Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Josh Marshall on Fitzgerald and McNulty - something odd

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ramblin_dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:22 PM
Original message
Josh Marshall on Fitzgerald and McNulty - something odd
Josh Marshall at TPM:

Here's a nut to crack, a small part of the ever-widening and occasionally enlightening Fitzgerald investigation guessing game.

if McNulty had been cooperating with or become a participant or enabler of some sort of Fitzgerald's investigation, he's not the first person you'd figure ... Bush would be appointing to the number two spot at DOJ -- especially when you consider that Al Gonzales will almost certainly have to recuse himself from any consideration of the entire Plame case.


http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/006815.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WarNoMore Donating Member (530 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. I haven't followed Mcnulty too much,
but it's interesting that he was the spokesman for the House Judiciary Committee during the Clinton impeachment. I knew I remembered his face.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mnemosyne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Do you really think Gonzales
will recuse himself? Seems I read somewhere about one of the Supremes not removing himself recently. Can't remember when, in the last year I think. I'll see if I can find a link.

Look what Gonzales did with the Geneva convention. He doesn't care about right or wrong obviously. He'll make some lame excuse for not needing to recuse himself and kiss ass, imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-23-05 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hard to know what's going down or even speculate on it. This is a...
...wait and see item. But far be it from me not to speculate. Here goes:

Hopeful scenario. They have the goods on Bush Jr., and a deal has been made to let him limp out the rest of his term, if Cheney (who will be named as an unindicted co-conspirator) resigns. Cheney will go to Halliburton Heaven, and not do time. For agreeing to this, McNulty was rewarded with the No. 2 spot in the DOJ, where he will protect Fitzgerald from interference as Fitz proceeds with other prosecutions (lower down the line) (--but I do keep thinking about Rumsfeld, lurking in the background of all this).

Downer scenario: A "Saturday Night Massacre" (a la Nixon) in reverse. Instead of firing the prosecutor, they've given him a bigger title and salary, in exchange for limitations on the most dangerous investigation, the AIPAC/Franklin investigation (and maybe McNulty thinks it's just too much for the public and the world--a total disgrace of the regime). Treasongate got limited because Libby's taking the fall for Cheney. And the two prosecutors are thinking, "What the hell? They cleaned out some of the bad guys. Maybe this will curtail some of the vast criminality of this regime, as it becomes a lame duck." (This scenario might also be combined with a Cheney resignation, so the Repubs can appoint a fresh face as VP to be Diebolded into office in '08, on a...dare I say it?...ahem...a law and order platform.)

Of these, I tend to think the first is more likely (and the VP scenario likely in either case). But you see what I mean. We really can't know yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC