Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

w don't have the CAJONES for this fight

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:33 AM
Original message
w don't have the CAJONES for this fight
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 09:01 AM by mopaul
he is not used to fighting for anything, he's used to things being given to him by birthright. he does not have what it takes to fight this scandal, which is turning out to be a real knock down drag out battle. he's not made of tough stuff, not of d.c., and a real mental lightweight. first real debate about the lies told to go to war, and he'll implode. i even suspect that he may resign or fake ill health or hide behind laura, anything, but have to appear before panels and discuss complicated matters pertaining to war and peace and treason.

although i am not allowing myself to be joyful and happy, i do occassionally break out into something similar to a smile, and it makes my face hurt, cause we dems have had little to smile about lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fertilizeonarbusto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. Never thought of it
but you're right. These people can't play dfefense, they can only bully and fight cakewalks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. The only problem is
he has a lot of other people who are willing to fight for him. The rest of the gop, the corporations, the partisan pundits and the rest of the media whores will fight and fight dirty. He's never had to fight before and they'll do everything in their power to see that he doesn't have to get his little hands dirty this time too.

The good thing about it is, with persistance he will fall and if he does the whole gop goes down with him because they've put everything they have into this puppet president and his pnac handlers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalhistorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. That's right!
And eventually even those who support Smirk, as well as the average American, will start to see that and get tired of it. It may take awhile, but it does happen. And I think it's finally beginning to happen in this country now, people are finally starting to wake up just a little!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King_Crimson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
2. This would be a good time...
for Senators Byrd and Graham to unleash an all out assault against this bunch of cowardly liars! I'd like to hear Byrd use the "IMPEACH" word!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maveric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
28. You are right! Kick em while they are down...
pummel them while they are at their weakness.
Play their game for a change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, bush has always been protected by the press,
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 08:56 AM by zidzi
the old dogs and darth vader. I can see rove now thinking of ways to keep him out of the front lines of press conferences and debates.

I mean all that money from their donor's tax cuts should buy something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. So true....
Chimpy already broke-down and forgot that inspectors were in Iraq
when he started the invasion.

If they don't extricate him from this mess soon, he will be an isolated and lonely president, like Nixon. THey can't let him answer questions in public and everywhere he goes there will be questions. To be honest an isolated and desperate *Bush really scares me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
6. Yup. What he NEEDS to do is have a real press conference and
answer questions. That's what a REAL man would do. Take the fight head on, like Clinton did. But he and Cheney are too cowardly so they let others do the talking for them. That is why they will lose this battle. Because that alone shows the public that they're hiding something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. enough with the BALLS references PLEASE
In case you don't know, W DOES HAVE BALLS AND HE'S STILL A BIG F***ING COWARD. Please STOP with the BALLS REFERENCES. THEY F***ING SUCK. x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. o.k., now YOU have to remove the offensive word from YOUR post
balls, cajones, testicles, whatever...words are just words.
i MEANT to insult bush by implying he was less than a complete man, but i may have been too vulgar. men have balls, what can i say?
to infer that a man has none, is to imply that he is not a man at all, and is a coward. it's street lingo, everyone uses it, we are all adults here. lighten up a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #10
13. no
the real meaning is to imply they are not a man but a WOMAN. I WON'T LIGHTEN UP. It's OUTDATED. Find ANOTHER EXPRESSION.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. guts? intestinal fortitude? nerve? courage? spine? valor? pluck?
dauntlessness? galantry? grit? self-assurence? derring-do?
i used a thesaurus, and under the word courage, is also listed the word 'balls'. who writes these things?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:18 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. I think the point was that
Edited on Thu Jul-17-03 09:22 AM by GumboYaYa
balls or cajones or whatever you call them, the implication is that it takes a man to be firm and strong. There are plenty of people with no balls or cajones (i.e. women) who have an abundance of personal fortitude.

The real issue is that we are all on the same team. We all agree that Bush doesn't have the "capacity" to fight this battle. I am absolutely certain that no offense was intended by your post and I hope this thread doesn't devolve into a battle over the words you chose. The substance of your post is dead spot on point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. I JUST WANT DUers TO STOP REFERRING TO HAVING "BALLS"
as NECESSARY FOR COURAGE. It's F***ING INSULTING REGARDLESS OF WHAT WAS INTENDED.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GumboYaYa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. That's exactly what I said.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
8. When almost every Republican in Congress will block any
investigation, tantamount to a cover-up and obstruction in my opinion, when the so-called felonious five will refuse to strike down even patently unconstitutional law, I wonder if he will ever have to fight. His supporters will, however, cover up, obstruct until the cows come home for they collectively know their house of cards, their entire agenda and ideology, are wholly corrupt and fallacious, so they will untimately wage a holy war rather than capitulate. Hopefully, I am wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:11 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Unfortunately, I think you're right
This bunch of thieves isn't going to give back their swag just because they've been caught. They've also demonstrated (in Afghanistan and Iraq) that they don't mind killing folks to get their way.

This will be a pitched, intense battle. The good news is that it will be over relatively quickly, as intense battles always are. But there will be casualties (maybe even fatalities), and both sides will take hits, but it's necessary if we're going to wrench our country out of the grubby hands of these greedy bastards.

So gear up, get your game face on, and let's get to it. We haven't done very well up to this point, but we've got them backpedaling now, so it's time to seize the initiative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegenerationMan Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Hello President Powell
We are looking at President Powell in a matter of months. Which would mean the Ds would have to run against the second black President (Clinton was the first). Powell did not use the Niger fib and he said in his UN presentation that the tubes were disputed, giving him deniability.

I'd rather run against Bush at this point, no? What did Powell draw of the black vote in polling back in 99-2000?

IMAGINE PRESIDENT KERRY!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopaul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. possible, but not probable
colin did his share of lying to go to war too, and is complicit in this as much as condi or any other of the crooks and liars. he has enjoyed a hollow and undeserved aura of respectability for years, but it's worn out after his shameful lying before the u.n. it'd tickle me pink if we had our first black president, and for it to come about in this way would be rich. don't forget, that's one of the republican's worst nightmares.....a black president
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegenerationMan Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Yo Mo! Colin was in on it but that won't matter
Remember Powell didn't include Niger in his UN talk and cautioned that the tubes were phony. The public perception is he fought the neo-cons, made the WH go to the UN, etc. HE HAS ENOUGH DENIABILITY TO SURVIVE THIS. (unfortunately for us).

Look at the record of meetings and docs and how Powell protected himself against this. It's Powell using LIHOP on Bush! He gave him enough rope to hang himself and was deliberately not forceful in stopping the Niger claim I bet.

Remember Newt and the neo-cons tried to get rid of Powell months ago. I think that was the last straw. That was a declaration of war between the CIA rank anf file, State, old conservatives and moderates vs. the neo-cons.

And Alma was against the campaign and the running. Since Powell would be appointed, Colin can tell her "It's just another Government Job, Alma, I'll just have a new office. It's Oval." Colin would tell her it's an Emergency.

Go MOPAUL!!

IMAGINE PRESIDENT KERRY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarianJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Not a Snowballs chance in Hell!
Remember, it was the republican rught wing that turned on him when there was speculation about Powell '96 (I remember George Will's "Abesnt without leadership" article about him). Also, Mrs. Powell was UNALTERABLY opposed to his running.

The repubs would rather lose with bush than win with Powell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Was Powell born in Jamaica or is he of Jamaican descent but born here?
Pardon my ig-nernce. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegenerationMan Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Powell is from Harlem--which he would win
Powell is from Harlem in New York City. Otherwise he would never have been considered for President before if he were foreign-born.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisafromstlouie Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
19. I think he is going to fight this with everything he's got.
We haven't seen anything yet. Just wait. They'll come out blazing with both barrells. I don't know if they can turn this scandal around but it's wishful thinking if you surmise he doesn't have the balls to fight. I've been burned by this bunch of assholes too many times to get my hopes up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Bush doesn't, but others do.
Bush will cower behind others who will do his fighting for him. He most definitely does NOT have the constitution or wherewithal or the intelligence to fight anyone. He's the ultimate coward and he's too stupid to even understand the issue. A real man would have already had a press conference. So, you're wrong. He's not going to do a damn thing except maybe read statements others wrote for him. He won't answer questions, he won't take responsibility, and he won't personally make a single decision regarding this fiasco...So, what are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lisafromstlouie Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. He has too much riding on his "credibility" to give up without a fight.
Surely, you don't think he's just going to lay down and let the dems keep trashing his credibility do you? As I said, I don't know if he can turn this issue around but we'll see, won't we?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RegenerationMan Donating Member (179 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. With Powell in, the GOP can war, keep Patriot Act, 9-11 covered & TIA
After Poppy Bush calls him up and tells him it's time, W will take his pillow and GLADLY go back to the ranch. He only ever just wanted to be the Baseball Commissioner, you know--not the President! He HAD to do that...


IMAGINE PRESIDENT KERRY!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. As I said, HE isn't going to do a damn thing except read prepared
statements. What is it about that statement that you fail to understand? Others will fight for him, he will hardly lift a finger or make any kind of decision. Others will tell him what to do, what to say and how to act. I wouldn't call that fighting, would you? When he steps in front of cameras and holds a real live press conference on the matter, I'll say I'm wrong. Do you think he's going to do that? Wanna bet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-17-03 03:40 PM
Response to Original message
29. I agree: W ain't got the cojones for it.
Look at his few, feeble, unscripted comments:

"darn good intelligence." Oh really, W? Then what's all the fuss about in the first place? Oh, that's right. You got darn good intelligence and just chose to ignore it.

"it's because Saddam wouldn't let the inspectors in." That one's too stupid to even merit response, other than his handlers saying "I think what he meant to say was ..."

IF (and it's a big "if" but I'm cautiously optimistic) this story keeps traction and he is continually called on to defend it, the Boy King will not handle it well. He'll retreat into only scripted appearances, leaving his evil minions to do his dirty work, proving MoPaul's point.

Do I think he'll RESIGN? Hell no. Do I think he'll be impeached? Not with the Puke congressional majority marching in lockstep.

But do I think this is an issue we can use in 2004? DAMN STRAIGHT!!

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC