Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thank Goodness THIS invention never made it to market

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:36 PM
Original message
Thank Goodness THIS invention never made it to market
Edited on Mon Sep-20-04 09:37 PM by SoCalDem




http://colitz.com/site/3216423/3216423.htm


I wonder who "tested" this "invention" before they patented it

APPARATUS FOR FACILITATING THE BIRTH OF A CHILD
BY CENTRIGUGAL FORCE

GEORGE B. BLONSKY and
CHAROLETTE E. BLONSKY

Patented November 9, 1965



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fenris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. I love the whimsical vaginal butterfly net.
Is that how they catch the baby once it reaches escape speed?:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. 10. Check net carefully for holes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Veteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. You could put prize amounts around the ring and play Wheel of Fortune™
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynzM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yeah...
'cause giving birth doesn't fuck your body up enough, LOL. Let's add motion sickness and loss of blood to the head to the deal!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonbeam_Starlight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. OH MY FREAKING LORD
I would KILL anyone who tried to put me in that while in labor.

GEEEEEEZ.

As if it wasn't bad enough I had 26 hours of labor, a nine pound baby and they didn't bother to tell me to pull my hands off the bed rail when they were taking me into the delivery room and broke three of my fingers when her HEAD was already delivered. Yeah, HEY put me in that FLINGING me around to get the baby out thingie!

Whatever!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
6. They gave up trying to sell it when I came up with a much cheaper solution
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MuseRider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Jesus!
I looked at this and thought it was something from LONG ago but this is from 1965??? One of the inventors was a woman??? Cripes. I can remember that I would have not cared where I was or who was there when I gave birth, it could have been in the middle of the street, I just wanted it over but this? Until I read it I would have thought this was only something a man could think of. Maybe Ms. Blonsky never had children. Why not just sling us around on a rope?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ummmm....
" It will he understood, that in all of the embodiments of the invention it is the primary purpose of the apparatus disclosed to accomplish delivery of the fetus by providing the necessary g`s required in any particular instance and this even though the supplementary forces supplied by the patient are zero either because she is too weak to render any assistance at all, or has lost consciousness."

Makes ya wonder, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 10:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ummm...
" It will he understood, that in all of the embodiments of the invention it is the primary purpose of the apparatus disclosed to accomplish delivery of the fetus by providing the necessary g`s required in any particular instance and this even though the supplementary forces supplied by the patient are zero either because she is too weak to render any assistance at all, or has lost consciousness."

Makes ya wonder, doesn't it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L.A.dweller Donating Member (477 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-20-04 11:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Protect your doggies ears!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC