Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney had Iraq in sights two years ago

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 07:32 AM
Original message
Cheney had Iraq in sights two years ago
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2003/07/22/wcheny22.xml

Documents released under America's Freedom of Information Act reveal that an energy task force led by vice-president Dick Cheney was examining Iraq's oil assets two years before the latest war began.

The papers were obtained after a long battle with the White House by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal charity that opposes government secrecy and which is suing for the dealings of the task force to be made public.


Dick Cheney was examining Iraq's oil assets two years before the latest war began The emergence of the documents could fuel claims that America's war in Iraq had as much to do with oil as national security. It also indicates that the Bush administration is beginning to lose the battle to keep its internal workings secret.



<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Leaping to a conclusion...
Edited on Wed Jul-23-03 07:40 AM by DarkPhenyx
...w/o enough information. I've said it before but nobody seems to eb listening. Yes, this does make me think we need to look deeper into things, but it isn't the smoking gun. It dosen't mean anything on it's own. So an energy task force was looking at *gasp* energy production. Big deal. Let's see what else there is before we go charging off and looking stupid....again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. "We report, you decide"
I think you are correct. But this is a great way of getting the "secret energy planning meetings" story back in the public eye.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DarkPhenyx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. As long as we approach it correctly.
If the movement comes across as too reactionary, too "anti-Bush", too tin hatty then it'll end up falling on deaf ears. Take a page from their play book. Start slow, build steadily, whisper constantly. Except when we do it we do it with class and the truth behind us. IF we find out we're wrong, or at least not entirely correct, it's a damn site easier to save face and back up or change tack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObaMania Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
2. So did Powell...
.. if I remember correctly, that was the first thing out of his mouth in his acceptance speech. Said something like, we have to get Saddam. This, I thought was sour grapes from not getting Saddam the first time. But now that I know more, I suspect that it was discussed with him before he was selected for (and terms of becoming) Sec of State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thom1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-23-03 08:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. The Bush 2000 Election was pushing
for the removal of SH. This is not that big of a deal. They were just looking for an excuse to take on Hussein. They would have taken on Iraq earlier if 9/11 had happened, and focus had to be shifted to Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC