Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Prosecutor in the Tookie Williams case being sued for killing unarmed man

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:24 PM
Original message
Prosecutor in the Tookie Williams case being sued for killing unarmed man
Edited on Tue Dec-13-05 03:37 PM by ET Awful
http://www.mlive.com/newsflash/national/index.ssf?/base/national-56/1134379748292950.xml&storylist=tookie

In February 2003, Monaghan shot and killed an unarmed driver he had pulled over while working as a reserve San Bernardino County sheriff's deputy. The defense argues Monaghan acted in self-defense after a foot chase.

The Sheriff's Department ruled the shooting of Jose Luis Perea, 47, was within the department's policy guidelines, and prosecutors found insufficient evidence to charge Monaghan with a crime. But Perea's family filed a $30 million wrongful death lawsuit.

In September, a federal magistrate judge dismissed much of the lawsuit but let two claims — excessive force and negligence — move forward. The court questioned some of Monaghan's account of the shooting.

Monaghan has said that after the traffic stop, he chased Perea through a pallet yard in Fontana. He said he was forced to open fire out of fear the suspect might have a weapon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. thank you for posting this
This case is getting more complex the more I read about it. I think there are allot of unanswered questions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. As Alice said, it just keeps getting curioser and curioser.
It is kind of interesting thoug isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. Chasing the guy down, without backup
And so Monaghan plugs him because the guy "might" have a weapon?

If I'm ever accused of shooting someone in the back when he's running away from me, I hope that defense is available to me: "Your Honor, he could have had a gun, and what if he'd stopped, turned around, pulled his weapon, aimed it at me, and fired, and if the gun didn't jam, and I didn't dodge behind something, and a bunch of other factors, why, he could have put my eye out! I had to shoot him in the back!"

"Case dismissed."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I like that the magistrate pointed out that if the guy had a gun
he probably wouldn't have thrown a baseball cap and an eyeglass case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nofurylike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-13-05 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. so, after receiving such leniency from the court, he turns around and is
cutthroat.
talk about cold-blooded!

bigot man in bigot court.

how disgusting it is that one comes to *expect* stories like this - and the absence of any indignation in the media!

aaaarrrgh!!!

thank you for posting this, ET Awful.


peace!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC