Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

When Plame was leaked, wasn't Rove just a Civilian advisor with

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:35 AM
Original message
When Plame was leaked, wasn't Rove just a Civilian advisor with
no official title or clearences? It seems like no one ever mentions this, and the RW talking heads always say that Rove is a "trusted advisor" and what not. I'd like to know how far apart the leak occured and Rove getting his offical title were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yes
I had forgotten about that until now. I wonder if this means he's in bigger trouble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I hope he is. If we forget it, their lies will become true and
public perception of the whole deal will be spun a lot more easily. I think it is a pretty important fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point.
And if Rove had no security clearances, did someone give him classified information, in violation of the law?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Brotherjohn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. It also means someone WITH clearance and an official status leaked it...
... to HIM.

Libby?
Cheney?

... Bush? (nah, too out of the loop)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Good point n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. He MUST have had a clearance done. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I don't follow what you are saying, can you elaborate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. When you work in offices like that you have a background clearance...
done and you also sign confidentiality oaths, etc.

Always in an office like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyBoots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:07 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. How high do you think a clearence like that would go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I would think that his would be VERY high...
He has unlimited access to the Prez, so it would have to be damned high. My mother was a secretary for Sec. Def and her clearance was reviewed weekly. That was a long time ago, I don't know how they 'maintain' these things now.

But, because of the information he could stumble on, his clearance would have to be very, very high.

You're smart to understand that all clearances don't entitle you to see everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
10. Irrelevant unless
he wasn't allowed to know. What's important is what was done with that information and if he wasn't allowed to know, who gave it to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flyarm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
12. he was WH campaign advisor!! ..n/.t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
13. hmmm .. wasn't he the first political advisor to ever have an office
in the WH? Just what level of clearance do you assign to a "political" advisor, when that "position" had never existed before? That's like hooking up a main line to everything private about our country to ONE political party's arm ...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:45 AM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah, rove can always be
"trusted" to lie, smear, and screw up anything that's real and true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC