Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I Hate To Say This, But If Cheney Goes, We're Screwed

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:06 PM
Original message
I Hate To Say This, But If Cheney Goes, We're Screwed
Bush will nominate Rice, Guiliani or *shudder* Romney, who will then be a SITTING VICE PRESIDENT in 08 and almost impossible to beat.

I am hoping Fitzgerald goes after Rove, Libby, etc but does not take Cheney down.

Of course, if he takes shrub down WITH Cheney, I'm fine with that.

I just want these monsters OUT in 08, and whatever enables that process to happen smoothly...

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. If cheney goes down, it will be a major blow to the repuke party...
I'm all for that :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cocoa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. if Cheney goes down, it would be Hugh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #12
25. I'm all for HUGH!!!!!!11
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 09:19 PM by cynatnite
:bounce: :toast: :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #25
45. HUGH leave me alone!
:grr::evilgrin::mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insanity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think the constitution says
Hassert should be next in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndyOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The line of succession applies, I think, only if the Pres
dies. If the VP dies the Pres can appoint a new one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cmd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Right. Nixon appointed Ford after Agnew went down in disgrace
If both the shrub and the evil eye go down, Hastert becomes president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. If Cheney is indicted and resigns
according to the constitution, Bush appoints his successor and the Senate confirms it.

Nixon did it with Ford after Agnew resigned. And Ford appointed Rockefeller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:18 PM
Response to Reply #6
58. Actually both houses need to confirm.
Just minor nitpicking on my part :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LA lady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Bush chooses
If Cheney goes down, Bush picks a new VP. I lived through the Nixon/Agnew days when Nixon picked Ford. But Ford lost to Carter the next year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sanity Claws Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Don't be so sure
This should taint the entire Thug party pretty badly. Remember Ford was not elected, even though he became Prez after Nixon was forced out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
39. Ford was picked by Nixon, so he had his taint. Cheney was picked by
Bush; say, he goes down - Bush picks his replacement. That plus the years of corruption being uncovered, will be the kiss of death for the presidential aspirations of any new VP picked by Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FranzFerdinand Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:09 PM
Response to Original message
5. question
you're not the first person to say "XXXX will then be a SITTING VICE PRESIDENT in 08 and almost impossible to beat."

what is that makes a sitting VP "impossible to beat"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NorCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. I'm not sure how it was meant above
but incumbents ALWAYS have an advantage over their opponent. Name recognition, media savvy, etc, etc., all come into play in our sham of an election process (the sheeple don't actually care about issues, or so it would seem).

If Cheney goes down however, I think that will too big a hit to the Repub reputation, and '08 would be ours to lose!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ender Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #10
23. thats a huge misnomer.
GWB was the first sitting VP to win since like Andrew Jackson.

The sitting VP spot is almost a kiss of death for a candidate.

You really need to look at history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #23
47. You're close...
Actually it was GHWB, and the last one before that was Van Buren.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Harry S Truman Donating Member (300 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Right
The country is so sick of these repuke crooks, it wouldn't matter who was sitting on the VP. Of course, as the media blow jobs continue, why bother thinking or voting????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catzies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. Answer
Four little words:

George. Herbert. Walker. Bush.

:evilgrin:

teehee

Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FranzFerdinand Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. you welcoming me?
thank you! i've been around for a while now. i'm a quiet guy. i had my Kerry sign stolen one day only to come to work and have someone here spend the better part of a morning calling me a freeper ;)

good times...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IntravenousDemilo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #5
48. Uh-uh. Two words:
Al Gore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
8. Gerald Ford
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 PM by DefenseLawyer
certainly wasn't impossible to beat in '76 under somewhat similar circumstances, and he actually got to be president for a while. Al Gore wasn't impossible to beat (although he was cheated, it was still close enough to allow them to cheat) Neither was Humphrey in '68 or Nixon in '60. I don't think historically being vice president has been much of an advantage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. If Bush went insane and appointed John McCain, there goes '08
But I think Bush is suffering from a different form of insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FranzFerdinand Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. i know McCain bashing it hot these days but..
i've seen worse Republicans ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #15
30. Worse yes, but he's better than the rest of the repug field.
Not to worry though, the RNC has decreed he shall not get the nomination. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #30
62. That's the point; he's too far towards the middle for them
Though, if the last resort of the RNC was to simply prevent the Democrats from taking the White House in '08, they might actually consider McCain as a desperation move on their part.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #15
63. Yeah, how much damage can he cause in 4 years
Seems like we went down that road once already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
14. almost impossible to beat......... silliness, simply silliness
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 09:14 PM by seabeyond
people dont want any of the three as pres, they dont trust any of the three even the republicans dont trust these three. cheney goes down, shows the corruption of the repug party, they will have no support from dem or independents. the repugs will be deflated and not go to the voters booth.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
16. I disagree. What is best for the country is best for our Party
and removing every corrupt politician in Congress and in the White House is what's best and necessary for the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
17. "a SITTING VICE PRESIDENT... almost impossible to beat"
Yeah! Like Al Gore!

Oh, wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FranzFerdinand Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. we have a winner
well done :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewJeffCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:30 PM
Response to Reply #19
38. Not to mention Tricky Dick Nixon in 1960
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
18. Believe me, if the Republican VP resigns, it's not going to be good news
for the GOP. If it escalated to the point that Cheney has to resign (which I have serious doubts about), the new VP has to serve in a scandal-ridden WH for the next 3-3.5 years. It's going to taint him/her in 2008.

We've seen all the potential GOP candidates for 2008 distancing themselves from Bushco in some form or another. They're rats fleeing a sinking ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
31. Exactly
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
21. your logic confuses me
I feel like the Unfrozen Caveman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FranzFerdinand Donating Member (284 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. i'm not familiar with your strange ways
was you talkin' to me?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #24
29. *snarf*
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 09:27 PM by CatWoman
:D

BTW -- Welcome to DU :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruggerson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. My logic is that incumbents always have a huge advantage
and we all know how the Republicans milk it (terror alerts, etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
22. If Cheney DOESN'T Go, We're Screwed
He's the linchpin in this whole deal.

Timing is everything.

The 25th Amendment:

Amendment XXV

Section 2. Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
If it happens now, you may be right.

If we retake Congress, or at least either the House or Senate in January 2007, all bets are off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
28. Are you kidding?
No one with any presidential aspirations for 2008 would accept the VP in a corrupt administration. Repugs like Hagel are already distancing themselves from Bush because he's unpopular. And do you really think Fitz is going to let Bush off the hook if he nails Cheney? Hardly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. I think you're right. They're heading for the lifeboats already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. I just want to see one (or more) GONE. Let the purge begin. Now.
One day at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
33. Sitting VP impossible to beat?
Look at history on that one and then get back to me. You will find that it is typically quite the opposite, particularly with an unpopular president such as Shrub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lectrobyte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
35. No, people are sick of Bush's terra and economic ruin,
the repubs won't have a chance unless they declare martial law after suicide bombers blow up polling places shortly after they open on the east coast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SunDrop23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
36. If Cheney goes, they will get as much distance as possible
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
37. Cheney and Shrub did their party a huge disservice
by not taking Cheney out immediately after the election and appointing an heir apparent. That moment has passed. No new Vice President is going to enjoy any incumbent advantages after Dick is chased out of town.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Still not too late to whip up a heart attack to evoke sympathy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
40. Nah. McCain will be the VP.
Cheney will resign for health reasons should he be indicted and Bush will pardon him. McCain already knows he's "in" which explains his severe asskissing of Bush and his policies lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #40
43. I dunno. The hard right beats on him like they do on Miers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:05 PM
Response to Reply #40
53. The neocons despise McCain.
I don't know why people around here keep saying that McCain would replace Cheney if Cheney has to leave office. McCain would be the last person in the world they'd pick.

Think about it. McCain as president would be almost good. He'd be somebody the Dems could work with. Why in the Sam Hell would the neocon fascists want to turn over the whole business to somebody like that?

No, if Crashcart crashes, it'll be another neocon, not McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
67. The Bush family are not neo-cons, they are Saudi puppets.
Now Dick Cheney, that's a neo-con.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
41. Wrong- we can beat anyone in '08...
...it depends on how we frame things...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. My guess is that the old Stalinist system will trump all in any case.
Stalin laughed to a colleague once, "It doesn't matter how people vote. What matters is who counts the votes."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message
46. The entire party will be tainted. Also with the economic shitstorm....
to come, the Democrats will make a huge comeback in 2008. Wes Clark's the man. You heard it from me first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #46
57. I like your prediction.
Al Gore would also be good.

My favs right now are Clark and Gore in no particular order. If one of the CBC decides to run, I may have to adjust my thinking. Those folks have been carrying the water for the Dems for a long, long time. They deserve a shot at the big spot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
49. You are all talking like things are normal. They are not. We don't have
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 09:52 PM by higher class
a vote if the right wing still control the votes. They stole in 00-02-04.

All is talk:

. if we continue to allow them to furnish their unvetted, un regulated Republican hardware, software, and technicians -
. if we allow their right wing networks to pay for the exit polls and then trust that right wing networks are not going to manipulate the vote in consort with the right wing -
. if we allow right wing networks to call the vote -
. unless we ensure that voters are unobstructed in getting to the polls and unless we assure their names are not purged.

All is nothing unless we wrench control of voting away from the right wing and place it in back of non-traitors.

Who are you going to trust?

Paper trails ARE NOT GOING TO DO IT!

Incumbents are irrelevant if citizens don't control the voting.

We are fools and suckers if we let it happen again in '06 or '08.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VADem11 Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
50. We're not screwed
If Cheney goes down, it'll taint the entire party. I don't see Bush becoming wildly popular again or see any VP he picks being popular. All of the candidates you mention aren't squeaky clean like Ford. VP candidates usually have to be confirmed by huge majorities like Ford. We've only had two sitting VP's win the presidency so it won't be impossible. It'll be ok eventually.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
51. Go to the light, DICK ..Please! Hell is ready!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
longship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
52. Chimp will be implicated.
Chimp was on AF-1 when the whole plan was put into action. We *know* as fact that he's known about it in detail for over two years. That means that he helped cover it up for over two fucking years. There's no way that there isn't presidential obstruction of justice and conspiracy.

We have to hope that Fitz has him by the short hairs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
54. The Republicans are fucked. The big fight of the next few years is between
the progressives and the DLC Republicrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Melinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. Ya mean like ROCKEFELLER won in 1976?
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 10:09 PM by Melinda
:rofl:

*edited to remove the reference to the klutz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
56. I'm sorry to remind you...
But a sitting vice president doesn't necessarily have a lock -- remember Al Gore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
59. Rethuglicans can only steal elections from now on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
60. IF Cheney Goes, I Don't See How The Giggling Murderer Can
Edited on Tue Oct-11-05 10:23 PM by Dinger
be immune. Have NO fear, if Cheney goes, they'll BOTH go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-11-05 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
61. I don't think so. Anyone associated with Bush in '08 faces an uphill...
battle. That person won't have the usual benefit of being an incumbent VP. Indeed, the then-sitting VP's association with Bush will be seen as a liability.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
64. If dick goes down, they only ones that could save the repug party .......
are the Dems.

Repugs are so SO screwed when this breaks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Exit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 12:36 AM
Response to Original message
65. Listen, my friend, nobody, but NOBODY
is worse than Cheney!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
66. No Need To Worry
Cheney isn't going to jail, he isn't going to resign and he certainly won't be impeached.

Think mafia and then you'll understand why, even if indicted, nothing will result.

Imagine if the head of the mafia had the ability to pardon. Now imagine Bush as the head of that mafia... see what I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 05:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC