Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Censoring the Dead (a little long)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:07 AM
Original message
Censoring the Dead (a little long)
Whenever I see old footage from the Vietnam War there is inevitably images of the dead and injured. There was no censorship of coffins coming home or innocent civilians caught up in the horrors of war. Think for a moment. Would the Vietnam War have ended differently if the images had been censored?

My understanding of those times was that the American public was being told one thing while they watched the news of the uncensored horrors of war. Public opinion was bound to work against them.

We are now seeing public opinion dwindling for the support of the Iraq War. The talking points of the administration and the pentagon aren’t being bought by the public any longer. Rather than demanding our troops being brought home a timetable for doing so is being demanded by more and more.

The demand for immediate withdrawal will not happen anytime soon and this administration will put off giving a date for as long as possible. They’ve got time and they are in no hurry to do so. The public’s desire to know there is an end is what Bush and his spinners are going to give, but it will be just another line to appease the masses. They’re good at it.

Our troops were supposed to be welcomed with flowers and cheers. The war would pay for itself by way of oil revenues. The hunt for WMD would take time. Yes, the public bought it all…hook, line and sinker. What’s another lie to delay the realization that there will be an inevitable permanent military presence?

What I’m getting at here is that the public will not force the administration to change its policy. The reason being is that majority of the American people don’t have the kind of emotional stake in this war the way they did in Vietnam. They are not seeing the war dead and they are not seeing the catastrophic effects of this obscenity on the innocent population of Iraq.

What it does is it distances them to a point that it’s a faraway story which has no impact on them. When we turn on the news we see distant explosions and a few covered bodies. Who they are…the viewer doesn’t know. The report will lead them to believe that it is a terrorist. Is it? Or is it an innocent caught in the crossfire?

Several months ago the public did see a few glimpses of flag draped coffins during transit. How many Americans have come home in the same way since then? Why aren’t we seeing those?

Death has a much stronger impact than life. It’s a sad state of society, but it is true. Seeing death can drastically change opinion and voice. The horrors of war being expressed visually can have a profound impact to such a degree that it is possible to force those in power to bend to the will of the people.

The corporate media’s self-censorship of such images has shaped public opinion and the lack of it. If you think about it this tells you their lack of adequate coverage for this war makes them complicit and way past their claim of ‘informing’ the public.

By shielding the American people of images of truth from war the media has in fact made this war drag on much longer and helped bolster the Bush administration. Their complicity goes further when the dead are used to hammer at those who dissent from the Republican talking points. The dead become propaganda to encourage and reinforce the false claims of going to war. When those who point to the horrors of war and the lies that leads to it they are accused of dishonoring those who died.

The Bush administration has blindly believed since the idea of going to war came about that they would need to control this story. They used everything in their arsenal to do so from flushing out possible dissenters in the CIA to the changing of the guard at the State Dept. They have a policy of punishing reporters and media outlets who don’t report what they’re told. They have bought commentators to spew their talking points and in one instance planted a so-called reporter to continue to spread their propaganda. Those who say what the administration wants them to say are blessed with perks such as privileged access and valuable interviews.

Even through the scandals of Abu Ghraib, Halliburton and many other abuses by the Bush administration and their friends, they’ve managed to control the story. There were times they almost lost their grip, but still managed to hang on.

It seems to me that’s been the key of the entire Bush Administration. Controlling the story (no matter which one it is). Nothing lasts forever. This certainly won’t.

I take heart in knowing that with the advent of the blogs their control is slowly slipping away day by day. The pressure is building and at some point the control they cherish so much will slip through their fingers. It’s inevitable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knowbody0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. three days of the reality photos
documenting the carnage and destruction would turn our nation around, the rest of the Abu Ghraib photos are to be turned over by the end of this month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-17-05 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because of that emotional link
some of us have come to the conclusion that the warn and happy masses will not turn to ACTIVE oposition until we have a Universal Draft

By the way, this is WW II, so they say, so I tell the adminiatration, put up or shut up... if this is WW II, then spread the suffering from Military Families to the rest of the population
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC