Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OMG - Who was the Dem who was just on Paula Zahn?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:13 AM
Original message
OMG - Who was the Dem who was just on Paula Zahn?
Edited on Thu Nov-17-05 02:13 AM by LeftCoast
He was TERRIBLE. Whoever's responsible for putting Democratic spokespeople in front of the cameras better get their sh*t together.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wonder if it was that or the fact that they will only let lame people on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. He was just so damned innefectual
She asked him about the Dems that voted for the war and he totally hemmed and hawed. Then he tried to work some spin that was totally amaturish. All he had to say was that as the Plame case shows us, the evidence presented to the run up to the war was mostly fabricated. The Dems, along with every other American were misled into supporting a war based on lies. Period.

This kind of stuff just infuriates me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I know. It is annoying and typical. They always have someone
pointless on so that way we look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftCoast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. If that's true, the Dems need to call them on it
We cannot expect to regain and hold power if they keep putting up stooges to represent the Democratic position.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorktv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Boycotts of the programs might help. Letter/email/phoning could too.
We have plenty of firebreathers but the only one allowed on is Howard Dean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 02:49 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Exactly
1. Fabricated evidence (and they obviously trusted the president, which was a clearly mistake in hindsight.)
2. They boxed all of the senators into a corner where they were either "Supporting Saddam" or "Supporting the President and the USA" with the Iraq war resolution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tishaLA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. They had Armstrong Williams on tonight
That's a good enough reason to send them a little love note.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 03:09 AM
Response to Original message
8. The Colmes-Daschle Syndrome
Tough to cure, heavy doses of quinine and grapeshot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 03:13 AM
Response to Original message
9. They ALWAYS put in members of the DLC crowd:
That way, they get someone who can be "called" a Democrat, but who will do everything in their power to make it look like Dems don't have a message (same as the rightwing spin). That's why the DLC is there: to infiltrate the Dem party, and make it irrelevant.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 04:02 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. "They ALWAYS put in members of the DLC crowd:"
and they think we don't notice.

This game is getting really old.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-17-05 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Julian EPSTEIN? (Transcript) - Sounds O.K. in the Reading
*******QUOTE*******

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0511/16/pzn.01.html

JULIAN EPSTEIN, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: I don't think Democrats are trying to have it both ways.

I think Democrats are levying legitimate criticisms. In fact, it is this -- it is typical of a White House that loses credibility -- the credibility numbers for this White House are in the 30 percent range. It's typical of a White House to go out and attack and blame your opponents.

The fact of the matter is, the public has lost faith in the honesty of this administration. They have lost faith in the competency of this administration with respect to its policies in Iraq. The Democrats aren't the ones that leaked classified information. The Democrats aren't the ones that misrepresented the intelligence information.

The Democrats aren't the ones that ignored all of the military experts who said we needed more capabilities on the ground in Iraq. So, for Dick Cheney to start accusing Democrats of being dishonest, when it is, in fact, his chief of staff, which -- who is on trial for obstruction of justice right now, I think is -- it's going to be a case of a dog that just doesn't bark.

People aren't going to believe it. It seems like a desperation tactic. And it's just not going to work. ....

EPSTEIN: I think the Democrats who voted for the authorization of war and those that didn't still want to see a stabilized Iraq and want to see a -- a positive resolution on behalf of the country. That's not the issue here.

The fact of the matter is, it's Republicans, as you pointed out, Paula, that are criticizing this administration for what is either incompetency or the misrepresentation of intelligence information.

And, furthermore, there is -- there is -- if you compare, for example, how Tony Blair, when he came before the United States Congress in 2003, when he was asked about weapons of mass destruction, he said, if we never find weapons of mass destruction, history will forgive us, because there are so many other important things.

The fact that this administration is the only one that can't see its own warts and wants to blame others, rather than accept any responsibility for its mismanagement...

ZAHN: All right.

EPSTEIN: ... is only making its situation much worse.

********UNQUOTE*******
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC