Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Krugman does Dowd: Lampoons Bush in 'Imperial nudity'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
MelissaB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 06:42 AM
Original message
Krugman does Dowd: Lampoons Bush in 'Imperial nudity'



Krugman does Dowd: Lampoons Bush in 'Imperial nudity'


RAW STORY


New York Times columnist Paul Krugman will take his column to new anti-Bush heights Friday with a column that ventures into the satirical landscape of liberal doyenne Maureen Dowd, newsroom sources tell RAW STORY.

The column is tenatively titled "Defending Imperial Nudity." Here are a few quick excerpts.

#
Hans Christian Andersen understood bad rulers. "The Emperor's New Suit" doesn't end with everyone acclaiming the little boy for telling the truth. It ends with the emperor and his officials refusing to admit their mistake.

Fox News repeatedly played up possible finds of imperial clothing, then buried reports discrediting these stories. Months after the naked procession, a poll found that many of those getting most of their news from Fox believed that the emperor had in fact been clothed.

Helen Thomas, the veteran palace correspondent, opposed the suit project from the beginning. When she pointed out that the emperor's clothes had turned out not to exist, the imperial press secretary accused her of being "opposed to the broader war on nakedness."

More: http://rawstory.com/news/2005/Krugman_does_Dowd_Lampoons_Bush_in_1103.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. dowd is liberal? i thought she just hated everybody....
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stop the bleeding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yeah this seems like a pretty good metaphor that Krugman
developed for this article, we'll see what it does. thanks for the post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mduffy31 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. That is what I thought
That is what I like about her, she takes out everyone, because you can't argure there aren't dems who need to be taken to the woodshed also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. looking forward to it..
I think we should belabor the hell out that metaphor. Repeat it until even the purblind idiots know it's true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-04-05 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. Krug's Klassic Klothing Kase
Terrific read! Krugman recaps the entire debacle in delicious satirical form.
I really liked his "little boy" - screaming over the din and effectively being labelled as a lunatic for it. We wasted that opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-05-05 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
6. Two great parts:
"Although the imperial administration was conservative, its wardrobe plans drew crucial support from a group of liberal pundits. After the emperor's nakedness was revealed, the online magazine Slate held a symposium in which eight of these pundits were asked whether the fact that there was no suit had led them to reconsider their views. Only one admitted that he had been wrong - and he had changed his mind about the suit before the procession."


"Even though skeptics about the emperor's suit had been vindicated, TV news programs continued to portray those skeptics as crazy people. For example, the news networks showed, over and over, a clip of the little boy shouting at a party. The clip was deeply misleading: he had been shouting to be heard over background noise, which the ambient microphone didn't pick up. Nonetheless, "the scream" became a staple of political discourse."

And the saddest part where so many are still trying to cover their butts and defend their votes:

"...And they all lived happily ever after - in the story. Here in reality, a large and growing number are being killed by roadside bombs."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 04:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC