Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Consensual Cannibalism - is it wrong?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:54 AM
Original message
Poll question: Consensual Cannibalism - is it wrong?
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 11:55 AM by VelmaD
Ok, this story about the guy consenting to be eaten has popped up in the Lounge the last couple of days:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=105&topic_id=484450

Just wondering what everyone thinks. Is it wrong to eat someone who asks you to do it? What do y'all think about this.

edit: I always misspell consensual. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
absyntheNsugar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess it all goes down to
is the eaten crazy, or are they sane at the time. If sane, what on earth would posess them to want to be eaten?

Kind of cyclical...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Could you make that same argument...
about anyone who wanted to commit suicide?

Would a sane person want to put a shutgun barrel in their mouth and pull the trigger with their toe?

This is not me being flippant believe it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Yossarian Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. LOL... Heinlein made a case for it in Stranger.... You grok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcane1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. I grokk in fullness...
he made a rather compelling case, IIRC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
4. A well-justified taboo
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 12:02 PM by supernova
is cannabalism. I mean, what kind of society would we have if we went around eating each other?

I think it's best reserved for the few cases of extreme survival.. the Donner party...the Andes plane crash. Even then the consumed were already dead, they weren't slaughtered for the purpose as a cow is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Well, I agree that slaughtering the unwilling...
would be wrong. But what is this guy is telling the truth and the guy actually wanted to be slaughtered and eaten?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Personally, I don't have a problem with it if he's willing..
Also, I'd add, without sounding too tacky and/or inhuman.. I've always wondered how it would taste...

Not that I ever would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Probably would taste...
like chicken. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
everythingsxen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. I just knew someone would say that.
:P

My money is that it wouldn't taste all that good, most humans being omnivores. Now you vegeterians out there... :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Sorry...
couldn't seem to help myself. It had to be done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. I think the repugs would mostly taste like chicken.
Dems would probably taste like like horse, or bear, or some other noble animal.

Except Zell Miller, who would taste like weasel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. Well, let's say he is telling the truth
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 12:24 PM by supernova
In a strange way, I believe him, btw. I believe there was someone that depressed, suicidal, etc. that would consent to that kind of torture, sick as that is.

It's not the actual eating of the flesh that concerns me, believe it or not. Afterall, I symbolically do that every month when we serve communion at church.

What concerns me is that over a period of time you could build a society where there is a two-tiered humanity. Those who see themselves as eaters, and those who see themselves as nothing more than a food supply. Goes against the grain of all being equal in the universe. That's what sickens me.

edit: Plus, you would ignore the fact that in the animal kingdom, cannibalism is a near universal taboo. Why do you suppose that is?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Part of me thinks...
you'd have a hard time convincing a significant number of people to want to be eaten - humans have a strong survivial instinct.

Then I think about our current society where there's a class who seems to think of themselves as just a source of cheap labor and I can't discount your scenario entirely. People are sheep - and we know what happens to sheep.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BiggJawn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. We already are moving that way.
The rich, "upper class" ReTHUGlicans, who see themselves as masters of all, the privileged ones, and the REST of us.

Willing or not, we're food for their bellies (metaphorically at present) grist for the mill, fodder for the cannon, etc.

And cannibalism IS practiced in the animal kingdom, albeit among the LOWER orders, like fish, rodents, and fowl...What lesson is to be learned there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
22. Cannibalism is not an animal kingdom taboo. That's bad biology. Sorry.
Plus, you would ignore the fact that in the animal kingdom, cannibalism is a near universal taboo. Why do you suppose that is?

Actually, it's not. Male lions kill (and eat) cubs if the food supply is low, we've got tape evidence of Alpha female chimpanzees and baboons going after lower ranking female's infants and probably eating them since the body never shows up - they don't practice burial; Mice, cats, dogs, wolves, hyenas, rabbits, etc. will all eat their young. Seagulls have to protect their own eggs and infants from other seagulls who see them as a tasty snack. Fish, turtles, frogs.... umm, umm, nummy nummy little ones. Strict herbivores are about it for the non-consumption clause. Omnivores and predators will eat their own as readily as someone else's.

Chimpanzees are actually pretty "brutal" - war parties frequently eat the remains of enemies. And they eat monkeys, who are pretty clearly related. So, no, cannibalism isn't taboo.

There's nothing anthropologically speaking that says we're the only ones who engage in cannibalism. For more information, please see Reay Tannahill's book on the subject called : Flesh and Blood: A history of the Cannibal Complex and Susan Allport's "Primal Feast: Food, sex foraging and love" for discussions on the value in a protein deficient society of cannibalism.

I'm agnostic on this issue - my ancestors and yours ate their enemies and their dead. We're here. I'm not apologizing for it. There seems to good reasons not to - we don't have a protein debt these days, meat's readily available, CJ/BSE/CWD/other prion diseases are easily transmitted.... but those can change in a matter of weeks or months.

Why the dead man wanted to do what he did .... well, fetish can be strange. And it was obviously fetish related. (Penectomy pretty much says that.)

Politicat. (Who is perfectly okay with someone eating her remains as long as she's dead from something other than murder first. After all, I won't be using them again, will I?)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #13
26. Er...that's not quite accurate.
There are many species that eat their own young.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldleftguy Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Are we making fun of the...
right wing fundamentalists again? Let us be sensitive and accept their traditions!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. depends on who's asking
If you asked me to eat you, Velma, I'd certainly comply.

:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I just knew...
somebody was gonna say that and the smart money was on you. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
THUNDER HANDS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
16. i yam what I yam
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:12 PM
Response to Original message
11. I have no problem if someone consents to being eaten after their death
Edited on Wed Dec-03-03 12:12 PM by BurtWorm
but I don't accept a cannibal's claim that the victim wanted to be killed and eaten at face value, even if he has "proof." Nor should any instance of consensual murder--and I'm not talking about assisted suicide, which I tend to support--be acceptable, mainly for the reason that you cannot ask the victim if they really did consent. But if a person is dying and makes an arrangement with a third party arbiter of some kind to provide a loved one (or other) with a portion of their body to be eaten--what the hell! To each his or her own! (No pun intended if one can be so construed.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TXlib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
19. Somebody who consents to be killed in a fetishistic ritual
is probably not playing with a full deck.

I don't think such a person would be mentally competent to make such a decision.

Now, assisted suicide, when the suicider has legitimate reason to want to die (incurable, excruciating, and/or debilitating disease, with no hope of regaining a normal life) is another matter entirely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
felonious thunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
21. Provided there's no murder involved
If I'd like to spot someone a nice juicy steak of my right thigh, by golly, I should be able to lop it off, put in a nice chipotle marinade overnight, grill it over some mesquite wood chips and serve with a garnish of cilantro pica de gallo, then why not?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnKleeb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
23. You are aware of that I am eating dinner soon
:puke: worst thing since the guy eating the rats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dirk39 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:38 PM
Response to Original message
24. You'd been seriously damaging a German, while we're about
to eat one another anyway. This is the poll of all polls, I need a new desk-chair.
Hungry in Germany,
Dirk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
25. I just saw this on BBC news and frankly
this sort of reminds me of the Twinkie defense. I mean the 'meal' isn't around to testify that he was eaten with his consent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
45th Med Donating Member (559 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
27. Personally, as a Hawaiian...I would like to have his head to shrink.
HEHEHE. J/K. But seriously folks.

Cannibalism is a ritual act of the Christian Communion. Figurately, we are eating the body and blood of Christ to become Christlike. Cannibalism is a pagan ritual act that Christianity picked up on. But, yeah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
28. What goes on in peoples' kitchens is their business.
This is the funniest thread in a long time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SiobhanClancy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:25 PM
Response to Original message
29. Sorry,I just can't get my teeth around the concept ...
of "consensual cannibalism".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-03 07:32 PM
Response to Original message
30.  Is it wrong to eat someone who asks you to do it?


My wife thinks it's wrong if I don't! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC