit Washington DC presently is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Ohio, ...
I won't cut and paste the text, but here is the import.

One bill bans all abortions under any circumstances.
Another one eliminates the licensing requirements for concealed weapons.
These are House bills.

An amendment to the Ohio Constitution that was enacted by voters last fall bans gay marriage (even though it was not legal anyway) AND bans legal recognition of any relationship that approximates marriage, gay or straight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's more legisaltive brilliance from Brownback
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d109:5:./temp/~bdV7kb::

(Cut and paste whole title, including colons, or you won't get to the page)

S.J.RES.14

Title: A joint resolution providing for the recognition of Jerusalem as the undivided capital of Israel before the United States recognizes a Palestinian state, and for other purposes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kliljedahl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is substantial evidence that by this point
unborn children draw away from surgical instruments:wtf:

I'd like to see that evidence. Nightcrawlers pull away from hooks too, are they human?


Keith’s Barbeque Central
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Save the nightcrawlers!
Real earthworms choose life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Repucks want to have Manditory 2 to 10 yrs, 4 unreported knowledge of drug
Edited on Fri May-27-05 02:25 PM by sam sarrha
users..and/or drug use.. wether it is a joint/a seed/roach/, whatever.. and that is Federal Hard Prison Bitch time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. Prevent abortions
But advocate killing of teens who commit murder? Culture of life is more like culture of mindless slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
candy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. State smoking bans.----Flame away! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Sorry, all for it.
I went back East to MA last year to visit some people from high school. I can't tell you how nice it was to walk into a bar without that stench and without having to send my jacket to the drycleaners the next day. People should not have to choose between their livelihood and health.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
12. Flag Desecration Act: 51 co-sponsors in the Senate
Edited on Fri May-27-05 02:39 PM by BurtWorm
Is that enough to pass it? :scared:

19. S.J.RES.12 : A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States authorizing Congress to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States.
Sponsor: Sen Hatch, Orrin G. (introduced 4/14/2005) Cosponsors (51)
Committees: Senate Judiciary
Latest Major Action: 4/14/2005 Referred to Senate committee. Status: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d109:19:./temp/~bdHc4N::
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. Yeah, save us from the flag-burning epidemic.
Hard to justify repealing free speech from something that hardly ever happens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Witch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
13. The Congress of the United States has determined......?
"The Congress of the United States has determined that at this stage of development, an unborn child has the physical structures necessary to experience pain."

I am not interested unless the scientists of the United States have determined it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Is there any other instance when a doctor tells a patient
"Congress thinks you're a bad, bad person for having this procedure. Go ahead. Make Congress's day."

:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
16. Do you know what really annoys me about this?
Edited on Fri May-27-05 02:53 PM by Inland
That they make the doctor recite it, even if the doctor thinks it's a crock of shit. Congress doesn't have an ounce of credibility, so it puts the words in the mouth of a trusted physician and hopes the woman accepts it with the REAL medical advice.

Not satisfied with being a distrusted laughingstock itself, Congress is acting to destroy the trust between the woman and her doctor. Congress hopes to shanghai doctors and hoped nobody notices that "medical advice" now includes propaganda from those same guys who brought you the Schiavo debacle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noiretextatique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-27-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. it's just infuriating
this meddling into women's healthcare and privacy, and politicians forcing doctors to recite anti-choice BS...and forcing women to listen to it. infuriating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC