Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you are not a feminist, you are not a progressive.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:12 AM
Original message
If you are not a feminist, you are not a progressive.
Have a nice day. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. ok.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. and if you're not a progressive, you're suicidal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. I wish that were so for sure!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #7
70. Unfortunately, it's suicidal in the "72 virgins" sense, not in the
"goodbye cruel world" one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
getmeouttahere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. care to elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dhalgren Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. When you're right, you're right.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. ok, bu what about masculinists? Do we not count? Well ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. no.
Well, that's not my answer, but you might want to get your flame suit ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. I can take hotter flames than ANYBODY at DU can spew.
I just refuse to walk on eggshells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Good - I like that.
I just had this fight on Sunday. I've had my fill of being called a misogynist this week. But I'll keep an eye on this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. that's "patriarchs," and you've already had your shot, thousands
of years of it.

How patriarchs expect the human race to progress while keeping half of it in ignorance and bondage is beyond me.

All you get is stagnation and hopelessness.

Have a nice day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. And there's the first "evil men" post of the day!
Considering this entire thread is merely flamebait, I'm not surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #10
22. Feminism isn't anti-man
It is about the critical analysis of societal power structures that keep women in a position of powerlessness.

I would agree with the original poster that progressive=feminist or anti-misogynist.

Progressive = anti-racist

Progressive = anti-homophobia

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. No, Warpy's statement is anti-man.
Not feminism. As I recall, feminism isn't man bashing. It's about obtaining equal rights. There's a huge difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:44 AM
Response to Reply #22
38. That's how I've always understood it.
Original poster didn't come off that way, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
49. We have a winner!
Congratulations and thank you! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #10
25. Now, now. Men aren't evil.
They're just stupid.

And women are crazy.

It's what makes the world go 'round.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #25
27. Now there's the most honest post on DU today!
Everybody sucks - get a fucking helmet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. It was always my understanding that the feminist movement
was about putting us all on a level playing field. Some "feminists" always sound like they want to be "in charge". Isn't this a bit hypocritical? And before you shoot off again, I am not a "patriarch".
I'm sure my sister and mom and wife and any other woman who has ever known me will be happy to tell you that I've never been "anti-woman".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mairead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #15
29. Your understanding is completely correct
Feminism is and always has been about equality and nothing else
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
43. well shut my mouth
ok not really. which is a woman thing. and here is the man doing the male thing, saying what about me, and what do women do wiht the issue. we talk to him. no not about dissing me. you hvae issue, talk

yet.......when men talking about feminism, what do we get

does say something doesnt it. males have issue lets talk, we are that good we can do women and men at the same time. has something to do with being a mommy. we mommies dont say, we are just going to take care of the girls. oh no. we take care of both girls and boys. we know how to do it. we are mommies.

lol lol
it always boils down to this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #43
53. You might want to learn basic grammar.
It was an absolute struggle just to read that post, which has no grounds in this discussion in the first place. I don't know where you got any of that tripe from ChicagoJoe's statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #53
57. You are being offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. I'm not trying to be, but the post really is hard to read.
Please tell me that post is grammatically correct in any way if you can. If you cannot, retract your comment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #60
62. i am not going to argue with you
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 10:26 AM by seabeyond
whatever. dont read. i dont care. sometimes, i put out. in whatever manner. i send. read /dont. i try to be good a lot of the times though. you have a valid argument. challenging, my read is. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #60
64. "If you cannot, retract your comment."
Fuck that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #64
71. okay, well fuck you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #57
61. lol lol lol
i thought it was all funny. lol,

you are cute

you know, life is feeling pretty good today lars. i think it is time to play.

tornadoes are comin, this afternoon. a day of swirlin energies, wink

have a good one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lars39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #61
67. It is funny, seabeyond!
Swirlin energies is right. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #9
73. Didn't we have matriarchy for the
thousands and thousands of years before that?

I thought the big boom in patriarchy had to do with cattle and property.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #5
28. tell me what your issues are. lets talk
you serious, then come on. it is not a battle between men and women. winner loser. i am all for win win. so lets talk

what is the masculinist issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #28
59. I'll take a shot at MY masculine issues.
Custody battles. They almost always currently favor women, unless the mother is a murdering crack addict, and that's not even a guaranteed win for the male. There are a lot of men who are and WANT to be terrific fathers that get simply pushed away by the system. There needs to be more equality in this arena.

The draft. I think all men AND women should be eligible for the military draft. There is no reason a man and a woman shouldn't have an equal risk of being killed in combat against their will.

A rebalancing of Title IX. Title IX itself HAS been invaluable in creating opportunities for women to excel in athletics. The problem is that no funding went along with Title IX. That needs to be changed. There needs to be Federal funding to help support athletic departments in public schools and universities so that men and women have the same opportunities WITHOUT having to take away opportunities for anyone. Robbing Peter to pay Paul (or Mary in this case) isn't moral.

Men's health. Greater research needs to be conducted for things like prostate cancer that affect only men. I believe this is probably a clear cut "grass is greener on the other side" issue, where men think women's health gets more attention and vice versa, but there should be no arguing that increased health research for ALL people is worth fighting for one way or another.

This isn't necessarily just a men's issue, but I think there needs to be a reform of the judicial system, such that neither the victim nor the accused are put before the spectacle of a public trial. It needlessly tarnishes the name of two people and creates an unhealthy media circus. I put this as a men's issue, because many men in particular have been victims of false prosecution for various violent crimes. By witholding the names of all involved in a trial until after a conviction is made, both the victim AND the defendant are not put through a media hell, and the innocent can remain innocent even after an unfortunate ordeal.

Domestic violence. Too many people think this only happens to women, but weapons are the great equalizer. There needs to be more resources and awareness of the problem of domestic violence against men.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #59
69. i agree with you on custody issue
my brother battled 7 years for his daughter. spent over 150k to fight. i was raising his baby as i had my own babies and we were all tired. this was my first awakening to the unjust, in court system. we kept saying if we walk this in honesty and integrity it will be so obvious. it was so obvious, and the court system still fucked brother, ergo niece. he just got custody last summer. she is 12

i agree on the draft issue. i am not in battle with this. if you want to protest, i wil stand with you. i already have stood with you. i argue this whenever it comes up. now military has to quit raping the women too.

having been in a competitive sport, and scholarship to university with this sport, and in the late 70's early 80's calif, lol lol. i think there is plenty going to male sport. maybe they need to balance and bring into line football, but i am open into seeing if there is an unfairness. i am really good at seeing unfairness. not an issue for me


research it, that is cool, it is in a line with my family. and to suggest that men is unfair treated really is a silliness issue if looking at facts. which is cool. you werent sure on your stand. but it would just take too much time ot point out all the unbalance favoring male to even start

got in an accident. i hit a person. i was a mess. the camera was on me. i thought it such an invasion. asked cop to tell them to stop. he said sorry cant. i dont know what we can do with the media circus. i have started my part by refusing to see a bit of it. i follow the technical of the cases thru internet and listening here. but i will not watch all the disgusting shows. but sure whatever. i am there

well i think we all need to do individual and quit with the sweeping on here. to say womans fault, is wrong, to say men fault wrong. depends. both are a possibility. a lot more

i see it is both. my sil did it in a sneaky quite way, while my brother did it in a loud in your face way. i dont trust a womans story anymore than a mans story. these are stories full of anger and pain and fear. they are what they are
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:30 AM
Response to Reply #69
72. I appreciate your agreement on most issues
You don't have to agree with ALL of the issues. I'm sure you don't agree with every issue that someone labels a feminist issue. That is not the point.

The point is that there ARE issues that concern men that are not just trying to keep women down, as is the popular assertion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. so true
thank you

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
11. How come ...
... discrimination based on race is always a civil rights issue but discrimination based on gender is just a cultural peculiarity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
12. Where Does One Get Membership In This Club?
My wife is asking this question, since she's stood for many liberal and progressive issues and she doesn't consider herself a "feminist" or any other label...just being who she is.

Is there some membership requirements? Some kinda test ya gotta take? Some initiation rite that needs be performed? Ya listen to Rushbo and this club sounds sure like some real wild S&M group (and he's pissed cause he's never been invited to join).

So is there an application? Or a "feminist test"? Curious minds want to know

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:38 AM
Response to Reply #12
30. Perhaps she isn't familiar with what feminism means
Many women and men have been indoctrinated by our society that the word "feminist" is bad. We also hear a lot of people say, "well I believe in civil rights and many liberal ideas, but I'm no liberal!" They say this because liberal has been turned into a dirty word by those that are most threatened by it.

Feminism is a movement and ideology and theory that highlights the historical patriarchal powers and how those powers have negatively affected our wifes, mothers, sisters, and daughters over the centuries. It is quite a beautiful ideological movement that if given a different name would be acceptable to all progressives.

It is a shame that the term has been co-opted by the right wing to signify man-hater.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. No, it's been co-opted by people like Warpy to mean "man-hater"
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 09:41 AM by Vash the Stampede
No zealot ever does justice to their cause. As is true for evangelists, so is true for feminists. Sad, but true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #35
45. Well if so...
Warpy doesn't speak for feminism. (Note: I do not know warpy or her/his positions)

Feminism is NOT about man-hating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #30
40. It's A Concept...not quite a movement
There are various factions of that movement...some for the right to choose, other on job/wage issues, others on health issues and so on. It's the progression of women's own self determination over the years as much as anything else.

I don't find the term offensive and I agree it's been co-opted by the right wing...as it's a threat on their patriarchial system...much inbred over the same centuries women have fought to gain their rights. I suggest this will always be a struggle, but woman have made a lot of strides and the various woman's organizations have helped to further this progress.

IMHO, many women are conditioned, as are men, is a culture where women are still that "step behind a man" attitude. It's changing...and a far better situation than what faced my mother or grandmother, but I think this is a slow process as well. Our world has changed, women's roles and responsibilities have changed as well...there's just some out there who haven't been able to deal with this yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #40
47. Women's roles and responsibilities
should be the same as men's roles and responsibilities.

The fact that we still distinguish between which gender does what is a societal problem. Apart from roles that can only be accomplished by one gender (breast feeding and giving birth), there really is no use to tell our daughters and sons that they are to do X but not Y.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:58 AM
Response to Reply #47
54. We Know It To Be True
It takes time for the rest of the world and society to do so, but I see that day being a lot closer now than it was when I was younger...and surely in generations past.

This week the local PBS station ran a program on the life of Emma Goldman...a fascinating look into what feminism was 100 years ago...the progress she and other women made, and their mistakes along the way. Examine the conditions women, especially immigrants in this country, faced at that time and it puts today's issues in a different perspective.

A lot of the sexual divide is religious and cultural...not based on science and reason, but on power, control and influence. Many religions still preach woman's secondary status to men...this is one of the biggest roadblocks to progress. Always has been.

The glass ceiling is cracked, and light is coming through...the problem on the other side is are women trying to be too much in their new roles of responsibility...being both the X and the Y. But that's another topic.

Cheers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #40
56. Actually by definition it is a movement
From www.dictionary.com

fem·i·nism ( P ) Pronunciation Key (fm-nzm)
n.
- Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
- The movement organized around this belief.

Source: The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition

feminism
n
1: a doctrine that advocates equal rights for women
2: the movement aimed at equal rights for women

Source: WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #56
63. This Still Isn't Organized...
like labor with an AFL-CIO, or religions in their various denominations. I see feminists as a variety of different groups...and each goal is a part of the equal rights struggle...no one represents all the interests in this way like the labor unions fight for their members.

NOW is a fine organization to promote women's causes, but they're more of a think tank these days...playing the beltway games.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
13. The world of moral certainty
Nice enough to visit, but I wouldn't want to live there.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
14. for a feminist...
that was a mighty chauvinistic remark!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #14
33. Why?
Are you equating feminism with anti-man?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murray hill farm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:50 AM
Original message
no...equating chauvinism with chauvinism
get our your Websters and look up the word...especially consider the generalized nature of such a statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
51. Indeed you are correct
I had subconsiouly added the "male" to the front of the word:

Chauvinism is extreme and unreasoning partisanship on behalf of a group to which one belongs, especially when the partisanship includes malice and hatred towards a rival group. The term is derived from Nicolas Chauvin, a soldier under Napoleon Bonaparte, due to his fanatical zeal for his Emperor.

The term entered public use due to a satirical treatment of Chauvin in the French play La Cocarde Tricolore (The Three-colored Cockade).

The origin of the term and early usage indicate that it was coined as a term for excessive nationalism or patriotism. An equivalent English term is Jingoism. Today "Chauvinism" is most often used to reference racism or sexism. As an ideology, it is not a reasoned explanation of society, but an excuse for the way things are (or could be).

In "Imperialism, Nationalism, Chauvinism", The Review of Politics, p. 457, Hannah Arendt describes the concept:

Chauvinism is an almost natural product of the national concept insofar as it springs directly from the old idea of the "national mission." ... (A) nation's mission might be interpreted precisely as bringing its light to other, less fortunate peoples that, for whatever reason, have miraculously been left by history without a national mission. As long as this concept did not develop into the ideology of chauvinism and remained in the rather vague realm of national or even nationalistic pride, it frequently resulted in a high sense of responsibility for the welfare of backward peoples.

(See, for example, white man's burden.)

The word does not require a judgment that the chauvinist is right or wrong in his opinion, only that he is blind and unreasoning in coming to it, ignoring any facts which might temper his fervor. In modern use, however, it is often used pejoratively to imply that the chauvinist is both unreasoning and wrong.

In the United States, chauvinism as a perceived social problem was brought to the forefront of national politics by the feminist movement, and the use of male chauvinism as a synonym for anti-female sexism. The prototypical "male chauvinist" is the character of Archie Bunker in the hit television comedy All in the Family which explored the issue as a recurring theme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Village Idiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
16. That's like saying if you are not a member of PETA or ALF,
You don't love animals...

or

If you are not a Zionist, you are not a Jew...

or

If you are not a racist, corporate shill obsessessed with the acquisition and abuse of absolute power, you are not a ReThuglican.

Wait a sec...

;^(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #16
34. I don't think so.
Feminism is merely the proposition that women should have equal footing in society as men. That is no how it is or ever has been and it is only radical for that reason. The other examples you mention are all extremist groups (especially that last one!) Feminists aren't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #16
41. Those examples aren't really comparable

Feminism is not a club or group like PETA. It is not a religious organization, nor is it a political party.

The critical social theory aspect of feminism is very much connected to progressive ideals.

I think we would all agree that one can not be a progressive and be a white supremacist. Likewise, one can't be a progressive and be a misogynist. The ideologies just don't mesh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lukasahero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:07 AM
Original message
More like if you are a member of the KKK
you aren't a progressive. I have to believe some things are obvious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:29 AM
Response to Original message
17. Question, enlightened one
Can I have ethical reservations about abortion and still be a feminist/progressive?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:32 AM
Response to Reply #17
21. Maybe not .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #21
26. chicagojo, can I ask:
Is that your opinion, or is it what you think the answer will be from feminists? To clarify, I am pro-choice; but I also do have the aforementioned reservations about taking life. Of course, I'm not a vegetarian, so I'm a hypocrite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
37. I think that would be the answer from the original poster,
and maybe others. I'm pro-choice with the same reservations. Of course, I will never have to make that choice, being male. My wife and I, however, have discussed this at length, and have decided that if it ever IS an issue in our life, we will act according to our situation at the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #37
44. Cool, thank you
It's good to know that some others are in the same quandry I am. I get dismayed by some DUers' refusal to acknowledge the validity of said reservations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chicagojoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #44
50. My attitude toward pro-choice people with reservations AND
anti-choice people is one in the same: If you don't like abortions, don't have one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greybnk48 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. True n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
20. Um, define "feminist"
You mean people in favor of equality, or do you mean the people who say "Women can do any job men can, even if they don't meet the physical strength requirements."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconoclastNYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
31. feminist=identity politics
i was raised by a radical feminist.

i share her values but i am not a 'feminist', does that mean i'm not a progressive?

identity politics divides us.

why must we get so tied up with labels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tx_dem41 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:39 AM
Response to Original message
32. I just love drive-by posts....
NOT.

Nothing like stirring the pot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
36. if expect equal treatment for everyone am i a feminist?
i don't understand why it is important to draw distinctions like this. of course i expect and demand that women be treated fairly, but i don't arrive at this position simply by classifying myself as a feminist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #36
39. That's the definition of feminist
Believing that women are human too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheepyMcSheepster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #39
52. indeed
here is what dictionary.com says:

feminism:

1. Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.

2. The movement organized around this belief.


it seems strange to me that a word that is supposed to mean equality for the sexes is based on a particular gender. i would prefer something less gender specific like equal rights.

i understand the social climate most live in holds women at a lower status than their male counterparts, but still i find the terminology too gender specific. i think this semantic game confuses the issue. i think you would have many more people proclaim themselves as "feminist" if a different word was used that is more descriptively accurate.

i am not try to be contrary or anything, i just find a disconnect between what the word means and what it sounds like it means. Feminism sounds like it is entirely about females when as i understand it that is not the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MountainLaurel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:07 AM
Response to Reply #52
58. I think the issue is
That men as a group haven't had to worry about being equal with women, so the language reflects the group trying to become equal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newportdadde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
42. Here wo go again.
:popcorn:

Predictions:

Thread will reach 150 posts then be locked.

Someone will accuse someone of having their 'Wheaties pissed in'.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kipling Donating Member (929 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
46. Feminists have given up too soon.
Edited on Fri Jun-10-05 09:56 AM by Kipling
Nowadays everyone thinks the battle is over. So everyone talks as though men are evil and women are great, but they still think the other way round. It's a disaster. Men aren't allowed to criticise women in any way, which is bad for us, and then when something important comes up it's "Look, I'm not sexist, but the audience might be, so you won't be doing the presentation..."
Feminists should keep going, but they need to focus more on present-day discrimination than fighting the Nuclear Family, which is pretty much a dead concept. That calls for a less combative approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
48. as much as its true, its an abuse of logic
You are a progressive, if you decide you are, and as life develops,
you'll come to mature in to whatever that is for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redstone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
55. Labels and words, yackita yackita yackita...
If everyone just treated everyone else with respect, there wouldn't be any need for arguments about words like "feminist" and "progressive" and so on.

I treat women with respect. Does that mean I'm a "feminist?" Fuck if I know, nor do I care. Labels mean nothing.

Redstone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #55
65. That is a real big "if".
And since much of the world does not treat everyone else with respect, these labels are needed to clarify our own positions in opposition to those others, IOW, republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
highlonesome Donating Member (317 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
66. I think it's completely possible...
...to seek gender equality and yet not be a feminist. To me, feminism -- in the US anyway -- hinges on the belief in a large net disparity in social power between men and women and that it's the result of the fact of living in a patriarchal society.

There are many people, like myself, who desire gender equality, yet don't really accept that we live in a truly patriarchal society. There are those of us who believe we live in a culture and society that is something wholly different and more complex than a straightforward patriarchy and therefore reject some of the central tenets of feminism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misunderestimator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #66
68. Not a "straightforward" patriarchy, but surely you see the patriarchal
influences throughout our society?

Which central tenets of feminism do you reject?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patcox2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
74. I don't define (and limit) myself by labelling
I do not want or need to put a big label on myself saying "I am a Feminist" or "I am a Progressive." I am me, I believe in many different ideas and values in varying degrees which can vary with context and situation.

So sad to see people trying to define who has the right to bear a label, arguing over it, even.

I am Patrick. I believe in absolute legal equality for people of every gender and sexual orientation, as well as equality of opportunity.

I am not into dwelling on the historical roots of chauvinism, nor do I believe I have any complicity because I am mired in a culture which embodies so many deep and subtle anti-woman blah blah blah shit.

I am whatever I want to be. Keep your labels and your entrance exams and your purity tests and all that hierarchical holier than thou shit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moderator DU Moderator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-10-05 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
75. Locking...
This is flamebait and a continuation
of a discussion from another thread.



DU Moderator
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC