Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Which of these would take longer?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:15 PM
Original message
Which of these would take longer?
Counting every single grain of sand on every single beach in the world, including all the sand at the bottom of the ocean and defining sand as "particles or granules ranging in size from 0.0625 to 2 millimeters." composed of silica, limestone, sandstone, magnetite, chlorite, glauconite, or gypsum -OR- counting every single blade of grass including every single member of the family Gramineae or Poaceae also known as the "true grasses" on the planet, blade being defined as a linear, parallel-veined leaf.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rusty_parts2001 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ummmmm
I don't know
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. shit... posted in wrong forum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sand.
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varkam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. The Sand N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. sand
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Sand is tinier, and there's probably less greenery than there used to be.
I'm going with "Sand," Alex.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. True, the planet looks like nothinmg but rock from space.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
7. sand
No contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Acryliccalico Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Sand ........... n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Go ahead and try them both.... we'll wait
:silly:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jara sang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. In my mind, I'm already there...
I'm already there.:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
petronius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
12. Probably the grass...
I'd guess that new sand isn't produced as quickly as grass, so once you finished the sand you could just go back and count up the new sand grains that had formed during the counting process. For the grass, however, by the time you got to the end, everything you'd counted would be dead and you'd have a whole new batch to count - the job wouldn't end.

So, even though there are probably far more sand grains than grass blades, you are more likely to be able to finish with the sand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. it depends-is creating those definitions included in the time estimate?
Because, you just gave them. But, they likely would't take that long a period of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laheina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
14. I'm going with the previous, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
realisticphish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. it's a close contest
there is clearly more sand. BUT, practically, the grass would grow back while you were counting the rest of the grass. Far less new sand would be created, though I suppose that is debatable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » The DU Lounge Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC