Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mike Brown Poll: Please Read

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:23 AM
Original message
Poll question: Mike Brown Poll: Please Read
Although Mr. Brown has stepped down, to the best of my knowledge, he remains a consultant to FEMA at a salary many of us could only dream of. Further, it seems that he has paid no penalty sufficient to the gravity of his failures.

I believe that this is disgraceful. Further, as a man who has held several supervisory positions in the Blue Collar realm, I can tell you that if a failure of my competence and leadership had led to one single fatality, I would assuredly spend time in prison.

Which brings me to my poll:


Based on your personal knowledge of Mike Brown's competence or lack thereof, do you believe that he should be prosecuted for criminal negligence?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ravenseye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. What is needed for a criminal negligence charge?
If criminal negligence means he intentionally made decisions that he knew would cause people to die and suffer, then no. I don't think the man is evil. Just seriously incompetent. A boob if you will.

I'm not sure you could prosecute him for being an idiot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
6. As far as I understand it
The charge would mean that he was willfully negligent in a position where his negligence could lead to death and suffering, not that he made decisions he knew would cause death and suffering. That would be more premeditated.

They've charged the bus driver in the evacuee fire for negligent homicide, for instance, for not doing what he could to prevent the fire. They are going after the people responsible for the maintenance of the bus, too. Not because their intention was to hurt anyone, but because their intention was to neglect a duty that would have prevented the accident from happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. That is very close to my perception of bringing negligence charges.
Any lawyers out there?

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. And some of the letters quoted on CNN today
Make it seem less like incompetence, more like arrogance. He didn't believe it was his job to coordinate or handle the actual work, and his arrogance kept him from doing anything. That's evil, in my book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. I read that post. . . That is the primary reason for this poll. Thx! NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. I couldn't find the statute. Maybe someone out there has it?
That is why I based the poll on "personal opinion."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. Second Shift NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
3. He should be prosecuted for perjury..
before Congress, when he lied about why the southern parishes of Louisiana were not included in the first declaration of a state of emergency. He said that Blanco left them out--it was a blatant lie designed to cover his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:38 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. Yes, that's an option.
However, it seems perjury is called less than traveling is in basketball!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohio_liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. State or Federal charges?
:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. They Would Be Federal Charges.
As far as I know, negligence does not need to be intentional in many cases.

In higher levels, it can be prosecuted as a breech of an oath of conduct. That is one reason why govt. officials are often "sworn in."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. Getting Interesting!
I wish I could somehow ensure over a thousand poll votes.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. The fact that there are no "no's" so far is interesting. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrackpotAmerica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-18-05 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Still no "no's" NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC