Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I'm more than a little unnerved by this....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Hailtothechimp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:04 PM
Original message
I'm more than a little unnerved by this....
For the past few months, whenever the dumbass travels anywhere in this country it has been for one of those staged social security events. You all know the kind I'm talking about: held in a red state, audience screened for people like us, meaningless little pep rally, etc.

So today, he goes out to one of these things and talks about...the Patriot Act: It should be made permanent, and so on. Why the shift in focus? Has he given up on his social security pipe dream? It's not like him to admit defeat.

With his approval ratings falling, Bolton held up in the senate, and the DSM taking root with the public, why shift the subject?

We all saw how the post-9/11 trauma led to it being passed in the first place. And now, with serious turbulence on the horizon for him and the rest of the Empire, why does he go back to it? Does he know something we don't? Is Bin Laden (or somebody else) still determined to strike in the U.S.???

Somebody please tell me I'm wrong about this. But I don't like how this feels.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. I should thank him for reminding me..
To write to my Reps again to let them know what a BAD idea this is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. I believe there are parts of the patriot act that are due to expire
soon. maybe that's why.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Yup the old "Sunset Clause"
Remember when civil liberties organizations were screaming about the PA being unconstitutional? The rethugs kept saying, "but it's not permanent there is a sunset clause."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. He's reminding the sheeple
how safe they are. The ramifications of this act were ironed out w/o benefit of discussion, from what I gather, but who cares as long as we're safe? :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. the unPatriot Act is coming up in legislation
They are looking to make it permanent and add more provisions to it.

What scared me was the look of the 'ralley'. It looked like Hitler speaking in front of his brownshirts. Frickin creepy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kittenpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. that's exactly what I thought (except the shirts were grey)
I'm surprised he had the nerve to go to Ohio with 'coingate' going on... of course in front of his carefully screened crowd he wouldn't have to worry about any questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Bush owes his ass to Ohio
Heh heh heh = yes sir! Thanks to his resident "house n*****."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That word...
...even only implied, is inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
22. I debated about it - then let it stand.
Apologies to anyone who feels offended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. That phrase was coined by antebellum slaves as a term of derision...
and sometimes it is wholly appropriate. As in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Excuse me, your bigotry is showing. n/t
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 09:17 PM by vickiss
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. So, is Harry Belafonte also a bigot?
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 10:35 PM by mitchum
He used the term when it was entirely appropriate. As it is in this case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #25
31. Sorry, it just isn't right in this forum.
I don't know enough about Harry B. to know if he is a bigot or not.

Use of that word is hurtful and offensive in most instances. Period.
I understand that you didn't mean anything offensive, but it still remains that it is to many of us. Nothing personal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #31
34. Fair enough
peace,
mitchum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. peace to you also mitchum,
I am sorry for the gut reaction post. Guess I've been a bit touchy and cranky lately!!

V
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. notice how many of his audiences are military, law enforcement or cadets?
They can be ordered to go and of course they won't protest.

It's getting harder to get real audiences of just citizens, even Republican ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Scary! Here it is.
Edited on Thu Jun-09-05 08:15 PM by babylonsister
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. Shades of the 1984 Apple computer commercial.
Yikes

Seig Heil!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #4
19. I'm also concerned
about the direction that the USA seems to be heading. If the worst comes to the worst and some type of martial law is imposed in the USA, I don't see them leaving for long a free and resource rich democratic Canada to operate unmolsted on their northern border.

Check out these articles all written by Dr. Norman Livergood, a former dept. head at the US Army War College.

Police State USA

<snip>

Under the former 1989 Guidelines, the FBI first had to obtain evidence suggesting some kind of criminal activity before its agents could begin investigating. Under the FBI's new May 30, 2002 revised Guidelines, FBI agents are authorized to carry out "general topical research" and retain files on this research. Specifically, agents may conduct "online searches" and visit "online sites and forums as part of such research."

The new Guidelines warn against searching "for information by individuals' names or other individual identifiers," but it's okay to search by names to locate "names of authors who write on the topic" that the agent is researching. Of course every citizen of the United States is a possible "author" of e-mail messages on a variety of subjects, so all U.S. citizens are potential "terrorism suspects" under these new guidelines.

The new Guidelines now encourage the FBI to snoop around looking for people who might be suspicious, creating files on anyone who catches their fancy. Agents can now investigate people, organizations, websites, chat rooms and forums for any reason or for no reason at all. They can enter your home without a warrant and are not required to inform you that they have invaded your home if you are not present.

All the records they create in their investigations will be placed in national databases available to all agencies now under the new "Homeland Security" umbrella. Never in U.S. history has there been such a monolithic surveillance mechanism with the terrible power to destroy American citizens' lives.




Military Dictatorship USA

We usually think of a nation being controlled by a military dictatorship when a military leader seizes control through a putsch, as in the case of General Pervez Musharraf in Pakistan or Saddam Hussein in Iraq. The previous government is overthrown and a military strong man places himself in power with few if any constraints from judicial or legislative oversight.

But we must look for the essence of a military dictatorship, those features which are present whenever this form of oppression occurs. In essence, a military dictatorship is a form of government in which absolute power is concentrated in a repressive ruler or a small clique who use military and police power to dominate the people mentally and physically.

Taking this definition as our touchstone, in the United States we know we're living under a military dictatorship when we see:

* a leader retaining power through stealing the election of 2004 and put into power in 2000 by a coup d'etat, not through democratic elections

* the military used to control the civilian population in violation of the U.S. Constitution

* the president ordering a US citizen held indefinitely by the military

* a shadow government being set up consisting entirely of executive branch officials in violation of the Constitution

* government informants spying on fellow citizens





Brainwashing America

<snip>

In an earlier article, I reviewed the varied aspects of personality profiling and simulation. While serving as Head of the Artificial Intelligence Department at the U.S. Army War College, 1993-1995, I conducted studies on profiling, psychological programming, and brainwashing. I explored and developed personality simulation systems, an advanced technology used in military war games, FBI profiling, political campaigning, and advertising. Part of my discovery was that:

* unenlightened human minds are combinations of infantile beliefs and emotional patterns

* these patterns can be simulated in profiling systems

* these profiling systems can be used to program and control people

Personality simulation systems are being used to create political campaigns that apply voter profiles to control their voting behavior. TV commercials and programs use personality simulation to profile viewers to control their purchasing and viewing behaviors. And sophisticated propaganda and brainwashing techniques are being used by the Bush junta to keep American citizens under control.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. The PA will sunset this year unless Congress votes to extend it
Even some Repubs have said some parts of the act have gone "too far" so it's hardly a slam-dunk. So chimp is nervous.

Actually, he has a lot of things worrying him now: his lies about Iraq coming home to roost, Social Security, approval ratings, Dems fighting back, Bolton, etc.

I'm enjoying it.

:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Job ratings in the toilet=talk of terror="need" for patriot act
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Massive lay-offs, health care insurgency....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MichiganVote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. You got it. The public= the favorite Bush toy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave502d Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
9. If he says it good than it got to be bad.n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
punpirate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. It's just that his boys have been working on it...
... and it's coming up for a vote, that's all. Just trying to generate some support in the public for having their Constitutional nuts cut off.

Once it's passed, it will be back to his regularly scheduled programming....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Gee, with all the bad news for the WH and *h, seems like TERRA ALERT
Not so much the Terra Alert as was used all last summer, but mention the Patriot Act and how there has been no repeat to 9/11...get the sheeple thinking boogerman Osama, call congress and tell them we want security, our rights be damned. SECURITY. BOO TERRA!

Problem is, Unless Osama has another video, like a Gnome on vacation. The people have to be waking up. The lies of this administration is coming home to roost. It is possible the only thing that could scare them back in step,... Osama video.

It's almost like a battered wife syndrome, there is a dangerous time, that is when the wife is trying to get away. I wonder to what lengths these people will go to keep in power. Be afraid.


\/

\/

\/




Bush lies, how can you tell? His mouth is moving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. John Harlowe , WSJ, appears on MSNBC
was asked this very question today. I cannot quote but pretty much this is his esplanation.

Bush has been having some "bad times" SS is not selling. This does not mean they are giving up on SS. Just sort of shelving it for a while. According to Harlowe Homeland Security(keeping Americans safe is a better theme or an are where Bush has had more success. Essentially.
they decided to puy Bush in more positive situations--.Talking about things at which he has been successful rather thn continue on SS at this time, especially since it is not working. In other words provide him with more more positve photops and hope this helps bring the numbers up.

Harlowe is usually pretty straight up and this makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
23. Isn't interesting that as Bush hits the road for the Patriot Act
a couple of "terrorists" are arrested in Lodi, California?

You don't think......naaaw, it's all just a coincidence. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
26. It's a good thing that I'm not planning any trips to Mid-America
Something tells me that there will be an "incident" very soon underscoring the "need" for this bullshit. They won't MIHOP in NYC this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DebJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
27. because 'terra' is the only thing people agree with him on.
stupid people, yes, but at least some people like him for his position on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stickdog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
28. I think Rove knows his boy's star is fading fast., and it's critical for
the neocons to get a full blown police state out this term's Repukefest before voters wise up in such great numbers that Repukes can't cheat themselves into a Congressional majority.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tsiyu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-09-05 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That's what I thought as well
they need to hurry up and get their gestapo in place before the sheeple wake up completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMMNG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
30. The reason for focus on the Patriot Act
Certain parts of it are due to exire soon. He wants those parts to be renewed and made permanent. Yes indeed, permanent police-state tactics, all on the taxpayers dime.

You should be unnerved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
32. they need it in place
to start round all of us up. we're putting quite a bug up GW's ass lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radwriter0555 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:08 AM
Response to Original message
33. For one thing, OBL didn't STRIKE the USA. Bush's PNAC hired the thugs
that perped 911.

Bush is floundering around a LOT. So far, no one on the planet is buying the regime's lies about Iran, so that plan is foiled. Bush's play at SS is just the regime's pretense at 'concerning' themselves with domestic issues....

He's being soundly beaten on his SS looting scheme, and the patriot act riles up the passionate ones like dean.

He's just stirring the pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:03 PM
Response to Original message
36. So, we scream NOW that Bush is planning terror attack to lift poll numbers
He probably is anyway, so he should get the full credit he deserves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. This will pass overwhelmingly.
Most Dems are afraid to be unpatriotic. Catchy acronim for lessening our liberties, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC