Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sitting down? Bush re-elect in Arizona is only 34%

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:31 PM
Original message
Sitting down? Bush re-elect in Arizona is only 34%
According to the Arizona Republic:

Vote Bush: 34%
Somebody else: 44%
Undecided: 22%

Bush won Arizona in 2000 by nearly 100,000.

This is great news.

http://www.azcentral.com/news/articles/0925bush-poll-ON.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wonder how that McCain thingy plays
with this crowd.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Another Bill C. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. McCain should have switched parties.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. He was probably afraid of the political fallout.
With good reason. The Repubs would likely make every attempt necessary to utterly destroy his career.

Which wouldn't surprise anyone. These are the same people who sponsored the "if McCain had a black, illegitimate child" polls in SC.

Who knows - when we win in '04, maybe he'll switch then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifelong_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. McCain is a conservative. Why would he join the Democratic party?
Seriously, McCain is FAR more conseravtive than certain Congressmen who get routinely trashed as "Republican lite" around here. So why is it okay for him to be a Democrat, but not those other guys?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boxster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Call Ryder (insert bad 2000 election joke here), honey!
We're movin' to AZ!

}(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkady Donating Member (40 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. Careful...
Be careful about this question- it allows the respondents to basically fill in whatever dream candidate they want.

A more accurate way to ask this question is to stack Bush up against individual candidates.

I don't want to be a wet blanket....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiouxJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. Saw this on the news last night
they even did "on the street" interviews and people were not happy with Shrub! I was eating dinner at the time and I actually jumped (up from the table) for joy - lol The Repukes in this state are finally waking up to the fact that Shrub is a completely incompetent pResident.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Julien Sorel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
7. First Napolitano, now this?
Maybe all us transplanted Californians are having an impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mandyky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Polls like this give me hope
that Dems can win some of the red states, or at least swing states, if we nominate the right candidate.
The only red states not in play would be severely religious states, like Utah, Mississippi, and Alabama. I am beginning to believe KY may even be in play, and we are quite bible beltish here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CMT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-03 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yep, Arizona will have 10 electoral votes in '04
and if we carry all of the Gore states, even with redistricting costing us 7 electoral votes and pick up Arizona we would be over the top, but if we win Arizona I think there is a good shot we will get Nevada and Colorado too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC