Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Are we at DU prepared for the ultimate letdown? as in NO indictments?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:55 PM
Original message
Are we at DU prepared for the ultimate letdown? as in NO indictments?
we have to be prepared for anything.

a posted in GD/Politics just reminded me of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. What are New Orleans Indictments? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pam-Moby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. I think she means
No indictments. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Stop Bush knew what I meant
:D

Just wanted to screw with me :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
69. Well who can blame him?
B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #69
72. !
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. Hard to be let down when you don't expect them to begin with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
soleft Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think it would be like Nov 04 = maybe worse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
22. Oh it would be much much worse.
I would be suicidal. Thank goodness that indictments are on the way. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
expatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:57 PM
Original message
We'll always have DeLay. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes...
I have an asp in a basket next to my bed. I still can't decide whether to use it on myself, or release it in the oval office:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Gawd, that's funny
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hang a left Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
28. I didn't get it.
And according to Catwoman it is pretty funny. ????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That's how Cleopatra committed suicide
a bite from an asp :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #4
30. LOL n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. Release it...please
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mcctatas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #33
68. I don't know...
PETA might get pissed, animal cruelty and all releasing a poor, helpless venemous snake in that pit of vipers;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackstraw45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. I think people here have REALLY counted their chickens
before they've hatched on this one.

WAY too much confidence that the BFEE would go down so easily.

My guess - Libby is charged and Rove walks. Libby plea bargins, spared jail time and writes a book in 2008.

Hope I'm wrong but we've got to calm our sense of celebration here until we KNOW something is going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
25. Writes a book about how he stood up against big government,
and stood up for free speech.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
34. If Karl Walks, There Are Going to Be Some REALLY Pissed-Off CIA People
My guess - Libby is charged and Rove walks. Libby plea bargins, spared jail time and writes a book in 2008.

That would be disappointing, of course. Not only to us, but to a whole
lot of really pissed-off CIA people. They're not known for going down
easy either.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
6. You must be listening to Jonathan Alter ...
He was on Franken's show today and said the same thing ... and then Al rightly pointed out that Alter's track record on stuff like this isn't exactly stellar.

I keep focusing on Fitzgerald's track record -- has he ever pursued an investigation for close to this long WITHOUT having something to show for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. On a positive note -- Fitzgerald is the one who brought down Gotti
Before that he was known as "the Teflon Don"

Just something to think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #15
31. See -- THAT's our Fitz ... he's up to this challenge, if anyone is
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:29 AM
Response to Reply #15
79. And The Illinois Republican Mafia
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ken_g Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
8. I would be soooo bummed. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. I'll be crushed
and will be convinced "there is no justice" for these evil bastards or anyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electropop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
18. I'm preparing "Plan B".
Looking for an apartment in Toronto.

Seriously, I am positive there will be indictments. Only question is how high up Fitz will dare to go. I think if he doesn't try to disable the regime, he is only endangering himself more - like just wounding a lion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LonelyLRLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. I am reading here and hearing that Fitz is fearless.
...... and smart, so let's hope he goes for the jugular.

My plan B would be in a warmer climate, say Costa Rica.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
10. I am not prepared
at all. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 02:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. Hell no, I'm not.
If Fitzgerald comes up empty, who's going to drink all this champagne I've stocked away in the fridge? :-)

Gawd, that would suck, CatWoman. Please, Fitz, throw us a frickin' bone! :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Well, Jen, if it's any consolation
I'll volunteer to help you out with disposing that champagne :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VolcanoJen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #20
64. I kinda suspected you would.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:19 PM by VolcanoJen
:toast:

Glug, glug, glug, girl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. I just wrote on a post about this same topic
It might not happen, folks. Let's not party too early. I saw all the anguish after November and it broke me up. I was a lurker then. DU-ers are passionate and sensitve. Hold something back just in case.

But if it happens, everybody come to my house for Octoberfest! Beer and brats on the grill! (that's sausage, not nasty kids!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. your post prompted me to post this thread
Mom

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TallahasseeGrannie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
67. OH!
well, good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. Or alternatively
There ARE indictments, but they decide the rules don't apply to them and then the media never reports on it again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
17. Possible, But Not Likely, They've Committed Crimes by their OWN ADMISSION!
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 03:02 PM by Beetwasher
From David Corn's latest:

"By Rove's own admission--or that of his attorney--Rove did pass classified information (Valerie Wilson's employment status at the CIA was classified) to at least two reporters (Cooper and Novak)."

That is a crime. Period. Rove admitted it. I can't see how he can avoid an indictment right there unless Fitz is crooked (and I don't think that's the case).

The ONLY way there will be no indictments is if Fitz is crooked and/or someone got to him, otherwise, there will be indictments.

Link to article:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/thenation/20051012/cm_thenation/328485
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Opusnone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
19. Vote, vote, vote
That is the only way.
Send them packing. The entire BFEE, the neocon bureaucrats and the corrupt cronies.
Vote in a Democratic Congress in 2006 and watch the roaches run under the fridge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nostradammit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #19
44. On Diebold and ES&S machines?
Not bloody likely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
21. Prepared? Hell, I'm expecting it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:02 PM
Response to Original message
24. NO!
But we would deal with it. Nothing could come close to matching the aftermath of the election. Now that was grief.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ken_g Donating Member (249 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
26. I expect indictments, but I also fear pardons
ala, pappy Bush and Iran-Contra.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stepnw1f Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. I Would Give Up My Citizenship (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
32. yes
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 03:09 PM by LSK
When has ANYTHING worked in our favor since Clinton was last elected? My brother-in-law keeps pounding on me that everything is fixed and there is no more America. Maybe hes right and no matter what we do, it wont matter.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nicholas D Wolfwood Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
35. A realistic thought on DU? And you aren't getting flamed?
Hell does seem a bit frosty today... I guess it could happen... :evilgrin:

On a more serious note, yeah, they might not happen at all. But even if they do, what will this really change? Neither Bush nor Cheney will be running for office again. It'll do some damage to the GOP as a whole, sure, but it's still only 2005. We've got a full year until 2006, and anything can, and will, happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goforit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. Well yes, but are they prepared for ultimate anger from 70% americans?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. yeah right
70% of Americans would only be "ultimately" angered if the Superbowl was canceled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
0rganism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #36
43. What, are the bushistas going to cancel Reality TV?
70% of Americans don't give a flying fuck about anything that doesn't inconvenience them directly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
37. Revolting thought!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alkaline9 Donating Member (586 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
38. what i'm expecting is...
...indictments .... followed by a rash of pardons :-(

While that may play out to be BushCo's end, it still wouldn't thrill me as much as the entire group of villains behind bars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lerkfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
39. I'm happy, actually, if nothing else happens from this point forward...
watching the flopsweat of this administration WORRYING about things happening is a pleasure in and of itself.

for stuff to happen on top of that would be gravy, in my book, considering the strangelhold the repubs have on govt. at the moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
42. I agree.
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 03:42 PM by cat_girl25
Fitzgerald, after all, is still a republican. Never trust republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nightjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. I agree up to a point
You can't label all repugs the same way if they are outside of this illegitimate white house.

I don't know a single democrat that would give a "pass' to a democratic president if he committed treason.
I wouldn't.
No one loves Bill Clinton more than I do but if he did what bush, Rove and co. did I would pursue prosecution to the fullest.

And so many republicans have finally seen that bush is a no good, empty suit and jumped ship.

I agree to be wary but I am not worried about him being a republican.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #55
76. he is not a republican nor is he a democrat -- see link in my post below
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 07:07 PM by emulatorloo
<snip>

Fitzgerald is careful to be apolitical in his targets and his public life alike. He registered to vote as an Independent in New York, only to discover, when he began receiving fundraising calls, that Independent was a political party. He re-registered with no affiliation, as he did later in Chicago.

He spit fire last year when reporters asked whether the racketeering indictment of Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah, a fundraiser for the Islamic militant group Hamas, was timed to boost President Bush's reelection campaign. The case was trumpeted first by Attorney General John Ashcroft.

"I am not running for an election. I'm not part of a political party," Fitzgerald said at the time. "The election is irrelevant to this case. The reason we brought this case now is we're ready to proceed."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #42
75. do a little research
fitzgerald is not a republican. . . .

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A55560-2005Feb1?language=printer

<snip>

Fitzgerald is careful to be apolitical in his targets and his public life alike. He registered to vote as an Independent in New York, only to discover, when he began receiving fundraising calls, that Independent was a political party. He re-registered with no affiliation, as he did later in Chicago.

He spit fire last year when reporters asked whether the racketeering indictment of Muhammad Hamid Khalil Salah, a fundraiser for the Islamic militant group Hamas, was timed to boost President Bush's reelection campaign. The case was trumpeted first by Attorney General John Ashcroft.

"I am not running for an election. I'm not part of a political party," Fitzgerald said at the time. "The election is irrelevant to this case. The reason we brought this case now is we're ready to proceed."

<snip>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Connie_Corleone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
45. Tear my house apart like on election night. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
46. You know...this thought had crossed my mind...
..but i really don't see it is being a possibility judging by the number of times Rover and Judy have been back and forth.

Of course, if the inconceivable happens and these criminals skate, I may well have to seriously reconsider moving my family back across the pond. I have no desire whatsoever to live in a facist dictatorship....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
savemefromdumbya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
47. I would have to put my vintage bottle of Chianti away til next time
grrrr:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
48. Someone will probably be indicted, but it won't be the people
we would like to see. They will throw someone to the wolves (Ollie North style) who will take all the blame because he's a good little Bushbot. It probably won't affect the people we'd most like to see indicted. We can still hope, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donheld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
49. Of course were not
How does one prepare for such a let down. Indictments are deserved in this case, but we've been let down so many times before. God i hope not again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. I think it's going to be worse than that...
I think Indictments will come (and everyone will cheer) but then nothing will result because Bush will pardon everyone and Congress won't impeach.

Here's a thread discussing that topic:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=104&topic_id=5038972&mesg_id=5038972

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi826 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
51. I don't believe that
You keep forgetting that it is the Grand Jury that indicts, not the prosecutor, and might I remind you that the jury in this case is mostly african american females and that when Cooper came back from testifying before them he was remarking on how tough the jury was?

I remember starting a thread about this very thing when I found out
about it. Blacks are not as easily intimidated as whites, especially when it comes to Bush, but I don't have to tell you that.
If there is a need to nail the Bushies collective asses, you better believe they will have no problem doing it.

Do you remember how the Bush was kissing up to blacks, even sending the head of the RNC to the annual NAACP conference for the first time in 5 years just before Katrina hit?
That's why.

The question is will the Rove be included in any indictments or will he somehow weasel out of it. I can't see him doing so since Fitzgerald took back his promise of NOT indicting him; no longer promising him he had nothing to worry about.

But I expect indictments.
Though I am becoming increasingly curious about just who and how many, since it seems his entire cabinet was in on this.
It almost seems that if they ALL aren't indicted it would be a crime.
Des
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #51
57. Thanks Des
and know that this black woman hates his dumb ass.

Would you believe that some freeper joined DU today just to call me a "nigger" in one of my threads?

I almost fell over laughing :hi:+
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi826 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #57
70. Good Lord
Catwoman wrote:

"Thanks Des"

No Prob.
I just wish I could be on that jury.
I would love to find out just what happened and how they were able to get away with the things they did. I would also love to know who the jury is looking at with regards to indictment. I keep hearing about 22 people that are possibles for indictment. I would love to know who they are.

"and know that this black woman hates his dumb ass."

Ditto. Natch.

"Would you believe that some freeper joined DU today just to call me a "nigger" in one of my threads?I almost fell over laughing :hi:+"

You're kidding! What's happening to DU?
And why did he call you that? Just out of the blue, or did he have a point in his racism?
I hope you read him the riot act at least.
Des

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #70
73. I have absolutely no idea why that pinhead did that
It was a lounge thread, and I was talking about all the spiders camped out on my front porch.

This idiot says they are there because I'm a nigger, and spiders like to scare niggers.

I don't know how that person knew I was Black. He/she obviously had been trolling the board for some time, gathering information.

At the time he/she wrote that, their post count was about four or five.

I laughed at him/her and alerted, and *poof* -- it was gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
52. Yes, because I'm pessimistic, and it's something not within my control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
53. No expectations
Been let down too many times. But if this investigation fizzles out into legal smoke, a few people get spanked, and the Bush juggernaut rolls on...then as Bob Dylan would say, "It's not dark yet, but it's getting there."

My wife and I bought a townhouse in Shanghai.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #53
63. How much did it cost? Seriously. I wondered that when I visited there
a few years ago. Figured Shanghai and Beijing were probably seriously great real estate investments even now.

Can you legally "own" property in China as a foreigner? Or is it like buying something in Mexico where you get the "99 year lease" etc.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jokerman93 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-13-05 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #63
78. short answer
Edited on Thu Oct-13-05 08:35 AM by jokerman93
yes foreigners can buy and own. It's a modified capitalist system now. No doubt. Roughly, prices seem to be hovering between %30 and %40 of a comparable purchase in the states. Although I don't really follow the real estate thing here. So I could be wrong. It's about 6668CNY/m2, and it's outright ownership too. Not speaking Chinese may be an obstacle though. My wife handled it. Lucky me.

As far as buying a parcel in the countryside, one must buy it from the government. There's a limit to the size though; about 200/m2. Not much. One must build on the property within two years or the gov. reclaims the land and keeps the change.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Spock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
54. I don't expect anything
It'll be interesting and exciting if they are indicted, but they are sufficiently tarred at this point. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
56. Well, it certainly wouldn't be the first time I've been disappointed.
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
58. Totally devastated for a little while, then
work harder on the election fraud!

These pricks have got to fall sometime, somehow. Odds are in our favor with all the crimes they are involved in.:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountebank Donating Member (755 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
59. Anything can happen obviously, but the way Fitzgerald has persued this
case makes it seem more likely than not that more than zero indictments are forthcoming.

Though I agree that the predictions based on wishful thinking instead of the facts at hand often lead to the greatest letdown - and lots of people base their predictions on wishful thinking.

I happen to think, based on what I've seen, sending a reporter to jail, etc., that Fitzgerald will issue some indictments, maybe not high level, Bush and Cheney will almost certainly skate free, but something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KnaveRupe Donating Member (700 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
60. Here's my concern:
Fitz has been EXTREMELY tight-lipped about the whole investigation. He has completely clamped down on info to such a degree that nobody really has much of an idea what's truly going on.

Yet the past few days has seen reports from "lawyers familiar with the case" that Fitz is looking at conspiracy charges against the entire White house Iraq Group http://americablog.blogspot.com/2005/10/wsj-fitzgerald-looking-at-white-house.html,

I guess my worry is this: if I was Rove, and I was about to be indicted, and I knew it was coming, and I knew I was screwed, I would try to save the ship by leaking insanely overblown accounts of the carnage that was to follow. I would have rumors out there that the prosecutor was about to indict every single republican in government, and that he was looking to execute the entire administration for treason.

That way, when he came back with one little indictment rather than the bloodbath the opposition had anticipated, it would demoralize them and would work to my side's favor.

So... since Fitz hasn't ever leaked anything that we know of, who HAS been leaking these latest rumors? What "lawyers familiar with the case"?

Not trying to be a buzzkill or anything. Nobody in this country wants to see these criminals get their comeuppance as badly as I do. But I'm proceeding with caution for this reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nvliberal Donating Member (618 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #60
61. Anything quoted from a blog can't be taken as gospel.
I wouldn't get my hopes up on this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
desi826 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #61
71. This isn't from a blog
it's from the Wall Street Journal.

And I just read another story talking about William Kristol on Fox News Channel telling viewers that he has spoken to lawyers "friendly to the administration" warning him that there were going to be indictments of high level administration officials and that the Repubs were going to take a hit, so get ready.

Then he started whining about the "criminilization of politics" (like THEY didn't start that shit with Clinton).

There will be indictments.
The question is who, and how long is it going to take Fitzgerald to announce them.

Hell, even if there are plea bargains, that's STILL an admission of guilt. If one flips over on the other, THAT'S an admission of guilt.

And you know what?
I'm also hearing that the White House is already feuding.
The opponants of the Iraq war within the White House see this as their vindication and a chance to finally get rid of Karl.

ALL of this is good.
No matter what happens.

The only down side I see to this is the very incompetant Democratic party, fumbling, bumbling, cowardly response to what should be a HUGE political opportunity for them.

2006 is their's to lose.
And they more than likely will.
But if they do, it won't be because American citizens and responsible public servants haven't tried to help them.
Des
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
62. Carful optimism on a leash here...
I decided not to hang my hopes on this too much no matter how bad it looks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:21 PM
Response to Original message
65. I am, I've seen the Bushie's get away with too much not to feel
that they could evade justice on this too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
66. Shit No! I am not prepared if there are 0 indictments
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
74. Absolutely after November 2004, nothing would surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
77. I'm on the other end -- I believe what will happen will be worse than...
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 08:25 PM by stevietheman
generally expected (worse for Bush). Something rather explosive. That's what my "tea leaves" are telling me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC