Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

According to MSNBC, three persons close

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:30 PM
Original message
According to MSNBC, three persons close
to the proceedings say Official A is Rove. No surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yeah, except it'll be incredibly hard to indict Rove for that reason...
because it's difficult to prove that Rove was aware that Plame was a covert agent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. did he lie and/or obstruct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. One would assume.
I'm not saying Rove's not going to be indicted; I'm just saying it's going to be hard to prove that particular charge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. What is easy is
perjury.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnnyCougar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Unless Rove told the same lies as Libby to the jury.
Or even investigators.

Rove is thinking about flipping. That's why there is the delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deadparrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Again, I'm not saying he's not going to be indicted...
See post #4. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-28-05 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
7. so why isn't that a crime (leaking classified info)?
Edited on Fri Oct-28-05 08:59 PM by npincus
C'mon Fitzy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC