|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 10:27 AM Original message |
OK, so you want to amend the Constitution, how about getting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtbymark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 10:31 AM Response to Original message |
1. The legislature could be so corrupt that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 10:34 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No shit. I maintain that if Congress had really wanted to fix the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 10:36 AM Response to Reply #1 |
4. You are correct, sir! There is no chance whatsoever of this happening |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 10:36 AM Response to Original message |
3. I agree; but nothing will change. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:01 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. I agree that we need an explicit right to privacy. This 'implied' BS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamin lib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
6. I'd like to see the right to contribute directly tied to the right to vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:19 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. Meaning that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flamin lib (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:30 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. No, didn't mean any of that. Just that if a corporation can't vote, it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 12:43 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. You didn't define "entity" as being distinct from "person" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:16 AM Response to Original message |
7. Here is a very simple amendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenPartyVoter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:33 AM Response to Original message |
10. Gotta do it from the ground up. Start with the towns as that will get |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Greyhound (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Oct-12-05 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
11. I am afraid that if the cost of electing our government is not borne |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Wed May 01st 2024, 01:35 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC