The technique is called BPL, for broadband over power lines. Test have been conducted in Manassas, Virginia; Cincinnati, Ohio; Raleigh, North Carolina; Penn Yan, New York; Cedar Rapids, Iowa; and no doubt some other places I can't recall right off the bat.
BPL is a bad idea, and here's why. The frequencies used for BPL are the same frequencies used by some amateur radio operators and by international broadcasters in the shortwave bands. Power lines, stretching for mile after mile, make perfect antennas. Thus, they will broadcast hash exactly in frequencies that interfere with amateur and international transmissions.
Of course, if you're happy with Fox, there's no need to listen to the BBC or Radio Canada or Deutsche Welle, or any of those other icky foreigners.
You'll never guess who's for it. Go ahead; guess. Oh, that was too easy, wasn't it?
Google for "bush broadband"ARRL Responds to * Comments on Broadband Internet Technology"Beloved Leader" Kim_Jong_Il, frequent poster at the Usenet group
rec.radio.shortwave, started this thread there back in April:
Bush Backs BPLHere's what he had to say:
======================
A month ago, I pointed out that Bush backed broadband access.
Bush backs broadband accessor
TinyURLHis speech at the time lacked details, and he made no mention of BPL.
Yesterday, he backed BPL.
Bush Backs BPL--quote--
....
And so here are some smart things to do: One, increase access to
federal land for fiberoptic cables and transmission towers. That makes
sense. As you're trying to get broadband spread throughout the
company, make sure it's easy to build across federal lands. One sure
way to hold things up is that the federal lands say, you can't build
on us. So how is some guy in remote Wyoming going to get any broadband
technology? Regulatory policy has got to be wise and smart as we
encourage the spread of this important technology. There needs to be
technical standards to make possible new broadband technologies, such
as the use of high-speed communication directly over power lines.
Power lines were for electricity; power lines can be used for
broadband technology. So the technical standards need to be changed to
encourage that.
And we need to open up more federally controlled wireless spectrum to
auction in free public use, to make wireless broadband more
accessible, reliable, and affordable. Listen, one of the technologies
that's coming is wireless. And if you're living out in -- I should --
I was going to say Crawford, Texas, but it's not -- maybe not nearly
as remote. (Laughter.) How about Terlingua, Texas? There's not a lot
of wires out there. But wireless technology is going to change all
that so long as government policy makes sense.
And we're going to continue to support the Federal Communications
Commission. Michael Powell -- Chairman Michael Powell, under his
leadership, his decision to eliminate burdensome regulations on new
broadband networks availability to homes. In other words, clearing out
the underbrush of regulation, and we'll get the spread of broadband
technology, and America will be better for it. (Applause.)
....
--end quote--
Sell your radios now. America will be better for it.
======================
FWIW, Kerry favors broadband access, but I don't know if he is in favor of using power lines for such access. Broadband access is not the problem. It's using power lines for access that is troublesome.
Behind in BroadbandMore than you ever wanted to know:
Threats to Our Amateur BandsBroadband Over Power Line (BPL) and Amateur Radio