Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Question for the women of CA/GOP Hypocrisy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:00 PM
Original message
Question for the women of CA/GOP Hypocrisy
I know this was a rough subject last night, so let me state the following. This question doesn't apply to women who didn't vote for Arnold or Democratic women.

But how on earth could a woman vote for Arnold? Did these women who voted for him--and according to the numbers it's evident that many did vote for him--have any self-respect? Why would they vote for a man who evidently has no respect for women?

Also the next point that I want to make is that this whole recall election shows the GOP hypocrisy. Arnold makes Clinton look like a church choir boy. Yet somehow his womaniznig is not a "character issue". That really sickens me to death.

Anyway I really wanted a flame free answer to the questions raised herein.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. kick
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. Denial
My aunt (75 years old) who is a Republican through and through told me that all the stories were made up. One the contrary women have been throwing themselves at the Groper for years.

Once you believe that, it's easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I understand it
But I just don't see how women, especially your aunt, who have gone through and suffered sexual harassment and discrimination, can be so hard on Arnold's victims.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fizzana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. My aunt, as did I & my family, grew up in South Africa during
apartheid so we were the distriminators. Some of us like myself got it, others like her, never did. She emigrated here in her fifties, hasn't worked since she got married many, many years ago so she hasn't known any real harassment or discrimination and therefore has absolutely no clue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. The same women who
yelled at nuns who protested Arnie. The right wing thug mentality is not exclusively male. I don't see how Arnie represents anyone's interests, male or female, but :shrug: People don't seem to vote their interest. I'll never figure it out.

I'm more concerned about CA when the Enron/Arnie thing hits them. It's going to be painful. Anyone who would sexually assault a woman... it's not a far stretch to think he will rape the state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Interesting reply
I just don't understand the logic behind this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. ? Don't understand
the logic behind my post or the problem with women voting Arnie?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. behind women voting for Arnold
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GinaMaria Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. maybe logic has nothing to do
with their decision. Maybe it's just partisan. Maybe they believe the simple sound bites out there, that dems are sexually sleezy, repugs are righteous... you know the drill. It has nothing to do with logic. The media feeds it. Repeat a lie often enough and people swear it's the truth. Manipulation of perception.

We are a culture that historically demonize victims and defends offenders. We still have a long way to go.

Best,
Gina
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
21. We sure do
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texastoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
8. A Wolf In Sheep's Clothing
First, I'm not from California, but if I were and I had voted for Arnold (I would have voted against the recall), I would tell you to count your blessings. What if Rush were elected? What if you got another Ashcroft? Nixon?

Adulterous, horndog politicians have been with this nation since it was born.

Mud-slinging and media productions about adulterous, horndog politicians have been with this nation since it was born (see the pamphlets written by the contemporaries of Ben Franklin, who was on the giving and receiving end of such mud-slinging).

Arnold did not make it to be the top movie star in the world by being stupid. I knew years ago when he married Maria that this day would come, that it was part of his personal achievement plan, and that he would select his forum wisely. He did.

I for one absolutely do not care what someone does in private with another consenting (key word there) individual. Arnold's native culture was not of the Victorian, sphincter-restricted, judgmentally moralistic bent. Neither was ours so much during the 70s and 80s when most of his boobie-squeezing behavior occurred. The term sexual harassment came to our culture only in the 80s. Arnold has done NOTHING that most men in America in a work environment have not also done until the words "lawsuit for sexual harassment" began to strike enough fear into the risk managers' hearts to revise corporate policies. If you are under 30, you have no idea how bad sexual harassment could be for a good-looking woman in the workplace.

California just might benefit from the election of Arnold, who is quite liberal in much of his thinking. The repukians think that Arnold will be malleable and do what he is told, and I've got a feeling that we are all going to be pleasantly surprised when he tells them to kiss his super movie star behind. Arnold really doesn't need the party like they need him. Let's wait and see.

Unfortunately, Clinton had to clear the way for all those following regarding the dip-the-cigar issue. He shouldn't have perjured himself. He was his own worst enemy FOR THAT TIME. I don't think it will be as big an issue anymore. As usual, the regressives are riding on the coattails of the Dems. Not the first time, and it won't be the last. Of course, womanizing is a character issue. It's not one that I look at when deciding whether or not someone is smart enough to do their job as an elected official.

Just think, in today's world, Thomas Jefferson would have been impeached for making whoopie with his black slave. Wow! How would that have played on the evening news? And what would the nation have lost because Jefferson loved a black woman not his wife?

The stupid Republicans would probably strung him up. What a bunch of idiots. Arnold is no idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Undemcided Donating Member (225 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
10. Compartmentalization.
Happens all the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Logansquare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. I heard a feminist theorist call these types "slave girls"
They identify and cling to power in order to benefit themselves, and don't feel particularly sorry about other women being hurt. They often view themselves as entitled and superior to other women. They attribute sexual assault or domestic violence against women as being mostly the woman's fault.

I remember a college classmate was raped and beaten while walking home from the laundromat after dark. A couple of the girls in the dorms (real princesses, by the way) said things like "what was she doing out by herself at night?," and "why didn't she try to scream and fight harder?" Absolutely no empathy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Same reason defense lawyers want women on
rape trial juries. Denial. If you believe that a man gets away with a pattern of abuse for years then you have to accept that you are a potential victim. That laws, culture, your own strength cannot protect you. It is much easier to blame the victims that it's their fault. Stupid, but easier to accept psychologically.

I can still remember my depression when I finally accepted my vulnerability and that victims are not at fault. It's hard to accept and understand and to then come out the other side and love men while recognizing the deviants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Classical_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
13. The same reason they voted for Clinton
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 02:55 PM by Classical_Liberal
They didn't believe the scandals. Just because you assume everything nasty said about az republican is true doesn't mean most people do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlaGranny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. It's easy to believe the accusations against Arnold.
Edited on Wed Oct-08-03 03:24 PM by FlaGranny
Cause he admitted they were true!! It's also easy to believe that he gangbanged. He said it himself during an interview. I don't believe anyone is assuming anything about Arnold.

I was a young working woman in the 50's and 60's, so I know all about sexual harrassment. I wouldn't have voted for someone like that back then and I wouldn't now either. That kind of person is repugnant. I've known enough dirty old men in my time. They've always disgusted me. Groping and crude sexual remarks are very revealing about a person's character. I have no problem voting for someone who has had sex with willing partners but I draw the line at dirty old creeps. Ugh!

Edit: Contrary to the opinions of some folks, most women do NOT throw themselves at actors, sports figures, and politicians (although I'll concede that enough do that these public figures should have no need to resort to this kind of behavior). It's a power thing and a "milder" form of rape.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. my opinion...
that I formed today while reading on some non-political boards. I think many of the women who voted for Arnold were liberal minded...but non-political. They came to terms with infidelities during Clintons tenure,and while there were distinctions,I don't think there was enough time for people who weren't totally emotionally involved to come to terms with the differences.

As for the conservative women who supported him,consistency is not a virtue with them..lol.

I do think this may be one of those 'defining moments'though. There was a thread here a few days ago where people listed the occurrences that made them forever Dem. Anita Hill was a big moment for many(myself included). I'm thinking there are a whole lot of women in California today(and maybe across the U.S.) who just became solid Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Good Point
Yeah but it surprises me that women would vote for Arnold to the extent that they did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Some of them WANT to be groped/
Its the Grope Wish Thingy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Yeah
I really doubt women want to be sexually harassed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spazito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
20. It would be interesting to see an age breakdown of the women who....
voted for him. I suspect they are in the 20-30 but have nothing to base my suspicions on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. I become very angry with stupid people myself,
however, this is what seems to have happened. Women who voted for Arnold were asked by reporters as they left the polls, why? They apparently, not knowing about Arnold's sexual harrassment, assaults and batteries prior to the Los Angeles Times story were convinced by the media or whoever that this was a smear campaign by the opposition to make Arnold look bad.

Now I really want to scream when I run into this mentality of those, who are so involved in their day to day lives, MTV and whatever they do to occupy themselves that they can't be bothered to get the facts before they vote and make a decision that affects not on themselves but everyone else as well.

Also, another reporter who was against Arnold's history of groping brought up the fact that many of the girls interviewed were between eighteen and twenty and hadn't had to deal with workplace sexual crimes yet, so they couldn't know how humiliating and frightening it is to be subject to this is a workplace where men control all the power.

Now, lastly, if Arnold ran as a Democrat, you can be sure the media would have smeared him from coast to coast on all of the sexually seamy stories the minute they got the hint that he wanted to enter politics let alone actually enter the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DealsGapRider Donating Member (650 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 06:15 PM
Response to Original message
23. If there's a silver lining to all of this...
...it's that the Repugs should be forced, once and for all, to quit calling themselves the party of family values. That's a good thing.

As for hypocrisy, I know I'll get flamed for this, but there's plenty to go around. Just as it was hypocritical for the GOP to support Ahnuld after lambasting Clinton, so was it hypocrtical for Gray David to campaign alongside Clinton while lambasting Ahnuld for groping.

I've seen a lot of blinders on here in DUland, where everyone refuses to believe that Clinton ever did anything that was not consensual. I find that remarkable. His penchant for non-consensual groping was legendary, and it's clear that he used women for sex even when it was consensual. How someone who does that can be said to respect women is beyond me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jiacinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I never said Clinton was perfect
But it was the right wing hypocrisy in sticking with Arnold that angered me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemCam Donating Member (911 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-08-03 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. That's the uncomfortable part..
They...at some level...are having to face their own hypocrisy.

I had to confront it with the Clinton scandal. Try as I might...and I did...to myself, I had to come to terms with the accusations. And the consensual nature of it...let me off the hook.

It's the same with Arnold. Why one would be attracted to him is unfathomable to me...refusing...all these years to be able to watch one of his movies...BUT......

He is a star, he has power, and now he's the Guv, luv...

And that is attractive.

And that means it is abhorrent only to the victims and the partisans.

Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC