a word that rhymes with score?
I exhort, you decide.
Hey Rush, if you're an honest Republican, and not just a prison be-atch for Bush, why don't you interview Phillips, an honest Republican, on your show?
If not, are you then simply a propaganda mouthpiece for anti-Americans?
http://www.buzzflash.com/interviews/04/01/int04001.htmlKevin Phillips: "... what the Bushes represent is just totally at loggerheads with everything from Abraham Lincoln down to McKinley and Teddy Roosevelt, to Eisenhower, who warned about the military-industrial complex... Nixon. John McCain and others -- not many -- but they've taken out after Bush Jr., and Ross Perot, and John Connelly, and even Ronald Reagan, didn't have much use for George Bush Sr. So there's a Republican lineage to this too."
---
So, Phillips, who wrote The Emerging Republican Majority way back when, can no longer in good conscience vote as a Republican, if that means voting for Bush.
why you ask? because-
"In terms of the obvious big scandals to which President Bush senior was connected -- we're talking about the October surprise in 1980, in which the Republicans were said to have had relations with Iran to keep the American hostages held in Iran from being freed in time for the election
. Then you go to Iran-Contra, where Iran would be supplied with arms in order that Iran use its influence for hostages being held in Lebanon in 1984, and for a while after that. And then Iraqgate was the involvement of George H.W. Bush, in building up Saddam Hussein during the 1980s.
You've got the sort of arrogance of the family that's entitled to rule. And you've got the presumption of having been anointed by God to play this specific role. Now, you can find other rulers in world history that have had the arrogance, and family, and the sense of being anointed by heaven to do something, but you don't look for that in the United States. That's nothing we did.
what's amazing to me is how easily they get away with this, and how little the press will go to the trouble to portray the way in which this is a change of convenience -- dumping somebody who was built up.
It isn't really pointed out the extent to which not just George Bush, but Rumsfeld and others, were involved in building up Saddam Hussein during the 1980s. He's starting to get some attention. But that's obviously a major reason why the Administration doesn't want Saddam tried by a world court. They want him tried by a body in Iraq that can be controlled and will keep testimony like that out of public hearing."