Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fitzgerald may have asked for extension of Grand Jury

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:54 PM
Original message
Fitzgerald may have asked for extension of Grand Jury
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:54 PM by HootieMcBoob
A source close to the Plame case is saying that Fitzgerald met alone with Judge Hogan yesterday, presumably to ask for an extension of the Grand Jury.

BushCo. sphincters to be set on "pucker" for a while.


http://firedoglake.blogspot.com/2005_10_09_firedoglake_archive.html#112914911606549275
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. No!
I can't take any more waiting!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I'd rather he got it right, Stephanie.
This is too important for the future of this country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
24. The longer he takes, the more time they have to launch a PR campaign
against him. Unless you tie Limbaugh's and Coulter's lips together, they still have pundits that can stir the shit to raise the polls against Fitz.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. If it means he gets the whole rotten crew....
..I say go for it....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I know
I can barely concentrate on anything else now any longer and I might explode. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Yes, but this isn't about you
It's about the truth, or something like it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. Are you kidding? Waiting for this is half the fun.
I'm getting a real kick out of watching the rightwing abandoning the administration like rats from a sinking ship.

There was an article in the WA Post today that gave a list of all the Repugs Bush has courted to run for the House and Senate who told him "no thanks".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. If this turns out to be true...
I wonder how long the extension will be for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #13
42. Ordinarily a new grand jury would have to be impaneled. The term of
the new grand jury would be 18 months I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. well if that's the case then I'm starting to think this must be bogus
what you and h2o man and walt starr have said makes more sense to me right now. If he met with the judge it could be that he's getting ready to wrap the whole thing up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChickMagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. That's right
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 05:06 PM by ginbarn
An extension on a grand jury is 3 months, if I remember correctly. If a new grand jury is impaneled, they will have to start from scratch.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
54. Waitin just maybe the only fun we get...
there are no guarantees that there will be indictments.

But would Fitz' ask for an extension if he didn't have business to attend to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
randyconspiracybuff Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Better To Let Fitz Take His Time
...and get it right rather than to rush this thing. The new revelations of Miller's notes may mean a lot more stones need unturning before indictments are issued (if there are any indictments).

But, I agree with you. The suspense is killing me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. Ah so, Grasshopper, a classic case of the "Emptiness of Waiting"
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:03 PM by SpiralHawk
My old Zen teacher always used to say, "waiting is like..."

Ah, but why be trite, or even profound for that matter? I shall not bore your further.

Let's all just squat back on our bamboo mats and Blissfully Contemplate the steady drip, drip, dri...

(Help, my planet's Poles are melting and all my bimbo pResident wants to do is cut taxes for the rich !)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lindsay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
37. Or as Heinlein had it, in Stranger in a Strange Land,
"waiting is."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
6. Set Repube Sphincters on Pucker: Make it so Mr. pResident*
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:06 PM by SpiralHawk


* Special circumstances apply for "special" people, especially Connecticut Yankee Preppy Cheerleaders who somehow become pResident of their nation even after having deserted their National Guard units.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Debau2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Oh my...
:rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray: :rofl: :spray:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moobu2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. They’re going to have sphincter fatigue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pithy Cherub Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
10. Possibly a very good exciting thing!
New testimony may have brought new avenues and new potential crimes into view. Fitzgerald is sworn to uphold the law and go wherever this may lead including the Oval Office. My immediate reaction also means more principals and staffers on the NSC may be in deep hot water without their GOP water wings.

Stay tuned to Our new REAL political reality show! :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. That's what I thought too
especilly considering the new info that the investigation was focusing on the white house iraq group now and that cheney may very well be a target.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #17
45. I am confident that Fitzgerald has been aware of the WHIG for a long time.
In fact, I think it may have been the existence of the WHIG and its responsibility for formulating and disseminating the lies to justify the invasion of Iraq that led Fitzgerald to expand the scope of his investigation long ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
back2basics909 Donating Member (438 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
22. Apart from the wait...
.. this MUST be good news, if it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack from Charlotte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
61. I agree. New targets have been IDed. Wack them all.*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. I have no idea how this works someone help me out...
What are the various other possible reasons for Fitzgerald meeting with the judge?

If the GJ hands down an indictment does the judge have to sign them before they are served?

If there is a need to get some subpoenaed to testify does that take a meeting with the Judge?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
66. If he were going to indict Cheney, wouldn't he inform the judge first?
That's so huge, I think he would alert the judge before he filed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cronus Protagonist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
14. He might be moving into new investigative areas too
That would be his reason for an extension.

http://brainbuttons.com/home.asp?stashid=13
Buttons for brainy people - educate your local freepers today!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
16. I sure hope he's acquired body guards.
Republicans are dangerous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blasphemer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
18. What is the time frame between indictments and a trial?
This story needs to be a big part of the upcoming elections. Ideally, the indictments would be timed for maximum effect. Would a trial start before next November if the indictments came down this month?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
19. hmmmmm....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
countryjake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
20. He's probably asking for protection!
With the tight ship he's run so far, I doubt anyone actually knows what that meeting could have been concerning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's really difficult to say what he may have been talking to the judge
about.

Could be a lot of things, especially Miller's latest testimony and the implications to the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
23. Let's hope nothing else critical is going on while Bushco
sits nervously awaiting the outcome. I'd hate for Dumbya's nerves to cause him to push the wrong buttons on Syria or Iran.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
25. Don't think so .... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Is that a hunch?
Or do you have other information?
I'm not all that familiar with the person who posted this and have no idea how reputable she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. H2O Man is above reproach
I'll vouch for him.

But share H20 Man ... what is the deal? Is he ready to rock and roll instead?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walt Starr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I'd bet he was meeting with the judge to inform the judge
he was ready to proceed with the completion of the case and formulate indictments.

He may also have been talking with the judge about how they go about informing the GJ they cannot indict *.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #27
31. Fitzgerald and the judge
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:26 PM by H2O Man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:34 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Here's a question for you
Just how wide can he make the net on crimes that investigating the original crime exposes? In other words, can he stretch this investigation to include all the way back to the DSM and how they might play a part in the actions that led to this investigation?

I desperately want to see someone (him, if he can) tie these two things together in a way that makes the case air tight on just what happened and what the DSM really means.

If he has shown that all of the "cover up" began before Wilson wrote his article, can he trace it back to the proof they were fixing the intelligence to fit the policy, of which Wilson was a thorn in their sides where their plans were concerned?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
41. There are not
limitations on how wide he can go. Matthews is saying this is the WHIGs bringing us to war. While the DSM is not going to directly come in to play, it is the same thing. Matthews just said Wilson showed the White House case for war was false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. I'm all over H2O man
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:51 PM by HootieMcBoob
I mean...he's the man.
Last summer I was hanging on his every word about this...his and a few other folks. That's why I'm interested to know what he has to say. Like I said I have no idea of the reputation of this blogger, or her source, it was just something I happened upon.

{on edit} and when I say last summer i'm talking about july 2004! the plame papers i think they were calling them :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #33
38. I misunderstood -- I'm up to speed with you now though!
:) Sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #33
40. People are anxious.
Chris Matthews again asked a guest (Miller's attorney) is this going to bring down the administration. Miller's attorney nodded yes to Chris's question about if Rove and Libby are indeed being indicted. Watch the show when it plays later.

Fitzgerald has had to meet with the judge numerous times.

Note: the Cheney forces have Victoria Toensing on. She said Fitzgerald has "gone over the edge." She is a disgusting human being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
47. she is despicable
Edited on Wed Oct-12-05 04:55 PM by leftchick
I am sure she has no reflection when she gazes in a mirror. :puke:

H2O Man I will be out of town from Friday to next Thursday and will only have sporadic internet access. I will also be at my Mom and Dad's where only faux is piped in.

It is a terrible time for me to be away from what could be the biggest events in this country in at least the last thirty years.

I am so sad. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Newspapers .....
even the very republican "Evening Sun" from very republican Norwich, NY, has an editorial about Karl potentially leaving the administration, in today's edition! Buy some papers, and you'll be fine!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #51
55. Hey H2O...
Have you entered the Indictment Poll?

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x5041196

1st prize is a DU t-shirt. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #55
58. I didn't see it.
Thanks. If anyone wants a hint at the correct answer, I suggest they use the official Water Man's guide to the changing colors of Sean Hannity's face. It was getting pretty bright red last night. I expect him to cry next Wednesday night, on air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #58
64. the official Water Man's guide...
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:

I would PAY TO SEE Hannity cry on the air!

It is a good time to be alive. Karma in action is a beautiful, terrible, wonderful thing to watch.

P.S. I have next Wednesday in the poll. ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #64
65. Poor Sean
is having a very difficult time with this. I suspect he will have Victoria Toenign (sp?/I'm tired) on to make himself feel better. He was losing control last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #51
56. lol!
Isn't it funny how net dependant I have become? I never even think of print editions of newspapers anymore. Well, I did buy the Washington Post in DC the day after the march for a "keepsake".

Thank you for reminding me and here is to an indictment filled future! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
53. don't worry about being away from the net
even the idiotic bushlicking "liberal" media will cover indictments. Any TV will do. Hell, even Faux will have it.

They'll be spinning it as the second coming. But they'll have it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #40
48. So they are beginning the attack on Fitzgerald.
It was to be expected. Watch for the phrase "gone over the edge" to be used by other republicans when referring to Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thinkingwoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #27
43. I'll 2nd that vouching
I've been watching him post on this issue for 2 years already. He owns this issue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cassiepriam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. What does this mean, why would he do this, is he digging deeper/wider?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. I hope not
I think thats bad news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demobrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
32. It sounds like new info is coming to lite
just this week. If so, it would make sense that he would ask for more time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DearAbby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. hard to tell what the meeting may be for, H2Oman has mentioned
very valid points, what the discussion may be about. Fitz is very closed about the case, so no one can be sure what the reasons are...again we just have to wait.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. Fitzgerald may have just been giving the judge a heads up on the
indictments he is going to seek. Particularly as to the identity of those he intends to indict. However, if he does want to extend his investigation I believe he would have to ask the judge to impanel a new grand jury. If that is the case, I think it would be because he has expanded the scope of the investigation. This seems unlikely to me though unless Miller provided him with a lot of information that he did not already know.

That possibility exists of course, especially in light of Miller's recently discovered notes. But I doubt that Miller's notes would contain anything that would implicate anyone Fitzgerald was not already investigating or anything that would suggest crimes that Fitzgerald was not already aware of. I just don't see why the White House would give Miller that type of information or why she would write it down if it was provided to her. And Fitzgerald informed the court a long time ago that the scope of his investigation had expanded beyond the identities of the leakers.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
67. I think if the indictments are going as high as we think they should -
then definitely Fitz would have to inform the judge before he makes his charges
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
39. There is no more time...the Pukes are mounting a Swiftboat..
on him now. Before it's over he'll be in Gitmo.....

Bad Move .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrotherBuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
46. Can Fitzgerald indict now, then form a second Grand Jury...
and continue an expanded investigation?

I think this nation deserves a bone thrown to them now, say, three indictments (Rove, Libby, and ?) for us to chew on while a new investigation continues and expands to include all of the White House rats (I count about twenty heads that need to be snagged).

We deserve the right to lick the bowl while the cake is in the oven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
49. I Suspected He Would - New Evidence
We know for certain there are new Miller notes that Fitzgerald hadn't seen until last week...hence calling Miller for not just an interview but to testify again before the entire Grand Jury. This meant there had to be more information Ms. Miller had in these notes that Mr. Fitzgerald felt was important to present in this case and could open the door to even more questions.

We don't know what those notes entailed other than it was another conversation with Libby. We also don't know if there were other conversations discovered or if Fitzgerald is holding other records that now have to be coroborated with what Ms. Miller has just turned over.

Also hauling Karl back in again means that side of the investigation is going strong as well...as Karl is caught between what he told investigators and what we're starting to find out now. Surely Fitzgerald has a bunch for material and whatever is being leaked has a purpose...to flush out other information. Miller looks like she's a case in point...protecting her own ass by serving up Libby's...which in turn is serving up Rove's.

The fact The White House Iraq Group is getting more press and fingers are pointing in this group's involvement in this scandal also is quite revealing. If this is a broader conspiracy, Fitzgerald will either need to extend his mandate or another investigation will have to take place.

Yes, patience works in our favor here. Let these goons twist in the wind. Fitzgerald had played this game before. Right now, Scott Fawell, George Ryan's "Scooter Libby" is singing like a bird in Ryan's trial...spilling out story after story of cronyism and other corruption. It took Fitz years to get Fawell to turn on his former boss...and even indictment and the threat of long jail terms didn't seem to matter to Fawell at first. Fitz found other ways to get to him. I imagine he's got some interesting angles to play in this scandal as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
52. Waiting for Sibel Edmonds' case to be heard by SCOTUS...
Probably wants to interview her and others that have been muzzled from him by the "States Secret" privilege gag rule. Would give him more ammunition if he can move forward then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. I think we are going to have an extension!!! This is too Big!!!
Its a cleansing process!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Generator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
59. Well if he can hook the big reptile
aka Cheney then I will live with my heart palpitations. (yes that WSJ story mentioned WHIG but not Cheney-chain yanked again-I'm a waiting-Of course it's CHENEY.)

Otherwise I'm screaming on the inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemsUnited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
60. 7/25/05 WSJ article discusses possibility of up to a 6 month extension
<snip>

Ms. Miller remains jailed over her refusal to cooperate. The grand jury's term ends in October, but could be extended for six months if prosecutors believe there is a reason to continue. Ms. Miller could face more time if prosecutors decide to seek criminal-contempt charges.

<snip>

http://online.wsj.com/public/article/SB112224465667094383-vL1oAwRLRhzsgM2Y_TL32y_tsQA_20060725.html?mod=blogs

A six month extension is a small price to pay if Fitzgerald is extending the scope of his investigation to the White House Iraq Group & the forged Niger memo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Something this long may work to our advantage...
If the subsequent impeachments won't happen until after the 2006 elections by delaying it that long, giving it that much attention around election timeframe as well as allowing a Dem congress to take over in 2006 might help us that much more clean house later if we can have President Pelosi doing it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-12-05 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
63. Oooooooo. There's waaaaaay too much....
antici -
















































(wait for it)




























pation.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC