Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FEMA not including coastal counties in 8/27 emergency declaration?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:10 PM
Original message
FEMA not including coastal counties in 8/27 emergency declaration?
http://www.fema.gov/news/event.fema?id=4786

Notice the green-colored parishes -- the only ones included in the declaration.

The parishes in white, the coastal parishes, were NOT included in the declaration. They were only included in an amendment issued on the 29th: http://www.fema.gov/news/eventdfrns.fema?id=4786
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TrueAmerican Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. looks like they were focusing on the "Red" areas
on the state to send their resources.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. This makes NO SENSE...
Why would they declare the inland areas a disaster and not the coast? This is unbelievable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walkon Donating Member (919 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. When you click on the map
It's entirely different and looks appropriate - dated 9-04-05.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Somebody told me they thought that was a recent "update" n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here is your answer
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 01:42 PM by Horse with no Name
The initial request in the letter states for ALL areas affected by the hurricane not designating counties...
then the second part lists the counties that won't be primarily affected but could possibly be secondarily affected by floods or tornadoes, etc.
Just covering all bases.

The President's action authorizes the Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), to coordinate all disaster relief efforts which have the purpose of alleviating the hardship and suffering caused by the emergency on the local population
and to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act, to save lives, protect property and public health and safety,
talking about the area that is directly hit
or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the parishes of Allen, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, Catahoula, Concordia, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, LaSalle, Lincoln, Livingston, Madison, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Richland, Sabine, St. Helena, St. Landry, Tensas, Union, Vernon, Webster, West Carroll, West Feliciana, and Winn.
Talking about the secondarily affected counties.

It follows the same format as the request from Gov. Blanco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Could you provide a link for that, please?
This is directly from the Federal Register Notice on the FEMA website - it specifically gives authorization for action in the designated counties, and it declares those parishes, NOT the coastal ones, to have been adversely affected by this emergency:

http://www.fema.gov/news/dfrn.fema?id=4489

Disaster - Information on Federally Declared Disasters

Federal Register Notice

Billing Code 9110-10-P

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Federal Emergency Management Agency



Louisiana; Emergency and Related Determinations

AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Emergency Preparedness and Response Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.

ACTION: Notice.

SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an emergency for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3212-EM), dated August 27, 2005, and related determinations.

EFFECTIVE DATE: August 27, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Magda Ruiz, Recovery Division, Federal Emergency Manage¬ment Agency, Washington, DC 20472, (202) 646-2705.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that, in a letter dated August 27, 2005, the President declared an emergency declaration under the authority of the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5206 (the Stafford Act), as follows:

I have determined that the emergency conditions in certain areas of the State of Louisiana, resulting from Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant an emergency declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5206 (Stafford Act). Therefore, I declare that such an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana.

You are authorized to provide appropriate assistance for required emergency measures, authorized under Title V of the Stafford Act to save lives, protect public health and safety, and property or to lessen or avert the threat of a catastrophe in the designated areas. Specifically, you are authorized to provide debris removal and emergency protective measures (Categories A and B) under the Public Assistance program, including direct Federal assistance, at 75 percent Federal funding. This assistance excludes regular time costs for subgrantees’ regular employees. In addition, you are authorized to provide such other forms of assistance under Title V of the Stafford Act as you may deem appropriate.

In order to provide Federal assistance, you are hereby authorized to allocate from funds available for these purposes such amounts as you find necessary for Federal disaster assistance and administrative expenses.

Further, you are authorized to make changes to this declaration to the extent allowable under the Stafford Act.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) hereby gives notice that pursuant to the authority vested in the Under Secretary for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Department of Homeland Security, under Executive Order 12148, as amended, William Lokey, of FEMA is appointed to act as the Federal Coordinating Officer for this declared emergency.

I do hereby determine the following areas of the State of Louisiana to have been affected adversely by this declared emergency:

The parishes of Allen, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Catahoula, Claiborne, Concordia, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, La Salle, Lincoln, Livingston, Madison, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Richland, Sabine, St. Helena, St. Landry, Tensas, Union, Vernon, Webster, West Carroll, West Feliciana, and Winn for Public Assistance Categories A and B (debris removal and emergency protective measures), including direct Federal assistance, at 75 percent Federal funding.


(The following Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers (CFDA) are to be used for reporting and drawing funds: 97.030, Community Disaster Loans; 97.031, Cora Brown Fund Program; 97.032, Crisis Counseling; 97.033, Disaster Legal Services Program; 97.034, Disaster Unemployment Assistance (DUA); 97.046, Fire Management Assistance; 97.048, Individuals and Households Housing; 97.049, Individuals and Households Disaster Housing Operations; 97.050 Individuals and Households Program-Other Needs, 97.036, Public Assistance Grants; 97.039, Hazard Mitigation Grant Program.)

/s/
_______________________________________
Michael D. Brown,
Under Secretary,
Emergency Preparedness and Response,
Department of Homeland Security.

Back to Disaster Federal Register Notices for Louisiana Hurricane Katrina



Last Updated: Tuesday, 30-Aug-2005 17:59:40



Bolding added.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is the President's authorization
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Here is how the FEMA statement/map relate
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 02:10 PM by Horse with no Name
On the map on their page--green are secondarily affected parishes, white are affected parishes.

WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Michael D. Brown, Under Secretary of Homeland Security for Emergency Preparedness and Response, today announced that Federal resources are being allocated to support emergency protective response efforts response efforts in the parishes located in the path of Hurricane Katrina.these are the white parishes on the map.

On the secondarily affected counties:The parishes of Allen, Avoyelles, Beauregard, Bienville, Bossier, Caddo, Caldwell, Claiborne, Catahoula, Concordia, De Soto, East Baton Rouge, East Carroll, East Feliciana, Evangeline, Franklin, Grant, Jackson, LaSalle, Lincoln, Livingston, Madison, Morehouse, Natchitoches, Pointe Coupee, Ouachita, Rapides, Red River, Richland, Sabine, St. Helena, St. Landry, Tensas, Union, Vernon, Webster, West Carroll, West Feliciana, and Winn were designated eligible for assistance.these were the parishes designated in green on the map.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Not to argue, but....
... if they were implicitly included in the original declaration, then why were the coastal parishes added in the amendment issued on the 29th?

I have a saved copy of the original PDF from that page, showing the green and white counties. The legend clearly states that the counties in green are designated for public assistance, and that there is no designation for the counties in white. It's dated August 27th.

If you click on the graphic today, you get a pdf file that has the southeastern parishes designated as "Public Assistance," and the southwestern parishes designated as "Public Assistance Category A & B." The vast majority of the original green parishes from the first edition are now labelled "No designation." It's almost a complete opposite of the original declaration.

If they then felt the need to amend it and change the southeastern parishes from "No Designation" to "Public Assistance" on the 29th, and change the northern 2/3s of the state from the original "Public Assistance" to "No Designation" ... in other words, do a flip-flop, then it certainly looks to me like a blatant mistake in the original declaration.






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. It wasn't a mistake
But perhaps a little too complicated for someone like Brown to understand? It is there in black and white.
Perhaps it is just another little show of smoke and mirrors...trying to confuse the sheeple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe it was Brown's mistake.
Very possible that he screwed it up, in which case my post on your other thread still holds:

<dupe>

I am not trying to start an argument. I agree totally with you that the buck stops at the White House, and he gave FEMA authority to respond, because it says in the original declaration that they can change it if necessary.

The point I am trying to make is that the omission of the coastal parishes in the original declaration very likely meant two days of confusion on the ground, while the FEMA people tried to figure out what they could, and could not, do.

I think the omission is a large part of the reason for the slow federal response, and is therefore evidence of either extreme incompetence or criminal negligence on the part of this Administration. Or, more likely, both.

I think it's a smoking gun.

</dupe>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. The President's declaration takes precedence over anything
that FEMA might have put on their site and it is covered in the first paragraph of the President' declaration:

The President today declared an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana and ordered Federal aid to supplement state and local response efforts in the parishes located in the path of Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing.


If the 'update' done on FEMA's site was some sort of ass covering, it won't work, the declaration is the document that matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. That's the Press Release, notifying the public of the above Actions.
The above post (#7) is the FEMA "Notice" and your link is to the WH press release. The actual order is "FEMA-3212-EM", as detailed in the FEMA notice:

    SUMMARY: This is a notice of the Presidential declaration of an emergency for the State of Louisiana (FEMA-3212-EM), dated August 27, 2005, and related determinations.


Not sure where you'd find "FEMA-3212-EM."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. #7 is the Federal Register Notice... and the proof.
Edited on Wed Sep-07-05 08:02 PM by WritersBlock
Does anyone know where they would be posted, if not in the Federal Register?

I still believe that on the 27th of August, only those parishes in green on the site I linked to above were in the declared emergency. Note this quote:


I have determined that the emergency conditions in certain areas of the State of Louisiana, resulting from Hurricane Katrina beginning on August 26, 2005, and continuing is of sufficient severity and magnitude to warrant an emergency declaration under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 5121-5206 (Stafford Act). Therefore, I declare that such an emergency exists in the State of Louisiana.


The emergency was not declared for "all" of Louisana on the 27th; it was declared only for "certain areas" of the state. Those areas were the northern 2/3s of the state. Not until the 29th were the actual coastal parishes included in the emergency declaration... at which time the northern part of the state was removed from the emergency declaration.

This two-day delay would have caused massive confusion on the part of the FEMA co-ordinators; confusion which would have caused considerable delay in getting rescue resources into the areas.

I think that the omission of the coastal parishes from the initial declaration of emergency on the 27th was the main reason that FEMA would not - could not - let rescuers into the area, therefore this ommision cost an untold number of lives. The person responsible for the omission should be held accountable for those deaths. And that person is George W Bush.



(On edit - updated post subject)




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SillyGoose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-07-05 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. Very weird. Here's the speech where he mentions LA fed disaster declaratio
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2005/08/20050828-1.html

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
August 28, 2005

President Discusses Hurricane Katrina, Congratulates Iraqis on Draft Constitution


Prairie Chapel Ranch
Crawford, Texas

11:31 A.M. CDT

THE PRESIDENT: This morning I spoke with FEMA Undersecretary Mike Brown and emergency management teams not only at the federal level but at the state level about the -- Hurricane Katrina. I've also spoken to Governor Blanco of Louisiana, Governor Barbour of Mississippi, Governor Bush of Florida, and Governor Riley of Alabama. I want to thank all the folks at the federal level and the state level and the local level who have taken this storm seriously. I appreciate the efforts of the governors to prepare their citizenry for this upcoming storm.

Yesterday, I signed a disaster declaration for the state of Louisiana, and this morning I signed a disaster declaration for the state of Mississippi. These declarations will allow federal agencies to coordinate all disaster relief efforts with state and local officials. We will do everything in our power to help the people in the communities affected by this storm.

Hurricane Katrina is now designated a category five hurricane. We cannot stress enough the danger this hurricane poses to Gulf Coast communities. I urge all citizens to put their own safety and the safety of their families first by moving to safe ground. Please listen carefully to instructions provided by state and local officials.

...


I don't understand why only certain counties would fall under the disaster declaration particularly when its obvious coastal counties would be very hard hit by the storm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:55 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC